Imposter Syndrome: Worth Your While

Imposter Syndrome: Worth Your While

Dr Alvin J Joseph¹, Dr. John Abraham²

¹Department of Psychiatry, St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru

²Department of Family medicine, St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12040080

Received: 08 April 2025; Accepted: 24 April 2025; Published: 13 May 2025

ABSTRACT

The impostor phenomenon (IP), characterized by persistent self-doubt and fear of being exposed as a fraud despite objective success, is prevalent among high-achieving individuals, particularly medical trainees. This review examines IP in psychiatry residents and medical professionals, with a focus on its neurobiological basis, socio-cultural determinants in India, and implications for mental health and career progression. Global and Indian studies indicate IP prevalence of 20–50% among medical trainees, with rates as high as 86% among Indian medical interns. We propose that IP results from an interplay of amygdala-mediated anxiety, prefrontal cortex dysregulation, and socio-cultural factors, including India’s collectivist culture, gender norms, and caste dynamics. Assessment tools, such as the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, and interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and institutional mentorship, are evaluated. Although not a formal psychiatric diagnosis, IP’s associations with anxiety, depression, and burnout highlight its clinical significance. We advocate for integrated individual and systemic strategies to mitigate IP, emphasizing culturally tailored approaches for Indian medical education and identifying research gaps to foster resilience among mental health professionals.

Keywords: Impostor Phenomenon, self-doubt, medical trainees, socio-cultural determinants

INTRODUCTION

The impostor phenomenon (IP), first described by Clance and Imes in 1978, refers to an internal experience of intellectual fraudulence among high-achieving individuals who attribute success to external factors (e.g., luck) and fear exposure as incompetent. ^[1] Initially identified in women, IP is now recognized across genders, cultures, and professions, with a high prevalence in high-stakes fields like medicine and psychiatry. ^[2,3] Characterized by chronic self-doubt, anxiety, and inability to internalize achievements, IP can lead to burnout, depression, and impaired professional development. ^[4,5] The “impostor cycle”—where achievement triggers anxiety, over-preparation or procrastination, temporary relief upon completion, and renewed doubt—perpetuates this phenomenon (Figure 1). ^[1]

In medical training, IP is particularly salient due to intense performance pressures and expectations of competence. Studies report 20–50% of medical students and residents experience significant IP, with rates reaching 86% among Indian medical interns. ^[6,7] In India, socio-cultural factors, such as collectivism, gender norms, and caste dynamics, exacerbate IP, making it a critical issue for psychiatric education. ^[8] Although not a DSM-5 diagnosis, IP’s overlap with anxiety and depression underscores its relevance. ^[9] This review explores IP’s neurobiological mechanisms, socio-cultural influences in India, prevalence among medical trainees, assessment tools, and evidence-based interventions. By integrating these perspectives, we aim to inform psychiatric training and promote resilience in India’s mental health workforce.

Figure 1: The impostor cycle, adapted from Clance (1985). Source: Reprinted with permission from Clance PR. The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree Publishers; 1985.

Neurobiological Mechanisms

Although not a recognized neuropsychiatric disorder, the impostor phenomenon’s phenomenology—chronic fear of failure, hypervigilance, and inability to internalize success—suggests involvement of brain circuits related to anxiety, self-referential thinking, and reward processing. ^[2] Research on IP’s neurobiology is nascent, but plausible mechanisms can be extrapolated from studies on anxiety and stress.

The amygdala, a limbic structure central to fear and anxiety processing, likely plays a key role. In IP, heightened amygdala activity may amplify perceived threats of failure or criticism, triggering a “fight-or-flight” response that overrides rational self-assessment. ^[10] This aligns with findings that chronic stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, increasing cortisol levels and impairing memory and reward signaling. ^[11] The prefrontal cortex (PFC), responsible for executive functions and emotion regulation, may exhibit dysregulation in IP, leading to excessive self-monitoring or inadequate suppression of irrational fears. ^[12] Mindfulness-based interventions, which enhance PFC control over amygdala activity, have shown promise in reducing IP-related anxiety. ^[13]

Neurotransmitter imbalances may also contribute. Dampened dopamine signaling in reward pathways (e.g., mesolimbic system) could blunt the sense of achievement, reinforcing beliefs that success is undeserved. ^[2] Low serotonin levels may exacerbate negative thought cycles, while hormonal factors, such as cortisol, amplify stress responses. ^[11] However, these hypotheses lack direct neuroimaging evidence, and no functional MRI studies have specifically examined IP. Future research should explore neural correlates using fMRI or stress biomarkers to validate these models. ^[4]

Socio-Cultural Determinants in India

The impostor phenomenon’s expression varies across cultural contexts, shaped by societal norms around success

and self-worth. In India, collectivist values, academic pressure, gender norms, and caste dynamics create a fertile ground for IP. ^[8]

Societal Expectations

Indian society places immense value on academic and professional success, often tying individual achievements to family honor. ^[6] Children face intense pressure to excel in exams and secure prestigious careers, with failure stigmatized. ^[14] This environment fosters self-doubt, as even high achievers may feel their success is a “fluke.” Humility, a valued cultural trait, can morph into false modesty, preventing internalization of accomplishments. ^[15] For example, a student scoring 95% may be questioned about the “missing 5%,” reinforcing self-criticism. ^[8]

Gender Norms

While IP affects all genders, women in India face unique challenges due to patriarchal norms. ^[1] Women’s achievements are often attributed to effort rather than talent, and those in male-dominated fields like medicine may encounter subtle bias, eroding confidence. ^[16] Lack of female role models exacerbates feelings of being an outlier. ^[3] Men, conditioned to project confidence, may mask IP with overwork or maladaptive coping, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. ^[17]

Caste Dynamics

Individuals from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) often face scepticism about their merit, especially in elite institutions where affirmative action is scrutinized. ^[18] This external doubt can internalize as IP, compounded by underrepresentation and stereotype threat, contributing to higher dropout rates among reserved category students. ^[19]

Cross-Cultural Perspectives

In Western individualistic cultures, self-promotion is encouraged, yet IP remains prevalent among high achievers. ^[3] In collectivist Asian societies, including India and East Asia, emphasis on group success and humility may amplify IP by discouraging self-acknowledgment. ^[20] International medical graduates also report heightened IP due to systemic biases. ^[21] These comparisons highlight the need for culturally tailored interventions.

The Holy Bible Perspective

From a biblical perspective, the impostor phenomenon can be understood through the lens of human identity and divine purpose. Scripture emphasizes that individuals are created in God’s image (Genesis 1:27) and endowed with inherent worth, suggesting that self-doubt and feelings of fraudulence may stem from a misalignment with this divine affirmation. Passages such as Psalm 139:14, which declares, “I am fearfully and wonderfully made,” encourage self-acceptance and confidence in one’s God-given abilities, countering the internalized inadequacy central to IP.31 Furthermore, biblical teachings on humility (Philippians 2:3) and reliance on God’s strength (Corinthians 12:9) offer a framework for balancing self-worth with modesty, potentially mitigating the perfectionism and fear of exposure that characterize IP. For medical trainees, integrating these principles through reflective practices or faith-based mentorship could complement psychological interventions, fostering resilience and a sense of purpose in their professional roles.

Prevalence in Medical Trainees

Medical training’s high-stakes environment fosters IP, particularly among psychiatry residents, who navigate both scientific and humanistic demands. ^[4] Global studies report 20–50% of medical students and residents experience significant IP, with females often reporting higher rates (41% vs. 24% in males). ^[5] In India, a study of 150 medical interns in Goa found 86% exhibited moderate-to-high IP, with 44.7% in the moderate range and 41.3% in the high range, per the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). ^[6] Another study in Mumbai reported 56.7% prevalence among undergraduates and interns, with first-year students and interns showing the highest scores, suggesting vulnerability at transitional stages. ^[7].

IP impacts clinical practice by fostering avoidance (e.g., shying away from procedures), overcompensation (e.g., perfectionism), or reluctance to seek guidance, risking patient safety. ^[4] In psychiatry, IP may hinder therapeutic alliances or boundary-setting, compromising care. ^[22] Table 1 summarizes key prevalence studies.

Table 1: Prevalence of Impostor Phenomenon in Medical Trainees

 Assessment Tools

As IP is not a DSM-5 or ICD-10 diagnosis, assessment relies on self-report scales. ^[9,23] The Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS), a 20-item questionnaire, is the gold standard, measuring intellectual fraudulence, fear of evaluation, and inability to internalize success. ^[24] Scores range from ≤40 (low IP) to >80 (very high IP). The Harvey Impostor Scale (HIPS) and shorter tools like the 3-item IPS-3 or 10-item CIPS-10 are less common but show promise for rapid screening. ^[24] IP correlates with anxiety, depression, and perfectionism, but its work-specific focus distinguishes it from generalized disorders. ^[25]

Interventions

Effective IP management requires individual and systemic strategies, with varying evidence bases.

Individual Interventions

Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT): CBT targets cognitive distortions, such as attributing success to luck, through restructuring and success logs. Small studies show reduced IP scores, but larger trials are needed. ^[26]

Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Approaches: Mindfulness, including Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, reduces anxiety by fostering non-judgmental awareness. Preliminary evidence supports its efficacy for IP. ^[13]

Self-Compassion: Programs like Neff’s self-compassion training help reframe self-criticism, showing moderate success in reducing IP. ^[27]

Systemic Interventions

Mentorship Programs: Near-peer mentorship normalizes self-doubt and provides reality-checking. A pilot study in dental students showed reduced IP after mentorship workshops. ^[17]

Institutional Culture: Creating psychological safety through open discussions and diversity initiatives mitigates IP. Indian medical colleges could integrate IP workshops into curricula, leveraging tele-mentoring for resource-constrained settings. ^[28]

Educational Reforms: Psychoeducational modules on IP, combined with reflective writing, can enhance resilience. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess impact. ^[4]

Cultural sensitivity is critical. Interventions must address India’s collectivist ethos and stigma around mental health support, tailoring strategies to women and marginalized groups. ^[8]

DISCUSSION

The impostor phenomenon is a dynamic interplay of psychological, neurobiological, and socio-cultural factors, amplified in psychiatry training by high-stakes demands and India’s cultural context. Its prevalence (20–50% globally, up to 86% in India) reflects perfectionism, stress responses, and systemic barriers like gender bias and caste stigma. ^[6,7] Neurobiologically, amygdala hyperactivation and PFC dysregulation are plausible but unconfirmed mechanisms, warranting fMRI and biomarker studies. ^[2] Socio-culturally, India’s collectivist values and rigid success metrics exacerbate IP, particularly for marginalized groups. ^[8]

Breaking the impostor cycle requires integrated interventions. CBT and mindfulness address cognitive and emotional drivers, while mentorship and inclusive cultures counter systemic triggers. ^[26,28] However, evidence gaps remain, especially in Indian settings. Systemic exclusion, not just individual deficits, fuels IP; departments with diverse leadership may report lower prevalence, a hypothesis needing exploration. ^[29] Future research should prioritize longitudinal intervention studies, qualitative narratives from SC/ST/OBC trainees, and neurobiological validation. Integrating IP education into India’s medical curricula, alongside near-peer mentorship, could normalize self-doubt and build resilience, aligning with calls to humanize medical training^{. [30]}

CONCLUSION

The impostor phenomenon undermines the confidence and well-being of psychiatry trainees, with significant implications for India’s mental health workforce. Driven by perfectionism, stress responses, and socio-cultural pressures, IP is not merely a personal failing but a systemic challenge. Targeted interventions—CBT, mindfulness, mentorship, and curricular reforms—can disrupt the impostor cycle, but culturally tailored approaches are essential for India. By normalizing self-doubt and fostering inclusive environments, medical education can empower trainees to internalize success. Future research and policy must address these gaps to ensure a resilient, diverse psychiatric workforce.

REFERENCES

1. Clance PR, Imes SA. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, research & practice. 1978;15(3):241.
2. Chrousos GP, Mentis AF, Dardiotis E. Focusing on the neuro-psycho-biological and evolutionary underpinnings of the imposter syndrome. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Jul 20;11:1553.
3. Bravata DM, Watts SA, Keefer AL, Madhusudhan DK, Taylor KT, Clark DM, Nelson RS, Cokley KO, Hagg HK. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2020 Apr;35:1252-75.
4. Gottlieb M, Chung A, Battaglioli N, Sebok‐Syer SS, Kalantari A. Impostor syndrome among physicians and physicians in training: a scoping review. Medical education. 2020 Feb;54(2):116-24.
5. Oriel K, Plane MB, Mundt M. Family medicine residents and the impostor phenomenon. Family Medicine-kansas City-. 2004 Apr 1;36(4):248-52.
6. Mascarenhas VR, D’Souza D, Bicholkar A. Prevalence of impostor phenomenon and its association with self-esteem among medical interns in Goa, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019 Jan;6(1):355-9.
7. Sawant NS, Kamath Y, Bajaj U, Ajmera K, Lalwani D. A study on impostor phenomenon, personality, and self-esteem of medical undergraduates and interns. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 2023 Jan 1;32(1):136-41.
8. Feenstra S, Begeny CT, Ryan MK, Rink FA, Stoker JI, Jordan J. Contextualizing the impostor “syndrome”. Frontiers in psychology. 2020 Nov 13;11:575024.
9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
10. Iob E, Kirschbaum C, Steptoe A. Persistent depressive symptoms, HPA-axis hyperactivity, and inflammation: the role of cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms. Molecular psychiatry. 2020 May;25(5):1130-40.
11. Chrousos GP. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nature reviews endocrinology. 2009 Jul;5(7):374-81.
12. Siraj RA, Aldhahir AM, Alzahrani YR, Alqarni AA, Alanazi TM, Alruwaili A, Algarni SS, Alghamdi AS, Alahmari MA, Baogbah AA, AlQahtani AS. The impact of imposter syndrome on self-esteem and intention to quit among respiratory therapy (RT) students in Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open Medicine. 2024 Jun;12:20503121241260149.
13. Wei M, Liu S, Ko SY, Wang C, Du Y. Impostor feelings and psychological distress among Asian Americans: Interpersonal shame and self-compassion. The Counseling Psychologist. 2020 Apr;48(3):432-58.
14. Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: a pilot study. International journal of medical education. 2016 Oct 31; 7:364.
15. Kolligian Jr J, Sternberg RJ. Perceived fraudulence in young adults: Is there an’imposter syndrome’?. Journal of personality assessment. 1991 Apr 1;56(2):308-26.
16. Jöstl G, Bergsmann E, Lüftenegger M, Schober B, Spiel C. When will they blow my cover? Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 2015 Feb 28.
17. Vergauwe J, Wille B, Feys M, De Fruyt F, Anseel F. Fear of being exposed: The trait-relatedness of the impostor phenomenon and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2015 Sep; 30:565-81.
18. Cokley K, McClain S, Enciso A, Martinez M. An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. Journal of multicultural counseling and development. 2013 Apr;41(2):82-95.
19. Ochs SL. Impostor Syndrome & The Law School Caste System. Pace L. Rev.. 2021;42:373.
20. Rohrmann S, Bechtoldt MN, Leonhardt M. Validation of the impostor phenomenon among managers. Frontiers in psychology. 2016 Jun 2; 7:821.
21. LaDonna KA, Ginsburg S, Watling C. “Rising to the level of your incompetence”: what physicians’ self-assessment of their performance reveals about the imposter syndrome in medicine. Academic Medicine. 2018 May 1;93(5):763-8.
22. Türkel NN, Başaran AS, Gazey H, Ertek İE. The imposter phenomenon in psychiatrists: relationships among compassion fatigue, burnout, and maladaptive perfectionism. BMC psychiatry. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):30.
23. World Health Organization. ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO; 1992.
24. Mak KK, Kleitman S, Abbott MJ. Impostor phenomenon measurement scales: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology. 2019 Apr 5;10:671.
25. Sakulku J. The impostor phenomenon. The Journal of Behavioral Science. 2011;6(1):75-97.
26. Neureiter M, Traut-Mattausch E. Inspecting the dangers of feeling like a fake: An empirical investigation of the impostor phenomenon in the world of work. Frontiers in psychology. 2016 Sep 27;7:1445.
27. Neff KD. Self‐compassion, self‐esteem, and well‐being. Social and personality psychology compass. 2011 Jan;5(1):1-2.
28. Chandra S, Huebert CA, Crowley E, Das AM. Impostor syndrome: could it be holding you or your mentees back? Chest. 2019 Jul 1;156(1):26-32.
29. Mullangi S, Jagsi R. Imposter syndrome: treat the cause, not the symptom. Jama. 2019 Aug 6;322(5):403-4.
30. Barr-Walker J, Werner DA, Kellermeyer L, Bass MB. Coping with impostor feelings: Evidence based recommendations from a mixed methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2020;15(2):24-41.