Influence of Microplastics in Environmental Contamination and Human Health: An Analytical and Statistical Approach

Influence of Microplastics in Environmental Contamination and Human Health: An Analytical and Statistical Approach

Manasvi Jain¹ ,Arun Sharma²*
¹Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Career Point University, Kota-325003 Rajasthan, India
²*Research Supervisor, Department of Chemistry, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Career Point University, Kota-325003 Rajasthan, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11120038

Received: 08 December 2024; Accepted: 13 December 2024; Published: 12 January 2025

ABSTRACT

Background: Plastics have many practical applications, leading to large amounts of plastic waste. Improper recycling or reuse of these waste results in environmental contamination, with microplastics becoming common pollutants. Microplastics can absorb and transport toxic contaminants, while also releasing harmful additives into the environment.

Aim and Objectives: Researching microplastics’ prevalence in different ecosystems, their effects on food webs, and hazards to human health are the overarching goals of this project.

Methodology: The present research on The publication reviews microplastics in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. It also delves into new research that has linked microplastics to human faeces, which may indicate that these contaminants enter the body via the sustenance and hydration we ingest.

Findings: Land and marine ecosystems across the world contain microplastics. Microplastics may be ingested and accumulated by animals at every stage of the food chain, including humans. Some of the hazardous compounds absorbed by microplastics may interfere with endocrine functioning, and they can also release plastic additives.

Conclusion: The specific ways in which microplastics harm people’s bodies are not well understood. In order to guide future efforts to manage and prevent pollution, further study on the dangers of microplastic pollution is required.

Keywords: Microplastic Pollution, Toxicity and Bioaccumulation, Human Exposure Pathways, Analytical Detection Techniques, Health Risk Assessment, Statistical Modelling of Contamination

INTRODUCTION 

Microplastics are microscopic plastic particles less than 5 mm in size. Their widespread presence has made them a significant environmental problem. Microplastics are found in cosmetics, synthetic fabrics, and industrial processes, and they are either intentionally created of microplastic components or are part of larger plastic garbage that breaks down. (Campanale et al., 2020). Because these particles might end up in soil, water, or even the air, they pose a serious threat to ecosystems and public health. The fact that microplastics are naturally occurring and possess the capacity to absorb hazardous materials substances adds about apprehensions about their possible enduring effects. The human body may absorb microplastics via a variety of food-related pathways. Microplastics are readily ingested by humans, as seen by their presence in seafood, water, and table salt. According to recent study, microplastics may induce oxidative stress, hormone system disruption, and inflammation. They may even go beyond cellular limitations.

Microplastics, or plastic particles smaller than five millimetres, are a relatively new kind of environmental pollution. These tiny particles have gotten into a variety of habitats, including terrestrial settings, marine life, and aquatic ecosystems, as a result of the widespread use and disposal of plastics. Because of their persistence and propensity to absorb toxic substances, microplastics endanger both human health and the sustainability of the environment. Environmentalists, scientists, and legislators throughout the world are very concerned about these particles because they have the potential to impact animals as varied as people and plankton by making their way into the food chain.

Because of its low cost, ductility, durability, and light weight (Khatebasreh & Jafarabadi, 2024), plastics find extensive employment in many diverse contexts. We have pushed more worldwide plastic manufacturing over the past 70 years, which has unavoidably resulted in a rise in the plastic content in the environment. Some have even claimed that we live in a plastic universe (Tita et al., 2020; Hämäläinen, 2022). Though they are environmental contaminants in and of themselves and transporters of a variety of chemicals, these synthetic polymers are acknowledged as consistent markers of the modern period, which is usually agreed to have started following the mid-1900s (Li et al., 2018; Campanale et al., 2020). It is expected that 33 billion tonnes of plastic would be produced by 2025. Plastic waste is clearly increasing according to statistics on plastic manufacture levels, consumption and disposal patterns, recycling rates, and demographics (Jacobsen et al., 2022). Plastics kept in various environmental contexts will eventually witness a decrease in particle size (Thakur et al., 2023) due of a range of physical, chemical, and biological processes. Microplastics have been found in freshwater, marine, agroecosystems, the atmosphere, food, drinking water, and other distant locations according to Campanale et al. 2020. Their sizes, forms, polymer contents, and concentrations also vary. Plastics are long-lasting because of their strength on a chemical and a biological level. Their low density, reasonable price, and corrosion resistance help them to be employed in a variety of consumer items as well. Among the at least 45 different kinds of plastic used in commercial purposes are polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polycarbonate (PC Li et al., 2016).

Thanks to plastic, humanity now has access to a great variety of luxury items. Still, given plastic’s negative impact on the ecology (Echevarría et al., 2014), there reason for concern. Abandoned plastics progressively break down in the environment into little plastic particles from a variety of physical, chemical, biological, and other mechanisms (Walker & Fequet, 2023). Microplastics hardly measure five millimetres. Microplastics acting as transport vehicles might absorb components from the surroundings and pull dangerous contaminants from their surroundings. Plastic pollution has long caused concerns among people as it might be harmful and unpleasant (Jain et al., 2023; Behera et al., 2024).

But during the past several decades, a lot of study has been done on microplastics—that is, less obvious plastic trash smaller than 5 mm—Khatebasreh & Jafarabadi, 2024 Artificial solid particles or polymer matrixes with regular or irregular morphologies and dimensions between 1 μm and 5 mm make up microplastics, Rodrigues et al. 2024 say. In water, microplastics cannot dissolve. Their roots may be major or secondary. pellets, spheres, films, fibres, and foam make comprise microplastics, according to Malafaia et al. (2023). Still, most of these research have been on how microplastics impact marine environments. Microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems have now also been studied with reference to freshwater and soil systems (Rochman, 2018). Moreover, microplastics travel and interact in several contexts. Recent research on the processes related to microplastics in terrestrial environments—including soil, freshwater, and the atmosphere—have concentrated mostly on

Usually smaller than five millimetres, microplastics—tiny plastic particles—have become a major environmental concern throughout the past few years. These particles have some roots in the breakdown of more general plastic waste, the shedding of synthetic fibres from textiles, and the usage of microbeads in personal care products. Microplastics have been documented in many varied kinds of ecosystems, including rivers, seas, soil, and even the atmosphere. The abundance of microplastics in the environment worries scientists, legislators, and the general people greatly (Wagner, 2018).

Microplastics are becoming more common as plastics’ increasing global manufacture and consumption drive further development. From roughly 2 million tonnes yearly in the 1950s to over 380 million tonnes in recent years, the worldwide production of plastic has grown significantly. Microplastics are widely distributed by the physical, chemical, and biological processes that break down plastic waste as it accumulates in the environment. A severe concern to human and environmental health are these particles as they remain in the surroundings and can collect and concentrate dangerous chemicals (Zalasowicz, 2016).

The abundance of studies on the origin, spread, and ecological effects of microplastics has helped scientists to become well informed about these particles and their damage to ecosystems. Research indicates that marine life consumes microplastics, which then find their way into the ocean where they influence ecological function and biodiversity. The finding of microplastics in water sources and agricultural soils has underlined the effect on terrestrial ecosystems, which is usually neglected.

There are still many questions even if more and more people are realising the problem. One major challenge is the conflicting findings of several research employing non-standard methods to identify and quantify microplastics. Academic papers have paid less attention to freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems than they have to marine ones. Little is known about how microplastics harm human health as most studies have examined how they indirectly affect the food chain rather than directly by consumption or inhalation. Moreover, it is unknown how long-term effects of microplastics and their components might affect human health.

This study is crucial to fill the information gaps and increase awareness of the hazards microplastics create to human and environmental health. This project will standardise the techniques for microplastic detection among many environments by means of an analytical and statistical approach. It will also look at human direct and indirect paths of contact with these contaminants. Furthermore, the study will examine how possibly harmful chemicals interact with microplastics to determine how these pollutants will affect human well-being going forward. Closing these gaps might lead to improved mitigating techniques and better-informed legislators on local and worldwide reduction of microplastics.

Problem Statement:

Microplastics are prevalent in the environment, raising significant concerns owing to the substantial damage they inflict on ecosystems and human health. Plastic particles measuring less than 5 mm are referred to as microplastics, and they may be located in soil, rivers, seas, and perhaps within human lungs. These particles emanate from several sources, including synthetic fabrics, cosmetics, industrial trash, and bigger fragments of plastic detritus. Due to their little size, microplastics can be readily ingested by marine organisms and other species, posing a risk to human health. The recent discovery of microplastics in our bodies, food, and water raises uncertainties over their long-term effects.

Objectives:

• To assess the prevalence of microplastics in various environmental matrices
• To identify the sources and pathways of microplastic contamination
• To analyze the impact of microplastics on human health
• To apply statistical methods for risk assessment

Types of micro plastic pollutants

The two broad categories of microplastics Primary and secondary microplastics. Primary microplastics constitute made in very small quantities for specific applications, such microbeads in cosmetics, exfoliants, and industrial abrasives. Because of their special functional characteristics, these intentionally introduced particles are released into the environment when a product is used or disposed of. On the other hand, larger plastic trash, such fishing nets, bottles, and bags, breaks down into secondary microplastics attributable to environmental variables such as ultraviolet radiation and mechanical influences wear, and microbiological decay (Campanale, 2019).

There are several common sources of microplastics. Urban runoff, wastewater treatment plants, and air deposition are the three main causes of microplastic contamination in the environment. Particles from automobile tires, shattered plastic items, and synthetic fibres from laundry all have an impact on the amount of microplastic present in various ecosystems. Agricultural techniques like spreading sludge and utilising plastic mulch also contribute microplastics into soil and water systems. Microplastics are found almost everywhere on Earth due to their extensive dissemination, even in the most remote locations (Prata, 2018).

Primary Microplastics

The term “primary microplastics” refers to materials that are made specifically to be very small. They often come in compact shape and are intended for certain industrial or consumer purposes. Common sources of primary microplastics are the following:

1. Microbeads in Personal Care Products: Microbeads are tiny, spherical plastic particles that are often found in toothpaste, cosmetics, and exfoliating scrubs, among other personal care items. Because of these microbeads’ abrasive qualities and capacity to improve product texture, they are added to goods. But since they are so tiny, they are difficult to filter out of wastewater systems after they are used and are flushed down the drain. Consequently, they infiltrate waterways and add to the pollution caused by microplastics.
2. Industrial Abrasives: Microplastics are used as abrasives in industrial settings for specialised purposes such as surface preparation and precise cleaning. For example, air blasting uses plastic pellets to clean surfaces without causing damage to them. During production, handling, or usage, these minuscule particles may leak into the environment, increasing the amount of microplastics in ecosystems.
3. Microfibers from Textiles: In textiles and apparel, synthetic fibres like acrylic, polyester, and nylon are often used. These textiles lose microfibers—tiny plastic strands—when they are washed. After being discharged into wastewater systems, these microfibers ultimately find their way into lakes, rivers, and the ocean. Microfibers are one of the most ubiquitous categories of microplastics identified. in aquatic habitats because of their lightweight nature, which makes them easy to carry by water currents. (Waring, 2018)
4. Pellets or Nurdles: Nurdles, another name for plastic pellets, are the basic materials used to make plastic items. These little, raw plastic pellets are sent all over the world to production facilities where they are liquefied and shaped into a variety of plastic products. Nurdles regrettably often leak into the environment during handling and transportation, where they remain and worsen the microplastic pollution problem.
5. Paints and Coatings: Additionally, a variety of paints and coatings used in home, automotive, and marine applications include microplastics. These little plastic particles provide resilience against deterioration and longevity. These coatings leak microplastics into the environment as they deteriorate over time. Due to their slow erosion from ship hulls and other structures, marine paints specifically are a significant source of microplastics in seas (Pivokonsky, 2018).

Secondary Microplastics

When larger pieces of plastic decompose, they release tiny particles called secondary microplastics. Plastics undergo a degradation process known as fragmentation, which breaks them down into tiny pieces by physical, chemical, and biological processes. Because plastic products are used so widely, The environmental presence of secondary microplastics is frequently higher than that of primary microplastics.. Typical origins of secondary microplastics consist of:

1. Degradation of Plastic Litter: Plastic debris, including bottles, bags, and packaging, is a common sight in the surroundings. These big plastic objects eventually disintegrate into tiny pieces due to exposure to sunshine, temperature changes, and mechanical forces. In maritime settings, where plastic trash is continuously exposed to the abrasive action of waves and UV rays, this process is very common. Oceans are thus overflowing with tiny plastic pieces that result from the decomposition of larger pieces of plastic waste (Rezania, 2018).
2. Tire Wear Particles: Synthetic rubber tires are a noteworthy additional source of secondary microplastics. Tiny particles wear off from the road surface due to friction from tires when cars move on it. These particles, which are also known as tyre wear particles (TWP), are composed of various chemicals, plastic, and rubber. When it rains, they collect on the surfaces of roads and are carried into water bodies, adding to the degradation of aquatic habitats with microplastics.
3. Fishing Gear and Marine Debris: Fishing nets, ropes, and traps that have been lost, abandoned, or discarded are among the most common sources of microplastics in maritime habitats. These materials, also referred to as “ghost gear,” deteriorate over time and release microplastic particles into the water. Furthermore, when general marine waste decomposes in the marine environment, plastic ropes, containers, and packing all play a part in the creation of secondary microplastics.
4. Fragmentation of Plastic Films: Plastic films are prone to fragmentation and are often employed as mulch or in packaging in agriculture. Mulch made of plastic is spread over the ground in agricultural settings to assist conserve moisture and prevent weed growth. After harvest, these films are often left in the field, where they break down into microplastics. Likewise, plastic packing films have the potential to break down during use and disposal, which increases the amount of microplastic pollution in both land-based and marine settings.
5. Household Dust: Indoor settings can include microplastics, especially in household dust. Airborne microplastic particles are released due to normal wear and tear on plastic furniture, carpets, and electronics. Both people and animals may consume or inhale these dust-settling particles. Microplastics are further dispersed by sweeping, vacuuming, and other cleaning tasks, which adds to their buildup in interior settings.

Due to their resistance to degradation, microplastics exhibit significant environmental persistence. Plastics are challenging to eliminate from ecosystems because of their diminutive size and their slow biodegradation compared to natural materials. Microplastics pose enduring threats to the health of humans and animals due to their potential persistence in the environment for decades or even centuries. Microplastics in aquatic ecosystems are frequently misidentified as food by marine organisms, potentially resulting in ingestion and subsequent bioaccumulation along the food chain. Evidence indicates that microplastics in marine sediments, the water column, and many species, including fish and marine mammals, intensify their effects on marine life (Corcoran, 2014). Microplastics can infiltrate freshwater systems and pollute soils through aerial and aquatic transfer in terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural areas are especially susceptible to the accumulation of microplastics from fertilisers, plastic mulch, and wastewater sludge, which may adversely impact crop yield and soil health.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN HEALTH CONCERNS

Investigation into microplastics is essential due to their prevalence, environmental persistence, and potential threats to ecosystems and human health. Microplastics have been detected in many settings, ranging from polar ice caps to the deep sea, and have been ingested by several organisms, including fish, birds, mammals, and zooplankton. This widespread contamination prompts enquiries on the ecological consequences of microplastics, since they may inflict physical damage on animals, disrupt digestive systems, and lead to famine or malnutrition. Moreover, hazardous substances such as heavy metals, endocrine disruptors, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) can infiltrate the food chain through microplastics and bioaccumulate prior to human consumption.

Increasing apprehension exists over the possible health hazards that microplastics may pose to humans. Microplastics can infiltrate the human body through many pathways, including dermal contact, inhalation of airborne particles, and consumption of contaminated food and beverages. Upon entering the body, microplastics can induce several harmful consequences, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and disruption of biological systems. Moreover, the compounds linked to microplastics may be integrated into the plastic matrix or incorporated within it, possibly resulting in detrimental consequences such as neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenesis (Brandon, 2019).

The influence of microplastics on human health is a complex and diverse concern that is challenging to fully comprehend. The surface chemistry, polymer composition, dimensions, and morphology of microplastics differ, potentially influencing their interactions with biological systems. Additional study is necessary to determine the possible health implications of extended exposure to low levels of microplastics, as the impact on health remains uncertain. Environmental microplastic pollution is a worldwide concern necessitating international collaboration and unified global action to mitigate. Microplastics impact every region due to their permanence in the environment and capacity to traverse vast distances by wind, ocean currents, and other transport mechanisms (Stager, 2012). A comprehensive knowledge of the origins, distribution, and impacts of microplastics is crucial for effectively addressing this worldwide issue and informing policy and management strategies.

Recent advancements in analytical and statistical methodologies have enhanced the precision of microplastics identification, measurement, and characterisation across various environmental matrices. Promising analytical approaches for detecting the polymer composition of microplastics and elucidating their biological behaviour include Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Pyr-GC-MS). These methodologies have also streamlined the evaluation of the threats that microplastic pollution presents to the environment and public health (Frias, 2018).

Statistical methodologies are essential in microplastic research as they facilitate the examination of extensive and intricate datasets, the evaluation of microplastic distribution and fate in the environment, and the analysis of health risks linked to microplastic exposure for both humans and animals. To formulate effective mitigation methods, researchers must have a comprehensive understanding of the origins, distribution, and effects of microplastics. Integrating analytical and statistical methodologies may facilitate this achievement.

As the information about the dangers of microplastics to the environment and human health accumulates, there is an imperative for more study and regulatory measures. This study seeks to conduct a comprehensive examination of the impacts of microplastics on human health and environmental pollution, while also emphasising the analytical and statistical methodologies employed in the pertinent research. This study aims to bolster ongoing initiatives to tackle the worldwide challenge of microplastic contamination by synthesising existing knowledge, pinpointing research deficiencies, and proposing new avenues (Hahladakis, 2018).

MICROPLASTICS AND HUMAN HEALTH

Microplastics are plastic particles measuring fewer than five millimetres in diameter; their increasing prevalence in the environment and potential adverse effects on human health are alarming. These minuscule particles are generated by several processes in the industrial sector, as well as by synthetic fabrics, microbeads in personal care items, and the degradation of bigger plastic debris. Due to their diminutive size, microplastics may be found in several environmental contexts, including freshwater and marine ecosystems, soil, air, and even within human bodies. Microplastics can infiltrate the body through the skin, ingestion, or inhalation, raising substantial concerns over their potential effects on human health due to their pervasive environmental presence (Seymour, 1976).

Pathways of Human Exposure

The primary modes of exposure to microplastics are ingestion and inhalation. Microplastics can be consumed through contaminated food or water. Research has demonstrated the existence of microplastics in several food items, including seafood, table salt, honey, and bottled water. Microplastics are known to accumulate in marine organisms, especially in filter feeders such as shellfish, and ultimately ascend the food chain to humans. The presence of microplastics in tap water and other liquids indicates that microplastics may be widely ingested.  Microplastics may significantly infiltrate the lungs through metropolitan areas characterised by air pollution. Microplastics, especially in the form of dust from decomposed plastics or fibres from synthetic fabrics, may get airborne. Inhalation and deposition of these airborne particles in the respiratory system might adversely affect health (Andrady, 2016). Dermal exposure, although under-researched, may elevate the total risk of microplastic exposure, particularly when utilising contaminated surfaces or personal care items containing microbeads.

Toxicological Effects: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

A growing body of research has examined the toxicological impacts of microplastics on human health via both in vitro and in vivo investigations. These research have elucidated the several mechanisms by which microplastics may adversely affect human health. An in vitro study indicates that microplastics may cause cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory reactions in human cell lines. Research indicates that human lung and intestine cells exposed to polystyrene microplastics experience significant damage, resulting in membrane rupture and apoptosis. The findings indicate that microplastics may directly interact with and damage human cells, potentially leading to adverse health effects (Hansen, 2016).

In vivo studies, especially those utilising animal models, have clarified the possible health hazards linked to microplastic exposure. Research on rats has demonstrated that ingested microplastics can accumulate in the stomach, liver, and other organs, resulting in liver failure, dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, and inflammation. Furthermore, research on inhalation indicates that microplastic fibres may accumulate in the lungs, leading to respiratory irritation and potentially aggravating illnesses such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is crucial to recognise that while these studies present persuasive evidence of possible health effects linked to microplastic exposure, the extent to which these findings may be generalised to people remains uncertain. Predicting the exact health impacts of microplastics in humans is difficult due to variations in human and animal physiology, exposure levels, and the size, shape, and composition of the particles (Browne, 2013).

Potential Long-term Health Implications

An increasing amount of research indicates that microplastics can bioaccumulate in human tissue and persist in the environment, raising concerns over the possible long-term health effects of microplastic exposure. Prolonged exposure to microplastics, even at minimal concentrations, may correlate with many health complications, including respiratory disorders, gastrointestinal problems, and systemic inflammation. A primary issue is the potential for microplastics to serve as vectors for viruses, heavy metals, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), along with other environmental poisons. The extensive surface area and hydrophobic characteristics of microplastics render them potential excellent carriers for the introduction of environmental pollutants into the human body. Upon entering the body, microplastic particles may leach these substances, rendering them more toxic and potentially resulting in cumulative effects that intensify their adverse health consequences (Hongwei, 2019).

Another cause for concern is the potential for microplastics to disrupt the human endocrine system. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are included into certain microplastics. These pharmaceuticals may imitate or inhibit hormones in the body, potentially resulting in various adverse consequences, such as hindered development, reproductive complications, and an increased susceptibility to specific malignancies. Although the precise impacts of microplastic-associated endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on human health remain under investigation, more study is essential owing to the potential for enduring damage. Consequently, it is difficult to exclude the possibility that people may experience mechanical or physical injury due to microplastics. The buildup of microplastic particles in the digestive system may result in physical obstructions, reduced nutritional absorption, and gastrointestinal discomfort. Inhalation of microplastics, especially fibres, may lead to respiratory tract irritation and long-term pulmonary dysfunction. The mechanical impacts underscore both the chemical toxicity of microplastics and the intricacy of their possible health implications for humans (Cingotti, 2019).

PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MICROPLASTICS

Huerta Lwanga et al. (2016) assert that plastic is used in greenhouses, coverings, coatings, wires, films, bags, lids, and containers, among several other everyday goods. Owing to their chemical durability, microplastics can persist in the environment for hundreds or even thousands of years. Commonly produced polymeric plastics include polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polystyrene (PS). These polymers have been identified in environmental debris (Andrady, 2011). Approximately 90% of worldwide plastic production consists of these plastic kinds (Andrady, 2011; Akdogan & Guven, 2019). Plastics experience various weathering and ageing processes in the environment, such as oxidation, thermal degradation, biofilm formation, and solar radiation, resulting in the deterioration of plastic polymers. The degradation of these polymers influences their physical and chemical properties, including colour, surface morphology, crystallinity, particle size, density, reactivity, surface functionality, and hydrophobicity (Guo and Wang, 2019).

Sources and patterns of microplastic dispersion

Extensive plastic fragmentation generates small plastic particles, the origin of microplastics, commonly present in facial cleansers, body washes, and toothpaste (Osman et al., 2023). Despite their minuscule dimensions, microplastic particles exert a significant detrimental impact on the ecosystem that cannot be overlooked (Al Mamun et al., 2014). Horton et al. (2017) assert that waste plastic from residential, commercial, and many sources might enter the marine ecosystem directly or through other water bodies, hence augmenting its prevalence and affecting aquatic organisms. Microplastics can be disseminated by wind and waves owing to their diminutive size and low density, elucidating their prevalence (Shahul Hamid et al., 2018). Plastic trash accumulates in the atmosphere when it is transported by wastewater and inadequately treated by purification facilities (Issac & Kandasubramanian, 2018). Furthermore, microplastics can be ingested indirectly as they are digested by animals that inadvertently ingest them higher up the food chain (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Sources of microplastics

The kind and mode of entry of microplastics influence their distribution in physicochemical processes and water resources. Identifying sources is crucial for precisely quantifying the microplastics that reach the ocean surface and for developing effective remediation strategies. Analysing the distribution of microplastics in the aquatic environment might reveal possible consequences. Pollution exacerbates with the accumulation of microplastics and improves with their reduction. Consequently, understanding the distribution of microplastics is crucial for mitigating possible risks.

Primary and secondary microplastics can be distinguished based on their origins and intended applications. Primary microplastics are present in several personal hygiene items, including cosmetics, toothpaste, and exfoliating scrubbers. They are produced at a microscopically small scale (Sun et al., 2019; Horton et al., 2017). Zhou et al. (2023) assert that this type of microplastic skincare product surpasses other naturally formulated cosmetics derived from almonds, walnuts, or oats. Small plastic particles, often not exceeding 0.25 mm, are frequently included in industrial shot-blasting agents and cosmetic formulations. A diverse array of applications use granules and powders containing microplastic-sized particles (Campanale et al., 2020; Rahman et al., 2021).

The microplastics exhibit a range of granule sizes. Wastewater from the medical sector discharges microplastics employed in dental and pharmaceutical applications into the environment. Primary microplastics are difficult to extract from aqueous systems due to their minuscule size and limited visibility (Xiang et al., 2022). Alongside the ongoing emission of primary microplastics, the debris from larger plastics may progressively decompose owing to thermal exposure and ultraviolet light. It may also disintegrate into smaller particles when exposed to mechanical forces such as winds and ocean currents (Alimba & Faggio, 2019).

The mobility and dispersion of microplastics are significantly affected by several factors, including weathering, fragmentation, strong currents, tides, and biofouling. Microplastics inhabit the ocean bottom, seabed, water column, shoreline, and ecosystem, where they are influenced by diverse biological, physical, and chemical processes in each habitat (Ma et al., 2020; Choy et al., 2019). Additional information regarding compartments is necessary. The causes and effects of the decrease are still being determined.

Microplastics serve as an optimal substrate for microbial growth owing to their diminutive size and diverse effects (Liu et al., 2021). Rahman et al. (2021) assert that microplastics can rapidly combine and release deleterious organic pollutants into water, including DDT, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and flavouring agents used in production.

Microplastic detection methods

The buildup of microplastics in the Earth’s crust may adversely affect human health and environmental security. The lack of a standardised approach for identifying and quantifying microplastics in soil impedes research. The existing methodologies are cumbersome and sluggish in execution (Li et al., 2021). Table 1 enumerates the many approaches employed for microplastic detection.

Table 1: Various detection methods used in microplastic

S. No	Detection methods	Benefits	Reference
1.	Stereomicroscopy	Simple, quick, and easy	Hidalgo-Ruz & Thiel, 2013
2.	Scanning Electron Microscope	Provide comprehensive, higher magnification information about the external surface morphology.	Sun et al., 2019
3.	Polarized light microscopy	Easy and rapid	Shim et al., 2017
4.	Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy	able to analyse chemical compositions, using a non-destructive method, allowing auto-mapping, and reducing the likelihood of inaccurate data.	Von Moos et al., 2012
5.	FPA-FTIR	Provide the sample in high definition with a brief description.	Li et al., 2018
6.	Raman spectroscopy	Engineered to test chemical compositions, this non-destructive approach minimises the likelihood of erroneous data and examines samples smaller than 1 μm.	Elert et al., 2017
7.	Thermoanalytical analysis	Can simultaneously ascertain the polymer and chemical makeup.	Majewsky et al., 2016
8.	AFM-IR	Generate a nanometer-resolution image of the particles.	Shim et al., 2017

A solitary detection approach may not consistently differentiate microplastics due to variations in polymer size, colour, and structure. Consequently, many detection approaches are employed in this case. The detection of microplastics often involves two procedures: physical and chemical identification (Zhang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Visual inspection or the utilisation of forceps and unaided vision is employed to identify both prominent and subtle coloured microplastics (Akdogan & Guven, 2019).

Mass spectrometry−chromatography (Löder and Gerdts, 2015), pyrolysis analysis (Majewsky et al., 2016), Raman spectroscopy (Anger et al., 2018), Fourier infrared spectroscopy (Corradini et al., 2019), and scanning electron microscopy (Fries et al., 2013) represent the predominant conventional techniques for microplastic detection. Despite the accuracy of these procedures, considerable work is typically required to eliminate and segregate dubious plastic particles prior to the qualitative and statistical identification of microplastics. Due to the absence of a defined protocol for the extraction and separation of microplastics, employing diverse methodologies may provide inconsistent results. Subsequent to extraction, each questionable plastic particle must be identified and counted. Due to the intricacy of the operating strategy, extensive sample testing is unsuitable for these methods. Therefore, innovative techniques must be investigated to address the aforementioned issues. Terahertz spectroscopy may reveal the “fingerprint” characteristics of material structures, facilitates rapid measurements, and requires minimal sample pre-treatment (Lian et al., 2019). The THz spectrum detection method, while not yet employed for microplastic identification, has demonstrated potential for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of many chemicals (Guan and Chao, 2019). Research on an efficient technique for simultaneously assessing microplastic contamination across many locations has been limited.

Nonetheless, the bulk of minute particles are likely to be overlooked during investigation. Chae and An (2018) assert that the first identification technique is both quick and straightforward. To provide a comprehensive understanding of microplastics, more research and development are necessary, initiating the advancement of microplastic detection.

Addressing the source, and effects of white pollution

With the progression of civilisation, plastic items have become increasingly ubiquitous in industrial manufacturing and everyday life. The absence of an adequate method for managing plastic trash renders white pollution a significant issue. Due to the protracted breakdown of plastics and their enduring impact on ecosystems, plastic pollution has been recognised as the second most critical scientific challenge in environmental and ecological studies (Connon et al., 2012; Kinigopoulou et al., 2022). Barboza et al. (2018) assert that plastic particles in aquatic environments are readily ingested by marine organisms, accumulate within their bodies, and ascend the food chain, posing a threat to human health. Moreover, microplastics can absorb heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, so transforming into carriers of these contaminants (Wang et al., 2017; Llorca et al., 2018). In the plastic manufacturing process, additives such as plasticisers, antioxidants, dyes, and pigments are used to modify and enhance the material’s properties. Liu et al. (2020) assert that the continuous leakage of chemical components into the environment harms the ecological system and elevates ambient concentrations. Due to their ubiquity in the environment and established detrimental effects, microplastics may pose risks to human health.

Canals from paddy fields discharge into the ocean, and agriculture significantly contributes to microplastic contamination in marine ecosystems. Microcapsule fertilisers are mostly utilised in agriculture to mitigate nitrate leaching into groundwater. This indicates that during irrigation, a greater volume of microplastic flow transpires compared to the non-irrigation season. Scratches and discolourations on the microcapsules’ upper surface signify the release of secondary microplastics throughout the paddy runoff process (Belioka & Achilias, 2023).

Plastic garbage is becoming ubiquitous, even in the most isolated and pristine locations on Earth. Recent study (Bergmann et al., 2022) indicates that laundering clothing may have generated microplastic fibres, which have substantially contaminated the Arctic. The aggregation of microfibers will intensify due to the absence of microfiber degradation and the increase in textile manufacturing (Zhuang & Wang, 2023). Their elevated surface-to-volume ratio, which potentially adsorbs greater quantities of harmful pollutants, may render them more hazardous to aquatic organisms than other microplastics (Liu et al., 2020). Due to their decreased microfibre density, they may be more easily transported across extensive distances by wind and water (Allen et al., 2022).

PHARMACOKINETICS INTEGRATION WITH MICROPLASTICS AND HUMAN HEALTH

Humans can be exposed to microplastics through three primary routes: ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. The digestive system manages the digestion and absorption of nutrients and electrolytes, mostly occurring in the small intestine. Only smaller microplastics, often measuring up to 5–10 μm, can be internalised in the lungs, but bigger microplastics, typically ranging from 100 to 150 μm, may be internalised in the digestive system. Particles translocated to these organs are quite uncommon. Microplastics can infiltrate the body through the small intestine. Microplastics must traverse intestinal mucus to engage with the intestinal mucosa. Two techniques to do this include the development of an organic matter corona or intestinal contents (Powell et al., 2007) and the use of tiny particle sizes (Szentkuti, 1997). Particles traverse the intestinal mucus and reach the intestinal epithelium, where they are internalised by many mechanisms, including transcytosis, absorption by migrating phagocytes, internalisation by M cells, persorption, and paratransport (Delon et al., 2022).The predominant microplastics in the environment possess a short half-life. Microplastics can potentially re-enter the brain, stomach, colon, liver, kidneys, bladder, and spleen. Phagocytosis or mucociliary transport will remove microplastics from the respiratory system. Significant microplastics may obstruct the minute capillaries of the lungs. The reticuloendothelial system and splenic interendothelial cell slits are two additional splenic mechanisms that may remove microplastics. The primary liver excretion processes are biliary excretion and Kupffer cell phagocytosis. The urinary system is expected to transport additives and monomers originating from plastics. Currently, Prata (2023) finds no evidence that microplastics have accumulated in the tissue over time.

Biodegradation, as defined by Williams (1976), refers to the decomposition of polymers within the human body. Contrary to common belief, all plastics may decompose under certain conditions (Ali et al., 1994). In a physiological context, three specific processes—oxidation, decarboxylation, and hydrolysis—can decompose polymers (Bischoff, 1972). According to the chemical and physical features of plastics, a pre-existing enzyme system may interact with them in a specific or adaptable manner (Kulkarni, 1965). The physiological degradation of microplastics may be influenced by surface area, which correlates with size, polymer type, and extent of past weathering. The gradual biodegradation of plastics may disturb normal metabolic processes (Kulkarni, 1965).The current research indicates that microplastics are unlikely to accumulate in tissues, including the internal tissues of senior cats or dogs and the stomachs of marine species, suggesting they may be evacuated (Nelms et al., 2019; Prata et al., 2022). Likewise, no evidence of accumulation within the human body has been observed to far. The phagocytes of the reticuloendothelial system are essential for the removal of retained particles. Phagocytes are present in the liver as Kupffer cells, hepatocytes, liver endothelial cells, and, to a lesser extent, in bone marrow and splenic macrophages (Hartenstein & Martinez, 2019; Ogawara et al., 1999). Furthermore, they may be exocytosed into the bile or trapped inside the interendothelial cell slits of the spleen (Moghimi et al., 1991; Handy et al., 2008).

EFFECTS OF MICROPLASTICS ON LIVING THINGS

Microplastics are present in the habitats of animals. They provide a significant threat to many aquatic organisms, including fish and marine mussels. The predominant kind of ingested microplastic is microplastic fibres (Gaylarde et al., 2021). The majority of individuals believe that the digestive and biliary systems eliminate microplastics upon their entry into the body. Researchers have detected microplastics in human blood (Kutralam-Muniasamy et al., 2023). Individuals are beginning to reassess the risks that microplastics present to human health. The absorption, distribution, accumulation, and metabolism of microplastics within the human body remain under investigation. Before examining any potential adverse effects, it is essential to understand the concentration of microplastics in the human body (Wu et al., 2023).

Considering that microplastics adversely affect several animals, the potential for human exposure to these particles cannot be overlooked (Cox et al., 2019; Malafaia et al., 2023). The risk of microplastic transmission to humans is significant, as we are the final consumers of seafood, which is severely affected by microplastics (Sridharan et al., 2021). Studies indicate that microplastics can infiltrate the human body from several sources, including bottled water (Mason et al., 2018), sea salt (Selvam et al., 2020), and tap water (Danopoulos et al., 2020). Recent studies indicate the presence of microplastics in human bodies, as evidenced by analyses of human stool (Zhang et al., 2021; Yan et al., 2021), blood (Leslie et al., 2022), breast milk (Liu et al., 2023), meconium (Liu et al., 2023), placenta (Ragusa et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2023), and infant formula (Liu et al., 2023). Specific additives are included into virgin microplastics, contingent upon product requirements, to enhance their capacity to act as vectors and adsorb pollutants from water. Studies investigating the whole plastic lifespan, from consumer use to disposal and fossil fuel extraction, have demonstrated the harmful dangers plastic poses to human health (Isaac & Kandasubramanian, 2020).

Aquatic organisms may ingest microplastics due to their morphology, colouration, dimensions, density, and other attributes (Wright et al., 2013). The research indicated that microplastics present in mussel tissues and latex-based spheres on the gill surface may collect in different areas of the epidermal cell surface of rainbow trout, situated beneath the skin phagocytes. Consequently, it is clear that epithelial cells significantly contribute to the adherence and infiltration of plastic particles into the fish organism. Humans may be exposed to microplastics through their dietary practices if they directly ingest gills and skin surfaces (Su et al., 2018).

Both tap and bottled water exhibited measurable concentrations of plastic particles (Koelmans et al., 2019). As a result, concerns over the heightened concentrations of microplastics found in canned food have intensified in recent years. Experts assert that restrictions and limits must be instituted to mitigate these health hazards (Ivleva et al., 2021). PET is the most prevalent plastic polymer, used in drinking water containers, pipes, food packaging, and building insulation. Continuous exposure to this plastic polymer may provide a carcinogenic risk to human health (Li et al., 2016; Kannan & Vimalkumar, 2021). The potential consequences of early human exposure must thus be meticulously considered.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION BY MICROPLASTICS

Particles of plastic measuring fewer than five millimetres in diameter are referred to as microplastics. They may derive from several sources, including fragmented bigger plastic items, industrial waste, and consumer products. Microplastics may be classified into two principal categories: primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are intentionally produced at diminutive sizes and utilised in items such as textiles, cosmetics, and industrial abrasives. Substantial plastic waste deteriorates into secondary microplastics when exposed to environmental factors such as UV radiation, physical abrasion, and chemical degradation. Numerous minuscule particles are now dispersed throughout the environment, raising significant concerns regarding their effect, persistence, and distribution (Olea-Serrano, 2002).

Global Distribution of Microplastics in the Environment

Microplastics are present in several environments, including soil, freshwater and marine ecosystems, as well as the atmosphere. They are extensively distributed across the environment in a multifaceted manner. Microplastics are pervasive in marine ecosystems, detected in various locations from surface waters to the ocean’s depths. Despite their widespread distribution over the ocean floor, they frequently assemble in gyres, leading to extensive areas of floating debris. Microplastics are transported across these ecosystems by currents, wind, and anthropogenic activity, ultimately accumulating in both isolated and intensively inhabited areas. Rivers and lakes significantly contribute to the transport of microplastic pollution, frequently transferring these particles from metropolitan regions to the ocean. Various methods, including atmospheric deposition, sewage sludge fertilisation, and agricultural practices, can introduce microplastics into soil (Shelby, 2018). The airborne existence of microplastics, resulting from environmental plastic degradation and wind erosion of contaminated soils, signifies their prevalence.

Environmental Persistence and Accumulation

One of the most alarming aspects of microplastics is their environmental persistence. Plastics decompose over time, however their polymer structures mainly persist; they do not biodegrade as rapidly as organic materials. Microplastics can collect over time and attain significant concentrations in many environmental matrices due to their persistence. The buildup is especially evident in sediments, as microplastics can remain entombed there for prolonged durations. Resuspension or bioturbation may facilitate their re-entry into the water column. The persistent presence of microplastics in the environment yields several repercussions. Animals are perpetually exposed to these particles, which may disrupt ecosystems and food webs. Remediating pollution is increasingly difficult as microplastics persist in the ecosystem, inflicting damage even after the pollution sources have been diminished or eradicated (Cariati F., 2019).

IMPACT OF MICROPLASTICS ON MARINE ENVIRONMENTS

Research on the effects of microplastics on the marine environment may be the most comprehensive. These little particles can adversely affect marine organisms through chemical contamination and physical injury. Marine organisms of varying sizes, ranging from big predators to little plankton, inadvertently ingest microplastics, erroneously identifying them as sustenance. The consumption of microplastics can lead to physical obstructions in the gastrointestinal tract, diminished feeding efficacy, and internal damage. Ingestion of microplastics may impede the growth and reproductive efficacy of diminutive creatures, such as zooplankton, thereby resulting in a cascading impact on the food chain (Chen, 2018).

Besides inflicting physical harm, microplastics can serve as carriers of hazardous materials. Plasticisers, stabilisers, flame retardants, and several other compounds commonly found in plastics may leach into the environment. Moreover, pesticides, heavy metals, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) exemplify hydrophobic pollutants that microplastics can adsorb from the environment owing to their elevated surface area-to-volume ratio. Marine animals that ingest contaminated microplastics may experience bioaccumulation and biomagnification of poisons, endangering their health and that of bigger predators, including people, that devour them (Ortiz-Villanueva, 2018).

IMPACT OF MICROPLASTICS ON TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS

While the impact of microplastics on marine habitats is well-documented, its consequences on terrestrial ecosystems are less acknowledged yet equally alarming. The presence of microplastics in soil may modify its physical and chemical composition, potentially impacting plant development and soil creatures. Research indicates that microplastics may hinder the germination and growth of some plant species. This may be attributed to changes in soil aeration and moisture retention, or to physical impediments to root development. Additional soil species, such as earthworms, are likewise vulnerable to microplastic pollution. Research indicates that earthworms ingest microplastics, which can build within their bodies and influence their behaviour and general well-being. Decreased eating activity, compromised reproduction, and modified burrowing behaviours may result from this intake, potentially leading to significant effects on the ecosystem’s functionality and soil quality. Microplastics in soil may augment soil toxicity and affect the availability and mobility of other pollutants, including heavy metals (Hirai, 2011).

INTERACTION OF MICROPLASTICS WITH OTHER POLLUTANTS

Microplastics may exert additive or synergistic effects with many types of environmental contaminants. Adsorption can efficiently concentrate hydrophobic pollutants on the surfaces of microplastics, as previously demonstrated. This interaction may result in the formation of intricate pollutant mixes that might be more harmful than individual pollutants in isolation. The presence of microplastics may enhance the bioavailability of specific heavy metals, hence raising the likelihood of absorption by organisms and resulting in higher damage (Rehse, 2018).

Microplastics engage with other contaminants both chemically and physiologically, and these interactions are significant. Microplastics may serve as substrates for microbial populations, including potentially pathogenic bacteria. These microbial communities are termed plastispheres, and they may differ markedly from those in the adjacent environment, thereby facilitating the proliferation of detrimental species. The plastisphere may affect the duration of microplastic degradation due to biofilm development and the rate of degradation as a result of microbial activity.

Environmental microplastic pollution is a multifaceted issue that significantly affects ecosystems and human health. Microplastics are enduring pollutants that have infiltrated many environmental matrices, ranging from the uppermost atmospheric layers to the profound oceanic depths. Their propensity to collect, combine with other pollutants, and impact many creatures poses a significant threat to the ecosystem (Wei, 2019). Addressing this issue necessitates a thorough comprehension of the origins, mechanisms, and impacts of microplastics, as well as the formulation of effective solutions for mitigating their presence in the environment. Increased research and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to address the challenges posed by microplastic pollution and safeguard environmental and human health.

Figure 2: Microplastics generation, transportation and ingestion in the environment affecting the whole ecosystem (Ghosh et. al., 2023)

ANALYTICAL APPROACHES TO STUDYING MICROPLASTICS

Microplastics are plastic particles measuring fewer than 5 millimetres in diameter. They are prevalent environmental pollutants that provide significant risks to ecosystems and human health. The worldwide production and utilisation of plastic materials will persistently increase, ultimately resulting in the infiltration of microplastics into the environment. These diminutive particles emanate from several sources, including personal care items, industrial activities, and the degradation of bigger plastic debris (Halden, 2018). Given the widespread presence of microplastics in soil, water, air, and human tissues, it is crucial to comprehend their distribution, concentration, and possible toxicological consequences by reliable analytical procedures.

Importance of Analytical Methods in Microplastic Research

Microplastics provide significant challenges to the research of these materials owing to their unique physical and chemical characteristics, interactions with diverse environmental components, and capacity to adsorb additional contaminants. Consequently, precise measurement and identification of microplastics are essential for comprehending their ecological effects, assessing the health hazards they provide, and determining their distribution in the environment. Analysis is a fundamental methodology employed in microplastic research. These approaches encompass several activities, including the identification, characterisation, and quantification of microplastic particles, as well as sample preparation and collection (Fisher, 2003). The selection of suitable analytical procedures is essential for achieving trustworthy results, as microplastics are intricate materials that might differ in size, shape, polymer type, and chemical additives.

Table 2:  Analytical Methods in Microplastic Research

Aspect of Microplastic Research	Importance of Analytical Methods
Sample Collection and Preparation	To guarantee representative samples and prevent contamination, accurate sampling procedures are crucial. Microplastics may be extracted from various environmental matrices such as water, soil, or air using analytical techniques that direct the collection, filtering, and separation processes.
Identification of Microplastics	Analytical methods such as Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman Spectroscopy can be employed to ascertain the chemical composition and kind of polymer in microplastic particles. This is essential for understanding the history of microplastics and their potential environmental effect.
Characterization of Microplastics	To learn how microplastics interact with other pollutants and the environment, it is necessary to examine their size, shape, and surface texture using techniques like scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Quantification of Microplastics	Imaging methods and thermal analysis (e.g., Thermogravimetric Analysis) provide information on the distribution of microplastics in various contexts by accurately quantifying these substances in samples.
Chemical Additive Analysis	To evaluate the toxicity and possible health concerns of microplastics, analytical methods are essential for detecting any chemical additions or adsorbed contaminants on their surfaces.
Impact Assessment	To evaluate microplastics’ effects on ecosystems and human health, scientists use cutting-edge analytical techniques to learn how these particles interact with living things and serve as carriers of other contaminants.

Overview of Sampling Techniques

Gathering samples from the environment or biological tissues is the initial stage in any analytical investigation of microplastics. Whether it is water, sediment, soil, air, or biological tissues being researched, the unique matrix will determine which sample approach is best.

• Water Sampling: Neuston nets, which have a mesh size of 200–500 micrometres, are often used for surface water sampling in aquatic settings. To gather floating microplastics, these nets are pulled horizontally over the water’s surface. Bulk water sampling also entails gathering massive amounts of water, which are then filtered to remove microplastic particles. For a thorough knowledge of the distribution of microplastics, sampling at various water depths—including deep and subterranean water—is also essential.
• Sediment Sampling: Microplastics are often sucked up by sediments, which gradually accumulate the particles. Grab samplers and core samplers are tools used in sediment sampling that are used to gather surface sediments or provide vertical profiles of sediment layers, respectively. When examining the temporal and geographical dispersion of microplastics in freshwater and marine sediments. this technique is very crucial. (Rani, 2015).
• Soil Sampling: There is growing recognition that terrestrial landscapes, such as metropolitan areas and agricultural fields, are microplastic reservoirs. Usually, soil augers or corers are used to gather soil samples, which are then sieved and density separated to separate microplastic particles. Understanding the effects of plastic contamination on terrestrial ecosystems and food safety requires research on soil microplastics.
• Air Sampling: Another important route for the dispersal of microplastics is atmospheric deposition. High-volume air samplers with filters that gather particles from ambient air may be used to collect microplastics in the air. After the particles are gathered, their concentration, size distribution, and polymer composition are examined. (Avila & Sanchez, 2009).
• Biological Sampling: There is rising worry about the prevalence of microplastics in biota, which includes people, animals on land, and marine life. To separate microplastics, biological samples—such as tissue, stomach contents, or excrement—are gathered and processed. This procedure often involves the use of chemical reagents to break down organic debris, which is then filtered and subjected to microscopic scrutiny.

Techniques for Detection and Quantification

After sample collection, the detection and measurement of microplastics are the next crucial actions. Sophisticated analytical methods that can reliably differentiate microplastic particles from other pollutants and natural particles are needed for these operations. The particulars of the microplastics under investigation, such as their size, shape, type of polymer, and presence of additives or sorbed contaminants, will determine which analytical approach is best.

• Microscopy Techniques: One of the methods most often used to detect and describe microplastics is microscopy. Microplastic particles may be seen and their size, shape, and colour can be determined using optical microscopy, which includes stereomicroscopy and light microscopy. However, polymer identification cannot be done just using optical microscopy.
• Spectroscopic Techniques: Raman and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy are effective methods for determining the polymer makeup of microplastics. These methods are based on the unique vibrational spectra of various polymers, which may be compared with reference databases. Raman spectroscopy can identify tiny particles (down to 1 micrometre), whereas FTIR spectroscopy is very helpful for analysing bigger particles (greater than 20 micrometres).
• Thermal Analysis Techniques: Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) is a thermal analytic method that breaks down a sample into smaller molecules for GC-MS analysis. This process is used to discover microplastic polymers. This technique offers comprehensive details on the makeup of the polymer and the existence of any impurities or additives. Another method for calculating the amount of plastic in a sample is thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), which measures weight loss under regulated heating.
• Chemical Extraction and Separation: Before examination, microplastics may need to be chemically extracted and separated from complex matrices like biological tissues or sediments. The process of density separation, which makes use of solutions like zinc or sodium chloride, enables the separation of microplastics from larger particles. Strong acids, bases, or oxidising agents may be used to break down the organic content in biological samples, removing the microplastic particles for further examination (Ghaffar, 2015).
• Automated Particle Analysis: The demand for high-throughput microplastic examination is expanding, and as a result, automated particle analysis systems have been created. These technologies swiftly count and characterise microplastic particles in huge datasets by combining optical or electron microscopy with image processing software. This method improves the effectiveness and precision of microplastic analysis, especially in research with large sample volumes.

Challenges in Microplastic Detection and Analysis

Finding and studying microplastics still presents a variety of challenges, despite advancements in analytical techniques. One major issue does not have any kind of established protocol for collecting, processing, and preparing samples. Differences in reported microplastic characteristics and concentrations resulting from different sampling tactics, processing methods, and analytical techniques may make cross-study comparisons more difficult. Another challenge is identifying microplastics in the nanometre size range, which are more difficult to distinguish and identify than larger particles. Current analytical methods, such as electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis, are being used to study nanoplastics; however, these methods still need improvement and validation (Zhang, 2018).

Pigments, sorbed pollutants, and chemical additives may make it difficult to identify and characterise microplastic particles. Novel analytical techniques that provide detailed chemical and geographic data on microplastics are being researched as potential solutions to these problems. Synchrotron-based methods Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) represents one example.of these technologies.

Table 3: Comparison of Analytical Techniques for Microplastic Identification

Analytical Technique	Principle	Advantages	Limitations	References
Optical Microscopy	Visualization using visible light	Simple, cost-effective, good for size and shape analysis	Cannot identify polymer type, limited to larger particles	Löder et.al., 2015
FTIR Spectroscopy	Infrared absorption of polymer bonds	Accurate polymer identification, non-destructive	Limited to larger particles (above 20 µm), time-consuming	Käppler et.al., 2018
Raman Spectroscopy	Scattering of laser light	High spatial resolution, works on small particles	Fluorescence interference, time-consuming	Löder et.al.,  2018
Py-GC-MS	Thermal decomposition followed by GC-MS analysis	Detailed polymer and additive analysis	Destructive, requires specialized equipment	Ruj et.al., 2014
TGA	Weight loss during controlled heating	Quantification of plastic content, simple	Cannot identify specific polymers, destructive	Turner et.al., 2020
Automated Particle Analysis	Image analysis combined with microscopy	High-throughput, accurate particle counting and sizing	Requires calibration, expensive	Imhof et.al.,  2012

The main analytical methods for studying microplastics, with an emphasis on their benefits, drawbacks, and guiding principles. Optical microscopy is still a straightforward and affordable technique for preliminary size and shape investigation, but it cannot distinguish between different polymer kinds. Although both methods may be time-consuming, FTIR and Raman spectroscopy facilitate accurate polymer identification. with Raman spectroscopy offering superior spatial resolution. Despite destroying samples, Py-GC-MS is unique in that it provides in-depth polymer and additive analysis. Despite its cost, automated particle analysis is becoming more and more crucial for high-throughput research (Godwill, 2019).

Table 4: Sampling Techniques and Their Applications in Microplastic Research

Sampling Technique	Matrix	Application	Challenges
Neuston Net Towing	Surface Water	Collection of floating microplastics	Mesh size limitations, risk of contamination
Grab Sampling	Sediment, Soil	Collection of surface layers	Limited to surface, potential loss of fine particles
Core Sampling	Sediment, Soil	Vertical profiling of microplastic accumulation	Time-consuming, requires specialized equipment
High-Volume Air Sampler	Air	Capture of airborne microplastics	Requires long sampling times, potential loss of volatile compounds
Biological Sampling (e.g., tissue digestion)	Biological Tissues	Isolation of microplastics from biota	Complex sample preparation, risk of degradation

The many sample techniques used in microplastic research, together with details on the environmental matrices in which they are used, their specific functions, and the challenges associated with each technique. Neuston net towing is a practical technique for collecting floating microplastics in surface waters, notwithstanding the possibility that it may miss smaller particles. Utilising sediment and soil collection techniques like grab and core sampling—which may be labour-intensive and prone to minute particle loss—is necessary to comprehend microplastic deposition. Air sampling for microplastics raises concerns about the potential loss of volatile compounds, while biological sampling often requires intricate preparation techniques to separate microplastics without destroying the sample (Massos, 2017).

Analytical techniques for studying microplastics have substantially advanced our comprehension of their environmental dispersion, ecological impact, and potential health risks to people. Despite these challenges, it is critical that sampling plans and analytic methods continue to advance in order to provide reliable data that might guide future research projects and affect policy decisions. Given that microplastic pollution is still becoming a bigger issue, it will be necessary to overcome the difficulties associated with microplastic analysis. Standardising methods and incorporating new technologies will be essential.

Table 5:  The removal efficiency of microplastics

Removal Method	Process Description	Efficiency (%)	Source of Microplastics	Remarks
Membrane Filtration	Separation through micro- and nano-sized membranes	95	Wastewater Treatment Plants	Effective for small-sized microplastics
Coagulation-Flocculation	Use of coagulants to clump microplastics for removal	80	Industrial Effluents	Depends on type of coagulant and microplastic size
Sedimentation	Allowing microplastics to settle in water	70	Stormwater runoff	Inexpensive but less effective for smaller particles
Chemical Oxidation	Use of strong oxidants (e.g., chlorine) to degrade plastics	65	Surface Waters	Can break down some plastics but may produce by-products
Bioremediation	Use of microbes to degrade or trap plastics	50	Agricultural Runoff	Still under experimental stages
Adsorption	Binding microplastics to adsorbents (e.g., activated carbon)	90	Industrial Wastewater	Requires regeneration of adsorbents

The table lists some methods for removing microplastics from the environment while keeping an eye on effectiveness and usability. Membrane filtration is the most efficient way to clean wastewater; it has a 95% clearance rate but is costly and needs a lot of maintenance. Adsorption requires frequent adsorbent renewal, yet this process is 90% successful, especially with industrial wastes. Coagulation-flocculation in industrial effluents may achieve an efficiency of 80%, contingent upon the coagulants used. Sedimentation is an inexpensive and simple solution, however for too-small particles, it is only 70% effective. Chemical oxidation may break down certain plastics (65%), but it can also produce hazardous byproducts. With its 50% effectiveness, bioremediation—which is now in the experimental stages—offers promise for treating agricultural runoff. Combining techniques might maximise removal effectiveness since each has advantages and disadvantages, particularly for different microplastic sizes and sources.

IMPACT OF MICROPLASTICS ON MARINE LIFE

Microplastics, defined as plastic particles measuring less than five millimetres, have emerged as a prevalent pollutant in marine ecosystems. The incidence of these minuscule particles in seas and oceans is increasing. They stem from several sources, including microbeads in personal care items, synthetic fibres from textiles, and the degradation of bigger plastic waste. Their diminutive size and environmental resilience render them very insidious, resulting in extensive pollution and significant threats to marine ecosystems. Marine life is affected by microplastics through ingestion, physical injury, chemical exposure, and interactions with larger ecological consequences (Wang, 2010).

Ingestion of Microplastics by Marine Organisms

Ingestion is one of the most extensively researched consequences of microplastics on marine organisms. Plankton and large marine animals are among the several marine organisms that may mistake microplastics for sustenance. Microplastic ingestion has been seen in animals across many trophic levels, affecting both herbivorous and carnivorous species.

• Zooplankton: Zooplankton is an essential component of the maritime ecology and is found at the foundation of the marine food web. According to studies, zooplankton may consume microplastics by mistakenly believing them to be their natural food source. Because microplastics take up room in the intestine and cause lower energy levels, slower development rates, and less successful reproduction, ingesting them may cause them to eat less. Concerns are also raised by zooplankton’s consumption of microplastics over the particles’ possible impact on fish and people at higher trophic levels as they move up the food chain.
• Fish and Invertebrates: It has been shown that a diverse array of fish and invertebrate species consume microplastics, either directly or indirectly, by consuming contaminated prey. For example, the feeding strategies of filter-feeding species, such as krill and bivalves, make them more vulnerable to microplastic ingestion. Microplastics that are ingested may cause physical obstructions in the digestive system, which will hinder the organisms’ capacity to absorb nutrients. This may sometimes lead to famine and even death. Microplastics in the digestive tract may create inflammation, interfere with regular eating habits, and harm general health even when they are not lethal.
• Seabirds and Marine Mammals: Ingestion of microplastic also affects marine animals and seabirds, which are higher up the food chain. Because they often consume fish and other marine life, seabirds are especially susceptible to microplastic contamination. Numerous seabird species have been found to have consumed large quantities of plastic; in fact, some studies have shown that over 90% of people had plastic in their guts. This consumption may cause actual harm to the digestive system, impair the birds’ physical state, and lower their chances of surviving. Because they eat a lot of food that could be tainted with microplastics, marine animals like whales and dolphins are also impacted. These apex predators may have gastrointestinal obstructions, decreased feeding efficiency, and exposure to hazardous compounds linked to plastics as a result of consuming microplastics (Kravchenko, 2014).

Physical Harm Caused by Microplastics

Microplastics may physically injure marine creatures via entanglement and abrasion in addition to consumption. Microplastics may still be dangerous, even though entanglement is often linked to bigger plastic waste. This is especially true when the microplastics group together to form larger clumps or entangle themselves in natural materials like coral or seaweed.

• Coral Reefs: Despite being among of the planet’s most biodiverse ecosystems, microplastic contamination is posing a growing danger to coral reefs. Microplastics have the ability to accumulate on coral surfaces, causing physical abrasion and harm to the fragile coral tissues. Reduced growth rates, an increased risk of illness, and, in extreme situations, coral mortality are possible outcomes of this. Furthermore, microplastics might make it more difficult for corals to efficiently collect food particles, adding stress to these already delicate ecosystems. (Nusair, 2019).
• Benthic Organisms: The presence of microplastic pollution poses a threat to benthic creatures, which are found on or near the ocean bottom. Sea cucumbers and other benthic feeders, such polychaete worms, may consume microplastics that have accumulated in sediments. Ingestion of microplastics may cause problems similar to those seen in other creatures, such as lower feeding efficiency and obstructions in the stomach. Additionally, the tangible presence of microplastics in sediments may alter the habitat’s chemical and physical characteristics, which may have an impact on the larger benthic population and interfere with crucial biological processes.

Chemical Exposure from Microplastics

Not only can microplastics physically endanger marine life, but they also provide major chemical dangers. It is well known that plastics may take a wide range of dangerous substances from the environment, such as heavy metals, hormone disrupting substances, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). In addition to the plastic itself, marine life that eats microplastics is also exposed to the hazardous chemicals that have collected on the plastic’s surface (Darbre, 2016).

• Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification: The possibility of bioaccumulation and biomagnification from chemical exposure from microplastics is one of the most alarming elements of the situation. The hazardous substances that microplastics contain may build up in the tissues of marine life as it consumes them. The poisons may go up the food chain and concentrate more at each trophic level when predators eat these infected creatures. High concentrations of hazardous substances in apex predators, such as marine mammals and economically significant fish species, may result from this biomagnification process, endangering human health as well as marine ecosystems.
• Endocrine Disruption: Numerous substances linked to microplastics are recognised endocrine disruptors, capable of interfering with marine creatures’ hormonal systems. A variety of negative outcomes, including as aberrant development, decreased fertility, and changed reproductive behaviour, may result from endocrine disturbance. For instance, feminisation of male fish has been connected to exposure to certain chemicals related to microplastics, which might have important consequences for population dynamics and the survival of species (Kedzierski, 2018).
• Carcinogenic and Mutagenic Effects: Certain heavy metals as well as PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are linked to microplastics, are known to cause cancer or mutagenesis. Marine species are more susceptible to genetic abnormalities and cancer if they consume microplastics tainted with these substances. These consequences raise major concerns regarding the health and survivability of marine populations exposed to microplastic pollution, even though the long-term repercussions are still not completely known.

Ecological Implications of Microplastic Pollution

Microplastics’ effects on certain creatures may have wider ecological ramifications, including upsetting whole marine ecosystems. Microplastic consumption, physical injury, and chemical exposure may cause impacted species to have lower survival rates, have less successful reproduction, and exhibit behavioural abnormalities. Interactions between species, including those involving predators and prey, as well as competition for resources, may be impacted by these changes.

• Trophic Cascades: The disruption of trophic cascades—the top-down effects that predators have on lower trophic levels—is one possible result of widespread microplastic contamination. The quantity of prey species may rise if apex predators, such sharks and marine mammals, experience unfavourable effects from microplastics, resulting in a decline in their populations. This might then have far-reaching consequences for the environment, changing the species composition and ecosystem function in the process (Gandamalla, 2018).
• Biodiversity Loss: Concerns about the loss of biodiversity are also raised by microplastics’ impact on aquatic organisms. Population decreases or even local extinctions may occur in species that are especially susceptible to microplastic contamination because of their habitat or eating habits. The loss of these species may lower marine ecosystems’ total richness and make them less resilient to other environmental stresses like habitat degradation and climate change.

Microplastics pose a serious and expanding hazard to marine life, having an effect on ecosystems and trophic levels alike. Because of the ingestion of microplastics, physical harm, and chemical exposure, marine animals are very vulnerable to significant health and survival problems. Furthermore, the biological consequences of microplastic pollution—like potential disturbances to trophic cascades and a decline in biodiversity—emphasize the pressing need to address this quickly growing environmental issue (Goyer, 2004). Raising public awareness, improving waste management practices, and addressing the sources of microplastic pollution are all necessary to protect marine life and preserve the health of our waters.

MICROPLASTICS IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS

Microplastics are plastic particles having a diameter of less than five mm; they are becoming recognised as a significant cause of environmental degradation. While maritime regions have garnered a lot of attention, terrestrial ecosystems are also affected. This section looks at the causes, locations, impacts, and potential solutions for microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems. Microplastics have several pathways of entry into terrestrial ecosystems. One of the main contributors is the deterioration of larger plastic products including bottles, bags, and synthetic textiles. According to Jambeck (2018), these materials break down in the environment to create microplastics, which are dispersed by the wind and water. One kind of secondary source is the direct application of products that include microplastics, such as certain fertilisers and exfoliating cosmetics.

Two examples of factors that influence the distribution of microplastics in soil are land use and agricultural practices. In urban and rural locations where plastic consumption is prevalent, microplastic contamination is a regular occurrence. Microplastics are very prevalent in agricultural soils as a consequence of the use of plastic mulch and the application of treated sewage sludge, according to research. These microplastics have the potential to accumulate over time and produce major environmental issues.

Impacts on Soil Health

Microplastics may have a major impact on the soil’s health and fertility. Microplastics have the potential to alter the chemical and physical properties of soil. Compaction and soil structure are modified by microplastics because they change the texture of the soil. This reduction in water penetration and soil aeration may have an effect on plant development. The microbiology of the soil may be impacted by microplastics as well. Soil bacteria are necessary to cycle nutrients and preserve the health of the soil. Research indicates that microplastics may disrupt microbial ecosystems, altering the diversity and functionality of microorganisms. This disruption to soil processes, such as the availability of nitrogen and the decomposition of organic matter, may have an effect on crop yields and ecosystem functioning (Ashton, 2010).

Effects on Terrestrial Flora and Fauna

Microplastics may directly affect terrestrial plants and animals via ingestion and entanglement. Plants may absorb microplastics from the soil, which might affect how they grow and develop. For instance, studies have shown that microplastics may alter the formation of roots and slow down the rate of seed germination. This can have a cascading effect on the plant communities and ecosystem services. Among the terrestrial animals that are vulnerable to microplastic contamination are insects and earthworms. Earthworms, which are vital for soil aeration and nutrient cycling, may ingest microplastics when they are on contaminated soil. Their reproductive system may be negatively impacted by this usage, which may also result in physical harm, including internal damage. Additionally susceptible are insects, particularly those that interact closely with the soil. Microplastics might potentially disrupt their ability to develop, survive, and feed. (Noik, 2015).

Impact on Food Chains

Because they are found in soil and plants, microplastics have the ability to get into food chains. Herbivores that consume polluted plants may swallow microplastics, which might then move to higher trophic levels. This bioaccumulation may impact both animal and human health if contaminated animals are consumed. Microplastics may be present in cattle and poultry, according to research, which begs the issue of how these toxins may find their way into human meals. While the complete impact on human health is yet unclear, there is growing concern about the prospect that microplastics might enter the food chain. As stated by Brennecke (2016).

Analytical Methods for Detection

In terrestrial environments, microplastic detection presents unique challenges. Soil samples must be processed in order to remove microplastics from soil particles, which may be labour-intensive and need specific techniques. Identification is often carried out using spectroscopy or microscopy (e.g., Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy) after methods such as density separation, sieving, and filtering. Recent advancements in analytical techniques have improved the ability to detect and quantify microplastics in soil. High-throughput techniques like pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) are being developed to increase detection sensitivity and accuracy (Dobaradaran, 2018).

Mitigation and Management Strategies

Addressing microplastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems requires a multifaceted approach. Effective strategies include:

1. Reducing Plastic Use: Promoting alternatives and limiting the use of single-use plastics is one of the best strategies to prevent microplastic contamination. Limiting the manufacture and use of plastic may help lower the total amount of plastic trash.
2. Improving Waste Management: Plastics may be kept out of the environment by improving waste management techniques, such as recycling and waste treatment procedures. There is less chance of microplastic contamination in terrestrial ecosystems when plastic trash is disposed of and treated properly.
3. Soil Management Practices: Limiting microplastic contamination may be achieved by putting best practices for soil management into effect, such as cutting down on the usage of plastic-based goods and minimising soil disturbance. Reducing the amount of microplastics released into soils is another benefit of using sustainable farming techniques.
4. Research and Monitoring: Understanding the scope and effects of microplastic contamination in terrestrial ecosystems requires ongoing study and observation. Creating standardised techniques to identify and measure microplastics will help us better evaluate and manage contamination.

Microplastics pose a serious environmental threat to terrestrial ecosystems, potentially having an impact on food chains, plant and animal life, and soil health. It will need a mix of management, research, and prevention to address this problem. We may try to lessen the effect of microplastics on terrestrial habitats and safeguard the health of ecosystems by using less plastic, managing trash better, and putting sustainable practices into practice. To effectively address this widespread problem, techniques and policies requiring ongoing study and monitoring are needed (Godoy, 2019).

HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MICROPLASTICS

Small plastic particles with a diameter of less than five millimetres, or microplastics, are increasingly being found as sources of pollution in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Some personal care products intentionally manufacture these particles at very small sizes, or larger plastic trash breaks down into smaller pieces. As microplastics permeate more and more ecosystems, the human food chain, and drinking water, concerns over potential health implications are growing. This section examines the many health risks associated with microplastics, focussing on the toxicological effects and implications for human health.

One of the primary reasons to be concerned is the possibility that microplastics, when consumed or inhaled, might cause both physical and chemical harm. Internal organs and tissues may suffer physical injury from microplastics due to their abrasive nature (Gaylarde, 2021). Studies suggest that these particles might accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract and lead to inflammation, oxidative stress, and perhaps even disruption of the gut flora. Consuming microplastics, for instance, has been linked in animal models to decreased nutritional absorption and gastrointestinal irritation. Despite the lack of human study in this area, the finding of microplastics in samples of human excrement suggests that similar processes may occur.

In addition to physical damage, microplastics may pose a chemical risk. It is well known that a variety of dangerous compounds, including flame retardants, bisphenol A (BPA), and phthalates, are both absorbed by and present in plastics. These compounds may penetrate the body via the plastic particles and disrupt endocrine function, perhaps causing issues with development or reproduction. Phthalates, for example, have been connected to hormone disturbance, which affects the health of the reproductive system and foetal development. Likewise, other health issues including diabetes, obesity, and heart disease have been linked to BPA, a widely used plasticiser (Hartenstein, 2019).

A major health concern is the potential for microplastics to act as carriers of other environmental pollutants. Microplastics have the ability to absorb and concentrate persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from the environment, including pesticides, heavy metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). When ingested, these contaminated microplastics introduce substantial quantities of dangerous substances into the human body, increasing the health risks associated with these pollutants. For instance, heavy metals like lead and cadmium have been linked to a number of chronic ailments, including cancer and kidney impairment. As a result, exposure to both microplastics and these pollutants at the same time may pose a greater danger than exposure to each of them alone (Horton, 2017).

The effects of microplastics on the respiratory system may have an impact on general public health. The majority of the microplastics created by industrial processes and degraded materials that are present in the air may be inhaled and cause lung damage. This exposure may lead to respiratory issues including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other inflammatory illnesses. Studies have shown that inhaled microplastics may induce lung inflammation and damage, but further research is necessary to fully understand the long-term health consequences and the potential for systemic health effects stemming from respiratory exposure (Issac, 2021).

The presence of microplastics in food and drinking water exacerbates these health risks. It has been shown that foods like shellfish, salt, and even honey contain microplastics. Microplastics and toxins may build up in the body as a result of eating contaminated food. Concerns over microplastics in drinking water are also growing. Numerous investigations have shown the existence of microplastics in tap and bottled water, raising questions about the security of these water sources. Even though legal limits for microplastic concentrations in drinking water have not yet been established, the prospect of long-term exposure to microplastics and associated chemicals poses a serious health hazard.

Determining whether microplastics pose a health risk is challenging due to their diverse physical and chemical properties. Microplastics come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and compositions, which may have an impact on their toxicity and physiological interactions. For example, microscopic particles may be more readily absorbed and have a higher potential for adverse effects than larger particles. The overall impact of microplastics on health may also differ according on the contaminants and additives that are present. Thus, risk assessments need to include these factors in order to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the health risks related to different types of microplastics (Jacobsen, 2022).

Because research on microplastics and health is still in its early stages, we still don’t completely understand their consequences. While in vitro experiments and animal studies provide valuable insights, translating these findings to human health remains challenging. Exposure levels, individual responses, and the presence of other environmental factors may all have an influence on the health outcomes. Thus, further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms via which microplastics impact human health and to develop workable strategies for mitigating these risks (Jain, 2023).

Microplastics may harm human health in a variety of ways; chemical and physical dangers are only two of them. Microplastics may physically harm internal organs in addition to being a threat to health and entering the body as carriers of environmental pollutants. Exposure by ingestion, inhalation, and contact with tainted food and water increases these risks even more. Further research is required to fully understand the health consequences of microplastics and to develop effective policies and programs that would reduce exposure and potential dangers in order to address these challenges.

MICROPLASTICS IN FOOD AND WATER

The environment is now home to a large number of microplastics, or plastic particles smaller than five millimetres, which are very dangerous to ecosystems and human health. Given their widespread use in food and water supplies, there are substantial concerns about the safety and quality of these essential resources (Kannan, 2021).

Presence of Microplastics in Food

The environment is now home to a large number of microplastics, or plastic particles smaller than five millimetres, which are very dangerous to ecosystems and human health. Given their widespread use in food and water supplies, there are substantial concerns about the safety and quality of these essential resources (Kannan, 2021).

1. Marine Food Chain: Particularly susceptible to microplastic contamination are marine creatures. Microplastics may find their way into the ocean either via atmospheric deposition or direct discharge from land-based sources. Plankton and bigger fish are among the marine animals that may consume these particles. According to a research by Rochman et al. (2015), 25% of fish species sold in marketplaces included microplastics. These particles have the ability to build up in the tissues and gastrointestinal system, which might have negative consequences on the organisms and endanger human consumers. Leslie (2022).
2. Salt: It has been discovered that microplastics are present in sea salt, which is created when saltwater evaporates. Microplastic particles were found in sea salts from different places, with quantities ranging from 0.5 to 1.3 microplastics per gramme of salt, according to a research by Yang et al. (2015). Since salt is a common food item for humans, the existence of microplastics in it is alarming since consuming these particles may have negative health effects.
3. Agricultural Products: Crop contamination by microplastics may also occur from contaminated irrigation water and soil. According to studies by de Sá et al. (2018), microplastics have the ability to be absorbed by plants and could make their way into the food chain. Microplastic particles have been found in the edible portions of lettuce and carrots in studies, which raises questions regarding their intake.

Presence of Microplastics in Water

There is a large prevalence of microplastics in freshwater and marine habitats. Water contamination from microplastics comes from the following sources:

1. Wastewater Discharge: Effluents from wastewater treatment facilities often include microplastics. These particles may come from a variety of sources, such as industrial operations, personal care products, and synthetic fibres from laundry. According to a 2016 research by Carr et al., wastewater treatment facilities may discharge millions of microplastic particles into rivers and seas.
2. Surface Water and Groundwater: Lakes, rivers, and seas are examples of surface waterways where microplastics have been found. Microplastic concentrations in surface waters of the North Atlantic Ocean were recorded by Thompson et al. (2004), with particle densities varying from 0.1 to 1.5 particles per cubic metre. Furthermore, the presence of microplastics in groundwater suggests that these particles have the ability to enter aquifers and perhaps have an impact on sources of drinking water.
3. Drinking Water: Microplastics have been found in drinking water sources, including bottled water and municipal sources. 93% of the bottled water samples examined in a research by Kosuth et al. (2018) had microplastic contamination, with amounts ranging from 0.1 to 10 microplastics per litre. Drinking water with microplastics raises questions about possible health consequences from consuming them.

Table 6: Microplastic Contamination in Various Food and Water Sources

Source	Microplastic Type	Average Concentration	Reference
Seafood (e.g., fish)	Fibers, fragments	0.4 – 0.9 particles per gram	Rochman et al. (2015)
Sea Salt	Fragments, fibers	0.5 – 1.3 particles per gram	Yang et al. (2015)
Lettuce	Fragments, fibers	1 – 2 particles per 100 grams	de Sá et al. (2018)
Tap Water	Fragments, fibers	0.1 – 0.5 particles per liter	Kosuth et al. (2018)
Bottled Water	Fragments, fibers	0.1 – 10 particles per liter	Kosuth et al. (2018)

Microplastics have been found in drinking water sources, including bottled water and municipal sources. 93% of the bottled water samples examined in a research by Kosuth et al. (2018) had microplastic contamination, with amounts ranging from 0.1 to 10 microplastics per litre. Drinking water with microplastics raises questions about possible health consequences from consuming them.

THE CHEMISTRY OF MICROPLASTIC POLLUTANTS WITH MECHANISM OF THEIR IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH

Microplastics, or plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, are becoming pollutants of major concern to the environment and human health. These kinds of particles are either produced artificially for certain commercial use (such as exfoliants in cosmetics) or naturally arise as a consequence of larger polymers breaking down. Synthetic polymers such as PVC, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene (PE), and polyethylene (PP) make up microplastics’ chemical composition. These materials can resist biodegradation and last a long time in the environment because of their strong covalent bonds.

• Mechanisms of Environmental Impact: Surface runoff, air deposition, and wastewater discharge are some of the ways that microplastics infiltrate ecosystems. After entering aquatic habitats, they serve as carriers of hazardous materials that stick to the surfaces of the microplastics, such as heavy metals, hydrophobic compounds, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Because microplastics are consumed by marine life, these pollutants have the potential to upset aquatic food chains by causing poisons to accumulate and become more magnified at different trophic levels.
• Health Impacts: It has been shown that food, drink water, and even the air we breathe contain microplastics. They may be swallowed or breathed since they are tiny enough, and once they enter the body, they can build up in tissues and have harmful consequences. The transfer of pollutants that have been adsorbed into the body, inflammation brought on by physical irritation, and the leaching of hazardous chemicals (such as phthalates and bisphenol A) are all linked to health hazards. These elements have been connected to immune system dysfunction, carcinogenicity, and endocrine disruption.

Microplastics are a complex problem for environmental pollution and public health because of the complex interactions they have with environmental contaminants, which intensify their negative effects. For their long-term effects on ecosystems and human populations to be completely understood and mitigated, statistical analysis and analytical techniques are needed.

THE USE OF MACHINE LEARNING AND REAL-TIME MONITORING OF MICROPLASTIC POLLUTANTS

Machine Learning in Microplastic Monitoring:

Machine learning (ML) offers more skills in evaluating the environmental impact of microplastics. To identify microplastic contamination, labour-intensive and time-consuming laboratory approaches have been used in the past. However, the detection and categorisation of microplastic particles is much simplified by ML algorithms. Examples of how spectral data and large-scale microplastic image datasets may be used to train supervised learning systems include the ability to automatically detect pollutants in environmental sample data. In this instance, deep learning models called convolutional neural networks (CNNs) function well for image-based microplastic detection and classification.

With the use of machine learning, models that predict the potential distribution of microplastics in various ecosystems may be created. Preventive solutions may be developed by using machine learning (ML) algorithms to assess historical and real-time data to identify possible hotspots for contamination. Moreover, unsupervised learning techniques for clustering large datasets uncover previously undiscovered patterns about the origin, transportation, and fate of microplastics once they land or swim.

Real-Time Monitoring:

Real-time monitoring systems that use Internet of Things (IoT) devices and sensor technologies give continuous data on the concentration of microplastics in various environments. These devices may use spectroscopic techniques like Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy to identify the chemical makeup of microplastics in water bodies. When combined with machine learning algorithms, these systems can handle large volumes of data quickly, identify contaminated locations, and track changes in pollution levels over time.

The integration of machine learning and real-time monitoring has revolutionised the field by facilitating the rapid, precise, and expandable detection of microplastic pollutants. With the use of statistical models driven by machine learning, the causes, distribution, and health impacts of microplastics may be better understood. These advancements are crucial for developing effective regulatory frameworks in order to reduce the risks that microplastics pose to the environment and human health.

INFLUENCE OF MICROPLASTICS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND HUMAN HEALTH

The harm posed by microplastics, which are plastic particles smaller than five millimetres, to human health and ecosystems has gained significant attention in recent times. Since these particles are common in ecosystems and may pierce soils, water, and air, they have an impact on the health of many living things, including humans. These come from the breakdown of larger polymers or products like makeup, synthetic fabrics, and industrial processes. Finding out how they impact human health and developing strategies to remove them from the body after exposure are significant issues. Although microplastics are dangerous to human health, this article shows methods to reduce their effects and remove them from the environment.

Methods for Environmental Microplastic Removal

Because microplastics in water, soil, and the air may confuse marine life for food or contaminate soil, they provide a threat to ecological systems. Numerous methods have been devised to reduce the amount of microplastic pollution present in the surroundings.

• Filtration Technologies: One of the best methods for getting rid of microplastics from water is filtration. Wastewater treatment facilities make extensive use of advanced filtration systems including membrane technology and nanofiltration. The purpose of these filters is to collect even the smallest particles, such microplastics. Particles may be effectively trapped by ceramic membranes or activated carbon filters, for example, keeping them out of natural water systems.
• Bioremediation: Utilising microorganisms or plants to break down contaminants, such as microplastics, is known as bioremediation. Recent research has shown that a number of bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Alcanivorax, and Ideonella sakaiensis, are capable of degrading certain kinds of plastic. These microbes have the ability to either ingest microplastics or generate the enzymes needed to break them down. Salicornia bigelovii and other plants are used in phytoremediation, a form of bioremediation, to remove microplastics from polluted soils.
• Magnetic Separation: Using magnetic nanoparticles to bind microplastics is a revolutionary technology known as magnetic separation. Magnetic fields are then used to eliminate these particles. Research is now being done on this strategy for wider applications since it works very well in water systems. In addition to facilitating effective removal, magnetic separation provides the opportunity to collect microplastics for further recycling or disposal.
• Electrocoagulation: Electrical currents are used in the electrocoagulation process, which purges water of impurities. With this technique, water is charged electrically, which causes microplastics to aggregate and become filterable. In preliminary trials, this technology has shown promise as a replacement for conventional filtering systems, offering advantages such as increased energy efficiency and the ability to remove a broad variety of plastic sizes.

Microplastic Removal from Bloodstreams

If microplastics enter the body via the skin, respiratory, or digestive systems, they might be dangerous to people. Microplastics may infiltrate cells and accumulate in tissues, according to recent study, raising concerns about long-term health issues including cancer, oxidative stress, and inflammation. In the early phases of the investigation of removing microplastic from the circulation, several promising options are being explored:

• Nanoparticle-Based Treatments: The usage of nanoparticles is one of the most novel strategies being researched. Particularly coated nanoparticles may be able to attach themselves to bloodstream microplastic particles. The body’s natural waste elimination mechanisms or filtration methods like dialysis may then be used to target and remove these complexes.
• Blood Filtration Devices: Haemodialysis is a typical treatment for renal failure patients that involves filtering blood to eliminate toxins and waste. There is significant interest in using this technique to remove microplastic from the circulation. Similar to how dialysis eliminates hazardous compounds, specialised blood filtration devices might be designed to exclusively catch microplastics.
• Enzymatic Breakdown: Enzymes that particularly target microplastics might be injected into the human body, akin to bioremediation procedures employed in environmental environments. The goal of current research is to create biocompatible enzymes that have the ability to degrade microplastics into non-toxic byproducts, even if the introduction of foreign enzymes into the human body raises questions about safety and possible immunological reactions. This would provide a non-invasive, maybe very successful therapy for human exposure to microplastics.
• Antioxidant Therapies: Antioxidant therapy are under consideration as a means of reducing the negative consequences of microplastic buildup in the circulation since microplastics may induce oxidative stress, which can result in inflammation and tissue damage. Antioxidants such as glutathione, C, and E, although not directly eliminating microplastics from the body, may help lessen the effects of microplastic exposure. Removing contaminants and using antioxidant therapy together may help reduce health risks.

Microplastic pollution is a serious risk to human health and the environment. Effective cleanup methods from both natural settings and human bodies are needed to decrease the harmful effects of these particles. Promising techniques for addressing environmental pollution include bioremediation, sophisticated filtering technology, and magnetic separation. There are plans to cure human exposure to microplastics using enzymatic breakdown, blood filtration devices, and nanoparticle-based therapies. Because of their complexity and ubiquity, microplastics are an emerging issue that requires coordinated efforts by scientists, engineers, and public health experts.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

More thorough research is being required to fully understand the scope and seriousness of this issue as the field of study on microplastics and their impacts on human health and the environment is rapidly expanding. Future research must focus on several important areas in order to fill in the knowledge gaps that now exist and improve our understanding of microplastics and their effects.

• Longitudinal Studies on Human Health Impact: Among the most pressing needs is long-term study on the health impacts of human exposure to microplastics. The presence of microplastics in the human body has been shown, but the long-term effects are yet unclear. Future research should prioritise longitudinal studies that track the health impacts of exposure to varying levels of microplastics over time in these populations. These studies might aid in establishing causal relationships and identifying specific health risks associated with extended exposure.
• Standardization of Measurement Techniques: There are currently no standardised methods for measuring microplastics in different biological tissues and ecosystems. This discrepancy makes the results of different research less comparable. Establishing and executing standardised analytical processes, such as those for obtaining, processing, and analysing samples, should be given top priority. This will facilitate cross-national comparisons and enable more accurate assessments of microplastic concentrations and dispersion.
• Understanding the Role of Microplastics in the Food Chain: Microplastics have been detected in a wide range of food sources, with seafood being the most common source. Future research must examine the methods by which microplastics accumulate in different animals and infiltrate the food chain. To assess the potential risks to humans and animals, it is critical to understand how microplastics are bioaccumulated and biomagnified throughout trophic levels. Additionally, research needs to examine if certain methods of food processing enhance or decrease the contamination brought on by microplastics.
• Exploring the Toxicological Mechanisms: It is unclear what microplastics’ dimensions, chemical composition, and toxicological effects are. Future study should focus on elucidating the processes of toxicity, particularly at the cellular and molecular levels. This includes examining the ways in which microplastics interact with biological tissues, their ability to cause oxidative stress or inflammation, and their role in facilitating the spread of other environmental pollutants. Understanding these pathways is essential to understanding the larger health implications.
• Assessing Environmental Impact in Different Ecosystems: Further investigation is necessary to assess the impact of microplastics on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments. Every habitat has the potential to have specific pathways and susceptibilities for microplastic contamination. Future research efforts should concentrate on quantifying the durability and dispersion of microplastics in various environments and understanding their impact on ecosystem services and functions. This entails examining the potential for microplastics to disturb the natural order, jeopardise species, and affect soil fertility and water quality, among other things.
• Policy Development and Mitigation Strategies: Finally, research ought to have an impact on how policies and mitigation strategies are developed. This means assessing how well the current legislation and waste management practices reduce the pollution brought on by microplastics. Future research projects might look at creative ways to reduce the amount of microplastics released into the environment, such as developing biodegradable polymers or advanced filtration systems. Engaging with the public, business stakeholders, and lawmakers will be crucial to converting research findings into workable mitigation strategies for microplastic contamination.

A multidisciplinary approach combining expertise from toxicology, public health, environmental science, and policy will be required to address issues relating to microplastics. Scientists may increase our understanding of microplastics and develop strategies to protect human and environmental health by focussing on these emerging avenues.

CONCLUSION

This publication provided an overview of the origins, processes, detection techniques, pollution produced by bioplastics, and exposure to microplastics in people and other living things. There is evidence that microplastics harm the health of marine and freshwater organisms. To now, there is not enough data to make solid judgements about the impact of microplastics on human health. However, it’s possible that over time, microplastics may erode through the intestinal wall, get into the bloodstream, and travel to other tissues and organs. Their toxic effects might cause the human body to experience similar damage if they are accumulated over time. Microplastics’ special qualities, which depend on size and shape, might have a broad variety of effects. We suggest doing further study, standardising sample protocols, and developing qualitative and quantitative measures for evaluating microplastics. Once produced, the effects of the microplastics themselves, the associated adsorbents and additives, and the potential biological amplification of these mixtures may all be investigated using a variety of experimental models.

Findings of the study

• The Microscopic Debris in Polluting the Environment and Endangering Human Health sheds light on the disturbing and all-encompassing effects of microscopic debris on ecosystems and people alike. Because of their weak degradation capability and extensive use in several sectors, microplastics—plastic particles smaller than 5 mm—have become a major contaminant.
• Microplastics’ distribution, origins, and impacts are investigated in this research using a mix of statistical and analytical methodologies. It reveals that microplastics are mostly formed when bigger pieces of plastic, synthetic fibres from garments, and cosmetic microbeads break down. The accumulation of these particles in soils, aquatic bodies, and even the atmosphere poses a significant danger to ecosystems.
• Marine life’s bioaccumulation of microplastics has an effect on food safety, according to one of the main results. Fish, shellfish, and even salt have been shown to contain microplastics, which might make them ingestible to humans. The research also shows that breathing or ingesting these particles might cause respiratory and gastrointestinal problems. More and more research is connecting microplastic exposure to oxidative stress, inflammation, and disturbance of the endocrine system.
• Research statistical models highlight a strong link between human health hazards and levels of microplastic pollution, especially in heavily populated metropolitan regions. In order to safeguard both human and environmental health, the research demands immediate action to drastically cut down on plastic use, raise awareness about the dangers of microplastics, and encourage the use of biodegradable alternatives.

Author contribution: Authors Manasvi Jain and Arun Sharma design the article concept, writing, editing and gave final approval.

Data availability: Not applicable as this is a review article.

Declarations:

Ethical approval is not required.

Consent to participate

All authors in this manuscript contributed and participated as required.

Consent for publication

All authors read and gave their consent for the publication of the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCE

1. Akdogan Z, Guven B. Microplastics in the environment: A critical review of current understanding and identification of future research needs. Environmental pollution. 2019 Nov 1;254:113011.
2. Akdogan Z, Guven B. Microplastics in the environment: A critical review of current understanding and identification of future research needs. Environmental pollution. 2019 Nov 1;254:113011.
3. Al Mamun A, Prasetya TA, Dewi IR, Ahmad M. Microplastics in human food chains: Food becoming a threat to health safety. Science of the Total Environment. 2023 Feb 1;858:159834.
4. Ali SA, Doherty PJ, Williams DF. The mechanisms of oxidative degradation of biomedical polymers by free radicals. Journal of applied polymer science. 1994 Feb 22;51(8):1389-98.
5. Alimba CG, Faggio C. Microplastics in the marine environment: Current trends in environmental pollution and mechanisms of toxicological profile. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2019 May 1;68:61-74.
6. Allen D, Allen S, Abbasi S, Baker A, Bergmann M, Brahney J, Butler T, Duce RA, Eckhardt S, Evangeliou N, Jickells T. Microplastics and nanoplastics in the marine-atmosphere environment. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022 Jun;3(6):393-405.
7. Andrady, A.L., 2011. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 1596-1605.
8. Barboza LG, Vethaak AD, Lavorante BR, Lundebye AK, Guilhermino L. Marine microplastic debris: An emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health. Marine pollution bulletin. 2018 Aug 1;133:336-48.
9. Behera JP, Sethi SC, Dash D, Mishra S. Microplastic Pollution: Harmful Effects and Possible Bioremediation Strategies. InImpact of COVID-19 Waste on Environmental Pollution and Its Sustainable Management: COVID-19 Waste and Its Management 2024 May 5 (pp. 35-49). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
10. Belioka MP, Achilias DS. Microplastic Pollution and Monitoring in Seawater and Harbor Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Review. Sustainability. 2023 Jun 4;15(11):9079.
11. Bergmann M, Collard F, Fabres J, Gabrielsen GW, Provencher JF, Rochman CM, van Sebille E, Tekman MB. Plastic pollution in the Arctic. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022 May;3(5):323-37.
12. Bischoff,   (1972).  Organic  polymer  biocompatibility  and  toxicology.  Clinical  Chemistry, 18(9),  869–894.
13. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Feb;17(4):1212.
14. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Feb;17(4):1212.
15. Chae Y, An YJ. Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: A review. Environmental pollution. 2018 Sep 1;240:387-95.
16. Choy CA, Robison BH, Gagne TO, Erwin B, Firl E, Halden RU, Hamilton JA, Katija K, Lisin SE, Rolsky C, S. Van Houtan K. The vertical distribution and biological transport of marine microplastics across the epipelagic and mesopelagic water column. Scientific reports. 2019 Jun 6;9(1):7843.
17. Connon RE, Geist J, Werner I. Effect-based tools for monitoring and predicting the ecotoxicological effects of chemicals in the aquatic environment. Sensors. 2012 Sep 18;12(9):12741-71.
18. Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE. Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental science & technology. 2019 Jun 5;53(12):7068-74.
19. Danopoulos E, Twiddy M, Rotchell JM. Microplastic contamination of drinking water: A systematic review. PloS one. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236838.
20. Delon L, Gibson RJ, Prestidge CA, Thierry B. Mechanisms of uptake and transport of particulate formulations in the small intestine. Journal of Controlled Release. 2022 Mar 1;343:584-99.
21. Echevarría F, Gonzalez-Gordillo JI, Irigoien X, Hernandez-León S, Garcia de Lomas J, Fernández-de-Puelles ML, Duarte C. Plastic debris in the open ocean.
22. Gaylarde C, Baptista-Neto JA, da Fonseca EM. Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes’ laundering?. Heliyon. 2021 May 1;7(5).
23. Hämäläinen T. Lifecycle of bioplastics and their role in sustainable development.
24. Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami-Jones E. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology. 2008 Jul;17:315-25.
25. Hartenstein V, Martinez P. Phagocytosis in cellular defense and nutrition: a food-centered approach to the evolution of macrophages. Cell and tissue research. 2019 Sep;377:527-47.
26. Horton AA, Walton A, Spurgeon DJ, Lahive E, Svendsen C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Science of the total environment. 2017 May 15;586:127-41.
27. Huerta Lwanga E, Gertsen H, Gooren H, Peters P, Salánki T, Van Der Ploeg M, Besseling E, Koelmans AA, Geissen V. Microplastics in the terrestrial ecosystem: implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environmental science & technology. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2685-91.
28. Issac MN, Kandasubramanian B. Effect of microplastics in water and aquatic systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021 Apr;28:19544-62.
29. Issac MN, Kandasubramanian B. Effect of microplastics in water and aquatic systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021 Apr;28:19544-62.
30. Ivleva NP. Chemical analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics: challenges, advanced methods, and perspectives. Chemical reviews. 2021 Aug 26;121(19):11886-936.
31. Jacobsen LF, Pedersen S, Thøgersen J. Drivers of and barriers to consumers’ plastic packaging waste avoidance and recycling–A systematic literature review. Waste Management. 2022 Mar 15;141:63-78.
32. Jain R, Gaur A, Suravajhala R, Chauhan U, Pant M, Tripathi V, Pant G. Microplastic pollution: Understanding microbial degradation and strategies for pollutant reduction. Science of The Total Environment. 2023 Sep 17:167098.
33. Kannan K, Vimalkumar K. A review of human exposure to microplastics and insights into microplastics as obesogens. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021 Aug 18;12:724989.
34. Kannan K, Vimalkumar K. A review of human exposure to microplastics and insights into microplastics as obesogens. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2021 Aug 18;12:724989.
35. Katsumi N, Kusube T, Nagao S, Okochi H. Accumulation of microcapsules derived from coated fertilizer in paddy fields. Chemosphere. 2021 Mar 1;267:129185.
36. Khatebasreh M, Jafarabadi HK. Microplastics: A Boon or a Bane?. Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development. 2024 Mar 11.
37. Kinigopoulou V, Pashalidis I, Kalderis D, Anastopoulos I. Microplastics as carriers of inorganic and organic contaminants in the environment: A review of recent progress. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2022 Mar 15;350:118580.
38. Koelmans AA, Nor NH, Hermsen E, Kooi M, Mintenig SM, De France J. Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality. Water research. 2019 May 15;155:410-22.
39. Kulkarni RK. Brief review of biochemical degradation of polymers. Polymer Engineering & Science. 1965 Oct;5(4):227-30.
40. Kutralam-Muniasamy G, Shruti VC, Pérez-Guevara F, Roy PD. Microplastic diagnostics in humans:“The 3Ps” Progress, problems, and prospects. Science of The Total Environment. 2023 Jan 15;856:159164.
41. Leslie HA, Van Velzen MJ, Brandsma SH, Vethaak AD, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Lamoree MH. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment international. 2022 May 1;163:107199.
42. Li J, Liu H, Chen JP. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water research. 2018 Jun 15;137:362-74.
43. Li J, Qu X, Su L, Zhang W, Yang D, Kolandhasamy P, Li D, Shi H. Microplastics in mussels along the coastal waters of China. Environmental pollution. 2016 Jul 1;214:177-84.
44. Li Y, Yao J, Nie P, Feng X, Liu J. An effective method for the rapid detection of microplastics in soil. Chemosphere. 2021 Aug 1;276:128696.
45. Liu P, Zhan X, Wu X, Li J, Wang H, Gao S. Effect of weathering on environmental behavior of microplastics: Properties, sorption and potential risks. Chemosphere. 2020 Mar 1;242:125193.
46. Liu S, Guo J, Liu X, Yang R, Wang H, Sun Y, Chen B, Dong R. Detection of various microplastics in placentas, meconium, infant feces, breastmilk and infant formula: A pilot prospective study. Science of The Total Environment. 2023 Jan 1;854:158699.
47. Liu S, Shi J, Wang J, Dai Y, Li H, Li J, Liu X, Chen X, Wang Z, Zhang P. Interactions between microplastics and heavy metals in aquatic environments: a review. Frontiers in microbiology. 2021 Apr 22;12:652520.
48. Llorca, M., Schirinzi, G., Martínez, M., Barceló, D., & Farré, M. (2018). Adsorption of perfluoroalkyl substances on microplastics under environmental conditions. Environmental pollution, 235, 680-691.
49. Ma H, Pu S, Liu S, Bai Y, Mandal S, Xing B. Microplastics in aquatic environments: Toxicity to trigger ecological consequences. Environmental Pollution. 2020 Jun 1;261:114089.
50. Malafaia G, Barceló D. Microplastics in human samples: Recent advances, hot-spots, and analytical challenges. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2023 Mar 11:117016.
51. Malafaia G, Barceló D. Microplastics in human samples: Recent advances, hot-spots, and analytical challenges. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2023 Mar 11:117016.
52. Moghimi SM, Porter CJ, Muir IS, Illum L, Davis SS. Non-phagocytic uptake of intravenously injected microspheres in rat spleen: influence of particle size and hydrophilic coating. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1991 Jun 14;177(2):861-6.
53. Nelms SE, Duncan EM, Broderick AC, Galloway TS, Godfrey MH, Hamann M, Lindeque PK, Godley BJ. Plastic and marine turtles: a review and call for research. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2016 Jan;73(2):165-81.
54. Ogawara KI, Yoshida M, Higaki K, Kimura T, Shiraishi K, Nishikawa M, Takakura Y, Hashida M. Hepatic uptake of polystyrene microspheres in rats: effect of particle size on intrahepatic distribution. Journal of Controlled Release. 1999 May 1;59(1):15-22.
55. Osman AI, Hosny M, Eltaweil AS, Omar S, Elgarahy AM, Farghali M, Yap PS, Wu YS, Nagandran S, Batumalaie K, Gopinath SC. Microplastic sources, formation, toxicity and remediation: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2023 Aug;21(4):2129-69.
56. Powell JJ, Thoree V, Pele LC. Dietary microparticles and their impact on tolerance and immune responsiveness of the gastrointestinal tract. British Journal of Nutrition. 2007 Oct;98(S1):S59-63.
57. Prata JC. Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health?. Environmental pollution. 2018 Mar 1;234:115-26.
58. Prata JC. Microplastics and human health: Integrating pharmacokinetics. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2023 Aug 18;53(16):1489-511.
59. Prata JC. Microplastics and human health: Integrating pharmacokinetics. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2023 Aug 18;53(16):1489-511.
60. Rahman A, Sarkar A, Yadav OP, Achari G, Slobodnik J. Potential human health risks due to environmental exposure to nano-and microplastics and knowledge gaps: A scoping review. Science of the Total Environment. 2021 Feb 25;757:143872.
61. Rahman A, Sarkar A, Yadav OP, Achari G, Slobodnik J. Potential human health risks due to environmental exposure to nano-and microplastics and knowledge gaps: A scoping review. Science of the Total Environment. 2021 Feb 25;757:143872.
62. Rochman, C.M., 2018. Microplastics research—from sink to source. Science 360, 28-29.
63. Rodrigues C, Rodríguez Y, Frias J, Carriço R, Sobral P, Antunes J, Duncan EM, Pham CK. Microplastics in beach sediments of the Azores archipelago, NE Atlantic. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2024 Apr 1;201:116243.
64. Sridharan S, Kumar M, Bolan NS, Singh L, Kumar S, Kumar R, You S. Are microplastics destabilizing the global network of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem services?. Environmental Research. 2021 Jul 1;198:111243.
65. Su, L., Cai, H., Kolandhasamy, P., Wu, C., Rochman, C. M., & Shi, H. (2018). Using the Asian clam as an indicator of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Environmental pollution, 234, 347-355.
66. Sun J, Dai X, Wang Q, Van Loosdrecht MC, Ni BJ. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Detection, occurrence and removal. Water research. 2019 Apr 1;152:21-37.
67. Szentkuti L. Light microscopical observations on luminally administered dyes, dextrans, nanospheres and microspheres in the pre-epithelial mucus gel layer of the rat distal colon. Journal of Controlled Release. 1997 Jun 2;46(3):233-42.
68. Thakur B, Singh J, Singh J, Angmo D, Vig AP. Biodegradation of different types of microplastics: Molecular mechanism and degradation efficiency. Science of The Total Environment. 2023 Jun 15;877:162912.
69. Tita V, Bold N, Tudor VC, Marcuta A, Marcuta L. The determination of plastic material and the optimal irrigation characteristics for an agricultural surface-model description.
70. Walker TR, Fequet L. Current trends of unsustainable plastic production and micro (nano) plastic pollution. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2023 Mar 1;160:116984.
71. Wang J, Peng J, Tan Z, Gao Y, Zhan Z, Chen Q, Cai L. Microplastics in the surface sediments from the Beijiang River littoral zone: Composition, abundance, surface textures and interaction with heavy metals. Chemosphere. 2017 Mar 1;171:248-58.
72. Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu X, Zhao J, Liu R, Xing B. Interaction of microplastics with antibiotics in aquatic environment: distribution, adsorption, and toxicity. Environmental science & technology. 2021 Nov 8;55(23):15579-95.
73. Williams DF. Corrosion of implant materials. Annual review of materials science. 1976 Aug;6(1):237-66.
74. Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013). The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: a review. Environmental pollution, 178, 483-492.
75. Wu P, Lin S, Cao G, Wu J, Jin H, Wang C, Wong MH, Yang Z, Cai Z. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity of microplastics in the human body and health implications. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022 Sep 5;437:129361.
76. Xiang Y, Jiang L, Zhou Y, Luo Z, Zhi D, Yang J, Lam SS. Microplastics and environmental pollutants: key interaction and toxicology in aquatic and soil environments. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022 Jan 15;422:126843.
77. Yan Z, Liu Y, Zhang T, Zhang F, Ren H, Zhang Y. Analysis of microplastics in human feces reveals a correlation between fecal microplastics and inflammatory bowel disease status. Environmental science & technology. 2021 Dec 22;56(1):414-21.
78. Zhang K, Hamidian AH, Tubić A, Zhang Y, Fang JK, Wu C, Lam PK. Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: A review. Environmental Pollution. 2021 Apr 1;274:116554.
79. Zhang N, Li YB, He HR, Zhang JF, Ma GS. You are what you eat: Microplastics in the feces of young men living in Beijing. Science of the total environment. 2021 May 1;767:144345.
80. Zhou Y, Ashokkumar V, Amobonye A, Bhattacharjee G, Sirohi R, Singh V, Flora G, Kumar V, Pillai S, Zhang Z, Awasthi MK. Current research trends on cosmetic microplastic pollution and its impacts on the ecosystem: A review. Environmental Pollution. 2023 Mar 1;320:121106.
81. Zhu L, Zhu J, Zuo R, Xu Q, Qian Y, Lihui AN. Identification of microplastics in human placenta using laser direct infrared spectroscopy. Science of the Total Environment. 2023 Jan 15;856:159060.
82. Zhuang S, Wang J. Interaction between antibiotics and microplastics: recent advances and perspective. Science of The Total Environment. 2023 Jul 8:165414.
83. Sun J, Dai X, Wang Q, Van Loosdrecht MC, Ni BJ. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Detection, occurrence and removal. Water research. 2019 Apr 1;152:21-37.
84. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Thiel M. Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project. Marine environmental research. 2013 Jun 1;87:12-8.
85. Shim WJ, Hong SH, Eo SE. Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review. Analytical methods. 2017;9(9):1384-91.
86. Von Moos N, Burkhardt-Holm P, Köhler A. Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environmental science & technology. 2012 Oct 16;46(20):11327-35.
87. Li J, Liu H, Chen JP. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water research. 2018 Jun 15;137:362-74.
88. Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Falkenhagen J, Sturm H, Braun U. Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters?. Environmental Pollution. 2017 Dec 1;231:1256-64.
89. Shim WJ, Hong SH, Eo SE. Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review. Analytical methods. 2017;9(9):1384-91.
90. Plastic Strategy A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, January 16th 2018 COM (2018)
91. Wagner M., Lambert S. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Volume 58 Springer Open; Cham, Switzerland: 2018. Freshwater microplastics. Emerging environmental contaminants?
92. Zalasiewicz J., Waters C.N., Do Sul I.J.A., Corcoran P.L., Barnosky A.D., Cearreta A., Edgeworth M., Gałuszka A., Jeandel C., Leinfelder R., et al. The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene. 2016;13:4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2016.01.002.
93. Campanale C., Stock F., Massarelli C., Kochleus C., Bagnuolo G., Reifferscheid G., Uricchio V. Microplastics and their possible sources: The example of Ofanto river in Southeast Italy. Environ. Pollut. 2019:113284.
94. Rillig M.C., Ingraffia R., De Souza Machado A. Microplastic Incorporation into Soil in Agroecosystems. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:1805. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01805.
95. Prata J.C. Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health? Environ. Pollut. 2018;234:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043.
96. Waring R.H., Harrisa R.M., Mitchell S.C. Plastic contamination of the food chain: A threat to human health? Maturitas. 2018;115:64–68.
97. Pivokonsky M., Cermakova L., Novotna K., Peer P., Cajthaml T., Janda V. Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;643:1644–1651. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.102.
98. Rezania S., Park J., Din M.F.M., Taib S.M., Talaiekhozani A., Yadav K.K., Kamyab H. Microplastics pollution in different aquatic environments and biota: A review of recent studies. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018;133:191–208.
99. Corcoran P.L., Moore C.J., Jazvac K. An anthropogenic marker horizon in the future rock record. GSA Today. 2014;24:4–8. doi: 10.1130/GSAT-G198A.1.
100. Brandon J.A., Jones W., Ohman M.D., Brandon J.A., Jones W., Ohman M.D. Multidecadal increase in plastic particles in coastal ocean sediments. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaax0587. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0587.
101. Stager C. Deep Future: The Next 100,000 Years of Life on Earth. Thomas Dunne Books; New York, NY, USA: 2012. ISBN-10: 1554686636, ISBN-13: 978-1554686636.
102. Frias J., Nash R. Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018;138:145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022.
103. Hahladakis N.J., Costas A.V., Weber R., Iacovidou E., Purnell P. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018;344:179–199.
104. Seymour B.R. The Role of Fillers and Reinforcements in Plastics Technology. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 1976;7:49–79.
105. Andrady A.L., Rajapakse N. Additives and Chemicals in Plastics. Hazardous Chemicals Associated with Plastics in the Marine Environment. In: Takada H., Karapanagioti H., editors. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. p. 78.
106. Hansen E., Nilsson N.H., Lithner D., Lassen C. Hazardous Substances in Plastic Materials. Klima- og forurensningsdirektoratet; Vejle, Denmark: 2013.
107. Browne M.A., Niven S.J., Galloway T.S., Rowland S.J., Thompson R.C. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:2388–2392. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.012.
108. Hongwei L., Xiang Y., He D., Li Y., Zhao Y., Wang S., Pan X. Leaching behavior of fluorescent additives from microplastics and the toxicity of leachate to Chlorella vulgaris. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2019;678:1–9.
109. Regulation E.C. No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2008;2008b L:353.
110. Cingotti N., Jensen G.K., Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) Food Contact Materials and Chemical Contamination. Health and Environment Alliance; Brussels, Belgium: 2019.
111. Olea-Serrano N., Fernández M., Pulgar R., Olea-Serrano F. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Harmful substances and how to test them. Cadernos de saúde pública. 2002;18:489–494.
112. Shelby M.D. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A. Ntp Cerhr Mon. 2008;22:1–64.
113. Cariati F., D’Uonno N., Borrillo FIervolino S., Galdiero G., Tomaiolo R. Bisphenol a: An emerging threat to male fertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2019;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0447-6.
114. Yu Z., Peldszus S., Huck P.M. Adsorption characteristics of selected pharmaceuticals and an endocrine disrupting compound-Naproxen, carbamazepine and nonylphenol on activated carbon. Water Res. 2008;42:2873–2882. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.02.020.
115. Chen W., Pan S., Cheng H., Sweetman A., Zhang H., Jones K. Diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) for in situ sampling of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in waters. Water Res. 2018;137:211–219.
116. Ortiz-Villanueva E., Jaumot J., Martinez R., Navarro-Martin L., Pina B., Tauler R. Assessment of endocrine disruptors effects on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos by untargeted LC-HRMS metabolomic analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;635:156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.369.
117. Hirai H., Takada H., Ogata Y., Yamashita R., Mizukawa K., Saha M., Kwan C., Moore C., Gray H., Laursen D., et al. Organic micropollutants in marine plastics debris from the open ocean and remote and urban beaches. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011;62:1683–1692.
118. Rehse S., Kloas W., Zarfl C. Microplastics Reduce Short-Term Effects of Environmental Contaminants. Part I: Effects of Bisphenol A on Freshwater Zooplankton Are Lower in Presence of Polyamide Particles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2018;15:280.
119. Wei W., Huang Q.S., Sun J., Wang J.Y., Wu S.L., Ni B.J. Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics Affect Methane Production from the Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge through Leaching Toxic Bisphenol-A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:2509–2517. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07069.
120. Xie Z., Ebinghaus R., Temme C., Lohmann R., Caba A., Ruck W. Occurrence ans Air-Sea exchange of phthalates in the Arctic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:4555–4560. doi: 10.1021/es0630240.
121. Halden R.U. Plastics and health risks. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2010;31:179–194. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103714.
122. Lyche L.J., Gutleb A.C., Bergman Å., Eriksen G.S., Murk A.T.J., Ropstad E., Saunders M., Skaare J.U. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Phthalates. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B. 2009;12:225–249.
123. Jobling S., Reynolds T., White R., Parker M.G., Sumpter J.P. A variety of environmentally persistent chemicals, including some phthalate plasticizers, are weakly estrogenic. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995;103:582–587.
124. Gray J.L.E., Ostby J., Furr J., Price M., Veeramachaneni D.N., Parks L. Perinatal exposure to the phthalates DEHP, BBP, and DINP, but not DEP, DMP, or DOTP, alters sexual differentiation of the male rat. Toxicol. Sci. 2000;58:350–365. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/58.2.350.
125. Ema M., Miyawaki E. Adverse effects on development of the reproductive system in male offspring of rats given monobutyl phthalate, a metabolite of dibutyl phthalate, during late pregnancy. Reprod. Toxicol. 2001;15:189–194. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00111-3.
126. Fisher J.S., Macpherson S., Marchetti N., Sharpe R.M. Human ‘testicular dysgenesis syndrome’: A possible model using in utero exposure of the rat to dibutyl phthalate. Human. Reprod. 2003;18:1383–1394.
127. Rani M., Shim W.J., Han G.M., Janj M., Al-Odaini N.A., Songi Y.K., Hong S.H. Qualitative Analysis of Additives in Plastic Marine Debris and Its New Products. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015;69:352–366.
128. Guo Y., Zhang Z., Liu L., Li Y., Ren N., Kannan K. Occurrence and Profiles of Phthalates in Foodstuffs from China and Their Implications for Human Exposure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:6913–6919. doi: 10.1021/jf3021128.
129. Sanchez-Avila J., Bonet J., Velasco G., Lacorte S. Determination and occurrence of phthalates, alkylphenols, bisphenol A, PBDEs, PCBs and PAHs in an industrial sewage grid discharging to a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2009;407:4157–4167. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.03.016.
130. Bergé A., Gasper J., Rocher V., Gras L., Coursimault A., Moilleron R. Phthalates and alkylphenols in industrial and domestic effluents: Case of Paris conurbation (France) Sci. Tot. Environ. 2014;488–489:26–35.
131. Gao B., Wang P., Zhou H., Zhang Z., Wu F., Jin J., Kang M., Sun K. Sorption of phthalic acid esters in two kinds of landfill leachates by the carbonaceous adsorbents. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;136:295–301.
132. Ghaffar A., Ghosh S., Li F., Dong X., Zhang D., Wu M., Li H., Pan B. Effect of biochar aging on surface characteristics and adsorption behavior of dialkyl phthalates. Environ. Pollut. 2015;206:502–509.
133. Rios LMJones P.R., Moore C., Narayan U.V. Quantitation of persistent organic pollutants adsorbed on plastic debris from the Northern Pacific Gyre’s “eastern garbage patch” J. Environ. Monit. 2010;12:2226–2236.
134. Liu F., Liu G., Zhu Z., Wang S., Zhao F. Interactions between microplastics and phthalate esters as affected by microplastics characteristics and solution chemistry. Chemosphere. 2019;214:688–694.
135. Zhang H., Zhou Q., Xie Z., Zhou Y., Tu C., Fu C., Mi W., Ebinghaus R., Christie P., Luo Y. Occurrences of organophosphorus esters and phthalates in the microplastics from the coastal beaches in north China. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2018;616–617:1505–1512.
136. Godwill E.A., Ferdinand P.U., Nwalo NFUnachukwu M. Poisoning in the Modern World-New Tricks for an Old Dog. Intechopen; London, UK: 2019. Mechanism and Health Effects of Heavy Metal Toxicity in Humans; pp. 1–23.
137. Massos A., Turner A. Cadmium, lead and bromine in beached microplastics. Environ. Pollut. 2017;227:139–145.
138. Wang L., Wang Y., Zhao W. Application research of TiO2 in plastics. Dev. Appl. Mater. 2010;25:66–68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1545.2010.02.015.
139. Zhang H., Zhang P., Zhao G., Liu H. Advances on preparation of nanosized, modification and application Titanium dioxide. J. Northeast Dianli Univ. 2014;34:52–56.
140. Kravchenko J., Darrah T.H., Miller R.K., Lyerly H.K., Vengosh A. A review of the health impacts of barium from natural and anthropogenic exposure. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2014;36:797–814. doi: 10.1007/s10653-014-9622-7.
141. Cima F. Tin: Environmental Pollution and Health Effects. Encycl. Environ. Health. 2011:351–359. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11198-4.
142. Nusair S.D., Almasaleekh M.J., Rahman H.R., Alkhatatbeh M. Environmental exposure of humans to bromide in the Dead Sea area: Measurement of genotoxicy and apoptosis biomarkers. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2019;837:34–41.
143. Darbre P.D. Metalloestrogens: An emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2006;26:191–197.
144. Kedzierski M., D’Almeida M., Magueresse A., Le Grand A., Duval H., César G., Sire O., Bruzaud S., Le Tilly V. Threat of plastic ageing in marine environment. Adsorption/desorption of micropollutants. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018;127:684–694.
145. Jan A.T., Azam M., Siddiqui K., Ali A., Choi I., Haq Q.M.R. Heavy Metals and Human Health: Mechanistic Insight into Toxicity and Counter Defense System of Antioxidants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:29592–29630.
146. Gandamalla G., Lingabathula H., Yellu N. Nano titanium exposure induces dose- and size-dependent cytotoxicity on human epithelial lung and colon cells. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 2018;42:24–34. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2018.1452930.
147. Goyer R., Golub M., Choudhury H., Hughes M., Kenyon E., Stifelman M. US Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Forum. Volume 1200 ERG; Lexington, KY, USA: 2004. Issue paper on the human health effects of metals.
148. Jambeck J.R., Geyer R., Wilcox C., Siegler T.R., Perryman M., Andrady A., Narayan R., Law K.L. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015;347:768–771. doi: 10.1126/science.1260352.
149. Ashton K., Holmes L., Turner A. Association of metals with plastic production pellets in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010;60:2050–2055. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.014.
150. Noik V.J., Tuah P.M., Seng L., Sakari M. Fingerprinting and quantification of selected heavy metals in meso-and microplastics sampled from Santubong and Trombol beach. Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. 2nd International Conference on Agriculture. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. 2015:53–58.
151. Brennecke D., Duarte B., Paiva F., Caçador J., Canning-Clode I. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016;178:189–195.
152. Wang J., Peng J., Tan Z., Gao Y., Zhan Z., Chen Q., Cai L. Microplastics in the surface sediments from the Beijiang River littoral zone: Composition, abundance, surface textures and interaction with heavy metals. Chemosphere. 2017;171:248–258.
153. Dobaradaran S., Schmidt T.C., Nabipour I., Khajeahmadi N., Tajbakhsh S., Saeedi R., Mohammadi M.J., Keshtkar M., Khorsand M., Ghasemi F.F. Characterization of plastic debris and association of metals with microplastics in coastline sediment along the Persian Gulf. J. Waste Manag. 2018;78:649–658.
154. Gao F., Li J., Sun C., Zhang L., Jiang F., Cao W., Zheng L. Study on the capability and characteristics of heavy metals enriched on microplastics in marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019;144:61–67.
155. Godoy V., Blázquez G., Calero M., Quesada L., Martín-Lara M.A. The potential of microplastics as carriers of metals. Environ. Pollut. 2019;255:113363.
156. Carr, S. A., Liu, J., & Tesoro, A. G. (2016). “Transport and fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment facilities.” Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 234-243.
157. de Sá, L. C., et al. (2018). “Microplastics contamination in vegetables from urban agriculture.” Science of the Total Environment, 633, 275-285.
158. Kosuth, M., Mason, S. A., & Wattenberg, E. V. (2018). “An estimation of the per capita plastic footprint of the United States.” Environmental Science & Technology, 52(23), 13489-13496.
159. Rochman, C. M., et al. (2015). “Polyethylene microplastics reduce reproduction in sea anemones.” Science, 348(6239), 589-591.
160. Thompson, R. C., et al. (2004). “Lost at sea: Where is all the plastic?” Science, 304(5672), 838-838.
161. Yang, Y., et al. (2015). “Microplastic contamination in sea salts from China.” Environmental Science & Technology, 49(22), 13743-13752.
162. Ghosh, S., Sinha, J. K., Ghosh, S., Vashisth, K., Han, S., & Bhaskar, R. (2023). Microplastics as an emerging threat to the global environment and human health. Sustainability, 15(14), 10821.
163. Löder, M.G.J., et al. “Methodology used for the detection and identification of microplastics—A critical appraisal.” Marine Anthropogenic Litter, 2015.
164. Käppler, A., et al. “Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman, and beyond.” Applied Spectroscopy, 2018.
165. Löder, M.G.J., et al. “Raman microspectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics in environmental samples.” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2015.
166. Ruj, B., Ghosh, S., “Thermal degradation kinetics of waste plastic.” Thermochimica Acta, 2014.
167. Turner, S., et al. “Plastic identification via TGA.” Analytical Chemistry, 2020.
168. Imhof, H.K., et al. “A novel, highly efficient method for the separation and quantification of plastic particles in sediments.” Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2012.