Exploring 21st Century Innovative Pedagogy Paradigms in Higher Education-NEP 2020

Exploring 21^st Century Innovative Pedagogy Paradigms in Higher Education-NEP 2020

Shaik Fathima

M.R. College of Education, Andhra University Affiliated College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12040140

Received: 05 May 2025; Accepted: 13 May 2025; Published: 21 May 2025

ABSTRACT

Education must be based on the framework of the paradigms that are used to describe the sequence of teaching and ways of thinking about the purposes of education and the role of teachers and learners like –a)PPP- Presentation, Production and Practice, b) OHE- Observation, Hypotheses formation, and Experimentation, c) ARC-Authentic use, Restricted use, and Clarification, d) ESA-Engage, Study, Activate and develop collaboration, critical thinking, creative thinking and communication.21st-century pedagogy, shifts from traditional teaching methods to a more learner centered, technology-integrated, and collaborative approach, emphasizing the development of various skills empowering effective teaching and learning. This paper is a qualitative study that envisions NEP 2020 innovative pedagogical paradigms and their role in higher education like- behavioristic pedagogy, constructivist pedagogy, social constructivist pedagogy, liberationist pedagogy, learner centered pedagogy, ignation pedagogy, language and non-language pedagogy, Flipped classroom pedagogy, art integrated learning pedagogy, Cutting edge pedagogy ,Critical pedagogy, transformative pedagogy, Problem based learning pedagogy paradigms and  challenges for implementation- that emphasize constructive learning and active involvement of the learners in their learning journey, fulfilling the need of 21st Century learning environment and pedagogy paradigm framework for teaching and learning. The main objective of this paper is to design the theoretical framework of 21st century pedagogy for teaching and learning, explore the innovative pedagogy paradigms adapted to avoid gaps in the teaching and learning process through these innovative pedagogy practices, that determine the learning experiences arranged for the learners, directly influencing their learning outcomes. Therefore, the use of relevant pedagogy paradigm is necessary to achieve the objectives of the curricula successfully. NEP 2020 strives to develop well-rounded, competent individuals with 21st-century skills, the curricula and pedagogies have to be reoriented and revamped that includes raising the standard of curricula and using appropriate pedagogies to deliver effectively to the learners.

Keywords: Pedagogy, Pedagogical Paradigm, NEP

INTRODUCTION

Pedagogy is the art and science of teaching, encompassing the methods, strategies, and approaches used to facilitate learning. Paradigm means a set of overarching and interconnected assumptions about the nature of reality (Maykut and Moorehouse 1994).It is an example serving as a model. Any paradigm is based on a number of assumptions that deal with the nature of reality. The five characteristics are that a paradigm is theory driven, ethical, flexible, adaptable, and measurable. Paradigm is a model or pattern for understanding or interpreting something that represents a dominant or influential way of thinking about teaching and learning. Pedagogy paradigm is a specific framework or model that shapes how educators think, design, implement, and evaluate their teaching practices and approach towards the teaching and learning process or a set of beliefs and practices that guide how to teach and learn, encompassing various approaches like behaviorist, constructivist, social constructivist, and liberationist. . Understanding different pedagogy paradigms helps educators make informed decisions about their teaching practices, aligning their approaches with the goals and principles of the chosen paradigm. This paradigm shift in education has led to a growing interest in the development of 21st-century pedagogy (Chai, 2015).  

The ‘21st-century learner’ concept first surfaced around the turn of the millennium, representing a distinct type of learner characterized by a set of ‘new’ skills closely tied to digital technology, digital communication, and adaptable approaches to knowledge. This notion of the 21st-century learner has arisen in response to the needs of an ever-evolving globalized and digitally driven society. These shifts necessitate fresh learning methods, updated skill sets, innovative knowledge approaches, and novel pedagogical strategies (Hirschman & Wood, 2018). So, the nature of 21st-century learning is characterized by a seismic shift from traditional education paradigms (Mahajan, 2012).

Objectives 

In higher education, pedagogy paradigms have crucial role because they influence -how teachers design instruction, engage students, and assess learning outcomes. Understanding different pedagogical approaches, educators can revamp their teaching methods to better suit diverse student learning styles and needs. The objectives framed explore the 21^st century pedagogy paradigm for improving the quality of instruction and student’s learning as per NEP 2020.  A qualitative research design and objective-wise content analysis was adapted to:

• Highlight the need of pedagogical paradigms in Higher Education.
• Design the theoretical framework of 21st century pedagogy for teaching and learning in Higher Education.
• Understand the common pedagogical paradigms in Higher Education.
• Explore the different innovative pedagogy paradigms in Higher Education.
• Review the literature on the challenges in implementing the different pedagogy approaches in Higher Education.
• Review the literature on the strategies for addressing challenges and implementing the innovative pedagogy approaches of the 21^st 

METHODOLOGY

The present paper is a qualitative, theoretical research design and objective- wise content analysis is done in this study. The aim of this pedagogical paradigm study is to enhance authentic teaching and learning, explore and supplement these pedagogical practices of the 21st century in the teaching and learning process for the higher education institutions towards excellence to avoid the gaps in the teaching and learning process through these innovative pedagogy practices, that determine the learning experiences arranged for the learners, directly influence their learning outcomes. Therefore, the use of relevant pedagogy paradigm is necessary to achieve the objectives of the curricula successfully.

Procedure: a) Designing and deciding the content, b) Selection of objective for each content unit for analysis c) Selection of the objectives- content units for designing, d) Analyzing and Interpretation.

Objective- wise Analysis

Objective: To highlight the need of pedagogy paradigms in Higher education.

Pedagogy paradigms in higher education are essential for empowering students and shaping them into effective, adaptable individuals. Effective pedagogical approaches, like active learning and collaborative projects, can significantly improve student motivation, interest, and overall engagement with course material, encourage students to engage in critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills, which are essential for success in higher education and beyond for:

• Understanding diverse learning styles,
• Designing instruction based on goals,
• Improving student engagement and retention,
• Fostering critical thinking,
• Promoting student autonomy and self-directed learning,
• Integrating technology and innovative teaching strategies,
• Creating a more inclusive and equitable learning environment,
• Fostering lifelong learning and a dynamic Learning Environment,
• Emphasizes active learning techniques, such as discussions, problem-solving activities, and hands-on experiences, creating a more engaging and interactive learning environment,
• Educators can explore new pedagogical paradigms, adapt to changing environments and improve student learning outcomes.

Objective: To design the theoretical framework of 21st century pedagogy for teaching and learning in Higher Education.

21st-century pedagogy, emphasizes towards student-centered, active learning, and integrates digital technologies to foster skills like critical thinking, collaboration and community, authentic learning and assessment, continuous improvement and reflection and creativity. This framework emphasize the importance of real-world applications, diverse learning experiences, and continuous feedback for both teachers and students,

 

21st century pedagogies include problem-based learning, design thinking, and dialogic teaching (Savery & Duffy, 1995; Luka, 2014; Lawlor et al., 2018; and Teo, 2019). These are approaches that are rooted in social constructionism but with a focus on developing skills as well as knowledge. The paradigm shift, the shift from lesson-based to structure-based approaches to meet the needs of 21st century education, is supported by analyzing the embedded curriculum delivered through structures. In the 21st century, innovative instructional methodologies have significantly encouraged students to learn experientially, especially through collaborative efforts with others (Kivunja, 2015). Innovative pedagogical paradigms represent a transformative shift in how education is conceptualized and delivered (Bunwirat & Boonsathorn, 2018).  Digital technologies serve as tools that enable critical thinking, foster creativity, facilitate collaboration, and enhance communication skills among students (Trilling & Fadel, 2009). This shift in educational focus represents a departure from traditional rote learning practices (Tsai et al., 2013). In the past few decades, various policy frameworks have been developed to address the evolving needs of different pedagogical approaches in higher education. The recent National Education Policy 2020 (NEP) is the outcome to integrate Indian traditional value-based education with the present technology dominated teaching and learning process. It aims to transform the existing education system through a multipronged approach, one of which is developing a pedagogy that makes education more experiential, holistic, integrated, inquiry-driven, discovery-oriented, learner-centered, discussion-based, flexible and enjoyable.

Objective: To understand the common pedagogical paradigms in Higher Education.

• Behaviorist pedagogy:This approach emphasizes teacher-centered instruction, where teachers deliver content through lectures and direct instruction, with the focus on shaping student behavior through reinforcement and repetition.
• Constructivist pedagogy:Constructivism views learning as an active process where learners construct their own knowledge through experience and interaction with their environment.
• Social Constructivist pedagogy:This paradigm highlights the importance of social interaction and collaboration in the learning process, emphasizing that knowledge is not solely or individual constructed but also through interactions with others.
• Liberationist pedagogy:This pedagogy focus on empowering learners and challenging existing power structures, aiming to create a more equitable and just learning environment.
• Learner-centered pedagogy: known as student-centered learning, is a teaching approach that prioritizes the learner’s needs, interests, and active participation in the learning process, shifting the focus from the teacher to the student. This pedagogy prepares educator to foster active, engaged, and autonomous learners, equipping them with the skills and knowledge to create effective and inclusive learning environments.
• Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm: This paradigm, rooted in the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, emphasizes experience, reflection, action, and evaluation within a context of faith and service.
• Language Pedagogy and Non-Language Pedagogy: Language pedagogy focus on teaching and learning languages, while non-language pedagogy encompasses teaching and learning in other subject areas.
• Flipped classroom pedagogy– This pedagogy aims to leverage the strengths of the in-person classroom by focusing on activities that require higher-order thinking and student interaction.Students engage with learning materials, such as pre-recorded lectures, before class, and use class time for interactive activities like problem-solving, discussions, and collaborative work.
• Art-integrated learning pedagogy – prepares educators to create engaging, holistic, and effective learning experiences that foster creativity, critical thinking, and deeper understanding across all subjects, ultimately leading to more well-rounded and successful students.
• Critical pedagogy – emphasizes preparing educators to foster critical thinking, social justice awareness, and empowerment in students, encouraging them to challenge power structures and inequalities.
• Cutting-edge pedagogy–is an innovative and advanced teaching method, including experiential learning, blended learning, 3D printing, and the integration of technology and simulations to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.
• Transformative pedagogy -is an activist pedagogy combining the elements of constructivist and critical pedagogy that empowers students to examine critically their beliefs, values, and knowledge with the goal of developing a reflective knowledge base, an appreciation for multiple perspectives, and a sense of critical consciousness and agency.
• Problem-based learning (PBL) pedagogy – is a pedagogy that uses complex, real-world problems as the primary vehicle for student learning. It moves away from direct instruction and towards a student-centered approach where students actively engage in solving problems, developing skills, and acquiring knowledge through collaboration and reflection.

Objective: To explore the different innovative pedagogy paradigms in Higher Education

Behavioristic pedagogy paradigm– Learning is viewed as a change in observable behavior achieved through reinforcement and repetition, with the teacher taking control of the learning process and focusing on measurable outcomes. Focus on change in observable behavior rather than mental processes, teacher centered approach rote learning, direct instruction, reinforcement i.e. rewards for desirable behavior and repetition i.e. skill and drill exercises, effective for teaching basic skills and facts, clear expectations, structured, standardized and measurable learning outcomes, assessment based on observable behaviors like exam performance.

Examples: Lectures, Micro teaching and Macro teaching skill and drill exercises, Question and Answer sessions, Graded Assignments and Exams, Positive Reinforcement etc.

Challenges:

Focus on observable behaviors and external stimuli, neglecting the cognitive skill processes, emotions, and individual experiences that influence learning, emphasis is on rote learning and direct instruction that can stifle higher-order thinking, creativity, problem-solving and critical thinking, may not be suitable for all learners, limited role for student autonomy and self-directed learning, potential for negative emotional impact like punishments and negative reinforcement can sometimes lead to stress, anxiety, and fear of failure among students that can damage their self-esteem and create a negative learning environment. Narrow assessment of learning outcomes-behavioral learning often relies on measurable outcomes, such as correct responses or task completion, which can be a narrow assessment of learning

Constructivist pedagogy paradigm

Constructivist pedagogy in higher education emphasizes students as active constructors of their own knowledge, rather than passive recipients of information. This approach involves creating learning experiences where students explore, experiment, and reflects on their learning, fostering deeper understanding and engagement. Student-centered learning- engage in activities like project work, problem-based learning, and simulations to construct knowledge. Learning is viewed as building upon existing knowledge and experiences, making it more meaningful and relevant for students. Constructivist pedagogy requires educators to adapt their teaching methods and create learning environments that support student-led learning and knowledge construction. Embracing this approach, higher education institutions can create more engaging and effective learning experiences for their students. Constructivist approaches often involve real-world problems and scenarios, helping students develop practical experience with social interaction and collaboration, reflection and self-assessment, increases engagement and motivation, holistic and in-depth understanding of concepts. Development of critical thinking skills-learn to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information as they construct their own knowledge and problem-solving skills.

Examples: Lifelong learning habits, Problem-based learning, Inquiry-based learning, Case studies, Simulations and role-play etc.

Challenges:

• Lack of structure and support- students may struggle with the autonomy required in constructivist classrooms, leading to a lack of direction and difficulty in completing tasks.
• Challenges for teachers: implementation can be time-consuming, large class sizes and limited time for active learning, managing student behavior and ensuring all students are engaged in the learning process and many teachers may not fully embrace or have the necessary skills to implement constructivist principles effectively.
• Assessment and Evaluation: multiple-choice tests may not be suitable for measuring the depth of understanding gained, need to develop alternative assessment methods, such as projects, presentations, and portfolios, which can be time-consuming and require careful grading.
• Teachers need to create engaging learning experiences and provide positive reinforcement to keep students motivated throughout the learning process.
• Not suitable for all subjects
• Lack of resources and material-ensuring equitable access to technology and providing adequate support can be a challenge for some institutions. There is a potential for unequal outcome.

Social Constructivist Paradigm:

In higher education, the social constructivist paradigm emphasizes learning as a social process where knowledge is actively constructed through interaction and collaboration. This approach shifts the role of the teacher from a knowledge disseminator to a facilitator, guiding students in co-creating understanding and the students construct meaning from their interactions with others, their environment, and their experiences. This paradigm increases student engagement, develops collaboration skills, enhances critical thinking skills, promote in-depth understanding and improves retention

Examples: Debate and discussions, group work, peer-to-peer interaction-allowing students to share ideas, perspectives, and knowledge. Group Projects- projects, engaging in discussions, brainstorming, and sharing ideas to achieve a common goal. Case studies- analyze real-world cases, discussing different perspectives and interpretations to develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Peer Teaching /Tutoring, and Online Forums/Communities etc.

Challenges:

• Teachers need to adjust their teaching methods addressing individual difference to accommodate diverse needs, manage group dynamics and ensure that all students are actively involved and contributing to the learning process and balance guidance and autonomy.
• Students’ inadequate prior knowledge.
• Embarrassment in exposing inadequate understanding to peers.
• Need for certainty.

Liberationist Pedagogy Paradigm

In higher education, the liberationist pedagogy paradigm emphasizes on social justice. It seeks to address issues of inequality and oppression; empowering students to challenge unjust systems, challenging dominant ideologies- encourage to question and critique the dominant norms and power structures that shape society. Enhance student centered learning, dialogue and collaboration: creating a classroom environment where students and teachers engage in dialogue. Critical consciousness: critically analyze their own experiences, the world around them, and the power dynamics at play. Praxis: connecting theory with action, allowing students to apply their learning to real-world situations and social change.

Implementation: Embrace student voices: incorporate student perspectives, experiences, and knowledge into the curriculum. Foster critical thinking: encourage students to analyze information, question assumptions, and develop their own perspectives. Promote dialogue: create opportunities for students to engage in respectful and productive dialogue with one another and with the instructor. Connect theory with practice: design learning experiences that allow students to apply their knowledge to real-world issues and social change. Support student agency: empower students to take ownership of their learning and to become active participants in shaping the learning environment.

Examples: collaborative research: work together on research projects, developing research skills and learning from one another. Student-led discussions: posing questions for their peers, creative expression-showcase their learning through visual art, interpretive dance, or other creative mediums, not just written analysis. Dialogical teaching: teacher facilitates dialogue and critical reflection, focus on student voice-have opportunities to choose topics, tasks, and learning methods that align with their interests and needs, connecting learning to social issues, community-based learning: engage in projects that benefit their community, applying their learning to real-world situations. Student-led projects: choose topics, research questions, and methods of inquiry that are relevant to their interests and experiences. Critical media literacy: students can learn to analyze and critique media messages, understand how they shape our understanding of the world etc.

Challenges:

• Challenge to implement effectively for students with diverse learning styles, prior knowledge, and lived experiences. It requires educators to be flexible and adapt their teaching methods to meet the needs of individual students.
• The emphasis on student voice and choice can sometimes create a challenge for educators to maintain a balanced classroom environment where all students feel heard and valued.
• Liberationist pedagogy needs to be more inclusive in addressing other forms of discrimination, such as gender, race, and identity-based biases, to truly foster a transformative learning environment.
• Implementation and sustainability in higher education requires a shift in teaching styles, assessment methods, and curriculum design. This can be challenging due to institutional structures, faculty resistance, and lack of resources.
• Educators need to develop alternative assessment methods that ensure inclusive and equitable assessment.
• It requires teachers to create more interactive and engaging learning experiences that encourage critical thinking and problem-solving.
• Educators may require changes in their own teaching practices and beliefs.
• It requires teachers to connect with local communities and create opportunities for students to apply their learning in real-world contexts.

Learner-centered pedagogy paradigm

Learner-centered pedagogy places the student at the center of the learning process, recognizing their individual needs, learning styles, and prior experiences. This is a teaching approach that focuses on students’ interests and active participation in their learning. It is also known as student-centered learning. It is based on a constructivist learning theory, encourages students to be more active and participative, starts from students’ interests and objectives, uses real situations and materials to develop deep learning experiences and encourages debates, discussion, and critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills.

Adapting to needs- planning for learning begins with a consideration of learners’ prior knowledge, skills and experiences-adapting to needs .Autonomy-learners work by themselves; learners take responsibility for their own learning; learners not only learn content but also develop their lifelong ‘learning to learn’ skills .Relevant skills- content is meaningful, and relevant to learners’ real lives; learners develop 21st century skills such as analysis, critical thinking, creativity and lifelong learning. Formative assessment- learning is seen as an ongoing process, not just a product; formative assessment is a key part of learning (e.g. self- /peer-assessment).

Examples: -Team projects, writing assignments, role play, service learning assignments, active learning, cooperative learning, and inquiry-based learning, Inductive teaching and learning etc.

Challenges:

• Teachers and learners may struggle to make the shift to learner centered pedagogy.
• Learner centered pedagogy developed in a particular local context and may not be culturally appropriate in all settings.
• Inadequate teaching and learning resources, inadequate time and large class size

Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm

Ignatian pedagogy is a teaching framework that focuses on developing “persons for others” by emphasizing intellectual, spiritual, and emotional growth. It prioritizes a holistic approach to learning, integrating personal experiences, reflection, and action in service to others. Encourages a student-centered approach where learners are active participants in the learning process, fostering a more personal and engaging learning experience.

• Context: The learning environment is designed to help students understand the relevance of the material and connect it to their own lives and experiences.
• Experience: Students engage in various activities like dialogue, debate, simulations, and field trips to actively participate in the learning process.
• Reflection: Students are encouraged to reflect on their experiences, critically analyze their understanding, and connect it to their values and beliefs.
• Action: Students are challenged to take action based on their reflections, applying their learning to real-world situations and making a positive contribution.
• Evaluation: Learning is evaluated not just through academic performance but also through personal growth, reflection on actions, and the overall impact of their contributions.

Examples: Service Learning Projects-Students engage in community service projects related to their academic disciplines, reflecting on the impact of their actions and connecting their learning to real-world problems. Discussions and debates, reflective assignments-students to write reflective essays or journals that analyze their learning experiences, personal growth, and the impact of their actions. Simulations and case studies- to create real-world learning environments where students can apply their knowledge and make decisions based on their understanding. Mentorship programs-connecting students with mentors who can provide guidance and support, helping them develop their skills and make a positive impact on the world etc.

Challenges:

• Integrating Ignatian pedagogy into diverse curricula- requires a deliberate effort to align it with the specific content and learning objectives of each discipline. Faculty may have varying perspectives on the pedagogy, requiring ongoing dialogue and professional development to ensure effective implementation and find ways to apply Ignatian principles to their specific subjects and programs, adapting them to the particular context.
• Engagement in a Digital World- The constant connectivity of the digital age can present barriers to the personal interactions that are central to Ignatian pedagogy, potentially leading to superficial engagement and limited critical thinking.
• Complementing other pedagogical approaches-Educators must consider diverse learning styles and preferences while implementing Ignatian principles, ensuring inclusivity and accessibility for all students. Encouraging interdisciplinary courses and integrating different perspectives can help students develop a holistic understanding of complex issues.
• Fostering critical reflection and action-Ignatian pedagogy emphasizes the importance of both intellectual engagement and practical application, but faculty must find a balance to avoid overemphasizing one over the other.Promoting Discernment: Discernment, a key element of Ignatian pedagogy, requires faculty to create opportunities for students to critically reflect on their experiences and make informed choices. Ignatian pedagogy is rooted in a commitment to social justice, and faculty must find ways to integrate this into their teaching and encourage students to engage with issues of inequality and injustice.

Language Pedagogy and Non-Language Pedagogy paradigm

In higher education, the “language and non-language pedagogy paradigm” refers to the recognition that both language skills and other cognitive abilities, such as non-language subjects, play a vital role in student success and overall learning. Language proficiency is crucial for communication, comprehension, and academic performance, non-language factors like critical thinking, problem-solving, and subject-specific knowledge are equally important. This paradigm emphasizes the need to develop a holistic approach to education that considers both linguistic and non-linguistic aspects of learning.

There are different approaches to language pedagogy-Structural approach emphasizes the importance of grammar and structure. Functional approach focuses on teaching students how language functions for communication. Interactive approach highlights the social and cultural context in which language occurs. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)-emphasizes using language for real-world communication and interaction. Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), Direct Method, Grammar-Translation Method, Audio-Lingual Method, Total Physical Response (TPR), Natural Approach. Language is essential for communication, understanding, and expressing ideas.

Examples: language skills are critical for teaching, academic writing, research, and engaging in discussions, proficiency in the language of instruction to prepare, access course materials and participate effectively in various academic and professional contexts etc.

There are different approaches to non- language pedagogy- constructivism-learners actively construct their own knowledge through experience and interaction, inquiry-based learning-students explore topics through questioning and investigation, collaborative learning-students work together to achieve learning goals, integrative approaches-connect different subjects and learning areas, reflective practice- encourages learners to think critically about their learning process. Students need to be able to analyze information, synthesize concepts, and apply their knowledge to solve real-world problems. These skills are often intertwined with language skills, as understanding complex concepts often requires the ability to express them clearly and accurately.

Examples: Non-language skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, and subject-specific knowledge are crucial for success in various disciplines. Non-language subjects like mathematics, science, engineering, and social sciences contribute to a well-rounded education and prepare students for diverse careers

Integrating Language and Non-Language Skills-Higher education institutions could strive to create learning environments that integrate language and non-language skills. Recognizing the importance of language and non-language skills, higher education institutions can better prepare students for success in their academic pursuits and future careers. Incorporating language-based activities into non-language courses and providing opportunities for students to develop their language skills in a meaningful context.

Examples: Collaborative projects, group discussions, and presentations can help students develop both language and non-language skills simultaneously.

Challenges:

The language and non-language paradigm in higher education presents challenges in areas like curriculum design, resource allocation, teaching methodologies, and student support. It can be difficult to ensure equitable access and support for students learning in diverse linguistic contexts, and to adequately integrate language learning into the broader academic curriculum.

• Challenges in curriculum design-All the students may not have equal access to language learning opportunities, particularly from marginalized communities or those with limited prior language learning experience. It can be challenging to design curriculum that effectively integrates language learning into non-language subjects, ensuring that students develop their linguistic skills alongside their subject matter knowledge. Need to balance language proficiency and academic content is a challenge.
• Challenges in resource allocation-Access to technology and resources-students need access to technology and resources that support their language learning, such as language learning software, online dictionaries, and translation tools. Bilingual or multilingual education programs may require additional funding for qualified teachers, curriculum development, and appropriate learning materials. Teachers need adequate training in both language teaching methodologies and in supporting diverse language learners within a broader academic context.
• Challenges in teaching methodologies-Teachers need to be able to adapt their teaching methods to meet the diverse needs of learners, considering their linguistic backgrounds, learning styles, and academic goals. It’s important to create engaging and interactive learning environments that encourage students to actively participate in the language learning process. Teachers need to develop assessment methods that accurately reflect both language proficiency and academic content knowledge.
• Challenges in student support- some students may experience language-based learning disabilities, which can affect their ability to learn and succeed in academic settings. Students from diverse cultural backgrounds may encounter challenges in navigating the language and non-language curriculum, which can affect their sense of belonging and academic achievement. It’s important to foster student motivation and engagement in language learning by making the learning process relevant and enjoyable.

Flipped classroom pedagogy paradigm

Flipped classroom pedagogy shifts traditional learning by having students engage with content (like pre-recorded lectures) outside of class, freeing up in-class time for interactive activities and deeper learning. Instead of learning in class and practicing at home, students prepare lessons outside the classroom and engage in activities and discussions in the classroom lead to more active and engaged learning experiences, students learn at their own pace and revisit materials as needed, class time is freed up for teacher-student and student-student interactions, fostering a more collaborative learning environment and focus on higher-order thinking-critical thinking, problem-solving, and creative application of knowledge.

• Pre-class: Students access learning materials, such as videos, readings, or online modules, before attending class.
• In-class: Class time is used for interactive activities, discussions, collaborative problem-solving, and applying the learned concepts.
• Post-class: Students may continue to explore the material or work on assignments to deepen their understanding.

Examples: a) Pre-recorded lectures on pedagogical approaches: Students can watch videos explaining different teaching methods before discussing them in class. b) Online modules on classroom management: Students can learn about classroom management strategies online and then practice them in simulated scenarios during class time. c) Case studies and problem-solving activities: Students can analyze real-world teaching scenarios and work collaboratively to find solutions. d) Numerical methods- students are engaged with materials outside of class and apply concepts in the class. e) Short videos on any topic within subject course, are created and shared with students via YouTube or email for pre-lecture preparation. f) Language learning- using videos paired with information slides for pre-class material. g) Non-Language learning -sapling learning, stages of silk worm cycle learning etc.

Challenges:

• Access to technology and resources: Unequal access to all students cost of devices and internet access can be a barrier for some students, some students may lack the necessary digital literacy skills to effectively engage with online learning materials. Creating high-quality online learning materials (videos, readings, etc.) is time-consuming.
• The flipped classroom model can increase teachers’ workload, especially in the initial stages of implementation. Teachers need to be flexible and willing to adapt their teaching style and content delivery.
• Student-related challenges: self-directed learning, lack of immediate feedback, motivation, may resist the change in learning style and the increased responsibility, struggle to communicate with teachers and peers outside of the classroom.

Art-Integrated Learning (AIL) pedagogy paradigm

Art-integrated learning (AIL) pedagogy paradigm in higher education is about learning “through” and “with” the arts, making art the medium for teaching and learning. Integrating art-based learning pedagogy  involves using art as a tool to enhance teaching and learning, fostering holistic development (cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains) simultaneously, promoting a more complete learning experience and experiential learning, and preparing teachers to implement art-integrated approaches in their classrooms. AIL is an innovative and constructivist learning pedagogy that uses various art forms (dance, drama, music, visual arts, etc.) as a medium for teaching and learning. Enhance teacher skills, improve student engagement, deeper understanding of concepts and cross-disciplinary approach. Art integration helps to develop crucial 21st-century skills like creativity and innovation, critical thinking, social and emotional development, inclusive education, life-long learning, communication, and collaboration. Research suggests that art integration can improve academic achievement and retention.

Implementing -Providing teachers with training and resources on how to effectively integrate art into their curriculum, ensuring access to the necessary art materials and resources and exploring how technology can enhance AIL, such as using online art tools, digital portfolios, or virtual museum tours.

Examples: a) Language Arts-storytelling through puppetry, poetry and performance, drama and role-playing: use drama and role-playing to explore historical events, social issues, or literary characters, promoting empathy and critical thinking. b) Mathematics-geometric art, musical rhythms and fractions: Use music to teach fractions and rhythms, demonstrating how mathematical concepts can be expressed through sound. c) Science-nature inspired art: students create art inspired by natural phenomena, like painting a sunset or sculpting a model of cell. Science experiments as performances: Turn science experiments into theatrical performances, making learning engaging and memorable d) Social Studies-Historical Dioramas: students create diorama models of historical events or places, fostering an understanding of history through visual representation e) Cultural performances: explore different cultures through music, dance, and storytelling, promoting intercultural understanding and appreciation etc.

Challenges:

• Faculty needs to be equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively integrate art into their disciplines, which requires professional development opportunities.
• Implementing art-integrated learning can be time-consuming,
• Access to appropriate art materials, software, and equipment can be a barrier,
• Need new strategies to develop for assessment and evaluating.
• Art-integrated learning is accessible to all students, including those with disabilities or limited access to technology, is crucial.
• Bridging the gap between art and other disciplines is essential to find effective ways to connect art-based activities with the specific subject matter and learning objectives of other disciplines.

Critical pedagogy paradigm

Critical pedagogy is a teaching approach that views education as a political and social act acknowledges that education is not neutral and is always influenced by social and political forces. In higher education it can be incorporated into the curriculum by selecting readings, activities, and discussions that address social justice issues and promote critical thinking. Aims to develop students’ awareness of social and political issues, empowering them to understand their own place in the world and how it is shaped by power relations. It emphasizes the importance of connecting theoretical concepts with real-world experiences and applying knowledge to address social issues. It emphasizes critical thinking and the ability to question assumptions and dominant narratives, values dialogue and collaboration between teachers and students, viewing them as co-learners. It seeks to create an educational experience that liberates individuals from oppression and empowers them to transform their own lives and society.

Examples: Using real-world problems and issues as learning materials, student-led discussions and debates, inquiry-based learning, promoting dialogue and participation, promoting collaborative projects and community engagement based learning in the classrooms, using case studies and real-world examples to explore social issues, encouraging student teachers to reflect on their own assumptions, promoting dialogue and collaboration and providing opportunities to engage in social action and activism. Critical analysis of media and culture: examining how media and popular culture reinforce or challenge existing power structures and social inequalities. Focus on social justice- importance of addressing social inequities and promoting a more just and equitable society etc.

Challenges:

• Many educators may lack the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively implement critical pedagogy, as they may not have been exposed to it during their pre-service training.
• Resistance from the students and faculty, as well as conflicts with institutional expectations, policies, and evaluation systems, that often prioritize traditional teaching methods and standardized assessments, is a challenge.
• Implementation requires significant time and resources for curriculum development, pedagogical training, and ongoing support, which can be challenging to obtain in a busy academic environment.
• Institutions may not provide adequate resources, training, or support for faculty to effectively implement, such as access to relevant materials, technology, and professional development opportunities.
• Difficulty in engaging all students: challenging to implement in large lecture halls or courses with diverse student learning styles and needs.
• It is politically charged, potentially leading to the polarization of views and hindering open dialogue and understanding.

Cutting-edge pedagogy paradigm

Cutting-edge pedagogy in higher education involves innovative teaching and learning approaches that utilize technology and emphasize student-centered, active learning experiences. This includes methods like project-based learning, flipped classrooms, inquiry-based learning, blended learning, gamification-incorporating game-like elements, such as points, badges, and leader boards, to motivate and engage students all of which aim to personalize and improve the learning process. Higher education institutions can create more engaging, effective, and relevant learning experiences for students like:

• Experiential Learning: Learning through direct experience and reflection, rather than solely relying on lectures or textbooks. Enhances understanding, promotes critical thinking, develops practical skills, and fosters a deeper connection to the subject matter.

Examples- Field trips, internships, simulations, service-learning projects, and real-world problem-solving activities etc.

• Blended Learning: This is combining online and traditional classroom instruction to create a more flexible and engaging learning environment. This allows for personalized learning, caters to diverse learning styles, and provides access to a wider range of resources and opportunities.

Examples- Using online modules, interactive simulations, and virtual field trips to supplement in-person instruction etc.

• 3D Printing and Immersive Experiences: Utilizing 3D printing to create tangible models and simulations, and employing immersive technologies like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to create engaging learning experiences enhances visualization, promotes hands-on learning, and provides opportunities for creativity and problem-solving.

Examples: Students can design and print 3D models of anatomical structures, explore historical sites through VR, or simulate complex scientific processes etc.

• Employability Skills and Service Learning: Integrating skills relevant to the workforce and community engagement into the curriculum prepares students for future careers, fosters civic engagement, and promotes a sense of social responsibility.

Examples: Teaching students how to communicate effectively, collaborate on projects, and solve problems in real-world contexts through service-learning projects etc.

• Learning Analytics: Using data to monitor student progress identify areas where students need additional support, and personalize instruction improves student outcomes, promotes more effective teaching, and allows educators to make data-driven decisions.

Examples: Analyzing student performance data to identify learning gaps, providing targeted feedback, and adjusting teaching strategies accordingly etc.

Challenges:

• Financial and infrastructural constraints: Implementing new technologies and pedagogies, including training and support for faculty, can be expensive, to provide the necessary infrastructure, such as reliable internet access, updated software, and hardware, to support new teaching methods.
• Resistance to change and lack of training: Some faculty may be resistant to adopting new technologies and pedagogies due to comfort with traditional methods or a lack of training and support. Institutions need to provide adequate training and ongoing support for faculty to effectively integrate new pedagogies into their teaching practices.
• The digital divide- students may lack access to necessary technology and internet connectivity. Ensuring that all students have equal access to technology and support, regardless of their background or location, is crucial for equitable implementation of new pedagogies.
• Data privacy and security-Implementing technologies like learning analytics and AI raises concerns about data privacy and security, requiring institutions to develop robust policies and practices.
• Teacher education challenges- curricula may not be aligned with the needs of the 21st century, making it difficult to implement new pedagogies. Problem of selecting suitable candidates, problem of employment for the teacher education faculty, lack of professionalism from the teacher educators, lack of good practice teaching and lack of proper guidance and supervision.

Transformative pedagogy paradigm

Transformative pedagogy in higher education shifts from traditional teaching methods to learner-centered approach that emphasizes critical thinking, inquiry, and social action. Encourages students to become active learners and take ownership of their learning, develop a more profound understanding of the subject matter and its connections to real-world issues, ability to analyze information, evaluate arguments, and make informed decisions. It aims to foster deep learning and personal transformation by engaging students in dialogue, reflective practice, and co-creation of meaning.

Examples: Problem-based learning, Project-based learning, collaborative learning, service-learning where students integrate learning with community service, applying their knowledge and skills to real-world problems etc.

Challenges:

• Institutional inertia and resistance: Transformative learning requires questioning assumptions and embracing new approaches, which can be uncomfortable for both students and educators who are used to traditional methods.Need for institutional support- need resources, training, and recognition for educators who adopt these methods, and without institutional backing, it may face barriers to implementation
• Limited resources:implementing transformative pedagogy can be costly, requiring investment in new technologies, curriculum redesign, and professional development for faculty, according to a study on transformative horizons in education.
• Digital divide and equity: Transformative pedagogy often relies on technology and digital resources, but access may be limited for some students, creating an inequitable learning environment.
• Digital literacy: ensuring that both educators and students have the necessary digital literacy skills to effectively utilize technology in transformative learning is crucial, according to a study on transformative horizons in education.
• Curriculum redesign-Transformative learning requires a substantial redesign of curricula to promote sustainability, social change, and ecological literacy.

Problem based learning (PBL) pedagogy paradigm

Problem Based Learning places the student at the center of the learning process, emphasizing active learning and self-directed exploration. Students take ownership of their learning by identifying knowledge gaps, seeking out resources, and reflecting on their learning process. It emphasizes the application of theoretical knowledge to real-world problems, helping students develop a deeper understanding of concepts and fosters the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, collaboration, and self-directed learning skills. PBL is a powerful pedagogy that can enhance learning and skill development in higher education. However, it requires careful planning, training, and adaptation to be implemented successfully. Problem-based learning (PBL) in higher education involves students working in groups to tackle complex, real-world problems, fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and self-directed learning.

Examples: a)Developing a business plan for a startup, b) analyzing a historical event, or c) designing a solution to an environmental issue, d) designing a curriculum for a specific age group or developing a lesson plan for a particular subject e)medical education: students are presented with patient case, including symptoms and history, and work in groups to diagnose the condition and create a treatment plan, f) STEM Projects-design a bridge, develop a sustainable energy solution, or solve other engineering problems, applying scientific and mathematical principles, g)community projects like food bank awareness and volunteering etc.

Challenges:

Implementing PBL effectively requires a) careful planning and preparation of problems and learning materials: require students to take on a greater responsibility for their learning, which can be challenging for some. b) Resource and infrastructure limitations: require access to reliable resources, technology, and learning management systems, which may not be available in all institutions. c) Teachers need to be trained in the principles and practices of PBL to effectively facilitate the learning process and manage group dynamics. d) Traditional assessment methods may not be suitable for PBL, and new assessment strategies may need to be developed.

Objective: To review the literature on the challenges in implementing the different pedagogy approaches in Higher Education

Implementing innovative pedagogical approaches in education is essential for preparing students for the demands of the 21st century, yet this transition faces significant challenges. Resistance to change from parents, teachers, and administrators (Doğru & Inandi, 2023), deeply ingrained in traditional teaching methods, requires comprehensive professional development and a culture of continuous learning to overcome. Additionally, technological access, specialized training, updated materials, and other resources are often needed, but budget constraints, especially in low-income areas, make these investments difficult (Htwe et al., 2024). Traditional assessment methods like standardized tests may not measure the skills nurtured by innovative approaches, necessitating the development of new assessments and policy changes. Teachers must undergo substantial professional development to acquire new skills and adapt to technology, which is resource-intensive and logistically challenging (Zhou & Eslami, 2023). The shift to these approaches requires extra time for planning and collaboration, often constrained by fixed curricula and time frames. Parental and community expectations about education can also lead to resistance, highlighting the need for effective communication and engagement (Pinquart & Ebeling, 2020). Ensuring equitable implementation is critical to avoid exacerbating educational inequalities, particularly in disadvantaged areas. Scaling successful approaches beyond individual classrooms or schools presents additional challenges related to sustainability, consistency, and alignment with existing systems (Rolfe & Holley, 2023). Furthermore, ongoing research and evaluation are necessary to ensure effectiveness, but these processes are resource-intensive and time-consuming

Objective: To review the literature on the strategies for addressing challenges and implementing the innovative pedagogy approaches of the 21^st century.

Comprehensive professional development for educators is crucial to equip with the skills and knowledge needed to implement these approaches effectively, along with ongoing training and support to address resistance and enhance teacher readiness (Seprudin, 2024). Prioritizing resource allocation is vital to bridge the digital divide and provide necessary technology and materials, especially in underprivileged communities, through partnerships, grants, and budget allocation (Jafari et al., 2024). Rethinking assessment methods to align with innovative approaches is necessary, as exploring alternatives like performance-based assessments and portfolios to measure 21st-century skills better (Kaing & Kol, 2023). Developing inclusive and culturally responsive curricula that reflect diverse backgrounds and perspectives promotes an inclusive educational environment (Caingcoy, 2023). Promoting collaboration among educators to share best practices and insights helps address equity and inclusion challenges while engaging parents and communities in decision-making builds supportive networks (Ainscow, 2023). Flexibility in scheduling allows time for project-based learning, collaboration, and student-centered activities (Pudjiarti et al., 2024), fostering innovation within the curriculum. Advocacy for policies prioritizing equity and inclusion in education, along with revising existing policies, ensures that the needs of underserved populations are addressed. Regular data collection and analysis on student performance, resource allocation, and participation in innovative approaches help identify disparities and adjust strategies to promote equity (Kubegenova et al., 2022). Addressing the challenges and ensuring equitable access, inclusion while implementing innovative pedagogical approaches is essential to promote fairness and maximize the benefits to all the students. Current socio-economic demands and challenges posed by the fourth industrial revolution (Lesufi, 2017) requires an altogether new paradigm shift in our education systems. In corroboration, Goodwin (2019) propounded that shifts in pedagogical practices are necessary in alignment with pervasive digital technology in the interest of the changing times. With regard to these enlightenments, pedagogical strategies for teaching and learning have to transform alongside digitization as technology proved to be equally influential and pervading all spheres of our lives the world over. Congruently, Mohamed (2014) and Lazarov (2018) posit that the aforementioned teaching strategic-shifts promulgates 21st century pedagogies that enable schools and surrounding areas to address issues of learners’ engagement, challenges, achievement and disciplines so as to prosper in the 21st century world of work.

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSIONS

In the 21st century, innovative instructional methodologies have significantly encouraged students to learn experientially, especially through collaborative efforts with others (Kivunja, 2015). Innovative pedagogical paradigms represent a transformative shift in how education is conceptualized and delivered (Bunwirat & Boonsathorn, 2018). These paradigms prioritize learner-centered approaches, emphasizing active engagement, critical thinking, and problem-solving over passive absorption of information. These paradigms recognize that students have diverse learning styles and paces, allowing for greater flexibility in curriculum design. Moreover, these paradigms frequently promote interdisciplinary learning, collaboration, and real-world application of knowledge, preparing learners for academic success and the challenges and opportunities of the rapidly changing world. By challenging traditional notions of education, innovative pedagogical paradigms empower students to become more autonomous, curious, and adaptable learners, better equipped to thrive in the complexities of the 21st century.

Design thinking encourages students to identify and solve problems using a human-centered approach. It typically involves stages like empathizing, defining the problem, ideating, prototyping, and testing solutions. Design thinking fosters innovation and a deep understanding of user needs. Blended learning is an educational approach that combines traditional in-person instruction with online learning to enhance students’ learning outcomes (Garner & Oke, 2015). Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) remains a potent tool in promoting 21st-century education, as it is recognized as an effective pedagogical approach. The principles of IBL encourage students to actively practice and acquire essential skills and knowledge during the learning process (Pedaste et al., 2012). Project-based learning, rooted in three constructivist principles, is an instructional method that prioritizes student-centered learning. These principles emphasize that learning is context-specific; learners are actively involved in the learning process and attain their objectives through social interactions and the exchange of knowledge and understanding (Cocco, 2006). Personalized and adaptive learning presents significant opportunities for enhancing learning (Taylor et al., 2021). Collaboration is an emerging and promising form of human interaction that has gained prominence in the 21st century. Collaborative learning is an educational method wherein group of students collaborate to address challenges, accomplish assignments, or generate creative outputs (Laal & Ghodsi, 2012). Gamification represents an innovative learning approach, given to the continuous emergence of new technologies and applications (Al-Azawi et al., 2016). It incorporates game elements, such as competition and rewards, into the learning process to make it more engaging and motivating. Game-based learning uses actual games to teach specific concepts or skills, promoting active participation and skill development (Chen et al., 2014). Integrating Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality technologies into education and training enhances existing teaching methods within a more diverse educational setting and holds significant importance for the education sector (Tan et al., 2022). AR and VR technologies offer immersive and interactive learning experiences. Technology integration in pedagogy has become an essential component of modern education. It involves the deliberate use of technology tools and resources to enhance the teaching-learning process (Othman et al., 2024). Technology integration can make learning more relevant, engaging and interactive to students’ lives when effectively implemented. According to Razzouk and Shute (2012), design thinking is a dynamic and imaginative process that encourages learners to explore experiments, create prototypes, collect feedback, and iteratively refine their ideas. Educators often blend these approaches to create dynamic learning environments that adapt to various subjects and settings. This dedication to inclusivity not only prepares students for success but also contributes to a more, just and equitable society. This necessitates a shift in pedagogical paradigms to align with the policy’s objectives of creating a more dynamic and inclusive learning environment towards attainment of optimal outcomes in the domains of physical and motor development, cognitive development, socio-emotional–ethical development, cultural-artistic development and the development of communication, literacy, and numeracy (NEP 2020).

Comparison of different Innovative Pedagogy Paradigms in Higher Education
MAIN ASPECTS	EXAMPLES/TECHNIQUES	CHALLENGES
1.Behaviorist pedagogy Ø  Teacher as the Primary Source of Knowledge Ø  Observable Behaviors Ø  Reinforcement and Punishment Ø  Structured Learning Ø  Direct Instruction	Ø  Lecturing Ø  Demonstration Ø  Repetition. Ø  Rote Learning Ø  Reinforcement Ø  Punishment	Ø  Lack of Student Agency Ø  Focus on Surface Level Learning Ø  Potential for Negative Impact on motivation Ø  Understand the traditional teaching approaches. Ø  Developing effective instructional strategies Ø Critically evaluating different teaching methods
2.Constructivist pedagogy Ø  Active Learning: Ø  Collaborative Learning Ø  Learner-Centered Approach Ø  Real-World Connections Ø  Reflection and Assessment Ø  Deeper Understanding Ø  Increase Engagement Ø  Enhance Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills Ø  Greater Ownership of Learning	Ø  Case Studies Ø  Simulations Ø  Debates Ø  Group projects Ø  Peer teaching	1. Institutional and Resource Constraints: Ø  Insufficient Resources Ø  Lack of Training Ø  Time Constraints Ø  Rigorous Assessment Methods Ø  Prioritization of Enrollment 2. Student-Related Challenges: Ø  Inadequate Prior Knowledge Ø  Shame of Exposing Lack of Understanding Ø  Need for Certainty Ø  Intragroup Conflicts Ø  Resistance to Collaborative Learning 3. Educator-Related Challenges: Ø  Lack of Commitment Ø  Difficulty Balancing Structure and Openness Ø  Controversial Issues Ø  Assessing Students Learning 4. Other Challenges: Ø  Lack of Alignment with Curriculum Ø  Public Perception Ø  Difficulty Measuring Outcomes
3.Social Constructivist pedagogy Ø  Learning as a social process Ø  Active participation Ø  Teacher as facilitator Ø  Focus on understanding Ø  Importance of shared meaning Ø  Increase student engagement and motivation Ø  Develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills Ø  Enhance understanding and retention Ø  Preparation for future professional and social life	1. Collaborative Projects and Group Discussions: Ø  Real-world applications, Classroom discussions Ø  Peer review and feedback Ø  Example:  group project- students analyze a case study and develop a solution, presenting their findings to the class. 2. Reciprocal Teaching and Peer Teaching: Ø  Student-led learning Ø  Focus on explanation and justification Ø  Example: student tutoring the classmate on a difficult concept, or a class discussion where students explain different viewpoints and theories 3. Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL): Ø  Student-driven questions Ø  Real-world connections Example: Students researching a current event and developing a presentation based on their findings, 4. Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Ø  Real-world problems Ø  Collaborative problem-solving Example: A group of students designing a solution to a community issue, such as urban planning or environmental sustainability	1. Student Concerns: Ø  Inadequate prior knowledge Ø  Embarrassment Ø  Need for certainty 2. Pedagogical and Practical Challenges Ø  Managing group work Ø  Insufficient guidance and feedback Ø  Cultural differences 3. Institutional limitations Ø  Lack of resources Ø  Rigorous assessment methods Ø  Limited pedagogical training Ø  Prioritization of quantity over quality
4.Liberationist pedagogy   Ø  Student Empowerment Ø  Critical Consciousness Ø  Social Justice Ø  Collaboration and Dialogue Ø  Relevance to Real-World Issues Ø  Increase Student Engagement Ø  Develop Critical Thinking Skills Ø  Improve Social Justice Awareness. Ø  Empowerment and Self-Confidence Ø  Enhanced Community Engagement	Ø  Inquiry-Based Learning Ø  Problem-Based Learning Ø  Active Participation Ø  Reflection and Self-Awareness Ø  Community Engagement Ø  Problem-Posing Education Ø  Student-Led Discussions Ø  Creative and Experiential Learning Ø  Collaborative Projects Ø  Invisible Theatre Ø  Focus on Critical Consciousness Ø  Incorporating Student Voices and Experiences Ø  Using a Democratic Approach Ø  Treating the Teacher as a Learner	1. Resistance to Change: Ø  Traditional Teaching Methods Ø  Lack of Institutional Support Ø  Instructor Resistance 2. Implementation Challenges Ø  Transformative Approaches Ø  Assessment Issues Ø  Curriculum Relevance Ø  Student Diversity 3. Societal and Institutional Changes: Ø  Systemic Issues Ø  Need for Collaboration
5.Learner-centered pedagogy Ø  Active Learning Ø  Individualized Learning Ø  Student Agency Ø  Collaborative Learning Ø  Constructivist Approach Ø  Increase  Engagement and Motivation Ø  Deeper Understanding and Retention Ø  Develop Essential Skills Ø  Preparation for Lifelong Learning	Ø  Project-Based Learning Ø  Inquiry-Based Learning Ø  Problem-Based Learning Ø  Cooperative Learning Ø  Differentiated Instruction	1. Time Constraints and Planning: Ø  Time for preparation Ø  Individual attention Ø  Large class sizes 2. Teacher Knowledge and Skills: Ø  Lack of expertise Ø  Transition from traditional roles 3. Resistance to Change: Ø  Traditional approaches Ø  Lack of support 4. Diverse Student Needs: Ø  Addressing diverse learners Ø  Managing classroom dynamics 5. Resource Constraints: Ø  Lack of materials and resources Ø  Inadequate support 6. Implementation Challenges: Ø  Inconsistency in implementation Ø  Managing disruptive behavior Ø  Lack of clear goals and criteria   Overcoming these challenges: Ø  Professional development Ø  Collaboration and support Ø  Focus on student engagement Ø  Flexibility and adaptability Ø  Clear communication
6.Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm Ø  Emphasizes a holistic approach to education, Ø  Focusing on intellectual, spiritual, and emotional   Involves these five key elements: Ø  Context Ø  Experience Ø  Reflection Ø  Action Ø  Evaluation	Ø  Experience-Based Learning Ø  Service Learning Ø  Case Studies Ø  Experiential Courses Ø  Reflection and Discernment Ø  Journaling and Reflective Essays Ø  Group Discussions and Debates Ø  Personalized Feedback Ø  Action and Service Ø  Community Engagement Ø  Leadership Development Ø  Advocacy and Social Justice Ø  Evaluation and Growth: Formative Assessment &Summative Assessment Ø  Self-Assessment   Specific examples Ø  Care for the Whole Person Ø  Community and Dialogue Ø  Faith and Values Ø  Transcendence	1. Integrating Reflection and Experiential Learning: Ø  Practical Implementation Ø  Accessibility for All Ø  Curriculum Integration 2. Adapting to Modern Educational Landscape: Ø  AI and the Future of Education Ø  Online Learning and the Core Principles Ø  Navigating Curriculum Pressures 3. Challenges in Implementation and Training: Ø  Faculty Development Ø  Measuring Impact Ø  Overcoming Resistance 4. Ensuring Social Justice and Equity Ø  Relevance to Students’ Lives Ø  Promoting Social Justice Ø  Addressing Bias
7.Language Pedagogy and Non-Language Pedagogy   Language Pedagogy: Ø  Importance: essential for academic success, particularly in fields requiring strong communication skills like literature, journalism, and international studies. Ø  Methods: Language pedagogy employs various approaches, including structural, functional, and interactive methods, each with its own strengths   Non-Language Pedagogy: Ø  Importance: Strong language skills are crucial for effective communication and understanding in all subject areas. Non-language pedagogy can be enhanced by incorporating strategies that support language learning. Ø  Methods: Non-language teachers can use techniques like: ·        Modeling language: Demonstrating the correct language usage. ·        Pre-teaching vocabulary: Introducing key terms before lectures. ·        Designing activities: Creating assignments that require language use and critical thinking.	Language Pedagogy Ø  Blended learning: Combining online and in-person instruction. Ø  Project-based learning: Engaging students in collaborative projects that require language use. Ø  Video conferencing and blogging: Utilizing technology for interactive language practice. Non-language Pedagogy Ø  Incorporate language activities: Writing assignments, presentations, and group discussions in all subjects. Ø  Provide language support: Offering grammar workshops, tutoring, and language learning resources. Ø  Use clear and concise language: Avoiding jargon and ensuring that instructions are easy to understand.   Ø  Interconnections: ·        Language as a tool ·        Non-language as a context for language ·        Teacher collaboration: Collaboration between language and non-language educators can create more engaging and effective learning experiences.	Challenges in Language Pedagogy: Ø  Language Proficiency and Support Ø  Language Discrimination Ø  Maintaining Cultural Identity Ø  Lack of Exposure and Practice Ø  Text Selection and Cultural Relevance Ø  Teacher Preparation Ø  Resource Allocation Ø  Linguistic Endangerment     Challenges in Non-Language Pedagogy: Ø  Teacher Training and Expertise Ø  Relevance and Engagement Ø  Learning Disabilities Ø  Motivation and Discipline Ø  Lack of Resources Ø  Alignment with Learning Styles Addressing the Challenges: Ø  Multilingual Education Ø  Language Support Programs Ø  Teacher Training and Development
8.Flipped classroom pedagogy   Ø  Pre-class learning Ø  In-class activities Ø  Post-class reinforcement Ø  Increase student engagement Ø  Enhance learning outcomes Ø  Improve critical thinking and problem-solving skills Ø  Personalized learning Ø  Greater flexibility and accessibility	Ø  Pre-recorded lectures Ø  Online modules and interactive learning Ø  In-class activities Ø  Problem-based learning Ø  case studies Ø  Peer instruction Ø  Technology integration	Ø  Need for instructor expertise and planning Ø  Technology and infrastructure requirements Ø  Student willingness and preparedness
9.Art-integrated learning pedagogy   Ø  Learning through the arts and with the arts Ø  Experiential learning Ø  Diverse art forms Ø  Focus on skills Ø  Holistic development Ø  Student-centered approach Ø  Enhance engagement Ø  Deeper understanding Ø  Improve  retention Ø  Increase  creativity and innovation Ø  Development of 21st-century skills Ø  Inclusivity	Ø  Visual arts Ø  Performing arts Ø  Music Ø  Interdisciplinary projects	1. Teacher Preparation and Expertise: Ø  Lack of training Ø  Time constraints Ø  Comfort level Ø  Need for interdisciplinary collaboration 2. Resource Limitations: Ø  Lack of funding Ø  Physical space constraints 3. Curriculum and Assessment: Ø  Curriculum overload Ø  Assessment challenges Ø  Stagnating course delivery 4. Technology and Accessibility: Ø  Technological disparities Ø  Adapting hands-on activities 5. Systemic Issues: Ø  Lack of vision Ø  Outdated models of teaching Ø  Need for continuous improvement
10.Critical pedagogy   Ø  Challenging Dominant Narratives Ø  Focusing on Social Justice Ø  Developing Critical Consciousness Ø  Promoting Dialogue and Reflection Ø  Empowering Students	Ø  Using real-world problems and issues as learning materials, Ø  Student-led discussions and debates, Ø  Inquiry-based learning, Ø  Promoting dialogue and participation, Ø  Promoting collaborative projects and community engagement based learning in the classrooms, Ø  Using case studies and real-world examples to explore social issues, Ø  Encouraging student teachers to reflect on their own assumptions, Ø  Promoting dialogue and collaboration Ø  Providing opportunities to engage in social action and activism. Ø  Critical analysis of media and culture: Ø  Focus on social justice Ø  Studying social movements Ø  Engaging in participatory research	Specific Challenges: Ø  Lack of Teacher Preparation Ø  Student Resistance Ø  De-centering Authority Ø  Potential for Negative Consequences Ø  Assessment Challenges Ø  Institutional Barriers Ø  Misinterpretation and Resistance Strategies for Addressing Challenges: Ø  In-service Training and Mentorship Ø  Creating Supportive Classroom Environments Ø  Reframing Assessment Ø  Collaborating with Institutional Leaders Open Dialogue and Transparency
11.Cutting-edge pedagogy   Ø  Technology Integration Ø  Student-Centered Learning Ø  Active Learning Ø  Skill Development Ø  Personalized Learning Ø  Data-Driven Instruction	Ø  Project-Based Learning Ø  Flipped Classrooms Ø  Inquiry-Based Learning Ø  Collaborative Learning Ø  Gamification Ø  Blended Learning Ø  Experiential Learning Ø  3D Printing and Immersive Experiences Ø  Employability Skills and Service Learning Ø  Learning Analytics	Ø  Financial Constraints Ø  Resistance to Change Ø  Infrastructure Limitations Ø  Inadequate Teacher Training Ø  Lack of Student Awareness Ø  Equity and Access Ø  Assessment and Evaluation Ø  Bureaucratic Structures Ø  Discipline-Specific Challenges Ø  Curriculum Relevance Ø  Student Attention Spans Ø  Multiple Modes of Learning
12.Transformative pedagogy     Ø  Student-centered Ø  Critical Reflection Ø  Social Justice Ø  Action-Oriented Ø  Dialogue and Collaboration Ø  Increased Engagement Ø  Develop Critical Thinking Skills Ø  Social Change Ø  Personal Transformation	Ø  Problem-Based Learning Ø  Project-Based Learning Ø  Community-Based Learning Ø  Experiential Learning Ø  Reflective Journaling	Ø  Curriculum Relevance and Real-World Application Ø  Traditional Course Delivery Ø  Balancing Control and Flexibility Ø  Addressing Resistance Ø  Uncertainty and Resourcefulness Ø  Assessment. Ø  Time and Resources
13.Problem-based learning (PBL) pedagogy   Ø  Student-centered learning Ø  Real-world problems Ø  Collaboration and teamwork Ø  Self-directed learning Ø  Critical thinking and analysis Ø  Improved problem-solving skills Ø  Enhance critical thinking Ø  Increase student engagement Ø  Greater knowledge retention Ø  Develop collaborative skills	Ø  Developing a business plan for a startup, Ø  Analyzing a historical event, or designing a solution to an environmental issue, Ø  Designing a curriculum for a specific age group or developing a lesson plan for a particular subject, Ø  Medical education- patient case, including symptoms and history, and work in groups to diagnose the condition and create a treatment plan, Ø  Engineering-STEM Projects-design a bridge, develop a sustainable energy solution, or solve other engineering problems, applying scientific and mathematical principles, Ø  community projects like- food bank awareness and volunteering Ø  Law–students could be assigned a case study to analyze legal precedents	Ø  Requires significant preparation Ø  Can be time-consuming. Ø  Require students to be self-motivated Ø   require adjustments to assessment methods

The NEP 2020 aims to revolutionize India’s education system by adopting learner-centered, holistic, and experiential approaches, moving away from rote learning and towards critical thinking and skill development. Innovative pedagogical approaches are crucial in preparing learners for the modern world’s demands. However, successful implementation relies on supportive educational policies, despite challenges. Educators remain committed to embracing innovation, driven by the potential to better prepare students for the future. Collaboration among teachers, administrators, policymakers, and communities is essential to overcome obstacles and adapt to changes in the educational landscape. A commitment to equity ensures that the benefits of innovative education reach every learner, regardless of their background, abilities, or circumstances. These methods, which focus on creativity, collaboration, technology integration, and experiential learning, enable students to navigate and contribute to the complexities of the 21st century.

REFERENCES                                                                                        

1. Ainscow, M. (2023). Collaboration as a strategy for promoting equity in education. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed., pp. 281-292). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-818630-5.05048-X
2. Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., & Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational gamification vs. game based learning: Comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4), 132-136.
3. Bharti, R. (2022). NEP 2020: A Paradigm shift in Skill-Based Higher Education. Retrieved on June 7, 2023 from: https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/nep-2020-a-paradigm-shift-in-skill-based-higher-education/
4. Bunwirat, N., & Boonsathorn, S. (2018). Inquiry-based learning: An effective pedagogical approach for empowering 21st century learners and education 4.0 in Thailand. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 9(1), 163-183.
5. Caingcoy, M.(2023). Culturally responsive pedagogy: A systematic overview. Diversitas Journal, 8(4), 3203 – 3212. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4842773
6. Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 389-398.
7. Chen, H. R., Jian, C. H., Lin, W. S., Yang, P. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2014). Design of digital game-based learning in elementary school mathematics. In 2014 7th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops (pp. 322-325). IEEE.
8. Cocco, S. (2006). Student leadership development: The contribution of project-based learning. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC.
9. Doğru, S., & Inandi, Y. (2023). Association between Personality Traits of School Administrator and Resistance to Change. I-manager’s Journal of Educational Psychology, doi: 10.26634/jpsy.16.4.19201
10. Garba, S. A., Byabazaire, Y.,& Busthami, A. H. (2015). Toward the use of 21st century teaching-learning approaches: The trend of development in Malaysian schools within the context of Asia Pacific. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(4).
11. Garner, B., & Oke, L. (2014). Blended learning: Theoretical foundations. Marion, IN: Indiana Wesleyan University
12. Goodwin, J. (2019). Our creativity ambition for South Africa’s classrooms: How can we enhance creativity in education systems? The lego foundation of the group. Retrieved from: https://www.legofoundation.com/en/why-play/skills-for-holistic-development/creativity-matters/creativity-matters-report-series/creating-systems/
13. Gupta, B. L., and Choubey, A. K. (2021). Higher Education Institutions–Some Guidelines for Obtaining and Sustaining Autonomy in the Context of NEP 2020. Higher Education, 9(1).
14. Hirschman, K., & Wood, B. (2018). 21st century learners: Changing conceptions of knowledge, learning and the child. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 23, 20.
15. Htwe, O., Yuliawiratman, B. S., Tannor, A. Y., MZ, N. A., Soh, E., Naicker, M. S., & Naicker, A. S. (2024). Barriers and facilitators for increased accessibility to quality rehabilitation services in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 60(3), 514–522
16. Jafari, S., Naeeni, S. K., & Nouhi, N. (2024). Decision-Making Strategies in the Allocation of Educational Resources. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 3(2), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jrmde.3.2.5
17. Kaing, S., & Kol, R. (2023). Rethinking teaching and learning assessments in the 21st century. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 78-90. doi: 10.62037/cjer.2023.03.02.05
18. Kivunja, C. (2015). Innovative methodologies for 21st century learning, teaching and assessment: A convenience sampling investigation into the use of social media technologies in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 1-26.
19. Kubegenova, A., Abuova, Z., Gumarova, A., & Kamalova, G. (2022). Using the Data Mining Tool to Analyze Student Performance. In International Conference on Internet and Modern Society (pp. 39-51). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-50609-3_4
20. Kumari, D. (2022). New Education Policy 2020 Paradigm Shift in Education. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 11(6), 1212.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR22620101516
21. Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490.
22. Lazarov, L. (2018). Education in the 21st century – pedagogical approaches In digital environment. ‘e-teacher’ information system. Eastern Academic Journal, 2(2), 13-25.
23. Lesufi, P. (2017). Educating our children for the fourth industrial revolution. 2016/17 VOTE 5: Educations annual Report debate. Mr Panyaza Lesufi, Member of the Executive Council for Education, Gauteng legislature – 30 November 2017.
24. Mahajan, R. L., Mueller, R., Williams, C. B., Reed, J., Campbell, T. A., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2012). Cultivating emerging and black swan technologies. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 45226, pp. 549-557). American Society of Mechanical Engineers
25. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide.Falmer Press/Taylor & Francis, Inc.
26. Mohamed, A., E. (2014). Blended & flipped learning: Case studies in Malaysian HEIs. Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies. Retrieved from http://irep.iium.edu.my/39334/1/Blended_%26_Flipped_LearningCase_Studies_in_Malaysian_HEIs.pdf.
27. Othman, F. M., Majid, L. A., Amran, N. N., Nazri, M. A., & Ariffin, M. F. M. (2024). The Use of Technology in Hadith Pedagogy. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 83-98. doi: 10.6007/ijarped/v13-i2/21074
28. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. D., Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
29. Pinquart, M., & Ebeling, M. (2020). Parental Educational Expectations and Academic Achievement in Children and Adolescents—a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09506- z
30. Pudjiarti, E. S., Lintong, M. M., & Hamu, F. J. (2024). The power of project-based learning: A catalyst for student engagement, collaboration and academic excellence. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 606-621. doi: 10.18488/61.v12i3.3735
31. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
32. Rolfe, U., & Holley, D. (2023). A32Towards a taxonomy of scale: a sustainable approach. International Journal of Healthcare Simulation, 3(1), 23-23. doi: 10.54531/ceun6931
33. Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in ProblemBased Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5-15.
34. Seprudin, S. (2024). Teacher Professional Development: A Systematic Literature Review on Strategies for Effective Continuous Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Sciences and Technologies, 1(1), 45-54. doi: 10.62207/0pb7vm02
35. Tan, Y., Xu, W., Li, S., & Chen, K. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) for education and training in the AEC industry: A systematic review of research and applications. Buildings, 12(10), 1529.
36. Taylor, D. L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. In Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward (pp. 17-34).
37. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
38. Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., Hong, H. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning design epistemology and its applications in education technology. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 81–90.
39. Zhou, G., & Eslami, Z. R. (2023). EFL teachers’ perceptions of the challenges of technology-based professional development. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 65-80. doi: 10.30827/portalin.vi2023c.29627

Websites

http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2011/01/21st-century-pedagogy-teachers-should.html.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388032880_Pedagogy_in_Higher_Education_An_Exploration_of_Universities_in_India

https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/2/42937.pdf

https://tssreview.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24.pdf

https://bhu.ac.in/Images/files/11(10).pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367420926_Pedagogical_Paradigms_in_Open_and_Distance_Education

https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE10/IJRPR34452.pdf

https://www.lsst.ac/blogs/innovative-teaching-methods-in-higher-education-empowering-mature-non-traditional-learners/

https://www.education.gov.in/shikshakparv/docs/background_note_Innovative_Pedagogy_Promote_EnjoyableEngaging_Learning.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380742759_Navigating_Educational_Paradigms_Examining_Challenges_and_Perspectives_of_Critical_Pedagogy_Implementation_in_Ghanaian_Elementary_Schools

https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89308

https://images.app.goo.gl/JkxM6rQBc5SdBnwE6

https://www.nu.edu/blog/behaviorism-in-education/

https://www.scirp.org/pdf/CE20120200001_53207289.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Farah-Deeba 29/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment/links/620f2d2308bee946f389ece6/Social-Constructivism-A-New-Paradigm-in-Teaching-and-Learning-Environment.pdf?origin=scientificContributions

https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd62392.pdf

https://www.ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/774

https://svcpune.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/115IPP.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatian_Pedagogical_Paradigm

https://bhu.ac.in/Images/files/11(10).pdf

https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904367.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/notice/AIL-Guidelines-English.pdf

https://www.vidyajournal.org/index.php/vidya/article/download/533/254/1289

https://shodhgangotri.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/20.500.14146/13900/1/synopsis.pdf

https://ncert.nic.in/division/der/pdf/Rajesh_Rv.pdf

https://www.ocerints.org/adved18_e-publication/papers/251.pdf https://rsisinternational.org/3ICMRP-2016/332-337.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383073124_Transformative_Pedagogies_Innovations_in_21st_Century_Education

https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/problem-based-learning-(pbl)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264820344_Pedagogical_challenges_of_Indian_higher_education_Policy_and_research_implications,

https://www.ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/774/567,

https://tssreview.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24.pdf

https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/679/4107

https://tssreview.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24.pdf

https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/89308 https://www.nu.edu/blog/behaviorism-in-education/ https://www.nu.edu/blog/behaviorism-in-education/ https://www.scirp.org/pdf/CE20120200001_53207289.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Farah-Deeba 29/publication/358439655_Social_Constructivism_A_New_Paradigm_in_Teaching_and_Learning_Environment/links/620f2d2308bee946f389ece6/Social-Constructivism-A-New-Paradigm-in-Teaching-and-Learning-Environment.pdf?origin=scientificContributions https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd62392.pdf https://www.ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/774 https://svcpune.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/115IPP.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatian_Pedagogical_Paradigm https://bhu.ac.in/Images/files/11(10).pdf https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904367.pdf https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/notice/AIL-Guidelines-English.pdf https://www.vidyajournal.org/index.php/vidya/article/download/533/254/1289 https://shodhgangotri.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/20.500.14146/13900/1/synopsis.pdf https://ncert.nic.in/division/der/pdf/Rajesh_Rv.pdf https://www.ocerints.org/adved18_e-publication/papers/251.pdf https://rsisinternational.org/3ICMRP-2016/332-337.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383073124_Transformative_Pedagogies_Innovations_in_21st_Century_Education https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/problem-based-learning-(pbl) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264820344_Pedagogical_challenges_of_Indian_higher_education_Policy_and_research_implications, https://www.ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/774/567, https://tssreview.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24.pdf https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/679/4107 https://tssreview.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/24.pdf