Adsorption of Malachite Green Using Alkali-Modified Fish Scale Bioadsorbents

The removal of toxic Malachite Green (MG) dye from water was studied using low-cost fish-scale biosorbents chemically activated with NaOH and KOH. The fish scales were cleaned, ground and soaked in 0.3 M NaOH or KOH (24 h), then rinsed and oven-dried to produce two adsorbents (FS-NaOH, FS-KOH) Batch experiments examined the effects of solution pH (3–11), adsorbent dose, and temperature (20–40 °C) on MG uptake. Equilibrium data were fitted to Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The NaOH-treated scales showed higher adsorption capacity than KOH-treated. Removal efficiency increased with higher pH and larger adsorbent dose, reaching >95% at optimal conditions. The data best fit a Langmuir model (monolayer adsorption), with maximum capacities on the order of 10–20 mg·g⁻¹ (FS-NaOH) and lower for FS-KOH. Kinetic analysis indicated pseudo-second-order behavior. The results demonstrate that alkali-modified fish scales are effective biosorbents for MG, with NaOH activation yielding superior performance.

Malachite Green, Fish scale adsorbent, NaOH activation, KOH activation

1. Shaikhiev IG, Kraysman NV, Sverguzova SV, Spesivtseva SE, Yarothckina AN. Fish scales as a biosorbent of pollutants from wastewaters and natural waters: A literature review. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2020;10(6):6893–6905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Badawi AK, Abd Elkodous M, Ali GAM. Recent advances in dye and metal ion removal using efficient adsorbents and novel nano-based materials: An overview. RSC Adv. 2021; 11:36528–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Soltani A, Faramarzi M, Mousavi Parsa SA. A review on adsorbent parameters for removal of dye products from industrial wastewater. Water Qual Res J. 2021;56(4):181–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Yildiz H, Yüksel AY. A novel biosorbent material from waste fish scales (Cyprinus carpio) for biosorption of toxic dyes in aquatic environments. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2025;15: 1535–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Sudarni DHA, Aigbe UO, Ukhurebor KE, Onyancha RB, Kusuma HS, Darmokoesoemo H, et al. Malachite green removal by activated potassium hydroxide clove-leaf agrowaste biosorbent: Characterization, kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies. Adsorption Sci Technol. 2021; 2021:1145312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha PD. Biosorption of malachite green from aqueous solution by Labeo rohita fish scales. Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3:363–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Aguilar-Rosero J, Urbina-López ME, Rodríguez-González BE, León-Villegas SX, Luna-Cruz IE, Cárdenas-Chávez DL. Development and characterization of bioadsorbents derived from agricultural wastes for water reclamation: A review. Appl Sci. 2022;12(5):2740. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Aswathy N, Varghese J, Vinod Kumar R. Photocatalytic degradation of malachite green using vanadium pentoxide-doped NiO thin film by sol–gel spin coating. Eur Phys J Plus. 2022;137: 1344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Keanjun N, Rattanawongwiboon T, Sricharoen P, Laksee S, Saengsane N, Thepchuay Y, et al. Ultrasound-assisted formation of composite materials from fish-scale waste hydroxyapatite in the presence of gamma-irradiated chitosan for the removal of malachite green. RSC Adv. 2024;14: 29737–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Shaikhiev IG, Kraysman NV, Sverguzova SV, Spesivtseva SE, Yarothckina AN. Fish scales as a biosorbent—Adsorption mechanisms and kinetic behavior. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2020;10: 6893–6905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nasuha N, Hameed BH. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm studies of a cationic dye using agricultural waste: Hazelnut shell. Chem Eng J. 2011; 166:575–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha P. Removal of dyes using low-cost biosorbents: Review. Appl Water Sci. 2013;3: 363–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zheng Y, Chen J, Ma S, Lu H, Li F. Alkali treatment of biomass material and its effects on surface functional groups and adsorption performance. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:21235–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Standard Laboratory Reference. Malachite Green Spectrophotometric Data. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bharathi KS, Ramesh ST. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review. Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3:773–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ho YS, McKay G. Pseudo-second-order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999;34: 451–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Foo KY, Hameed BH. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J. 2010; 156:2–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Crini G, Lichtfouse E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ Chem Lett. 2019; 17:145–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Crini G, Lichtfouse E. Environmental benefits of adsorption in wastewater treatment. Environ Chem Lett. 2019; 17:145–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc. 1918; 40:1361–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Freundlich H. Über die Adsorption in Lösungen. Z Phys Chem. 1906;57:385–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Problem-Based Learning Strategy: Effect on Achievement of Genetics among Biology Students in Colleges of Education Oyo, Oyo State
• Gut Content Analysis of Siganus canaliculatus (Danggit)
• Predicting Human Neurotherapeutic Response through Preclinical Imaging Intelligence
• Can Algicidal Bacteria be the Solution to Successfully Manage Freshwater Algal Blooms?
• Boosting Carbon Capture: Progress in Enhancing RuBisCO’s Carboxylase Activity