Design and Development of an LM741 Instrumentation Module for Enhancing the Teaching of Basic Analog Circuit Principles in Physics and Electrical Engineering

Design and Development of an LM741 Instrumentation Module for Enhancing the Teaching of Basic Analog Circuit Principles in Physics and Electrical Engineering

Jonathan Ebube Jibunor^1*, Akinola Samson Olayinka², Olamotse Roland Igbape³

¹ Department of Physics, National Open University of   Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi, Abuja.

² Department of Physics, Edo University, Iyamho, Edo State, Nigeria. 

³ Department of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA. 

ABSTRACT

Traditional teaching methods often fall short by relying heavily on theoretical explanations without practical applications, leading to gaps in student understanding. This study is about the design and development of an Instrumentation Module aimed at enhancing the teaching of basic analog circuit principles through hands-on experimentation with the LM741 operational amplifier module. The Instrumentation Module addresses this challenge by providing a flexible and customizable platform for students to engage with various circuit configurations, including voltage followers, amplifiers, summing amplifiers, difference amplifiers, and integrators. The module facilitates lab experiments that promote a deeper comprehension of analog circuits and enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Constructed using essential electronic components—such as the LM741 op-amp, resistors, capacitors, and a regulated power supply—the module serves as a functional educational tool. Target users include students in physics and electrical engineering, as well as educators teaching these principles. The design-based research framework employed in this project emphasizes educational efficacy and accessibility, ensuring that the module aligns with pedagogical goals. Empirical results confirm the operational effectiveness of the various circuit configurations, demonstrating accurate performance across experiments. This work significantly contributes to improving educational resources for teaching fundamental electronics, offering an engaging learning environment that bridges theory and real-world applications. Future research may explore more complex operational amplifier configurations and the development of tailored simulation tools to further enhance the learning experience in analog circuit design.

Keywords: Instrumentation Module, Analog Circuit Principles, Operational Amplifier, Design and Development, Teaching Enhancement, Laboratory Instruments

INTRODUCTION  

The effective teaching and learning of analog circuit principles, particularly in developing societies like Nigeria, faces significant challenges. Traditional pedagogical approaches, heavily reliant on theoretical lectures, often fail to engage students and foster the development of essential practical skills, leading to a limited understanding of the subject matter (Pursky et al., 2023). This gap between theory and practice is further exacerbated by the absence of dedicated instrumentation modules tailored for teaching analog circuit principles using the LM741 operational amplifier (Kendir Tekgül & Yaltkaya, 2023, Mihret et al., 2023). The lack of flexibility in experimentation with customizable resistance and capacitance values restricts students’ exploration and understanding of analog circuits, hindering their ability to connect theoretical concepts to real-world applications (Cynthia et al., 2023).

This study addresses these challenges by designing and developing an advanced instrumentation module that integrates practical demonstrations using the LM741 operational amplifier, a versatile and widely available integrated circuit (Li & Dong, 2023, Fuada, 2022, Bearden et al., 2022, Chong et al., 2022, Lean et al., 2022). The module, incorporating various operational amplifier application circuits such as Voltage follower, Non-inverting Amplifier, Inverting Amplifier, Summing Amplifier, Difference Amplifier, and Integrator, aims to enhance the teaching and learning of basic analog circuit principles by providing students with hands-on learning experiences and fostering the acquisition of practical skills.

The study’s primary objective is to design and develop an advanced instrumentation module that enables flexibility in experimentation by providing customizable resistance and capacitor values, allowing students to manipulate and explore analog circuit principles. A comprehensive instrumentation manual accompanying the module will offer precise instructions and clear guidelines for connecting each circuit to perform experiments, maximizing the learning experience. The study also includes a rigorous evaluation to ensure the module’s effectiveness in enhancing students’ understanding and application of analog circuit principles.

By addressing the limitations of traditional teaching methods and introducing practical demonstrations using the LM741 operational amplifier, this study aims to improve the teaching and learning of analog circuit principles, bridge the gap between theory and application, and promote the acquisition of practical skills in designing and analyzing analog circuits. The module’s design and development are motivated by the need to enhance physics education in developing societies, reduce reliance on foreign technology, and promote local technological development.

REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIES

Several studies have explored the development of educational instrumentation tools to improve the teaching of analog electronics, particularly operational amplifiers (OpAmps).

Chong et al. (2022) designed a reconfigurable experimental board that demonstrates seven different OpAmp configurations, addressing issues of cost and complexity in traditional teaching setups. Their approach emphasized hands-on learning using a single compact board.

Fuada (2022) developed an educational kit focused on phase-shift RC oscillators using a single LM741 OpAmp. The kit enabled students to measure output frequency and observe phase shift, achieving high validity and reliability in practical use.

Lean et al. (2022) proposed a cost-effective OpAmp experimental board using TRIZ methodology, supporting seven configurations with minimal components. The board was tested for effectiveness in analog circuit instruction.

Costa et al. (2021) introduced a hybrid educational kit combining hardware and simulation software to teach OpAmp circuits, allowing automatic measurement and signal application for enhanced learning.

Fan et al. (2019) reported a curriculum reform at UESTC that integrated analog and circuit analysis courses. They emphasized hands-on learning and simulation, streamlining content to focus on essential analog concepts and EDA tools.

Omar et al. (2019) developed an amplifier training kit that supports both inverting and non-inverting configurations. The kit simplified circuit implementation and reduced common student errors in breadboard-based setups.

Avelino et al. (2015) presented a mobile studio-based OpAmp trainer integrated with data acquisition tools. It allowed students to explore different configurations and reinforced practical understanding of OpAmp behavior.

Talukder and Collier (2002) described a microcontroller training platform for hands-on instruction in embedded systems. Although not focused on OpAmps, the study highlighted the benefits of practical, hardware-based learning environments.

These studies collectively underscore the importance of interactive, cost-effective, and reconfigurable educational tools in analog electronics education. However, most existing modules either focus on specific OpAmp applications or lack adaptability and affordability. This creates a gap that this work addresses through the design and development of a versatile LM741 instrumentation module tailored for effective teaching in physics and electrical engineering programs.

MATERIALS

In the design and development of the instrumentation module for teaching basic analog circuit principles, a variety of components were utilized to ensure a comprehensive educational experience. Table 3.1 provides a detailed summary of the materials employed in the construction of the module, categorizing them into active electronic components, passive electronic components, wiring and connectors, and structural components. This diverse selection of materials is integral to facilitating hands-on learning and practical experimentation in analog electronics.

Table 3.1: Summary of Materials Used

Part No.	Component Type Description	Quantity
Active Electronic Components
IC1	LM741 Operational Amplifier	6
D1	IN4002 Diode	4
LED1 – LED3	5mm Red LED	3
IC2	LM7915 Voltage Regulator	4
IC3	LM7815 Voltage Regulator	4
T1	240V/15V Transformer	1
Passive Electronic Components
R1-R56	1/4W, 5% Resistors	40
C1	2200μF, 16V Capacitor	2
C2 – C11	Customizable capacitor bank	5
Wiring and Connectors
W1-W100	22AWG Solid Wire	100
J1-J100	Banana Jacks	100
CL1-CL6	Connecting Leads	20
Structural Components
PCB1-PCB4	Copper-Clad Prototyping Board	1
PAN1	3mm Acrylic Perspex Panel	1
PAN2	6mm Plywood Panel	1
SHT1-SHT4	1mm Aluminum Sheets	4

Figure 3.1 illustrates the transformer used to step down 240V AC to 15V AC, a crucial component for supplying power to the instrumentation module.

Figure 3.2 shows the LM741 operational amplifier, which serves as the central component in various circuit configurations within the module.

Figure 3.3 depicts the IN4002 diode, utilized in the rectification process to convert AC to DC voltage in the power supply circuit.

Figure 3.4 presents the LEDs that are incorporated into the module for visual indication of circuit operational status.

Figure 3.5 illustrates both the LM7915 and LM7815 voltage regulators, providing regulated positive and negative DC voltages essential for the circuit operation.

Figure 3.6 displays the various resistors used in the module, which are critical for setting gain values and signal conditioning in the op-amp circuits.

Figure 3.7 shows the capacitors that are essential for filtering and timing applications within the instrumentation module.

Figure 3.8 depicts the 22AWG solid wire used for making connections between various components within the module.

Figure 3.9 illustrates the banana jacks, serving as connection points for input and output signals in the experimental setups.

Figure 3.10 presents the connecting leads used to establish temporary connections during circuit testing and experimentation.

Figure 3.11 shows the copper-clad prototyping board, which serves as the foundation for assembling the electronic components of the module.

 

Figure 3.1: The 240V/15V Transformer

 

Figure 3.2: LM741 Operational Amplifier

 

Figure 3.3: IN4002 Diode

        

Figure 3.4: LEDs

 

Figure 3.5: LM7915 Voltage Regulator and LM7815 Voltage Regulator

 

Figure 3.6: Resistors

 

Figure 3.7: Capacitors

 

 

Figure 3.8: 22AWG Solid Wire

 

Figure 3.9: Banana Jacks

 

 

Figure 3.10: Connecting Leads

 

Figure 3.11: Copper-Clad Prototyping Board

 

METHOD

This study utilized a design-based research approach to develop and assess an educational instrumentation module focused on teaching fundamental analog circuit principles with the LM741 operational amplifier. The methodology involved several key components. First, a dual power supply unit and six basic analog circuits were designed, including voltage follower, non-inverting amplifier, inverting amplifier, summing amplifier, difference amplifier, and integrator circuits. Each circuit was carefully crafted with appropriate component selection and calculations to optimize performance. Detailed, well-labeled schematics illustrated the circuit configurations, accompanied by explanations of each component’s role within the overall system.

To enhance student engagement, the module incorporated customizable resistance and capacitance values, allowing learners to experiment with different component configurations to observe their effects on circuit behavior. A thorough prototyping phase involved building and testing the module on a breadboard, ensuring functionality met specified requirements. The final design was implemented on a copper strip board, chosen for its durability and cost-effectiveness, with detailed descriptions of soldering techniques and component placement provided.

Additionally, a custom enclosure was designed to protect the module and improve its aesthetics, while an instrumentation manual was developed to offer clear instructions for use, including safety guidelines and experiment descriptions. The evaluation of the module’s functionality involved testing each circuit with known input signals and comparing the outputs to expected values, confirming the design’s effectiveness. This comprehensive methodology establishes a solid foundation for creating an educational tool that significantly enhances the understanding of basic analog circuit principles using the LM741 operational amplifier.

Circuit Design, Circuit Schematics and Configuration:

Circuit Design Formulae

Non-inverting Amplifier Circuit Design:

Inverting Amplifier Circuit Design:

Summing Amplifier Circuit Design:

Difference Amplifier Circuit Design:

Integrator Circuit Design:

Where:

Gain (Av): Represents the amplification factor of the amplifier circuit, indicating how much the input signal is amplified at the output.

R_f (Feedback Resistance): The resistance connected between the output and the respective input (inverting or non-inverting) of the operational amplifier (op-amp) in the circuit.

Rin (Input Resistance): The resistance connected between the input terminal (inverting or non-inverting) of the op-amp and the ground in the circuit.

Vout (Output Voltage): The voltage that appears at the output of the amplifier circuit after amplification or processing of the input signal.

V1, V2, V3, … (Individual Input Voltages): Represent the respective input voltages applied to the summing or difference amplifier circuit for processing.

R1, R2, R3, … (Individual Input Resistances): Denote the input resistances connected to the respective input voltages in the summing amplifier circuit.

C (Feedback Capacitance): The capacitance connected in the integrator circuit used for integrating the input voltage over time.

ʃ Vin dt (Integral of the Input Voltage over Time): Represents the mathematical operation of integration on the input voltage in the integrator circuit.

Figure 3.12 outlines the block diagram of the operational amplifier educational experimental module, detailing the overall structure and functional relationships between the components.

Figure 3.13 illustrates the dual power supply design, highlighting the configuration for providing both positive and negative voltage rails to the op-amp circuits.

Figure 3.20 depicts the schematic of the instrumentation module, detailing the arrangement of power supply units, op-amp circuits, and customizable components.

Figure 3.21 presents the breadboard prototype of the dual power supply unit, showcasing its practical implementation.

Figure 3.22 shows the breadboard prototype of the voltage follower.

Figure 3.23 illustrates the breadboard prototype of the non-inverting amplifier.

Figure 3.24 depicts the breadboard prototype of the inverting amplifier.

Figure 3.25 presents the breadboard prototype of the summing amplifier.

Figure 3.26 shows the breadboard prototype of the difference amplifier.

Figure 3.27 illustrates the breadboard prototype of the integrator.

Figure 3.28 depicts the breadboard prototype of the customizable resistors, allowing for flexible experimentation with different resistance values.

Figure 3.29 shows the breadboard prototype of the customizable capacitors, facilitating hands-on exploration of capacitance effects in circuit behavior.

Figure 3.30 illustrates the implementation of the module on a copper strip board, highlighting the soldered connections and layout.

Figure 3.31 presents the soldered joints on the copper strip board, emphasizing the quality of connections for reliable circuit performance.

Figure 3.33 shows the wiring diagram of the voltage follower.

Figure 3.34 illustrates the wiring diagram of customizable resistors and capacitors.

Figure 3.35 presents the wiring diagram of the non-inverting amplifier.

Figure 3.36 shows the wiring diagram of the inverting amplifier.

Figure 3.37 illustrates the wiring diagram of the summing amplifier.

Figure 3.38 presents the wiring diagram of the integrator.

Figure 3.39 presents a photograph of the sample of the completed instrumentation module

 

Figure 3.12:  Block Diagram of the op-amp Educational Experimental Module

Regulated DC Power Supply Circuit Design

A transformer steps down the 220V AC (50Hz) to 15V AC, which is then fed into a bridge rectifier for conversion to pulsating DC.

To achieve a smooth, constant DC voltage, a smoothing capacitor of 2200 µF is placed after the bridge rectifier, providing an unregulated 15V DC.

For a regulated 15V supply, a voltage regulator IC (LM7815) is employed. Bypass capacitors (0.33 µF and 0.1 µF) are connected to both sides of the regulator to enhance stability and improve transient response.

The output from the LM7815 yields a regulated 15V. For the negative voltage, a similar configuration is used with the LM7915, which captures the negative half of the AC supply, converting it into negative DC.

 

Figure 3.13: Dual Power Supply Circuit Diagram

The instrumentation module, as illustrated in Figure 3.20, comprises several key components:

• Power Supply Unit: This unit provides +15V and -15V DC power to the operational amplifier circuits.
• Six Op-Amp Circuits: Each circuit is constructed around the LM741 operational amplifier integrated circuit. The specific configurations include: Voltage Follower, Non-Inverting Amplifier, Inverting Amplifier, Summing Amplifier, Difference Amplifier, and Integrator
• Customizable Resistors and Capacitors: These components are mounted separately and connected as needed to the op-amp circuits. A total of 12 resistor values and five capacitor values have been customized. The resistor values include one 1kΩ, one 3.3kΩ, one 2.2kΩ, four 10kΩ, one 22kΩ, and four 100kΩ. The capacitors, primarily used in the integrator circuit, are valued at 1µF, 10µF, 100µF, 22µF, and 47µF.
• LEDs: These provide visual indicators of the circuit’s operational status.

 

Figure 3.20: Schematics of the Instrumentation Module

 

Figure 3.21: Breadboard Prototype of the Dual Power Supply Unit

 

Figure 3.22 Breadboard Prototype of the Voltage follower

 

Figure 3.23: Breadboard Prototype of the Non-Inverting Amplifier

 

Figure 3.24: Breadboard Prototype of the Inverting Amplifier

 

Figure 3.25: Breadboard Prototype of the Summing Amplifier

 

Figure 3.26: Breadboard Prototype of the Difference Amplifier

 

Figure 3.27: Breadboard Prototype of an Integrator

 

Figure 3.28: Breadboard Prototype of the Customizable Resistors

 

Figure 3.29: Breadboard Prototype of the Customizable Capacitors

 

Figure 3.30: Copper Strip Board Implementation of the Module

 

Figure 3.31: Soldered Joints in the Copper Strip Board

 

Figure 3.33: Wiring Diagram of the Voltage Follower

 

Figure 3.34: Wiring Diagram of Customizable Resistors and Capacitors

Figure 3.35: Wiring Diagram of the Non-Inverting Amplifier

 

Figure 3.36: Wiring Diagram of the Inverting Amplifier

Figure 3.37: Wiring Diagram of the Difference Amplifier

Figure 3.38: Wiring Diagram of the Integrator

Figure 3.39: Photographs of sample of the completed instrumentation Module

Experimentation Manual

The experimentation manual was carefully designed to cover all six operational amplifier circuits included in the instrumentation module. Each section provides detailed instructions and insights into the functionality and applications of these circuits. However, to conserve space, we will focus specifically on the summing amplifier experiment in this presentation.

The same systematic approach used in crafting this section has been applied to the preparation of lab manuals for the other operational amplifier circuits, including the voltage follower, inverting amplifier, non-inverting amplifier, difference amplifier, and integrator. Each manual offers a structured outline of the theory, setup, procedure, and expected outcomes, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of each circuit’s operation and practical use.

Experimentation Manual for the Summing Amplifier

Objective: To understand the operation of a summing amplifier circuit and verify its output characteristics using a pre-configured instrumentation module.

Apparatus:

Instrumentation Module: With built-in LM741 op-amp, powered with +15V and -15V internally.

• Resistors: Onboard but customizable
• Input Signal Sources: Two function generators or DC power supplies
• Voltmeter or Oscilloscope
• Connecting Leads

Circuit Diagram:

Please refer to Figure 3.36: Wiring Diagram of the Summing Amplifier and Figure 3.34: Wiring Diagram of Customizable Resistors and Capacitors

Theory:

A summing amplifier is a circuit that combines multiple input signals into a single output signal.

The output voltage is the weighted sum of the input voltages, with the weights determined by the ratio of the feedback resistor (R_f) to the input resistors (R₁, R₂).

The output voltage is given by the formula:

Key features:

• Inverting output (opposite phase to the input signals)
• Gain determined by the ratio of resistors
• High input impedance (virtually zero for the inverting input)
• Low output impedance

Experimental Procedure:

• Using the connecting lead join V₁ to Terminal 1 of a 10k Ω resistor (R₁)
• Using another connecting lead join T₁ to Terminal 2 of the 10k Ω resistor (R₁).
• Using the 3^rd connecting lead join V₂ to Terminal 1 of another 10kΩ resistor (R₂)
• Using the 4^th connecting lead join T₂ to Terminal 2 of the 10kΩ resistor (R₂)
• Using the 5^th connecting lead join T₃ to Terminal 1 of another 10kΩ resistor (R_f)
• Using the 6^th connecting lead join T₄ to Terminal 2 of the 10kΩ resistor (R_f)
• Turn ON the equipment
• Input a small input signal of 2V to V₁ with respect to GND and another input signal of 2V to V₂ with respect to GND
• Measure and record the output signal Vo with respect to GND

Repeat the same experiment using R₁= 100kΩ, R₂= 100kΩ, R_f =100kΩ and for the 3^rd experiment use R₁=2,200Ω, R₂= 1kΩ and R_f = 3,300Ω

In each case calculate and Tabulate your reading

R1	R2	Rf	V1	V2	Vo

 

Observations:

• Compare the measured output voltage (Vo) with the calculated output voltage for each resistor combination.
• Note any discrepancies between the measured and calculated values.
• Observe the shape of the output waveform and compare it to the input waveforms.

Analysis:

Analyze your results and discuss the following:

• How does the output voltage of the summing amplifier change with different resistor combinations?
• How do the measured values of output voltage compare to the calculated values?
• What is the relationship between the input voltages and the output voltage?
• How does the summing amplifier affect the amplitude and shape of the input signals?
• What is the significance of the negative sign in the output voltage equation for the summing amplifier?

Safety Precautions:

• The instrumentation module is already powered internally, so no additional power supply connections are needed.
• Handle the module and its components with care.

Additional Notes:

• The summing amplifier can be used to combine multiple signals into a single output signal.
• The gain of each input signal can be adjusted by changing the ratio of the feedback resistor (Rf) to the corresponding input resistor (R1 or R2).
• This experiment demonstrates the basic operation of a summing amplifier using a pre-configured instrumentation module. You can explore more advanced applications and variations of the summing amplifier circuit in subsequent experiments.

RESULT

The results obtained from a series of experiments designed to evaluate the performance of various operational amplifier configurations, including the voltage follower, non-inverting amplifier, inverting amplifier, summing amplifier, difference amplifier, and integrator were presented. These experiments aimed to explore key amplifier characteristics such as voltage gain, output voltage, and circuit behavior under different configurations and input conditions.

The findings are analyzed in terms of both theoretical expectations and practical outcomes, highlighting how varying component values and configurations impact the effectiveness of each amplifier type. The results are hereby presented.

Table 4.1.1 presents the readings from the voltage follower experiments, demonstrating that the output voltage (Vo) closely tracks the input voltage (Vin) across all trials, with a consistent voltage gain (Av) of approximately 0.99.

Table 4.1.2 details the experimental results for the non-inverting amplifier, showing how varying resistor values influence the output voltage (Vo) and the calculated voltage gain (Av), which deviates slightly from theoretical expectations.

Table 4.1.3 summarizes the results from the inverting amplifier experiments, indicating that the measured output voltage (Vo) and gain (Av) closely align with theoretical predictions, despite minor deviations.

Table 4.1.4 provides the results for the summing amplifier, demonstrating how the output voltage (Vo) is influenced by the input voltages (V1 and V2) and the corresponding resistor values.

Table 4.1.5 summarizes the results from the difference amplifier experiments, highlighting the relationship between the input voltages (V1 and V2) and the resulting output voltage (Vo).

Table 4.1.6 presents the results from the integrator experiments, showing the output voltage (Vo) and the corresponding gain for different resistor-capacitor (RC) combinations when subjected to a sine wave input.

4.1.1 Tabulated Readings of the Voltage follower

Exp/No	Vin (V)	Vo
1	5	4.95	0.99
2	4	3.94	0.99
3	3	2.96	0.99
4	2	1.97	0.99
5	1	0.96	0.96

4.1.2 Tabulated Readings of the Non Inverting Amplifier

Exp	R1 (Ω)	Rf (Ω)	Vin (V)	Vo (V)
1	10,000	10,000	3	5.78	1.93	2.00
2	100,000	100,000	3	5.78	1.93	2.00
3	2,200	3,300	3	7.45	2.48	2.5

4.1.3 Tabulated Readings of the Inverting Amplifier

Exp	R1 (Ω)	Rf (Ω)	Vin (V)	Vo (V)
1	10,000	10,000	5	4.87	0.99	1
2	100,000	100,000	5	4.87	0.99	1
3	2,200	3,300	5	7.46	1.49	1.50

4.1.4 Tabulated Readings of the Summing Amplifier

R1 (Ω)	R2(Ω)	Rf (Ω)	V1(V)	V2(V)	Vo(V)
10,000	10,000	10,000	2	2	3.92	4.00
100,000	100,000	100,000	2	2	3.90	4.00
2,200	1,000	3,300	2	2	9.00	9.60

4.1.5 Tabulated Readings of the Difference Amplifier

R1 (Ω)	R2(Ω)	Rf (Ω)	V1(V)	V2(V)	Vo(V)
10,000	10,000	10,000	3	2	-0.95	-1
100,000	100,000	100,000	3	2	-0.95	-1
2,200	1,000	3,300	3	2	-1.46	-1.5

 

4.1.6 Tabulated Readings of the Integrator

R1 (Ω)	Cf (µf)	V1n(V)	Vo(V)
1000	1	5	-5.00	-1.00
3,300	10	5	-6.00	-1.20
2,200	100	5	-10.00	-2.00

DISCUSSION                                     

The results of the experiments conducted on various amplifier configurations—voltage follower, non-inverting amplifier, inverting amplifier, summing amplifier, difference amplifier, and integrator—demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of these circuits in amplifying and manipulating signals.

Voltage Follower

The voltage follower exhibited an output voltage (𝑉o) that closely matched the input voltage (Vin), confirming its intended functionality. The measured voltage gains ranged from 0.96 to 0.99, indicating performance aligned with theoretical expectations. The low output impedance characteristic of the voltage follower was critical in maintaining signal integrity across varying loads.

Non-Inverting Amplifier

In the non-inverting amplifier, the measured gains showed a close alignment with theoretical values, although slight discrepancies were noted due to component tolerances and measurement inaccuracies. The amplifier effectively amplified the input signal while preserving its waveform characteristics, making it suitable for applications where signal fidelity is essential.

Inverting Amplifier

The inverting amplifier demonstrated the expected phase inversion in addition to effectively amplifying the input signal. The measured gains were generally consistent with theoretical predictions, with the phase shift being a critical characteristic for applications requiring precise signal manipulation.

Summing Amplifier

The summing amplifier accurately combined multiple input signals while maintaining their waveform shapes. The output voltage reflected a linear relationship with the input voltages, confirming its reliability in applications such as audio mixing and feedback systems. Minor discrepancies in measured versus calculated output voltages were attributed to practical factors.

Difference Amplifier

The difference amplifier effectively produced output voltages that closely matched theoretical calculations, demonstrating its capability to amplify the difference between input signals. Its ability to reject common-mode signals enhances its utility in noisy environments, ensuring stable and accurate output.

Integrator

The integrator’s output voltage varied significantly with different resistor-capacitor (RC) combinations, confirming its role in signal integration. The experiments illustrated a clear relationship between input and output voltages, with a notable phase shift introduced, characteristic of integrators. The results indicated effective signal processing capabilities suitable for various applications.

Overall, the findings from these experiments affirm the reliability and functionality of the analog circuits, highlighting their importance in educational settings and practical applications in electronics.

CONCLUSION    

This experimental investigation provides a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of six fundamental operational amplifier configurations utilizing the LM741 operational amplifier. The results demonstrate the LM741’s versatility and effectiveness in implementing these configurations, achieving outcomes that closely align with theoretical predictions.

The study underscores the critical role of operational amplifiers in analog circuit design, highlighting their ability to perform a wide range of functions, from basic amplification to complex signal processing. The experimental data emphasizes the importance of understanding the specific characteristics and limitations of each configuration to effectively leverage operational amplifiers in practical applications.

Furthermore, the observed discrepancies between theoretical predictions and experimental results illustrate the significance of practical considerations such as component tolerances, measurement inaccuracies, and loading effects in real-world circuit implementations. This underscores the necessity for careful component selection, precise measurement techniques, and a thorough understanding of circuit behavior to achieve optimal performance.

The knowledge gained from this study serves as a valuable foundation for further exploration of operational amplifier applications and the development of advanced analog circuit designs. The insights derived from this investigation contribute to a broader understanding of analog circuit design principles, paving the way for the creation of more sophisticated and reliable electronic systems in contemporary technology.

REFERENCES

1. Adrian, O. G. O., Emagbetere, A., & Johnbull, J. (2015). The impact of physics laboratory on students offering physics in Ethiope West Local Government Area of Delta State. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(7), 951-956. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1943
2. Agarwal, R. P. (2005). Challenges in Teaching Analog Electronics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 638-641.
3. Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and development of physics module based on learning style and appropriate technology by employing Isman instructional design model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 84.
4. Avelino, A. M., delos Santos, G. A., Danoso, J. T., Gumapac, R. L. D., & Vicedo, M. M. V. (2015). Design and testing of a mobile studio operational amplifier trainer board. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, 3(4), 223-230. https://www.researchpublish.com
5. Bearden, I., Dvořák, L., & Planinšič, G. (2022). Work Group 2 Position Paper: Experiments and Laboratory Work in Teacher Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2297, 012008. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2297/1/012008
6. Bello, T. (2012). Effect of Availability and Utilization of Physics Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Academic Achievement in Senior Secondary School Physics. World Journal of Education, 2(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n5p1
7. Berg, E. van den (2009). The PCK of teaching in the laboratory: Turning manipulation of equipment into manipulation of ideas. In O. de Jong & L. Halim (Eds.), Teachers’ Professional Knowledge in Science and Mathematics Education: Views from Malaysia and Abroad (pp. 85-110). Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. ISBN: 978-983-2267-07-2.
8. Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Performance evaluation of the LM741 operational amplifier under varying temperature conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2932567
9. Chong, P. L., Ganesan, S., Ng, P. K., & Kong, F. Y. (2022). A TRIZ-Adopted Development of a Compact Experimental Board for the Teaching and Learning of Operational Amplifier with Multiple Circuit Configurations. Sustainability, 14(21), 14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114115
10. Costa, R., Portela, P., & Alves, G. (2017). An educational kit to teach and learn Operational Amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS) (pp. 137-138). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2017.7984353
11. Costa, Ricardo & Portela, Paulo & Alves, Gustavo & Felgueiras, Carlos & Viegas, Clara. (2021). An Alternative Way of Teaching Operational Amplifiers Using a Reconfigurable and Expandable Kit. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/RITA.2021.3125893.
12. Costa, Ricardo & Portela, Paulo & Alves, Gustavo & Felgueiras, Carlos & Viegas, Clara. (2018). A reconfigurable and expandable kit to teach electronic circuits based on Operational Amplifiers. 1-10. 10.1109/TAEE.2018.8476096.
13. Cynthia, C., Arafah, C., & Palloan, P. (2023). Development of Interactive Physics E-Module to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9, 3943-3952. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2302
14. Fan, H., Li, S., Feng, Q., Chen, W., Ye, X., Xie, S., & Heidari, H. (2019). Reform and Practice of Analog Circuits. In 2018 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS 2018) (pp. 346-349). Chengdu, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/APCCAS.2018.8605620
15. Fuada, Syifaul. (2022). Development of Educational Kit for Practical Course in the Topic of Phase-Shift RC Oscillator. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE). 18. 112-130. 10.3991/ijoe.v18i05.29131.
16. Gray, P. R., & Meyer, R. G. (2009). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits (5th ed.). Wiley.
17. Grigoriou, V., Papageorgiou, K., & Kalkanis, G. (2010). Hands-on Experimentation in Educational Physics Laboratory utilizing a Common Mobile Phone – The Case of Decrescent Oscillation. In M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou, & P. Michaelidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-on Science (pp. 355-357). Retrieved from http://www.clab.edc.uoc.gr/HSci2010
18. Horowitz, P., & Hill, W. (2015). The art of electronics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
19. Kendir Tekgül, E., & Yaltkaya, Ş. (2023). Gamma Ray Effect on Op-Amp 741 and Timer 555 IC. Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering, 28(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1094384
20. Lean, Chong & Ganesan, Silvia & Ng, Poh Kiat & Kong, Feng. (2022). A TRIZ-Adopted Development of a Compact Experimental Board for the Teaching and Learning of Operational Amplifier with Multiple Circuit Configurations. Sustainability. 14. 14115. 10.3390/su142114115.
21. Li, H., & Dong, B. (2023). Research on portable constant pulse current source device. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2479, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2479/1/012008
22. Maricau, E., & Gielen, G. (2013). Analog IC Reliability in Nanometer CMOS. Analog Circuits and Signal Processing. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6163-0.
23. Medha, U., & Upadhyaya, K. S. (2019). Experimentation in Physics on Virtual Labs Using Smart Phones in Schools. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 8(6), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/
24. Mihret, Z., Alemu, M., & Assefa, S. (2023). Effectiveness of blended physics laboratory experimentation on pre-service physics teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), em0144. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12607
25. National Semiconductor. (1998). LM741 Operational Amplifier. Retrieved from https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm741.pdf
26. Ndihokubwayo, K. (2017). Investigating the status and barriers of science laboratory activities in Rwandan teacher training colleges towards improvisation practice. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(1), 47.
27. Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2019). An Assessment of the Impact of Improvised versus Conventional Laboratory Equipment on Students’ Performance in Thermal Expansion. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajesms/article/view/188308/177571
28. Omar, Norsyira Zuraiza & Daud, Sharipah & Abdul Rahman, Rahimah. (2019). Electronic Educational Development Kit For Amplifier Circuit Using Adjusting Gain.
29. Pursky, Oleg & Gamaliy, V & Demidov, P & Dubovyk, T & Buchatska, I & Forostyana, N. (2023). Laboratory equipment for practice learning in the framework of educational course “Molecular Physics and Thermodynamics”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2611. 012011. 10.1088/1742-6596/2611/1/012011.
30. Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-011-9291-6
31. Rashid, M., & Khan, A. I. (2020). Augmented Reality in Electrical and Electronics Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1691-1704.
32. Sedra, A. S., & Smith, K. C. (2015). Microelectronic circuits (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
33. Sujanem, Rai, & Suwindra, I. N., & Suswandi, I. (2020). The effectiveness of problem-based interactive physics e-module on high school students’ critical thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012025
34. Talukder, Habib & Collier, Michael. (2002). A General Purpose Microcontroller Trainer. African Journal of Science and Technology. 3. 10.4314/ajst.v3i1.15296.
35. Tamunoiyowuna, S., & Omeodu, M. D. (2022). Extent of availability and usage of various laboratory equipment among physics students’ in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(03), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.3.0190
36. Tan, P. (2021). Research on the Development and Reform of Electronic Physics Laboratory Based on Computer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1744, 032195. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032195
37. Temes, G. C., & LaSorte, N. J. (1980). Challenges in Teaching Analog Electronics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 23(4), 238-241.
38. Texas Instruments. (2020). LM741 Operational Amplifier. Retrieved from https://www.ti.com/product/LM741
39. Voudoukis, N., & Pagiatakis, G. (2017). Operational amplifiers teaching and students’ understanding. 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942865.