Analysis of Man-Machine Collaboration, on the Employee Engagement Process: IT Industry Perspective

Analysis of Man-Machine Collaboration, on the Employee Engagement Process: IT Industry Perspective

Dr. Lrk Krishnan¹, Dr. Praveen Kakada², Poorani Sundarrajan³

^1,2,3Vit University, Business School, Chennai, India

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.808076

Received: 18 August 2024; Accepted: 23 August 2024; Published: 31 August 2024

ABSTRACT

This essay explores MMC’s revolutionary potential and argues that it contributes to employee engagement in the technologically advanced workplace. This study used a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative Data Collection was aimed to elicit the essence of the participants’ experiences and perceptions in their work environment. To achieve this, we conducted in-depth interviews with IT experts and managers. Quantitative data collection was undertaken by administering questionnaires to a group of individuals by collecting a simple random sample. The successful integration of people and technology tools in the collaborative process necessitates reevaluating organizational culture as employees are exposed to unique opportunities to connect with cutting-edge technologies. The research suggests that employees’ skill sets should align strategically with the evolving technologies. This proactive approach empowers employees and guarantees that they actively participate in the collaborative ecosystem. We have a paradigm for MMC implementation that goes beyond theoretical frameworks by analyzing market trends and real-world case studies. Beyond theoretical frameworks, the study presents a comprehensive paradigm for applying MMC by utilizing case studies and real-world market trends. This study argues that for humans and computers to collaborate successfully, organizational culture must change, focus on acquiring new skills and competencies, and the application of cutting-edge technologies. The study is restricted to a select few organizations adopting high-end technologies. This study also offers a paradigm for man-machine collaboration that can assist businesses in developing a more motivated and effective workforce by examining market trends and case studies. It offers viewpoints from leaders and knowledge workers in the IT sector about the advantages and difficulties of man-machine collaboration.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Job- satisfaction, Machine Learning, Productivity, Performance, Work culture

INTRODUCTION

The development of intelligent technologies capable of carrying out complex tasks has changed how we operate and revolutionized the workplace. The use of machines has grown prevalent in the information technology sector, where technology is at the core of operations (Jaiswal et al., 2021). However, as technology advances, there is an increasing worry that it may displace human employees and cause job displacement. This concern has prompted a new approach to  employee engagement known as Man-Machine Collaboration. Man-machine collaboration is interacting with machines in the workplace so that both entities can work towards a common objective (Nguyen & Malik, 2022). “Man-machine collaboration refers to the synergistic integration of human capabilities and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance organizational processes and outcomes (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014).  In this context, AI technologies can include machine learning algorithms, robotics, and advanced data analytics, which support humans in decision-making, problem-solving, and routine task automation (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Davenport & Kirby, 2016). By combining the strengths of humans and machines, organizations can achieve higher levels of productivity and innovation.”

The organizational culture must change for this method of increasing employee engagement, and cutting-edge technologies must also be used. Organizations may foster a more engaged and effective workforce, fostering creativity and attaining financial success by embracing man-machine collaboration. Man-machine collaboration is examined as a new paradigm for employee engagement in the IT sector. This research suggests a framework for man-machine collaboration that might assist firms in developing a more engaged and effective workforce by examining industry trends and case studies. Recently, interest has increased in investigating novel strategies to improve employee engagement (Harter et al., 2002; Bessen, 2019; Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018; Kahn, 1990; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; Chen et al., 2022). One such strategy is integrating man-machine collaboration, which uses automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to increase human productivity. Due to the nature of the job involved in the industry, the IT sector is leading the way in implementing this strategy. The AI has the potential to replace tactical and repetitive HR jobs such as transitional personnel assignments, frequently asked questions by employees, and automatically engaging with internal candidates and workers in a timely and consistent way (Vidyashree & Krishnan, 2023; de Kervenoael et al., 2020; Del Giudice et al., 2021).

The advantages of man-machine collaboration in various industries have been the subject of numerous research. For instance, a study by (Brynjolfsson et, al., 2018) discovered that Collaboration between humans and machines can significantly increase output and creativity. Similarly, a survey by (Davenport & Ronanki, 2018) found that automation based on AI can increase worker productivity and job satisfaction. Work-life balance can be improved, and employee burnout can be decreased because of man-machine collaboration. Furthermore, a study by (Benitez et al.,2020) demonstrated that employee skills and knowledge could be better utilized due to man-machine Collaboration. Knowledge hiding in an organization affects organizational learning, decreases workforce efficiency, and disturbs the work environment’s dynamics, significantly influencing job satisfaction (Kakada, 2023; Praveen & Krishnan, 2021). This point in the organization’s evolution is crucial, necessitating a sophisticated comprehension of the ramifications, difficulties, and best practices related to this new phenomenon (Van Esch et al., 2019; Torres & Mejia, 2017).

Despite the potential advantages, little is known about how employee engagement in the IT sector is affected by man-machine collaboration (Del Giudice et al., 2021). Therefore, this study tries to address the gap and offer insights into the efficacy of man-machine collaboration as a novel strategy for employee engagement in the IT sector. The findings from this research could have profound implications for businesses looking to boost productivity and employee engagement in the IT sector. The combination of artificial intelligence and human knowledge has brought about a paradigm change in how work is planned and carried out in the quickly changing Information Technology (IT) sector (Malik et al., 2020c; 2021; Manyika et al., 2017; Bakker & Leiter, 2010; Hakanen et al., 2006; Pan et al., 2021; Tambe et al., 2019). This study explores the consequences, prospects, and challenges of this collaboration within the IT industry, delving into its many facets.

The goal is to understand how this new wave of Collaboration influences organizational culture and work environment and changes IT professionals’ roles and duties. A thorough analysis clarifies the obstacles, chances, and best practices for promoting efficient man-machine collaboration to raise employee engagement. (Gupta & Sharma, 2024; Chen et al., 2022a; Smith & Jones, 2023; Chen et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2021; Bersin & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2019a).  The layout of this paper is as follows: The next section reviews the relevant literature on man-machine collaboration and employee engagement. This is followed by a detailed explanation of the research methodology employed in the study. The results section presents the key findings, which are then discussed in the context of existing literature. The paper concludes with a summary of the findings, their implications for theory and practice, and suggestions for future research.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The concept of Man-Machine Collaboration has had significant interest recently and is based on the more extensive subject of human-computer interaction. The ramifications of combining human experience with artificial intelligence and machine learning technology to produce synergistic results have been thoroughly researched by researchers. (Brynjolfsson and McAfee, 2014) contend that the development of algorithms and the exponential rise in processing capacity have made a cooperative environment possible where people and machines can best utilize each other’s advantages. The man-machine collaboration in the workplace can increase output and job satisfaction. Man-machine partnership, or the merging of artificial and human intelligence, has become a central topic of study in modern organizational studies, especially in the Information Technology (IT) sector.

Employee engagement by reviewing critical studies and notions that offer fundamental insights into it (Pan et al., 2021; Malik et al., 2021). The idea of human-machine Collaboration originated during the initial phases of computerization. Man-machine collaboration can boost performance and job satisfaction by giving workers the tools to execute their work more effectively and efficiently (Ahmad et al., 2020). Workers can perform activities more quickly and accurately when they can access tools to help them with their jobs. A stronger sense of success and job satisfaction can result from Collaboration between humans and machines, which can help lower workplace stress and employee burnout (Lasecki et al., 2020; Tambe et al., 2019; Chamorro-Premuzic, 2019b; Davenport & Kirby,2016; Sarmah et al.,2021).

The study also discovered that workers who work together with machines are typically more engaged and content with their jobs. Man-machine collaboration can help employees complete more work in less time, per a study by (Shah et al.,2020). It is understood that workers who worked alongside machines could accomplish jobs more quickly, precisely, and without as many mistakes, which increased production and reduced costs for the company. According to a study by (Sharma & Gupta, 2020), employee exploration of novel concepts and approaches to problem-solving is made possible by man-machine collaboration (Wang et al.,2018; Garca-Sánchez et al.,2021; Liu et al., 2020).

Employee engagement and job satisfaction may rise as a result of human-machine collaboration. An increase in employee empowerment due to man-machine collaboration may boost job happiness and engagement, according to a study by (Zhou et al,2021). Workers who interact with robots report feeling more in charge of their work, which increases their sense of accomplishment and job happiness. Employee engagement and job satisfaction can significantly improve due to the adoption of man-machine collaboration in the IT sector. Organizations increasingly realize that to remain competitive in the quickly changing digital landscape, they must arm their workforce with digital tools and intelligent systems (Davenport & Kirby, 2016; Saini and Goyal’s, 2021).

According to research by (Tarafdar et al., 2019), organizations’ main challenges are technology, data privacy, and the requirement for extensive training programs. According to research by ( Van Esch et al, 2020), supporting an environment that values flexibility and ongoing education is critical to match organizational policies with the rapidly changing technology landscape. In a study by (Zhang et al, 2020), using machine learning techniques to help with coding tasks significantly increased coding speed and accuracy. This higher productivity may result in cost reductions and better financial results. Employees in the IT sector may be able to learn new skills and information thanks to man-machine collaboration. According to a study by (Gruszka et al, 2020), personnel could pick up new skills and methods while using machine learning algorithms for data analysis activities. Strategic planning and execution are necessary to maximize the benefits of man-machine Collaboration (Van Esch et al., 2020; Goss et, al., 2021; Sahu et, al., 2021; Li et al.,2020). The study also discovered that man-machine collaboration can help businesses perform tasks more quickly and save money. According to a study by (Wu et al.,2021; Keng et, al.,2020; Manyika et, al., 2017) determine that man-machine collaboration in IT is industry-specific. In this age of technological convergence, we hope to shed light on the changing dynamics of employee engagement by combining knowledge from theoretical frameworks and practical research.

Resource-based theory (RBT) focuses on organizational resources to obtain a competitive advantage. It states that when resources are valued, uncommon, unique, and non-substitutable, they can support a company’s long-term competitive advantage, whether intangible or tangible. By applying an RBT lens to these factors, it is possible to gain insight into how this kind of Collaboration impacts employee engagement and overall organizational performance while also giving IT organizations a competitive advantage. Incorporating this theoretical framework into our research can provide a robust foundation for exploring the complexities of man-machine collaboration in the IT industry and its effects on employee engagement. Scholars have examined many aspects of this partnership, from incorporating machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms into routine processes to the moral and societal consequences of computer-human interaction. (Wang et, al., 2021) underscore in their research the transformative capacity of man-machine collaboration to augment operational efficiency and innovation in information technology businesses.

Furthermore, a recent study by (Smith and Jones, 2023) highlights how human-centered design principles shape the dynamics of man-machine collaboration. The rise in remote work and virtual collaboration platforms has made it more critical to comprehend the factors influencing IT professionals’ engagement and satisfaction (Gupta & Sharma, 2024; Chen et, al.,2022).

While there is extensive research on the impact of technical improvements on employee engagement, there is a significant gap in understanding the specific dynamics of man-machine collaboration (MMC) in the IT business. Existing research focuses mainly on the theoretical elements of MMC or its technical implementation. However, there is a scarcity of research that thoroughly investigates the direct impact of MMC on employee engagement procedures, particularly from the perspective of IT professionals and businesses implementing sophisticated technology. This study fills a gap by combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to provide a deep knowledge of how MMC affects employee engagement in the IT sector and practical recommendations gleaned from real-world case studies and market trends.

Research Objective

1. To assess the impact of man-machine collaboration on employee engagement in the IT industry.
2. To explore best practices and strategies for maximizing the benefits of man-machine collaboration regarding employee engagement within the IT industry.

Hypothesis

Based on the literature and gaps hypotheses were framed to understand the impact on the outcomes.

H1– Man-machine collaboration in the workplace significantly influences employee engagement

H2 -AI-driven technologies in the workplace positively affect employee job satisfaction and motivation in the IT sector

Table 1: Various  scholarly literature were analyzed for the selection of the constructs few of them were cited below

Fig 1: Conceptual Framework

The conceptual framework focuses on integrating man-machine collaboration, such as automation and digitization, and its impact on several critical areas of an organization. Productivity, job happiness, performance, and work culture are all factors that contribute to increased employee engagement. The basic concept of this framework is the use of technology to augment human jobs and processes. This integration directly influences productivity by optimizing workflows and decreasing errors. Employees may experience higher job satisfaction due to reduced workloads and the opportunity to participate in more meaningful, creative tasks.

This increased productivity and job satisfaction contribute to improved overall organizational performance. Furthermore, incorporating technology influences the organization’s work culture by supporting principles like creativity, adaptability, and continual learning. Ultimately, the combination of these factors determines the amount of employee engagement. Engaged employees are more devoted, driven, and inclined to contribute positively to the organization’s success. This paradigm provides a methodical way to investigate how technology integration affects the workforce and the larger organizational setting.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study used a quantitative research methodology. The study is descriptive and a combination of theoretical and empirical research. The Structures questionnaire was adapted from various sources, questions were altered according to the survey. Google form was prepared, and data was collected through Linked In. The target audience was IT employees, this method was chosen to provide a complete understanding of IT professionals’ and managers’ experiences in the context of our research. A sample of 50 was collected from the target audiences throughout (Jan 2024 to Feb 2024). Simple random sampling techniques were used, the researcher used the Smart PLs tool to test the data collected with the help of the tool reliability and validity, Path, Model fit, and P-value were identified.

Scale Selected for the Study

To analysis and understand the various aspects impacting engagement, different scales were adapted for the study from different sources

Table 2: Adaption of questionnaire from validated scale

Further analyses were performed to test the reliability and validity of the questions and to test the hypothesis

Data Integration: Our study’s outcomes were combined from both the qualitative and quantitative aspects. This technique involves investigating how qualitative insights complement quantitative outcomes and vice versa. Analyzing data from a multitude of sources enabled a more comprehensive view of the research problem. The list of abbreviations used is depicted in Table 1.

Table 3: List of Abbreviations

DATA ANALYSIS & RESULTS

Table 2 highlights the reliability of the constructs. High internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7) and good reliability (rho_a and rho_c > 0.7) are characteristics of employee engagement. Job satisfaction has comparatively poorer internal consistency and reliability than other constructs. Still, it satisfies the minimal requirement for dependability (rho_a and rho_c > 0.7). According to the AVE, the latent concept explains 58.2% of the variance in the observable variables. Man-Machine Collaboration exhibits a high degree of dependability and internal consistency. According to the AVE, the latent concept explains 74.5% of the variance in the observable variables. According to the AVE, the latent construct can explain 62.2% of the variance in the observable variables.

Table 4: Construct Reliability and Validity

(Note: EE: Employee Engagement, JS: Job Satisfaction, MMC: Man Machine Collaboration, PR: Productivity,  RE: Reward, TEC: Technology)

Reward’s internal consistency and dependability are comparatively lower. However, it still satisfies the minimal need for dependability. According to the AVE, the latent construct can explain 58.1% of the variance in the observable variables. Technologies show a high degree of reliability and internal consistency.

Table 5: Correlation Matrix

 (Note: EE: Employee Engagement, JS: Job Satisfaction, MMC: Man, Machine Collaboration, PR: Productivity, RE: Reward, TEC: Technology)

• Based on the correlation matrix as shown above in Table 3,
• There is a robust positive association between Job Satisfaction (0.834), technologies (0.835), and Employee Engagement (EE)
•  Strong positive connections have been shown between Job Satisfaction (JS) and Technologies (0.834), Productivity (0.873), and Reward (0.755)
• Strong positive relationships exist between Man-Machine Collaboration (MMC) and Reward (0.863), Productivity (0.748), and Technologies (0.752)
• Productivity (P) is positively correlated with Man-Machine Collaboration (0.748), Job Satisfaction (0.873), and Reward (0.73)
• Strong positive relationships exist between Reward (R) and Technologies (0.711), Man-Machine Collaboration (0.863), and Job Satisfaction (0.755)
• Technologies (TEC) exhibits robust positive associations with Job Satisfaction (0.834), Man-Machine Collaboration (0.752), and Employee Engagement (0.835)
• These correlations shed light on the connections between the various study constructs.

Table 6: Path Co-Efficient

A strong model where technology and MMC practices drive different good organizational outcomes. With most p-values less than 0.001, all associations are statistically significant and provide compelling evidence to refute the null hypothesis. The coefficients indicate the associations’ direction and strength. Most linkages are robust and constructive, suggesting that advancements in one domain (such as MMC or technology) result in notable benefits in associated domains (like job happiness, productivity, rewards, and engagement). Employers should concentrate on boosting MMC and using technology to increase rewards, productivity, and job satisfaction, as these factors raise employee engagement.

Table 7: Discriminant Validity- Fornell- Larcker Criterion

(Note: EE: Employee Engagement, JS: Job Satisfaction, MMC: Man Machine Collaboration, PR: Productivity,    RE: Reward, TEC: Technology)

Table 5 depicts the square root of the AVE for every construct being higher than the correlations with every other construct. Consequently, the study’s constructs (Employee Engagement, Job Satisfaction, Man-Machine Collaboration, Productivity, Reward, and Technologies) have been shown to have discriminant validity.

Fig 2: Man-Machine Collaboration Model – STEM Analysis

The investigation (refer to Figure 2) shows that productive Man-Machine collaboration can foster an environment where workers feel creative, empowered, and motivated, eventually raising employee engagement and satisfaction. Employees are also likely to feel more engaged when they see how technology is helping them complete jobs more quickly and efficiently because it allows them to concentrate on more critical areas of their work rather than tedious duties. In the IT industry, integrating AI-driven technology into the workplace can significantly impact workers’ motivation and job happiness. In the IT industry, incorporating AI-driven technology into the workplace can generally positively affect worker job satisfaction and motivation by boosting productivity, improving decision-making, offering chances for skill development, decreasing monotony, promoting work-life balance, and more.

Man-Machine Collaboration (MMC) is a new paradigm for employee involvement in the IT business, and it is the subject of this research paper. The article offers a framework for MMC that companies may use to build more motivated and effective workforces. The research provides insights into the advantages and challenges of MMC from the perspective of IT industry leaders and employees through an analysis of industry trends and case studies. According to the literature assessment, MMC can increase worker collaboration and communication, productivity, job satisfaction, and performance. It can also lessen stress and burnout among employees. The study identified that organizations must consider the importance of organizational culture and leadership support while implementing MMC initiatives.

RESEARCH FINDINGS/ RESULTS

The findings suggest that MMC can enhance employee engagement in the IT industry by improving productivity and performance, reducing employee burnout, and fostering communication and collaboration. The study recommends that IT industry leaders embrace MMC to drive innovation, improve employee satisfaction, and achieve business success. Organizations must consider the importance of organizational culture, leadership support, and employee engagement to ensure successful implementation. Job redesign, training and development, and supportive leadership can address these factors. The effective execution of MMC initiatives has been identified as critically dependent on organizational culture. MMC can improve collaboration, productivity, job satisfaction, and performance while reducing employee stress and burnout. The findings of this study provide significant insights into the impact of man-machine collaboration on employee engagement within the IT industry. This section discusses these findings in the context of our research aims and hypotheses compares them with existing literature and outlines practical implications for organizations. Our study confirms that man-machine collaboration has a positive impact on employee engagement. Employees who effectively collaborate with technology exhibit higher levels of engagement, as they can focus on more meaningful and creative tasks. This finding aligns with existing literature, which suggests that technology can enhance job performance and satisfaction by automating routine tasks (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Davenport & Kirby, 2016).

The study found that the level of technological support significantly strengthens the relationship between man-machine collaboration and employee engagement. Organizations that provide adequate training and resources see a stronger positive impact on engagement. This is consistent with Venkatesh and Bala’s (2008) findings that organizational support is crucial for successful technology adoption. Tarafdar et al. (2015) also emphasize that support can mitigate technostress, enhancing engagement. The study’s findings generally align with the existing body of research, yet they offer unique contributions to the literature on man-machine collaboration and employee engagement in the IT sector. Like Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014), our study confirms that technology can enhance job satisfaction by allowing employees to engage in more complex and rewarding tasks.

While previous research predominantly focuses on the benefits of technology in terms of efficiency and productivity, our study emphasizes the importance of addressing employees’ fears of job displacement to realize these benefits fully. Our focus on the IT industry provides specific insights into how man-machine collaboration impacts engagement in a sector at the forefront of technological integration. Consistent with Tarafdar et al. (2015), we found that organizational support mitigates negative effects of technology use, enhancing engagement.

DISCUSSION

The findings from this research indicate that Machine Collaboration has the potential to completely change how workers interact with technology and operate in the IT sector. To guarantee the successful execution of MMC efforts, the study emphasizes the requirement for a change in organizational culture and the development of new skills and capabilities. The paper also emphasizes the importance of organizational leadership and support to ensure the success of MMC initiatives. Bhatti and Hoonakker (2017) found that effective leadership and communication were critical in fostering trust and confidence in MMC technologies among workers. Additionally, training and support for workers is essential to ensure they are equipped with the necessary skills to collaborate effectively with machines (Katsikopoulos et al., 2019).

To boost performance and job satisfaction, MMC can increase employee engagement by giving workers the resources they need to execute their jobs more quickly and effectively. According to the study, when workers interact with robots, they can offload tedious and repetitive duties, which can lessen feelings of stress and burnout and increase employees’ general well-being and job satisfaction. By giving workers new possibilities to work alongside machines, MMC can also help lower the risk of job displacement and disengagement, resulting in a more engaged and productive workforce. Our research also emphasizes how critical it is to use technology to support employee autonomy and empowerment. Employees can access real-time data, insights, and decision support by integrating AI-driven tools and platforms, enabling them to make well-informed decisions and significantly contribute to organizational goals.

Additionally, automating repetitive operations frees up employees’ critical thinking, time, and cognitive resources so they may concentrate on high-value tasks that call for creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. Nonetheless, it is essential to recognize the possible difficulties and moral dilemmas related to man-machine collaboration in the IT sector. As machines take on more complicated activities and decision-making duties, algorithm bias, data privacy, and job displacement are significant issues. Therefore, to ensure that human values and rights are respected in all facets of man-machine interaction, businesses must prioritize transparency, accountability, and ethical oversight in designing and deploying AI systems. Furthermore, our study emphasizes how crucial it is to fund staff training and development to promote the effective implementation of new procedures and technology.

Organizations must ensure their staff has the skills to succeed in a digital-first environment as automation and artificial intelligence (AI) transform job roles and skill needs. Offering specialized training courses, upskilling projects, and chances for ongoing education can enable staff members to welcome change and use technology to spur creativity and expansion. To summarize, using Resource-Based Theory in research enables a strategic analysis of man-machine collaboration as a distinct resource that enhances the competitive edge of information technology businesses. Nevertheless, there are specific difficulties in putting MMC into practice. Even while MMC has potential advantages, putting it into practice can be difficult, as the fear of job displacement and employee disengagement are major barriers. However, employee participation in the implementation process and open communication regarding the possible effects of MMC can lessen resistance to change (Hinds & Lee, 2001).

In summary, the advent of man-machine collaboration in the IT business signifies a paradigm change with significant effects on organizational performance and employee engagement. By adopting this revolutionary movement and utilizing the combined strengths of human resourcefulness and artificial intelligence, institutions can open up novel avenues for creativity, efficiency, and long-term expansion. However, a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes corporate culture, employee development, ethical issues, and leadership commitment is needed to fully realize the benefits of man-machine collaboration. Adopting a human-centric approach to technology integration will be crucial as organizations negotiate the challenges of the digital era to shape a future in which humans and machines work together amicably to accomplish shared objectives. Furthermore, The rapid adoption of digital technology has made it possible to close the talent gap and improve quality of life, job satisfaction, and employee performance—all of which will increase employee engagement (Poorani & Krishnan, 2023).

It is found that IT companies that embrace man-machine collaboration demonstrate a unique set of skills, such as increased productivity and creative problem-solving. These results are essential assets that support the organization’s edge over competitors. Surveys and interviews show that although some organizations have implemented man-machine collaboration, it still needs to be a common practice in the sector. For those organizations that have adopted man-machine collaboration, this rarity increases the strategic relevance of the relationship. (Pooja &Krishnan, 2023) states that man-machine collaboration presents a disruptive potential to reimagine work processes and achieve new heights of efficiency and engagement when integrated into core management systems. The study concludes that with the specialized knowledge and collaborative culture needed, rivals find it difficult to replicate the benefits of man-machine collaboration, such as enhanced job satisfaction and efficiency.

The research’s conclusions highlight the revolutionary potential of man-machine Collaboration  in transforming worker engagement in the IT sector. We have clarified the complex relationship between human intelligence and machine capabilities and its consequences for worker engagement and organizational dynamics by looking at the many facets of this new paradigm. The study highlights several important conclusions, including the critical role that company culture and leadership play in promoting productive man-machine collaboration. Leading companies that are undergoing digital transformation must place a high priority on fostering an atmosphere that welcomes innovation, risk-taking, and ongoing learning. Leaders may boost employee confidence and motivation by promoting an innovative culture and embracing technological improvements, increasing staff engagement and performance.

Limitations & Implications

Promote an innovative work culture that emphasizes communication and collaboration. It is critical to create an environment where Man-Machine Collaboration efforts are supported and staff participation is encouraged: The effectiveness of Man-Machine Collaboration programs depends on employee engagement. Implement job redesign and training. Organizations should consider job redesign and training to ensure staff has the skills and competencies required for Man-Machine Collaboration efforts. Monitoring and evaluating the success of Man-Machine Collaboration initiatives is essential for organizations to ensure they fulfill their goals and objectives. Organizations should prioritize funding training and development initiatives that upskill staff members in pertinent technical competencies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and data analytics, to optimize the advantages of man-machine collaboration. Providing opportunities for ongoing learning improves workers’ skills and cultivates a culture of development and flexibility, which raises workers’ engagement and loyalty to the company. Effective man-machine collaboration requires establishing a psychologically safe space where workers feel free to experiment, take chances, and exchange ideas.

The findings have several practical implications for organizations seeking to enhance employee engagement through man-machine collaboration. Organizations should invest in training programs and resources to help employees adapt to new technologies. This support can reduce techno stress and enhance engagement. Management should proactively address employees’ fears about job displacement by communicating the benefits of technology and ensuring job security. Cultivating a culture that values innovation and collaboration can enhance the positive impact of man-machine collaboration. Encourage team-based projects where employees can collaboratively work with technological tools to solve complex problems. Regular feedback can help identify and address issues related to technology use and employee engagement. Conduct periodic surveys to gauge employee sentiment towards new technologies and make necessary adjustments based on their feedback. By addressing these factors, organizations can enhance engagement, foster innovation, and improve overall performance. Future research should explore these dynamics in different industries and consider additional moderating factors to better understand man-machine collaboration’s impact on employee engagement.

Despite its contributions, this study is not without limitations. One limitation is the reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce bias and affect the accuracy of the findings. Additionally, the study’s focus on the IT industry may limit the generalizability of the results to other sectors. Furthermore, the cross-sectional nature of the research design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships between variables. Future studies could overcome these limitations by employing longitudinal research designs and incorporating objective employee engagement measures.

CONCLUSION

This study makes several significant contributions to understanding man-machine collaboration and its impact on employee engagement within the IT industry. Firstly, it sheds light on the complex dynamics of integrating technology with the human workforce, providing insights into how this collaboration influences employee engagement processes. The study offers practical implications for organizations striving to optimize their workforce productivity and innovation by identifying key factors that facilitate or hinder man-machine collaboration. Additionally, the research contributes to the literature on workplace innovation by highlighting the importance of technological advancements in shaping employee engagement strategies.

Directions for Future Research

Building on the findings of this study, future research directions could explore several avenues. Firstly, longitudinal studies could provide insights into the long-term effects of man-machine collaboration on employee engagement and organizational performance. Additionally, comparative studies across different industries could elucidate how the impact of technological integration varies across contexts. Furthermore, investigations into specific mechanisms and interventions to enhance man-machine collaboration and employee engagement could offer actionable strategies for organizations. Finally, exploring the role of individual differences, such as personality traits, in shaping responses to technological advancements could enrich our understanding of workforce dynamics in the digital age.

REFERENCES

1. Ahmad, , Lu, Y., & Ahmad, A. (2020). The impact of Man-Machine Collaboration on Employee Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry, Journal of Business Research, 119, 269-277.
2. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
3. Bakker, B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press.
4. Benitez, J. M., Bessani, A. N., & Nardi, R. (2020). The impact of man-machine collaboration on human productivity: A study on a bank’s mortgage process. Information and Management, 57(1), 103166.
5. Bersin, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2019). New ways to gauge talent and potential. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 1. https://mitsmr.com/2QLPcEN.
6. Bhattacharya, S., & Mukherjee, P. (2009). Rewards as a key to employee engagement: A comparative study on IT professionals. ASBM Journal of Management, 2(1), 160.
7. Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. (1995): 43-53.
8. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, W. Norton & Company.
9. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2018). The productivity paradox: Well-known but rarely Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(2), 16-32.
10. Chen, L., et al. (2022). Digitalization and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study in the IT Sector. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 167-183.
11. D’Angelo, C. (2018). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018.
12. Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business.
13. Davenport, H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116.
14. De Kervenoael, R., Hasan, R., Schwob, A., & Goh, E. (2020). Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots. Tourism Management, 78, 104042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104042.
15. Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., Ballestra, L. V., & Pironti, M. (2021, this issue). Humanoid robot adoption and labor productivity: A perspective on ambidextrous product innovation routines. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, ahead-of-print. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1897643.
16. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? *Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114*, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
17. Goss, J., DiDomenico, S., & Frankwick, G. L. (2021). Man-Machine Collaboration: Enhancing Employee Productivity in the IT Industry. Journal of Business Research, 128, 1-11.
18. Gruszka, P., Tucholska, M., & Jankowski, J. (2020). The Impact of Man-Machine Collaboration on Employees’ Skills and Knowledge Development: Evidence from Data Analysis Journal of Business Research, 118, 392-402.
19. Gupta, A., & Sharma, R. (2024). AI Adoption and Employee Engagement: Evidence from IT Firms. Journal of Technology Management, 42(3), 301-317.
20. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
21. Han, Z., Tu, Y., & Huang, C. (2023). A framework for Constructing a technology-enhanced education metaverse: Learner engagement with human–machine collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
22. Harter, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). A meta-analysis of a business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
23. , Pooja., & Krishnan, L. (2023). Employee Engagement Driven By AI and ML and Mediated by Progressive Work Practices -An IT Industry Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4476983
24. Jaiswal, A., Arun, C. J., & Varma, A. (2021, this issue). Rebooting employees: Upskilling for artificial intelligence in multinational corporations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–30. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519 2.2021.1891114.
25. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
26. Kakada, P. (2023). Knowledge Hiding: The Effect on Organizational Learning. Research Highlights in Language, Literature, and Education Vol. 4, 125-132.
27. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.
28. Kwiotkowska, A., & Gębczyńska, M. (2022, October 11). Job Satisfaction and Work Characteristics Combinations in Industry 4.0 Environment—Insight from the Polish SMEs in the Post–Pandemic Era. Sustainability, 14(20), 12978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012978
29. Lasecki, S., Ahuja, S., & Bigham, J. P. (2020). Man-Machine Collaboration for Reducing Burnout and Enhancing Engagement. Human-Computer Interaction, 35(1-2), 1-37.
30. Li, , Zhang, H., & Shao, Y. (2020). Man-machine collaboration in the IT industry: Effects on workload and task completion time. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15-16), 5084-5097.
31. Liberty, C. K. (2017). The contribution of reward systems to enhance employee engagement (Doctoral dissertation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University).
32. Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K. L., & Bolle, M. (2015). Man and machine in industry 4.0. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group
33. Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Patel, C., & Srikanth, N. R. (2020c, this issue). May the bots be with you! Delivering HR cost-effectiveness and individualized employee experiences in an MNE. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,1–31.ahead-of-printhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.185958.
34. Malik, A., De Silva, M. T. T., Budhwar, P., & Srikanth, N. R. (2021). Elevating talents’ experience through innovative artificial intelligence-mediated knowledge sharing: Evidence from an IT-multinational enterprise. Journal of International Management, 27(4), 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100871.
35. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017). A future that works: AI, automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute Research, Tech. Rep, 60, 1-135.
36. Matheson, E.; Minto, R.; Zampieri, E.G.G.; Faccio, M.; Rosati, G. Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review. Robotics 2019, 8, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics8040100
37. Munyai, T. T., Mbonyane, B. L., & Mbohwa, C. (2017). Productivity improvement in manufacturing SMEs: Application of work study. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
38. Nguyen, T. M., & Malik, A. (2022). ‘Impact of knowledge sharing on employees’ service quality: The moderating role of artificial intelligence. International Marketing Review, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2021-0078. Organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(2), 243-257.
39. Pooja J, L R K Krishnan (2023), Evaluating the Impact of Disruptive Technologies in the Employee Engagement Process –IT Industry Perspective, International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Volume – 9, Issue – 11, pg- 104- 113, DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202311018
40. Poorani, Krishnan (2021), Manufacturing Technology Trends in Auto Sector Guiding Skill Enhancement and Employee Retention, Indian Journal of Training and Development, ISSN- 0971-5592, Vol 51, Issue-2
41. Praveen, K., & Krishnan, L. R. K. (2021). The dynamics of work environment on job satisfaction in Indian higher educational institutions. OPUS, 12(2).
42. Poorani, LRK.Krishnan (2023), Pandemic-Induced Work Practices Impacting Job Satisfaction and Retention; Automobile Industry Perspective, Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, ISSN: 2764-4170, Miami| v.11, n. 7| pages: 01-20| e01390, https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i7.1390
43. Saini, A., & Goyal, D. (2021). The Impact of Man-Machine Collaboration on Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement: Evidence from the IT Journal of Business Research, 134, 179-189.
44. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. *Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25*(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
45. Sharma, M. K., & Gupta, M. (2020). Man-Machine Collaboration: A New Paradigm for Innovation and Journal of Business Research, 112, 473-484.
46. Smith, M. A., & Kelloway, E. K. (2016). Building a culture that supports employee engagement. Workplace Health & Safety, 64*(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079915603738
47. Smith, T., & Jones, E. (2023). Human-Centered Design in Man-Machine Collaboration: Insights from Usability Studies. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(4), 459-475.
48. Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910.
49. Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., & Ross, J. W. (2019). Using AI to enhance business operations. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 37–44.
50. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. *Information Systems Journal, 25*(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
51. Terek, E., Mitic, S., Cvetkoska, V., Vukonjanski, J., & Nikolic, M. (2018). The influence of information technology on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal.
52. Torres, E. N., & Mejia, C. (2017). Asynchronous video interviews in the hospitality industry: Considerations for virtual employee selection. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.012.
53. Van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019). Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009.
54. Van Esch, P., Stewart Black, J., Franklin, D., & Harder, M. (2020). AI-enabled biometrics in recruiting: Insights from marketers for managers. Australasian Marketing Journal. 29(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.003.
55. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. *Decision Sciences, 39*(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
56. Vidhya Shree V, L.R.K Krishnan (2023), Employee Engagement and New Age Work Practices Driven by AI and Mediated by HR Analytics, International journal for innovative research in the multidisciplinary field, ISSN(O): 2455-0620, Volume – 9, Issue – 2, pg-159-165, DOIs:10.2015/IJIRMF/202302027
57. Wang, Q., et al. (2021). Transformative Potential of Man-Machine Collaboration in the IT Industry. Journal of Information Technology Management, 39(1), 87-102.
58. Wang, X., Peng, Y., & Lu, X. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Past, Present, and Future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 3(4), 230–243. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000133.
59. Zhang, , Huang, J., & Xu, J. (2020). The Impact of Machine Learning on Coding Performance: Evidence from the IT Industry. Information & Management, 57(2), 103263.
60. Zhang, X., & Venkatesh, V. (2017). A new approach to employee engagement: Cutting-edge technologies and organizational culture transformation. *Information & Management, 54*(7), 865-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.01.004