Enhancing Classroom Learning Experience: A Comprehensive Study on the Integration and Influence of Technology in 21st Century Education in Guyana

Enhancing Classroom Learning Experience: A Comprehensive Study on the Integration and Influence of Technology in 21st Century Education in Guyana.

André Alexus Lewis

Department of Language and Culture Studies, Faculty of Education and Humanities, University of Guyana

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010162

Received: 30 December 2024; Accepted: 04 January 2025; Published: 08 February 2025

ABSTRACT

This study examines the integration and impact of technology on classroom learning in 21st century education in Guyana, aiming to enhance the overall learning experience. The study found that the integration of technology in Guyana’s education system has greatly enhanced the overall learning experience for students. This research highlights the importance of incorporating technology in classroom settings to ensure students are better prepared for the demands of the 21st century. This study explores the various ways in which technology can enhance the learning experience in classrooms, with a specific focus on the education system in Guyana. The integration of technology in classrooms has been shown to have a positive impact on student engagement and knowledge retention. In Guyana, this study aims to investigate how various technological tools can be effectively utilized to enhance the overall learning experience.

Keywords: technology, classroom learning, integration, influence, 21st century education, Guyana.

INTRODUCTION

This research investigates the blending of technology into classrooms in Guyana and its effects on teaching and learning altogether. Technology naturally becomes a part of education in developing countries like Guyana, which are affording quite a few new challenges and opportunities. Thus, this research intends to study how available tools for learning at Guyanese schools are used and what effect they have had on the outcome of learning for a student and its engagement. It will also focus on what types of technology are frequently being used and teachers’ and students’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of technology. Through a study of a changing economy, this research will occupy a very important void in the existing literature and offer insights that can affect educational policy and practice in some similar contexts. In addition, this study analyses the changes it brings along in pedagogy, and it aims to provide a more holistic view of how technology affects the educational landscape in Guyana.

Background

The push for technology integration in education is yet another part of the overall government and educational reforms meant to improve learning and prepare students for a digitalized global economy (Ministry of Education, Guyana, 2020). Such real prospects are one of the many challenges that technology adoption has in Guyana, including poor infrastructure and fewer resources, as well as the different levels of teacher expertise using digital tools (Smith & Thomas, 2019). This study looks into these contextual factors, exploring how they affect the effectiveness of technology integration and mapping strategies for mitigating barriers that exist in similar contexts (Johnson, 2021).

Research Method

The study has employed a mixed-method approach for it seeks to investigate the use of technology in classrooms in Guyana and its effects. The study sample consisted of 250 educators from different levels and geographical locations of education and 500 stratified and randomly chosen students to provide a diverse and representative sample. Data were collected through standardized questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and direct classroom observations. The quantitative data was analyzed using the statistical software; Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) whereby inferential statistics like the chi-square test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and regression analyses were applicable to classify the variables concerning their interrelation. Qualitative data, such as interviews and observations, were transcribed into a systematic analysis using NVivo software into the themes previously identified and emergent themes to bring out deeper nuances of technology integration in education. A thematic analysis identified the most common such as perceived benefits, and challenges of using technology, and they were confirmed with quantitative findings in this study to support the reliability and validity of the research. Multiple researchers independently coded the data to ensure the rigorous trustworthiness of the analysis, and any discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Thus, it incorporated findings towards an all-embracing scope on how technology affects teaching and learning in Guyana with a quantitative manner of offering statistics support to trends identified through qualitative narratives.

Statement of the Problem

The integration of technology in education has become increasingly important in the 21st century, with Guyana being no exception. Technology integration in education has brought about significant changes in the way students learn and teachers teach. It has revolutionized the traditional classroom setting, making learning more interactive and engaging. With the integration of various digital tools and resources, educators are able to create more dynamic and personalized learning experiences for their students. The integration of technology in education has become increasingly prevalent in the 21st century. This trend has been driven by the need to adapt to a digital world and provide students with the skills they need to succeed in the future. In the context of enhancing classroom learning experience in 21st century education in Guyana, the integration and influence of technology has become crucial. This trend has been driven by the need to adapt to a digital world and provide students with the skills they need to succeed in the future.

Research Objectives

1. Examine the kind and level of use of technology across all education levels in Guyana.
2. Investigate teachers’ attitudes and the factors that influence the teaching by technology.
3. Explore the effects of using technology on student engagement levels and learning outcomes.
4. Determine the main obstacles and supports for effective technology integration in education.
5. Propose actionable strategies for optimizing technology in education settings.
6. Analyze Guyana’s educational technology practices against global trends to identify potential improvements.

Research Questions

1. What do teachers in Guyana think about the use of technology to improve the quality of education in the classrooms?
2. Which factors encourage the shunning or embracing of technology for education among teachers in Guyana?
3. To what extent does technology contribute to the engagement of students or achievements of students present in Guyanese learning environments?
4. To what extent does the use of modern technology in the classroom complement the teaching aims of the teachers working in Guyana?
5. In what direction is the process of teaching and learning likely to change in Guyana should technology become a prominent element of education?

Scope and Limitations

When integrating technology in education in 21st-century learning systems, people often focus on the tools and disregard the process entirely. Many researchers limit the focus of their studies to the use of specific tools within select institutions for a specific time frame. The data generated from such research seldom reflect a long-term pattern of technology integration in the complex cohort that makes up the education system. When researching the efficacy of learning management systems, the focus was on five systems within a period of 18 months. The results indicated variations in the use and integration of the tools, use of the system, and obstacles to integration based on course size and individual instructor preference.

Research was conducted within individual university departments with a small number of instructors. Similarly, a study examined the effectiveness of integrating technology in elementary and secondary education over a five-year period. The study was confined to the integration of open source software and focused on one school district encompassing five elementary schools. An investigation explored the issue of teaching in a computer-simulated business simulation game. The investigation was a four-month exploration of twenty-two case studies of teachers using the business simulation game. The inventory of technology integration in 21st-century learning requires a system by which data are tracked and examined over several years, involving more institutions from within varying contingents in order to generate findings that reflect the true integration occurring at these levels.

EVOLUTION OF EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Education has evolved over the years to meet the challenges of each generation, often succumbing to the demands of improvement or reform. The term ‘education’ is not just an ordinary word; it is multi-faceted and multi-layered in its diversity, complexity, origin, definition, structure, nature, and objectives (Engeström & Sannino). As such, education has grown to accommodate and reflect changes in mass media and Information and Communication Technologies. This specifically includes computers, recorded visual and audio media, animation, taped satellite broadcasts, and other applications used in the teaching-learning process, cellular telecommunications devices, and audio and video equipment and associated media used to complement, enhance, or modify the traditional or conventional methods of classroom instruction (Hawkridge, 2022). In this chapter, we will explore the evolution of education in the 21st century, focusing on how technology has shaped the learning experience in Guyana. From the integration of computers to the use of multimedia tools, we will analyze the impact of these advancements on classroom instruction (Martin, 2021).

This chapter on the evolution of education in the 21st century will lay the groundwork for a comprehensive look into the integration and influence of ICT and technologies in 21st century education (Chu et al., 2021). It is essential to explore education’s background, to be aware of the historical paths that it has taken. This also helps to appreciate the revolution of the educational processes of today, which combine more traditional or conventional learning with technologies and, by doing so, are able to be more responsive to the needs and characteristics of the learners in their society (Selwyn, 2021).

Traditional Classroom vs. Modern Classroom in Guayan

The traditional classroom made use of the blackboard, textbooks, worksheets, pens, and pencils; and often saw students bunched in rows for a majority of the teaching and learning duration. Today’s classrooms across Guyana are making good use of various computer educational projects, interactive smart boards, tablets or laptops, digital resources, and a variety of learning software. (Martin, 2021) The use of integrated projectors, cell phones, video cameras, personal digital assistants, and video conferencing facilities are also what some may see daily in our teaching and learning arena. The rapid growth of Guyana’s communication and technology sector has necessitated policymakers and educators to guide the sector with clear objectives, relevant educational, and proper ethical frameworks if we are to develop our Guyanese learners into the global citizens of tomorrow who are capable of working, representing, or governing effectively (Roberts & Gaskin-Peters, 2021).

The millennium generation, those born after 1985, is entering a post-digital world where technology is embedded in their everyday practices (De et al., 2021). This generation, the contemporary student, is growing accustomed to a lifestyle where they can accomplish a range of life tasks with the use of technology such as laptops, CDs, VCRs, camcorders, and answering machines whenever, and in some cases wherever, they want to. However, there is evidence at all educational levels that some staff and students are not as familiar with, or interested in using technology for educational purposes. This generation is entering educational institutions across the island and is expecting a blend of educational lifestyle across the formal, informal, and social interactive uses of technology in order to be satisfied within the 21st teaching and learning environment (De et al., 2021). The combination of and the now growing need for the use of technology is offering teaching staff the possibility of using new or enhanced pedagogic approaches in their classroom settings (Shatrı, 2020). This is further confirmed as the very environment Guyanese teachers trained in Russia would have been teaching in is rapidly changing from the traditional placement of benches and desks to audience-styled placements, to rooms that accommodate not test-scheduled examinations but internationally graded examinations offered daily, thereby offering the freedom of teaching and learning (Shatrı, 2020).

Key Technological Advancements

Education technology has expanded the concept of time and space, making it possible for learning and inquiry activities to spontaneously accompany students throughout the day. The introduction of devices such as interactive whiteboards, digital signs, smartphones, tablets, and laptops has allowed them to digitally represent and communicate knowledge more quickly and effectively (Shatrı, 2020). Additional functions such as email, web chat, blogs, digital translation tools, file and content databases, video archives, social networks, virtual games, campus information systems, and mobile apps improve access to tutors, instructors, consultants, and students’ colleagues’ help. Remote working and distance learning have become more common in this new environment (Shatrı, 2020). In this context, multi-touch devices, virtual world interfaces, web conferencing tools, simulations, CAD environments, VR and AR applications, and gaming software further enhance users’ participation and the definition of increasingly effective strategies (Mahamad et al., 2022). These types of digital tools allow for continuous biunivocal internal participation. Students may have an active role in the learning activities or may participate in free inquiry by accessing learning objects, structured paths, simulations, and vocational tests (Wekerle et al., 2022). They can use advanced navigation, 2D and 3D analytical representations, feasible step-by-step guidance, charts and infographics, voice output modeling, automatic search and browse dictionaries, definition functions, annotation, highlighting, and text-to-speech. Finally, the use of track records and certificates verifies skills and can be associated with online profiles, resumes, or personal identification (Chen et al., 2020).

LITERATURE REVIEW

This chapter analyzes a set of literature that looks at the use and effects of digital tools in educational contexts. It goes on to discuss some academic contributions about how they get into the classrooms and their implications on learning environments. While the more traditional educational strategies have by now shifted towards more vibrant, student-centered engaging ones using digital tools to facilitate the process of education (Hoidn and Reusser, 2020), this kind of ascribed transformation is global as interactive and participative learning trends would also be identified as becoming extensively adopted across the globe in learning for cognitive development and problem-solving skills (Killam et al., 2024).

In Guyana, the implementation of these educational technologies faces serious challenges such as inadequate resources and lack of training of teachers. The absence of necessary physical and digital infrastructure and professional development disabled students and teachers to fully engage in the use of digital tools in teaching and learning, leading to a disrespect of what Miller (2023) would say. There is also a critical need for systems providing reliable internet connectivity while entering digital tools into regular classroom practices to achieve educational purposes and addressing the challenges would be beneficial for enhancing the impact of digital tools in education, increasing student engagement time with the same level of education (Oughton et al., 2021).

Theoretical Frameworks in Educational Technology

The research is basically grounded on the diffusion of innovations theory (Rogers, 2003) and constructivist learning theories (Piaget, 1977). Both theories are especially suited to study how new technologies are adopted in educational settings and how they can transform processes of learning within them. The diffusion of innovations theory facilitates the analysis of adoption rates and the types of factors conditioning uptake of educational technology in Guyana, while constructivist approaches to learning inform how such technologies can improve learning by supporting active and engaged learning environments (Vygotsky, 1978). It will set a background for looking into the real use of technologies in classrooms and their educational impacts, focusing primarily on theory adaptability in our Guyanese context (Lee & Lai, 2020).

Constructivism and Technology Integration

According to constructivist theories, knowledge and conceptual development in learning occur through learners’ activities such as discussing, examining, designing, inquiring, investigating, analyzing, exploring, evaluating, judging, and reasoning with environments, scenarios, cases, and stimuli. Teachers provide learners with experiences, skills, strategies, confidence, and support to construct their understandings and meanings In the context of technology integration in 21st century education in Guyana, constructivist theories emphasize the importance of learners’ active engagement with diverse activities to enhance their understanding and meaning construction (Rumjaun and Narod, 2020). Active knowledge construction is people making meaning of the events and environments they encounter and perceive relationships among their past and new experiences, new and old knowledge, and learned and acquired concepts. From a constructivist perspective, learning is an engaging, active, lifelong, and meaning-making experience. Constructivist learning occurs through the creation of an authentic environment that features learners as meaning-makers (Popa, 2022).Digital technologies enable educators to create authentic learning environments for constructivist learning. Educators design learning experiences and teach with tasks to facilitate learner experiences for deeper understanding and facilitated knowledge transformation (Ohashi et al., 2024).

Constructivist educators are guides and coaches who provide instruction emphasizing context, facilitation, support, and exploration, rather than direct, didactic, subject-based, off-the-shelf, short-term, short-sighted, or content-focused instruction (Ohashi et al., 2024). Constructs are existing knowledge and positions that students will need to access, utilize, adapt, and expand in diverse settings. Contexts are tasks that require students to use constructs to collaborate, solve problems, or investigate (Schmidt and Tang, 2020).

Connectivism and Digital Learning Environments

Connectivism stresses the interconnection between people and the way information flows within networks. It focuses on the shift in education with the rapid technological growth and how information is converted into learning (Popa, 2022). Networks, needs, access, diverse experience-based learning, and increased knowledge repositories are all fundamental to the learning process. The role of the educator is to create a sense of belonging in the classroom, provide supportive teaching–learning relations, and foster knowledge exchange and interactive participation with learners in the digital environment (Popa, 2022).

The idea of digital learning can be summed up through the analogy of a mathematical theory grounded on the learners’ experience in the digital learning environment. It is knowledge-intensive, child-centered, and digital-centric. The combination of offline and online instruction is critical. Teachers are catalysts. In the digital environment, they assist students. Online learning requires a structured design, including a learning management system, to provide online learning and support interaction among the teacher and the students. In this process, designing a course should focus on building and maintaining a connection and interaction between the teacher and learners.

PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION

The constructivist learning theory is both a pedagogical belief and a structure to assist in developing effective teaching strategies to help students learn successfully. This is in line with a universal usage of technology and pedagogy integrated to assist with the diverse instructional strategies that are necessary for students (Zajda and Zajda, 2021). When teachers take into account the constructivist learning theory, which involves integrating technology into their classroom routines, the school system begins to improve from both an instructional point of view and a better understanding of the content (De et al., 2021). This will eventually assist with the inconsistency in the effectiveness of learning concepts in the 21st century, global-minded education systems. One approach to improving learning outcomes in the 21st century education system is by incorporating a variety of technological tools and resources into the curriculum. This can help engage students and make learning more interactive and relevant to their daily lives (De et al., 2021).

The exploration of possible instructional models that are cognitive and personalized will help with assimilating different educational concepts and evoking specific applications in a variety of classroom settings that can be facilitated with technology (Zajda and Zajda,2021). This implementation model is another method that was examined to highlight confidence intervals surrounding instructional delivery when integrating the constructivist learning belief and technology. This will allow students to take a long-term approach to learning and support the argument for both pedagogy and the positive effects of using technology to improve student learning (Wilson et al., 2020). These factors clearly illustrate what happens when both concepts are applied properly and when measurements are in place to examine technological needs and structural organization to help both teachers and learners.  (Haleem et al., 2022). These combinations create different scenarios for teaching individual students how they can cooperate with a constructivist approach using technological tools offered in a variety of online learning and classroom situations and how it affects student learning and evaluates the process (Zajda and Zajda2021).

Active Learning Techniques

Effective learning does not only mean conveying content in as rich a way as possible, but also engaging students in active participation in the learning process. In this, instructors use activities that encourage students to mentally engage with content, ask questions, solve problems, discuss ideas, explore alternatives, explain their reasoning, and think critically (Howell, 2021). Students participate by clarifying issues, solving problems, providing explanations, generating support for their opinions, asking questions themselves, and reflecting on their learning. Active learning goes beyond classroom engagement (Bean & Melzer, 2021). It includes the extent to which the students are engaged in thinking, discussing, using information, or working collaboratively with others to construct meaning. In fact, learning is not a battlefield of activity in the teacher’s presence and passivity in his or her absence (Yaacob et al., 2020). The role of the teacher is crucial, but so is the learners’ contribution of ideas to collective learning, which enables them to construct their own knowledge or skills (Lei & Medwell, 2021). Constructivist learning theory tells us that people learn by constructing new knowledge from their experiences. The teacher’s role is to facilitate the process. Researchers also argue that people learn better and retain acquired knowledge longer when they are engaged in learning activities. These activities prepare them for real-life problem-solving and other significant tasks they will encounter in their work and personal lives (Putz et al., 2020).

Flipped Classroom Models

Flipped learning has become one of the most influential educational trends in innovative research in recent years. This is in response to the restrictions imposed on traditional teaching models by static content and independent teacher-centered learning processes. The flipped learning approach requires a student-centered learning process supported by integrated digital resources. In the flipped classroom, students have autonomy, freedom of choice, flexibility, and interactivity. Teachers and students can develop optimized curriculum materials effectively. Flipped learning proactively suggests problem orientation for different learning stages and independently sets up digital resource combinations, realizing different learning objectives and exploring multiple diversified learning paths for personalized learning.

With digital assistance promising to bring about significant change in learning patterns, a simple change in teaching approach, the role of teachers, course allocation, and methods provides a new problem for how to effectively transform administrative teaching into effective learning. The new approach replaces the noun of the flipped classroom with the verb, simplifying the teaching approach, linking the teaching method prior to class and the teaching method after class, through the teaching method centered on “everyone is the implementer,” breaking the subject-centered forced learning method of traditional classroom teaching, and realizing the learner-centered purpose of the classroom, making the course vibrant.

ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK IN TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED EDUCATION

In this chapter, the research study examines assessment and feedback on technology-enhanced teaching and learning. Classroom critical work is not done until the responsibilities of learners in the assessment and feedback process are explored and developed in addition to those of educators (Chen et al., 2020). A critical part of the technology-enhanced education dimensions of assessment and feedback is the understanding of who possesses the power, agency, and control within these processes, as well as how it comes into play (Chen et al., 2020). Both formal and informal opportunities must constantly be created so that learners are encouraged to develop agency and to discover their own assessment strategies and, as a result, feedback strategies. In technology-enhanced teaching, we specifically explore the identity and roles of educators and students in assessment and feedback when determining to what degree technology is integrated into the learning process.

Ample opportunities need to be provided for learners to develop self-regulatory skills to ensure that authentic assessment can effectively involve learners in this manner. Essential skills include learners’ capacities to determine and reflect on explicit or implicit criteria, to self and peer assess on the basis of such criteria, and to set and develop targets. Indeed, in order to be significant, feedback and assessment strategies should allow students to develop a lifelong productive relationship with their learning journey (Chen et al., 2020). Educationalists should aim for the real involvement of learners in assessment; self, peer, and educator assessments should be undertaken at every phase of the education learning cycle. This extreme engagement implies that, as a result of this involvement, students could be in a position to exert a significant degree of control over their learning. It should actually hold true to the extent that the actual assessment and feedback processes may be planned or may also be controlled and conducted by students within certain legal and/or technical limits.

Formative and Summative Assessment

Formative assessment is provided through technology tools integrated with the learning management system, which has the potential to continually engage students in real-time knowledge transfer and understanding. They include tools that allow for instant feedback and can be used to ask questions about the topic that students answer directly from their mobile devices (Cosi et al., 2020). Class discussion can be monitored via a response tool. During the allotted questions, students engage in various interactive exercises (Putz et al., 2020). Personalized feedback to each student is also covered through another tool. Summative assessment is achieved through a quizzes tool, which is a good platform to effectively address syllabus content and give students hands-on practice for assessments that would be part of their summative evaluations after each unit delivery (Daka et al., 2021). All of the above-mentioned tools, combined with learning outcomes, can be used in the constant student engagement method, which is a hybrid mix of learning techniques with technology embedded. In addition, the course progress feature will give me a good percentage rate on the completion from each student, as well as a format in which I can get analytics if any student is facing difficulty or is prematurely working through the syllabus material (Zhang et al, 2020)

Peer Assessment Tools

The use of instructional technology may provide unique teaching and learning experiences for educators and students. Many peer assessment tools developed in the instructional technology domain facilitate easy-to-implement, anonymous, controlled, and structured peer and collaborative learning experiences where end users are able to carry out self-assessment scales of their peers based on focused assessment criteria, and subsequently provide constructive comments to endorse a well-grounded reasoning for the respective further development of artifacts (Putz et al., 2020). Despite their perceived advantages, few reports in the education literature document large-scale integrations of these developed peer assessment tools in a regular classroom, especially in primary and secondary schools, and their influence on learning and teaching aspects (Hernández-Torrano and Courtne, 2021).

The development and implementation of a peer assessment tool for the allocation of attribute levels to Year 10 pencil-and-paper constructors’ activity descriptions, and its effect on students’ reflective understanding in a subject-based technology course, are herein discussed (Ibarra-Sáiz et al., 2020). Phase one addressed the development. Tests, interviews, class observations, and questionnaires administered to students, their teacher, and a relevant external expert were used to gather data for the analyses in Phase two (Jain, 2021). The questionnaire protocols were also developed to qualitatively and quantitatively assess students’ attitudes towards peer and self-assessments, participation in the allocation of attribute levels, and the use of the tool. Data were statistically analyzed and trends were observed. The findings from the studies revealed that the tool could be beneficial for the development of mutual understanding in the peer conferencing process (Zou et al., 2022).

FINDINGS

Professional Development and Educator Readiness
The research indicates a considerably high demand for professional technology-related development among educators. Almost 72 percent of the surveyed 250 teachers reported that they had not been educated well enough to integrate technology in the classroom. These improvements in different aspects, including the mentioning of professional development, confer to improvement in teachers’ confidence and competence to use the technology as much as a 40% increase of technology proficiency after training (Yurtseven et al., 2020).

Technology Use and Classroom Dynamics
The ranges of technology used were really diverse-65% of the classrooms had only the basic digital facilities like computers and projectors, while 15% of them had even more advanced interactive software. The frequency of use is also varied such that, for example, 30% of teachers used technology every day with a high degree of correlation with higher student engagement levels. Teachers reported that the use of digital tools often increases the level of classroom atmosphere productivity and liveliness within the learning process in a way that encourages participation and interest among the student population.

Impact on Educational Outcomes
The quantitative data analysis thus suggests that there is a clear association between the educational outcomes and regular use of technologies. The score achieved by students in classrooms wherein technology is integrated regularly is approximately 20 percent higher than that of student test scores in low technology environments. Moreover, 80 percent of students are reportedly more interested in some subjects if taught through technology-enhanced methods.

Challenges in Adoption
Although the indications have been positive, there remain many critical challenges. The identified key obstacles included infrastructural deficiency, since 60% of schools did not have enough technological resources. Financial constraints, which restricted further technology acquisition, represented another major issue. 50% of educators cited a lack of follow-up support and maintenance as another major post-training challenge.

Equity and Access
Still another major problem, which is digital divide, underlies access disparities regarding technology in the issue of equity in education. Urban schools were well-equipped (70% had sufficient technology) in contrast to rural schools (only 30%); thus, reflecting a geographically uneven distribution, access, and usage of technologies.

DISCUSSION

The results from this study speak to the transforming power of technology in education as it goes hand in hand with the current trends around the globe emphasizing the use of digital resources as an additive in bettering educational environments. Still, the introduction and eventual impact of technology in Guyana displays benefits and challenges that need critical deliberation.

There is, however, a very pronounced gap in the professional development needs of teachers in Guyana that indicates the urgency of concern regarding the current educational practices. Even with this much recognition of the absence of technology integration, sufficient, appropriate training is lacking, making implementation ineffective. This is in line with research by Yurtseven et al. (2020), which suggests that ongoing professional development of teachers is critical for the effective use of new technologies because it was evident that the improvement of teachers’ confidence, as well as competence, after attending professional development programs, is in line with the long-term usefulness of such initiatives, according to Hennessy et al. (2022). Such results encourage long-term investments in teacher training to improve technology integration, particularly where such technology is undergoing fast digital transformation.

Another area of technology being used was proved to have a positive relationship with a student’s engagement and academic performance, as the propagation theory of innovations (Rogers, 2003) states. It implies that the introduction of new technology may lead to knowledge and outcome improvements in learning skills. The observed increase in student interest and standardized test scores is also in line with constructivist theories (Piaget, 1977; Vygotsky, 1978) which argue in favor of active learning environments owing to the use of technological tools. Thus, these results seem to indicate that well-integrated technology into teaching practices can remarkably enhance educational experience and results, which is essential for student preparation for the globalized and digital economy.

The challenges faced, such as limited infrastructure and lack of funds, are reflections of a more systemic phenomenon in most developing countries trying to bring technology into education. These barriers are in line with reasoned global-level issues and are part of what the literature has described as the availability of resources, often determining the overall success of technology adoption in an educational environment (Elendu et al., 2024). Such changes would be necessary for some policy shifts both at local and national levels to make possible funding and the development of infrastructure.

Access disparities in technology are also a matter of equity-in-the-rural-urban schools, and may help to sustain the educational inequalities that already exist. Such a digital divide has been noted in the local context and with broader research, and it underscores the importance of equal access to resources to enable every student to benefit from digital education (Elendu et al., 2024). Thus, strategic interventions through policy would be needed to address the inequities, such as investment in rural education with technology or training done through communities.
Last but not least, the issues around cybersecurity are always the neglected side of technology in education. Schools are now becoming more dependent on digital platforms of learning; hence, securing data is mandatory. This is aligned with global discussions on securing sensitive information in educational settings and templates, thus creating the need for a comprehensive resource development strategy directed towards educational environments (Yurtseven et al., 2020).

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In conclusion, it is apparent that technology is prevalent in the classrooms being observed, and it has undoubtedly influenced the learning process to a great extent. However, there are some limitations, as highlighted in the discussions. It is opined that the government should prioritize modern educational standards, encourage the use of technology, and increase allocations and availability of resources for the improvement of the quality of education. The educators should endeavor to explore their role in establishing classroom climates that support active learning, student collaboration, and other forms of meaningful interaction within a technological context. It is recommended that other tertiary institutions seeking to enhance the quality of education should consider similar studies for a more comprehensive overview of the uses, effectiveness, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and limitations of the integration of technology in 21st-century education, as well as the influence of the government and the role of educators in enhancing the classroom learning experience.

With the results and insights obtained thus far, the research strategy described above looks promising. This study provides evidence to support the argument that technology has the potential to improve the quality of education. Furthermore, the apparent ineffectiveness suggested by the availability of technological resources found in some schools shows a concern regarding the allocation of the budget for resources. It is apparent that the university students within the discipline believe that educational technology offers the possibility of grounding education in the context of real-world experience and enhances the sense of social responsibility. There is potential that this study could frame the ongoing development in university education in partnership with schools. It is hoped that the output of the evaluations of the technology use in this instance could add significant strength to the existing case for action in directing and managing the changes. The evidence reviews, council conclusions, and debate in schools about the use of technology have indicated the importance of teachers’ involvement, but with the possible lack of resources from the central budget.

IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE

The implications of this research for policy and practice have been interpreted through the perspectives of stakeholders, including educators, parents, and the broader educational system. The insights proffered from these stakeholder consultations highlight the mixed perspectives and belief systems on the impact of technology on students’ learning, while they provide some degree of insight into the complexities of technology’s integration. The implications for policy on leadership, equity, resource allocation, assessment, accountability, and curriculum have been considered to make a meaningful impact on adolescents’ learning in the ever-evolving 21st-century learning environments. The research also suggests several implications for classroom practice from current practice and research literature on implementing enriching learning interactions in technology-enriched learning environments. This chapter addressed the study’s second research question: What is the rationale for the integration of technology in 21st-century education? Various review literatures have intelligently derived the relevance of technology’s integration in education and identified its effectiveness for improving students’ learning through active engagement, better understanding of concepts, deeper knowledge, higher-order thinking, and problem-solving skills, project work, and real-world experiences. Some stakeholders and participants in the project recognized the potential of embedding technology in learning.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

It is evident from this research that the integration of technology in the education system has failed largely due to the factors identified by the teachers, which impact technology integration within the school system to effectively improve the students’ educational learning experience. While this research pointed out these factors, future research can delve deeper into the reasons why these factors continue to influence the school system despite interventions implemented to improve the use of technology. There are factors that are unique to the Guyanese education system, and these may not necessarily be experienced in other developing countries. These developments are taking place as the Government of Guyana has made significant strides in improving technology infrastructure within the school systems, which ultimately aids in the promotion and integration of use.

Given that technology has the potential to improve the learning process, it is necessary that cohorts within the school systems work cohesively to address these negative factors that prevent them from integrating and utilizing technology in a more positive manner. One must recognize the importance of having an education system that is flexible and dynamic when dealing with changes. The research can identify ways of making our teachers more receptive to the use of technology as a teaching tool. The regulatory body can formulate a comprehensive plan that can train and educate the teachers. Overcoming this issue could have wide-reaching implications for making Guyanese students more competitive internationally. Success in this area could significantly enhance students’ capacity to reach higher educational goals and opportunities. The education budget can be used more effectively in other areas.

REFERENCES

1. Adolphus, U. N., Grace, O. U., Akogwu, C. J., Arinze, E. O., & Ezeh, K. D. (2023). GLOBALIZATION OF AFRICA AND AFRICAN GLOBALIZATION: A 21st CENTURY PERSPECTIVE. Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373421596_GLOBALIZATION_OF_AFRICA_AND_AFRICAN_GLOBALIZATION_A_21_st_CENTURY_PERSPECTIVE
2. Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
3. Ayu, M. (2020). Online learning: Leading e-learning at higher education. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 47-54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329223239_Online_Learning_Leading_e-Learning_at_Higher_Education
4. Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358137333_Engaging_Ideas_The_Professor’s_Guide_to_Integrating_Writing_Critical_Thinking_and_Active_Learning_in_the_Classroom
5. Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
6. Chen, G., Chan, C. K., Chan, K. K., Clarke, S. N., & Resnick, L. B. (2020). Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(4-5), 642-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269
7. Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8_1
8. Cosi, A., Voltas, N., Lázaro-Cantabrana, J. L., Morales, P., Calvo, M., Molina, S., & Quiroga, M. Á. (2020). Formative assessment at university through digital technology tools. Profesorado, revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 24(1), 164-183. DOI: 10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.9314
9. Daka, H., Mulenga-Hagane, M. L., Mukalula-Kalumbi, M., & Lisulo, S. (2021). Making summative assessment effective. https://dspace.unza.zm/server/api/core/bitstreams/755897bf-22d5-405a-bc06-9fc2fc76eb26/content
10. De Vera, J. L., Andrada, M. D., Bello, A., & De Vera, M. G. (2021). Teachers’ competencies in educational technology integration on instructional methodologies in the new normal. Lukad: An Online Journal of Pedagogy, 1(1), 61-80. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3885890
11. Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), e38813. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
12. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
13. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
14. Hawkridge, D. (2022). New information technology in education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312826
15. Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., … & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
16. Hernández-Torrano, D., & Courtney, M. G. (2021). Modern international large-scale assessment in education: An integrative review and mapping of the literature. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536
17. Hoidn, S., & Reusser, K. (2020). Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. In The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 17-46). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338921121_Foundations_of_student-centered_learning_and_teaching/citations#fullTextFileContent
18. Howell, R. A. (2021). Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies. Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318
19. Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2
20. Jain, N. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492
21. Killam, L. A., Camargo-Plazas, P., & Luctkar-Flude, M. (2024). Learner-educator co-creation: A case for enhancing authentic assessment in nursing education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.15194
22. Kalyani, P. (2020). An empirical study on NEP 2020 [National Education Policy] with special reference to the future of Indian education system and its effects on the Stakeholders. Journal of Management Engineering and Information Technology, 7(5), 1-17. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4159546
23. Lei, M., & Medwell, J. (2021). … of the COVID-19 pandemic on student teachers: How the shift to online collaborative learning affects student teachers’ learning and future teaching in a Chinese …. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09686-w
24. Li, L., & Ruppar, A. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.010
25. Mahamad, S., Shuhaili, F. M., Sulaiman, S., Awang Rambli, D. R., & Balogun, A. O. (2022). Visual Signifier for Large Multi-Touch Display to Support Interaction in a Virtual Museum Interface. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 11191. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111191
26. Martin, R. N. (2021). A Qualitative Case Study of Perceptions of Preservice Teachers regarding ICT-Based Teacher Preparation in Guyana. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=currents+AND+pedagogical&ff1=subTeacher+Education&id=ED642626
27. Miller, G. A. (2023). Understanding Faculty Perspectives on Using a Learning Management System at a Caribbean University in Guyana. https://www.proquest.com/openview/0035b8e265c41393b150c52dbb97fcb6/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
28. Morel, G. M. & Spector, J. M. (2022). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335774240_Cultural_considerations_in_technology_enhanced_learning_and_instruction
29. Ohashi, T., Saijo, M., Suzuki, K., & Arafuka, S. (2024). From conservatism to innovation: The sequential and iterative process of smart livestock technology adoption in Japanese small-farm systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123692
30. Oughton, E. J., Lehr, W., Katsaros, K., Selinis, I., Bubley, D., & Kusuma, J. (2021). Revisiting wireless internet connectivity: 5G vs Wi-Fi 6. Telecommunications Policy, 45(5), 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102127
31. Pace, J. L. (2021). Hard questions: Learning to teach controversial issues. https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/hard-questions-learning-to-teach-controversial-issues
32. Phillips, J., Jagnandan, S., Jagnandan, A., & Khan, B. (2023). An Investigation of the Effects of Technology-Enhanced Instructional Approaches on Students’ Programming Skills at New Amsterdam Secondary School. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i7-02.
33. Popa, N. (2022). Operationalizing historical consciousness: A review and synthesis of the literature on meaning making in historical learning. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052333
34. Putz, L. M., Hofbauer, F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106392
35. Rahimi, R. A. & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
36. Roberts, T. A. & Gaskin-Peters, N. T. (2021). Early Interventions for Guyanese Business Development and Optimization. Offshore Technology Conference. https://onepetro.org/OTCONF/proceedings-abstract/21OTC/1-21OTC/466650
37. Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory—albert bandura. Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_7
38. Rupnarain, R. Z. (2024). The Changing Role of Teachers and Teaching Styles in The Classroom of High Schools in Guyana Amidst the Pandemic. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 12(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeld.2013/vol12n14558
39. Schmidt, J. T., & Tang, M. (2020). Digitalization in education: challenges, trends and transformative potential. Führen und managen in der digitalen transformation: trends, best practices und herausforderungen, 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28670-5_16
40. Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09971-9
41. Shatrı, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in the learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education. doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.36
42. Thomas, E., & Sharif, W. R. (2024). Teachers’ Perception: Implementing Competency-Based Education for Grade Ten Students in East Berbice Corentyne, Guyana. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 6(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
43. Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., … & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
44. Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
45. Wilson, M. L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Cheng, L. (2020). The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103941
46. Yaacob, A., Mohd Asraf, R., Hussain, R. M. R., & Ismail, S. N. (2020). Empowering learners’ reflective thinking through collaborative reflective learning. International Journal of Instruction. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1282379
47. Yurtseven Avci, Z., O’Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
48. Zhang, Y., Ghandour, A., & Shestak, V. (2020). Using learning analytics to predict students performance in Moodle LMS. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 15(20), 102. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.15915
49. Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: Theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1811-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502

APPENDIX

Table 1: Professional Development Needs

This table illustrates that different categories of teachers in Guyana have shown a high desire for professional development. Both beginning teachers and experienced special education teachers reported very high training needs, especially in technology and effective teaching strategies. The table emphasizes pointed and specific professional development as an imperative element concerning how teachers could be better trained to operate effectively with technological tools.

Table 2: Technology Use and Student Engagement

Table 2 establishes the very same relation between frequency of use of technology in the classroom and levels of the students’ engagement. The data show that high levels of engagement on the part of students correlate with a daily use of technology, while weekly usage does not exceed moderate levels, with less than this indicating mild to low engagement. This indicates that more regular use of the technological medium will rather successfully increase student interaction for the learning material in general.

Table 3: Barriers to Technology Integration

The main barriers to effective integration of technology into educational settings in Guyana have been listed in this table. Limited infrastructure and finances had a high impact on the ability to integrate technology effectively, whereas moderate impact mentions arise from lack of support. The table reveals areas for intervention necessary for overcoming these barriers and thus improving technological integration in educational institutions.

The bar graph interprets the degree to which technology is used in classrooms concerning the resulting levels of engagement among students, using percentages of the said figures. Thus the more apparent just value in evidence is at daily use, which stands at a very high 80 percent engagement; when technology is used daily, students appear most involved and interactive. On the other hand, weekly use would produce a moderate value of about 50 percent, while infrequent use (‘rarely’) translates into only a low value of 20 percent. The strong contrast caught in between these points demonstrates how important it has become to have technology integrated into the classroom environment for it has considerably enhanced student interest and participation in learning activities.

The horizontal bar graph illustrates the obstacles with the greatest impact preventing the efficient use of technology use in educational settings. Highlighted are three primary barriers: limited infrastructure, financial constraints, and lack of support. According to the graph, the impact levels for these barriers are as follows: 90%, 90%, and 70%, respectively. Both limited infrastructure and finances are great impediments to restricting access to necessary resources and funding to integrate technology. The absence is not so great but nevertheless significant enough to indicate a need for improved training and assistance directed at educators in order to get the most out of technology. Such a striking graph, such as this, speaks to urgent consideration of the key areas for enhancing technology use in the educational setting.