Effective Chronic Wound Healing
- Jonathan Opoku
- 245-261
- Oct 10, 2024
- Public Health
Effective Chronic Wound Healing
Jonathan Opoku
Pat J Health Company Limited, Ghana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11150019P
Received: 02 September 2024; Revised: 26 September 2024; Accepted: 30 September 2024; Published: 10 October 2024
ABSTRACT
The adverse impact of chronic wounds is felt worldwide. The concerns for advanced wound care product are progressively increasing due to factors such as value for money spent in wound care products.
Acute and Chronic wounds are managed in most health facilities in Ghana with sodium chloride (0.9%) infusion solution and povidone iodine fortified with metronidazole solution. The procedure is usually done by the nurse cleaning the wound with the saline solution wet gauze or cotton and then covered with the povidone iodine wet gauze for acute and chronic wounds. For chronic infected wounds, the wound is usually cleaned with saline solution and covered with wet gauze saline or currently with neomycin wound care spray or powdered antibiotics applied on the wounds. But it is popular as many wounds are covered with povidone iodine after wound cleaning in wound care practices in Ghana. Despite all these efforts, many wounds, especially chronic type wounds take a very long time to heal or sometimes fails to heal which reduce the quality of life of the people suffering from the menace. When it happens in this way, many resort to the use of local remedies to cause the wounds to heal but no avail, especially in Ghana where advanced treatment is scare. It is against this background that focal research in wound care was done in Ghana to come out with an innovative pharmaceutical wound care product effective for chronic and acute wounds healing to improve the quality of life of people as global burden of wounds escalates.
In a Blind Observational Study for a period of five years in Ghana to observe the wound care products efficacy to heal wounds especially chronic types, the objective of the study was to examine a new product efficacy in chronic wound healing in the targeted population of patients with wounds. A product that has dual purpose of wound care as a cleaning and application agent, also has unique product pharmaceutical characteristics. A scalable, easy- to- use, multi-purpose, multi-use and cost-effective product, able to address the barriers or problems of wounds healing. The areas of consideration as far as wound care are concerned included: The study also sought to observe the product ability to control wound pains, control wound bleeding, control and prevent wound infection, remove wound debris, remove wound exudates effecting wounds healing at reduced healing time and with minimal scar in varied targeted patients’ population. Again, to observe the product with outcome of which to mitigate the long-term effect of chronic wounds like recurrent hospitalizations, financial burden, amputations, deformity, and frequent visit to hospital for wound care. One product, 9G Wound Solution (a cleaning and application product) manufactured by Pat J Health Company Limited, Ghana, was effective in wounds healing, especially, effective chronic wounds healing. The product was used to subject varied patients’ population with wounds on randomized basis, for wound care, and through observation the direct short, intermedial and long-term outcomes recorded of product effectiveness recorded. The outcome reported included control of wound pains, control of wound odor, control of bleeding, control of wound infection, removal of wounds exudates, removal of wound debris and ultimately reduced wound healing time to prevent wounds complications like amputations.
The study was progressively extended across 10 regions in Ghana to cover 500 patient population with varied wounds. Patients’ population included those with Diabetic ulcers, Burns, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, herpes zoster skin ulcers, Perineum wounds, Surgical abdomen-pelvic wounds, Traumatic wounds, Buruli Ulcers, gas gangrene wounds, and Mouth ulcers. The outcome of using the new wound care product were directly observed for the study period. By this observational study, the new product was observed to be superior to the controls as this product was able to heal 99% patients who had wounds, especially chronic wounds for many years, including 20years-old wound at reduced healing rate with no reoccurrence within the study period. The product scientifically readily released to the wound environment modulators capable to address the problems or barriers of wounds and simultaneously promoting modulators effective for wound healing. The product was not only effective in chronic wound healing at reduced time but also controlled wound pains shortly, controlled wound odor shortly, stopped wound bleeding, fought and controlled wound infection. However, using the product needed change of wound dressing every two days. The long-term effect of the product on target population not conclusively observed within the period of the research. We need to continuously observe the reported long-term effect of the product efficacy.
INTRODUCTION
Epidemiology of Chronic Wounds
Chronic Wounds starts with varied causes and progressively becomes difficult to heal which pose suffering on people with these health problems ranging from pains, deformity on individuals in sufferings and putting socioeconomic burdens. The adverse impact of chronic wounds is felt worldwide. According to the American Diabetes Association, over 9-12 million Americans suffer from chronic ulcers/wounds. In the US, chronic wounds affect around 6.5million people at any one time. In the US, foot ulcers and other complications are responsible for 20% of the nearly 3million hospitalizations every year related to diabetes. Approximately 2.2 million people have chronic wounds in the UK. In Africa, the news is not different as increase in adult population with high risk of development of diabetes and injuries from vehicle accidents pose risk of chronic wounds.
Progress of Acute Wounds to Chronic Wounds
During Covid-19 pandemic there were some neglected essential primary health care activities as advocated by health authorities, which included patients who needed wound care services. This led to many wounds progressed to complicated wounds to chronic wounds. A simple wound can progress to complicated chronic wound when it is neglected.
A wound is considered to be chronic if it hasn’t started to heal after 4 to 12 weeks despite treatment. These kinds of wounds usually arise as a result of poor blood circulation, diabetes or a weak immune system.
Problems of Wounds or barriers of wounds healing
Wound Pains
Painful chronic wounds can be a burden in daily life and prevent and also prevent sufferers from getting a good night sleep. Constant pains can really wear you down making a patient with chronic wound feels quite low or depressed. It often hurts when the dressing is changed too, particularly if the dressing is stuck to the wound. But this pain can be reduced in various ways-for instance, by using dressings that are less likely to stick to the wound. The wound can also be rinsed with saline solution first so the dressing comes off more easily. However, there chronic wounds with constant pains not as a result of aforementioned factors but due to poor healing mechanism and chronic wound infections. Drugs like acetaminophen or ibuprofen, or other pain medications are often prescribed to control pains. Some patients as a result of constant pains become addicted to pain relieving medications.
Combating and prevention of Wound Infections
Wounds are less likely to heal well if they are infected with bacteria. Depending on how severe the infection is, antibiotics may be considered. They are usually taken as tablets or capsules, but sometimes applied to the wound in an ointment, spray, powder or placed on the wound using a dressing. Antibiotics resistance as a result of chronic wounds care is high due to constant wound infection.
Wound bleeding
Mild, Moderate, and Severe Bleeding
With severe bleeding, any of these may be true:
- Blood is pumping from the wound.
- The bleeding does not stop or slow down with pressure.
- Blood is quickly soaking through bandage after bandage.
With moderate bleeding, any of these may be true:
- The bleeding slows or stops with pressure but starts again if you remove the pressure.
- The blood may soak through a few bandages, but it is not fast or out of control.
With mild bleeding, any of these may be true:
- The bleeding stops on its own or with pressure.
- The bleeding stops or slows to an ooze or trickle after 15 minutes of pressure. It may ooze or trickle for up to 45 minutes.
Wound debris
Debridement is a natural process that occurs in all wounds and is crucial to healing: damaged and dead tissue, debris and bacteria are removed from the wound, minimizing infection risk and encouraging healthy granulation tissue to form, which aids healing (Strohal et al, 2013).
Dead tissue, slough and debris in a wound can:
- Prevent or delay a wound’s normal healing process (Weir et al, 2007);
- Mimic or hide infection;
- Attract bacteria to the wound, increasing the risk of infection (O’Brien, 2002);
- Prevent practitioners from assessing the extent and size of the wound, which is particularly problematic when staging pressure ulcer damage (Weir et al, 2007);
- Increase odor and exudate (Vowden and Vowden, 2011).
Wound Exudates
Exudate production by open wounds is essential for moist wound healing. However, when wounds produce insufficient or too much exudate, and/or the composition of the exudate is harmful, a wide range of problems can occur that ultimately delay healing, distress patients and consume considerable healthcare resources.
Wound Odor
Wound odor, also referred to as malodor, is typically the result of necrotic tissue or bacterial colonization in the wound bed. Certain dressings like Hydrocolloids, also tend to produce a characteristic odor as a result of the chemical reaction that takes place between the dressing and wound exudate, causing odor. While not directly harmful to the patient, wound odor is often indicative of bioburden or other barriers to wound healing. In addition, the psychological effects of malodorous wounds on the patient, relatives, or caregiver can be significant.
Assessment of Wound Odor
Though there is no universally recognized scale for measuring wound odor, the following can be used to qualitatively assess wound odor for documentation purposes:
Very strong: Odor is evident on entering the room (6–10 feet or 2–3 meters from the patient) with the dressing intact. Strong: Odor is evident on entering the room (6–10 feet or 2–3 meters from the patient) with the dressing removed. Moderate: Odor is evident at close proximity to the patient when the dressing is intact. Slight: Odor is evident at close proximity to the patient when the dressing is removed. No odor: No odor is evident, even at the patient’s bedside with the dressing removed.
Etiology
Most wound odors are thought to arise from the metabolic processes of anaerobic bacteria. In chronic Wounds; such as pressure ulcers, leg ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers, the odor may also be due to tissue degradation. The aptly named, foul-smelling compounds called cadaverine and putrescine, are released by anaerobic bacteria as part of the putrefaction of tissue.
Wound Treatment Modalities
Cleaning the wound
The wound is often cleaned when the dressing is changed, normally using a saline (salt) solution. Overall, though, not enough is known about the pros and cons of the various solutions that are used to clean wounds, and how they affect the healing process. It is also not yet clear whether tap water could be used for the medical cleaning of wounds.
Wound dressings
Once the healthcare professional has cleaned the wound, they cover it with a new dressing. Most wounds are kept moist, for instance with moist compresses. Various kinds of dressings can be used instead, which include: films, hydrogel dressings, hydrocolloid dressings, dressings containing iodine or alginates and foam dressings. The dressings are used to remove excess fluid from the wound and protect it from infection. They are usually left on the wound for several days. Dressings are changed if it is clear that they can’t soak up any more wound secretions, if they slip out of place, or fluid leaks out of the bandage.
In addition, substances called growth factors can be put on the wound to help the wound cells grow better. One approach involves putting some of the patients own blood into a machine to increase the concentration of blood plasma (platelet rich plasma, PRP). The blood that is prepared in this way is often applied to the wound as a gel. Growth factors can also be made chemically. Several studies suggest that they can help chronic wounds to heal better.
Debridement
When treating chronic wounds, doctors or nurses often remove dead or infected tissue. This is known as debridement. The tissue is removed using instruments such as tweezers, a sharp spoon-like instrument called a curette, or a scalpel. An enzyme-based gel is sometimes applied too, to help clean the wound.
The wound can also be cleaned using a high-pressure water jet. Another form of debridement involves the use of a certain species of maggots (fly larvae) that are specially bred for medical purposes. The maggots are placed on the wound, either as they are or in a pouch. They remove dead tissue and fluid from the wound.
Because debridement is often painful, a local anesthetic is used to numb the wound beforehand, for instance using an ointment. If more severe pain is expected painkiller can be taken before treatment. Larger wounds are sometimes cleaned under general anesthetic.
Compression stockings and compression bandages
If venous insufficiency is what caused the chronic wound, then compression stockings or compression bandages can help it to heal faster. The pressure from the stockings and bandages helps the veins to carry blood back to the heart. This also relieves the pain caused by venous leg ulcers.
Antibiotics
Wounds are even less likely to heal well if they are infected with bacteria. Depending on how severe the infection is, antibiotics may be considered. They are usually taken as tablets, but are sometimes applied to the wound in an ointment or placed on the wound using a dressing.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
In hyperbaric oxygen therapy, you go into a special chamber to breathe in oxygen under high pressure. This is meant to increase the oxygen concentration in your blood and improve the blood supply to the wound area.
Research suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve the healing of wounds in people with diabetic foot problems
Negative pressure wound therapy
In negative pressure wound therapy (also called vacuum-assisted closure or VAC therapy), the wound is covered with an airtight dressing that is connected to a pump by a thin tube. The pump continuously sucks fluid out of the wound, creating negative pressure across the surface of the wound. The aim is to increase the flow of blood to the wound. It helps keep the wound moist too, which is also meant to improve the healing process. Research suggests that negative pressure wound therapy helps chronic wounds to heal better and can also reduce the length of the hospital stay.
The pump that is attached to the wound limits your mobility somewhat and makes noise. Some people find this annoying. Changing the dressing and tube can also be painful and cause a small amount of bleeding.
Skin grafts
Skin grafts are considered as a treatment option if a wound is so large that it can’t close on its own. In this procedure, skin is taken from another part of your body – usually your upper leg – and transplanted to the wound. There are also grafts that are made from human cell products and synthetic materials.
Skin grafts increase the chances of poorly healing venous leg ulcers closing faster. Chronic foot wounds (ulcers) in people with diabetes also heal faster after a skin graft.
Ultrasound and electromagnetic therapy
Ultrasound therapy involves treating chronic wounds using sound waves. The sound waves make the tissue warmer. But ultrasound therapy hasn’t been scientifically proven to help the wound heal faster.
The same is true of electromagnetic therapy, where weak electromagnetic waves are applied to the wound using pillows or mats that have magnets in them.
Treatment of Wound Odor
Implementing one or more of the following precautions can help minimize the risk of developing malodorous wounds in at-risk patients and minimize complications in patients already exhibiting symptoms:
- Cleanse the wound as often as advisable to reduce bioburden
- Ensure the patient is practicing good hygiene
- If not contraindicated, increase the frequency of dressing changes
- Change bed linen as soon as it becomes soiled
- Use products designed to decrease or mask odor (i.e., calcium alginate)
- Use cleansers designed to break through biofilm or bioburden
- Use wound cleansing products that are biocides designed to kill odor causing bacteria
Treatment of malodorous wounds is typically aimed at treating the underlying infection or debridement of the devitalized tissue responsible for the odor. While topical or systemic antibiotics may be effective, it is difficult to reach the necessary concentration of antibiotics at the infection site. One formulation that has found wide use in the wound care community is metronidazole gel or powder, which even though it is most effective against anaerobic bacteria may have some effect on a range of aerobic organisms at the concentrations typically used.
If it is not feasible to eradicate the cause of the wound odor, odor-controlling dressings can help mitigate the psychological effects of excessive wound odor. Activated charcoal is widely used as a deodorizing agent in dressings for these purposes. Cleansing and/or debridement of the wound may be necessary before applying the dressing to achieve the desired effect. If these measures are not enough by themselves to mitigate odor from the wound in question, external deodorizers (air fresheners, scented candles, essential oils, coffee grounds, etc) can be used to mask the odor.
Economics of Wounds Care
The concerns for advanced wound care product are progressively increasing due to factors such as:
- value for money spent in wound care products
- cost reduction in wound care
- scalability of wound care products/service
- additive benefits of wound care products
Scope of the study
Geographically, the study covered all patient’s population with varied wounds across 10 regions in Ghana. In all 500 patients population with wounds were involved. In context, the study assessed the efficacy of the wound care products in healing chronic wounds at reduced rate whilst observing the following: The control of wound pains, control of wound odor, control of bleeding, control of wound infection, removal of wounds exudates, removal of wound debris and ultimately reduced wound healing time. Again, the outcome of which to mitigate the long-term effect of chronic wounds like recurrent hospitalizations, financial burden, amputations, deformity, and frequent visit to hospital for wound care were observed. The study was limited in scope as it could not captured all the patient population with wounds in all the 16 regions in Ghana.
Objective
The main objective of the study was to examine a new product efficacy in chronic wound healing in the targeted population of patients with wounds. The specific objectives of the study included:
The product ability to control wound pains, control wound bleeding, control and prevent wound infection, remove wound debris, remove wound exudates effecting wounds healing at reduced healing time in varied targeted population with wounds.
The research involved finding an alternative wound care product with a unique product pharmaceutical characteristic in such a way that using this product can control wound pain, wound bleeding, prevent and fight wound infection, remove wound dead tissues to promote fast wound healing and save the user from financial burden related to wound care. A scalable wound care product that is multi-use, multipurpose, simple to use, and cost effective for home based wound care and clinical setting should be the choice and practice in wound care.
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
Impact of the new product for wound care in the targeted patient’s population of wounds.
In the blind studies of impact of the new product for wound care among the targeted population of 500 patients with wounds progressively across 10 regions in Ghana for a five years trend, with more than 1000pcs of samples product piloted, there were exceeding results of benefits of the new product to the targeted population though initial difficulty of acceptance of the new brand was encountered.
This initial acceptance challenge of the new product is consistent with some Ghanaians as they would always like to stick to the status quo-thus the randomized controls of wound care products in wound care practices in Ghana. This challenge was overcome as the efficacy of the new product gained popularity through recommendations of the product to others by patients themselves and relatives.
The data collected and analyzed based on the main and the specific objectives of the study. This data was classified into type of wound treated in varied age patients’ group and gender with the new product and the direct benefits of the new product in wound care in the following areas stated in the tables below compared to the controls.
Table 1: Criteria for data collection
Healing rate | Debris Removal | Pain control | Infection control/prevention | Bleeding Control | Odor control | Exudates Removal |
Table 2: Type of Wounds treated with the new product and percentage in the studies population
Type of Wounds | % population treated |
Chronic Venous Ulcer | 16% |
Chronic Diabetic Wound | 30% |
Chronic Mouth Ulcer | 1% |
Surgical Infected Wounds | 15% |
Acute Herpes Zoster Sores | 1% |
Acute Multiple Wounds | 7% |
Acute Injuries | 7% |
Surgical Non-infected Wounds | 8% |
Mouth Ulcers | 1% |
Burns | 6% |
Perineal Ulcers | 3% |
Cancerous Wounds | 5% |
Wound Biometrics
Table3: A five-year trend of sample in varied population of patients’ wounds and characteristics in the Blind Studies
Type of Wounds | Age of patient | Sex | Existing condition | Location of wound | Duration of wound |
Chronic Venous Ulcer | 40 | M | Sickle cells | Leg | 20 years |
Chronic Diabetic Wound | 48 | F | Diabetes | Leg | 4 months |
Chronic Mouth Ulcer | 5 | F | Unknown | Mouth | >3 years |
Acute Leg Sore | 4 | F | Groin Lymph nodes(infection) | Leg | < 7 days |
Chronic Foot Venous Ulcer | 66 | M | Unknown | Foot | 6 years |
Acute Herpes Zoster Sores | 32 | F | HIV | Torso | 10days |
Acute Multiple Wounds | 40 | M | Nil | Different parts | < 24 hours |
Acute Deep Wound(injury) | 28 | M | Nil | Chin | < 24 hours |
Surgical incisional wound-C|s | 45 | F | Nil | Lower abdomen | 2 weeks |
Cancerous Perineum Wound | 58 | F | Perineal Cancer | Perineum | 2years |
Chronic Celluptic Wound | 68 | F | Cellulitis | Hand | 4months |
Acute Celluptic Wound | 72 | F | Gas gangrene ? Buruli Ulcer | Leg | 2 weeks |
Surgical Wound | 6 | M | Injury | Forehead | < 24 hours |
Surgical Excisional Wound | 35 | F | Keloids | Pubis | < 24 hours |
Pressure Sore | 52 | M | Chronic Illness | Buttocks | 2 weeks |
Superficial Burns | 9 | M | Nil | Abdomen | < 24hours |
Traumatic Injury | 6 | M | Nil | Leg | < 24 hours |
Vulva ulcers | 19 | F | Candidiasis | Vulva | 2 years |
Bilateral Venous Leg Ulcers | 45 | M | Nil | Both Legs | 1 year |
Table 4: A five-year trend of sample in varied population of patients’ wounds and specific Wound problems
Type of Wound | Location of wound | Duration of wound | Specific Wound problem/ Concerns |
Chronic Venous Ulcer | Leg | 20 years | Prolonged wound healing |
Chronic diabetic wound | Leg | 4 months | Prolonged wound healing |
Chronic Mouth Ulcer | Mouth | >3 years | Prolonged wound healing |
Acute Leg Sore | Leg | < 7days | Wound pains and infection |
Chronic Foot Venous Ulcer | Foot | 6 years | Prolonged wound healing |
Acute Herpes Zooster Sores | Torso | 2 weeks | Severe pains, Effective wound healing |
Acute Multiple Wounds | Different parts | < 24hours | Bleeding and pains |
Acute Deep Wound(non-sutured) | Chin | < 24hours | Bleeding, pains, effective healing and infection prevention |
Surgical Infected incisional wound-C|s | Lower abdomen | 2 weeks | Wound Infection, Pain, Exudates, prolonged healing |
Cancerous Perineum Wound | Perineum | 2 years | Wound odor, Wound infection, prolonged healing |
Chronic Celluptic Wound | Hand | 4 months | Wound debris, Wound exudate, Prolonged healing |
Acute Celluptic Wound | Leg | 2 weeks | Spread of wounds, wound odor, Wound infection, Wound healing |
Surgical Wound (sutured) | Forehead | < 24hours | Wound infection prevention, pain, bleeding, Intact sutures, effective wound healing |
Surgical Excisional Wound (sutured) | Pubis | < 24hours | Wound infection prevention, effective wound healing |
Pressure Sore | Buttocks | 2 weeks | Prevention of infection, effective wound healing |
Superficial Burns | Abdomen | < 24hours | Wound pains, prevention of wound infection, bleeding, effective wound healing |
Traumatic Injury | Leg | < 24hours | Wound bleeding, healing, Wound pains |
Vulva ulcer | Vulva | 2 years | Ulcer healing, control of odor, pains, infection |
Bilateral Leg Venous Ulcer | Both Legs | 1 year | Prolonged healing, Pains |
Table 5: A five-year trend of sample in varied population of patients’ wounds, specific Wound problems/concerns and outcome of intervention using the new product for wound care.
Type of Wound | Specific Wound problem | Outcome of Intervention | ||||||
Healing | Debris Removal | Pain control | Infection control/prevention | Bleeding Control | Odor control | Exudates Removal | ||
Chronic Venous Ulcer | Prolonged wound healing | < 3months | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Chronic diabetic wound | Prolonged wound healing | < 7 days | – | + | – | – | – | + |
Chronic Mouth Ulcer | Prolonged wound healing | 1 week | – | + | – | – | – | – |
Acute Leg Sore | Wound pains, immobility and infection | < 7 days | – | < 24hours Mobility restored | + | + | – | – |
Chronic Foot Venous Ulcer | Prolonged wound healing | 11months | – | – | + | – | – | – |
Acute Herpes Zoster Sores | Severe pains, Effective wound healing | 7 days | – | + | + | – | – | – |
Acute Multiple Wounds | Bleeding and pains, infection prevention | 2 weeks | – | + | + | + | – | – |
Acute Deep Wound(non-sutured) | Bleeding, infection prevention, effective healing and pains | 2 weeks | – | + | + | + | – | – |
Surgical infected incisional wound-C|s | Wound Infection, Exudates, Pain, prolonged healing | 7 days | – | + | + | – | – | + |
Cancerous Perineum Wound | Wound odor, Wound infection, prolonged healing | * | – | – | – | – | – | + |
Chronic Celluptic Wound | Wound debris, Pain, Wound exudate, Prolonged healing | 4 weeks | + | + | + | – | – | + |
Acute Celluptic Wound | Spread of wounds, wound odor, Wound infection, Wound healing | * | + | + | + | – | + | + |
Surgical Wound (sutured) | Wound infection prevention, Intact sutures, pain, bleeding, effective wound healing | < 7days | – | + | + | + | + | – |
Surgical Excisional Wound (sutured) | Wound infection prevention, pain, bleeding effective wound healing | < 2weeks | – | + | + | + | – | – |
Pressure Sore | Prevention of infection, pains, exudates, bleeding, effective wound healing | * | + | + | + | – | + | |
Superficial Burns | Wound pains, prevention of wound infection, bleeding, effective wound healing | < 7days | – | + | + | + | – | – |
Traumatic Injury | Wound bleeding, healing, Wound pains | < 7 days | – | + | + | + | – | – |
Vulva ulcer | Ulcer healing, control of odor, pains, infection | < 2weeks | – | + | + | – | + | – |
Bilateral Leg Venous Ulcer | Prolonged healing, pains | 6 months | – | + | – | – | – | – |
Keys: * (cased missed), +(affirmative), – (Not Applicable)
Table 6: A five-year trend of sample in varied population of patients’ wounds, showing Duration of wounds in the controls against the Healing Duration using the new product for wound care.
Type of Wound | Wound Duration | Healing Duration using the New Product |
Chronic Venous Ulcer | 20years | < 3months |
Chronic diabetic wound | 4months | < 7days |
Chronic Mouth Ulcer | >3 years | 1 week |
Chronic Foot Venous Ulcer | 6 years | 11 months |
Bilateral Leg Venous Ulcer | 1 year | 6 months |
CONCLUSION
The new product 9 G Wound Solution was superior to the controls as it was effective to heal wounds, especially chronic type of wounds at reduced rate, and also proved to have additive benefits in wound care by addressing most of the wound problems and barriers to wound healing. This offered much economic advantage to patients and their relatives not spending much money in buying wound care additive treatments, such as pain control medications and excessive use of antibiotics in wound care.
Throughout the period of studies there were observed or reported problems of patients’ recurrent hospitalization or amputation of limbs whilst patients on the new product for their wound care against in the case as observed in patients’ population in the control group. However, the product efficacy to heal patients’ population with cancerous wounds needs further studies as most of the patients with cancerous wounds died along the studies.
Scientific Evidence Based of using our innovative wound care Product for wound dressing.
A chronic wound with suspicion of cancer, almost healed with 9 G Wound Solution
Below are graphics of the stages of wound healing progress for a 66-year-old man farmer with chronic wound, Right Foot Venous Ulcer for 6years in Ghana.
Graphics Of The Stages Of The Wound Healing
Some Images of Various Cases of Chronic Wounds Managed With the 9g Wound Solution
SOURCES
- Holloway S. Recognizing and treating the causes of chronic malodorous wounds. Nursing Times. http://www.nursingtimes.net/recognising-and-treating-the-causes-of-chron…. Published March 1, 2004. Accessed July 28, 2017.
- Thomas S, Fisher B, Fram P, Waring M. Odor Absorbing Dressings: A comparative laboratory study. World Wide Wounds. http://www.worldwidewounds.com/1998/march/Odour-Absorbing-Dressings/odou…. Published April 7, 1998. Accessed July 28, 2017.
- Aziz Z, Cullum N. Electromagnetic therapy for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7): CD002933. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Broderick C, Pagnamenta F, Forster R. Dressings and topical agents for arterial leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; (1): CD001836. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Chen J, Wan Y, Lin Y et al. Platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factors as novel platelet concentrates for chronic hard-to-heal skin ulcers: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dermatolog Treat 2022; 33(2): 613-621. [PubMed]
- Cullum N, Liu Z. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (5): CD001180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Gethin G, Cowman S, Kolbach DN. Debridement for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD008599. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Greene E, Avsar P, Moore Z et al. What is the effect of larval therapy on the debridement of venous leg ulcers? A systematic review. J Tissue Viability 2021; 30(3): 301-309. [PubMed]
- Greene E, Avsar P, Moore Z et al. What is the effect of larval therapy on the debridement of venous leg ulcers? A systematic review. J Tissue Viability 2021; 30(3): 301-309. [PubMed]
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG, Germany). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot syndrome: Final report; Commission N15-02. 2016.
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG, Germany). Negative pressure wound therapy for wounds healing by primary intention: Final report; Commission N17-01B. 2019. [PubMed]
- Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG, Germany). Negative pressure wound therapy for wounds healing by secondary intention: Final report; Commission N17-01A. 2019. [PubMed]
- Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC et al. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (3): CD005083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lee Y, Lee MH, Phillips SA et al. Growth factors for treating chronic venous leg ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen 2022; 30(1): 117-125. [PubMed]
- Liu Z, Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (10): CD010318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- McLain NE, Moore ZE, Avsar P. Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; (3): CD011675. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Moreira Da Cruz D, Oliveira-Pinto J, Mansilha A. The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on limb amputation and ulcer healing. Int Angiol 2021; 41(1): 63-73. [PubMed]
- Norman G, Westby MJ, Rithalia AD et al. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (6): CD012583. [PMC free article] [PubMed]