Effectiveness of VAT Audits on Compliance in Oman Tax System

Effectiveness of VAT Audits on Compliance in Oman Tax System

Sara Eid Mattar Al-Hinai, Dr. Shahnawaz Ali

Administrative and Financial Sciences, Oman College of management and Technology, Muscat, Muscat, Oman

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG0025

Received: 04 February 2025; Accepted: 08 February 2025; Published: 12 March 2025

ABSTRACT

This study explores the effectiveness of Value-Added Tax (VAT) audits in enhancing tax compliance in Oman, focusing on tax years 2022-2024. It examines the extent to which VAT audits contribute to reducing tax evasion, increasing fiscal transparency, and ensuring efficient revenue collection. The research draws from Omani state budgets, tax compliance reports, and audit documents to provide insights into the role of VAT audits in improving fiscal governance. Additionally, a comparative analysis with other GCC nations highlights Oman’s progress and challenges in tax compliance enforcement. The findings indicate that VAT audits have significantly increased compliance rates but continue to face administrative, technological, and taxpayer-related challenges that require urgent attention. The study underscores the need for further digitalization of audit processes, enhanced training of auditors, and improved taxpayer awareness programs to maximize the effectiveness of VAT audits in Oman.

Keywords: VAT audits, tax compliance, Tax Evasion, tax evasion, GCC countries, Value-Added Tax.

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of VAT in Oman represents a significant policy shift aimed at enhancing the country’s fiscal stability. The adoption of VAT aligns with the broader Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) taxation framework and serves as a crucial tool in diversifying Oman’s revenue sources, reducing its dependency on oil income. A structured VAT audit mechanism plays a pivotal role in ensuring compliance, reducing tax evasion, and increasing transparency in the tax system. This study explores the impact of VAT audits on tax compliance, highlights key challenges faced in their implementation, and conducts a comparative analysis with other GCC countries to assess Oman’s standing in the regional tax landscape. By evaluating these aspects, the study provides insights into how Oman can enhance the efficiency of its VAT audit system to achieve greater economic sustainability. of VAT in Oman in 2021 marked a major shift in the country’s tax policy. As part of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) framework, Oman’s VAT system aims to diversify revenue sources and reduce dependency on oil revenues. However, the effectiveness of VAT depends largely on structured audit mechanisms ensuring compliance. This study evaluates how VAT audits impact tax compliance, highlights challenges, and compares Oman’s VAT audit performance with GCC counterparts.

Research Objectives

1. Evaluate the effectiveness of VAT audits in improving tax compliance in Oman.
2. Identify the primary challenges faced in VAT audits.
3. Compare Oman’s VAT audit system with other GCC nations.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Background of VAT Audits

VAT was first introduced in Germany in 1918, but its modern form emerged in France in 1954. The system spread globally due to its efficiency in tax collection and reducing evasion risks. In Oman, VAT was implemented in 2021 as part of economic diversification efforts, following the successful adoption in UAE (2018) and Saudi Arabia (2018).

Several studies emphasize the importance of VAT audits in ensuring compliance and revenue collection. Alm and Martinez-Vazquez (2003) highlight that VAT audits serve as a deterrence mechanism against tax evasion, especially when combined with strict enforcement policies. A study by Keen and Lockwood (2010) further explores the relationship between VAT audits and compliance, suggesting that a well-structured audit system significantly improves voluntary tax compliance. In the context of developing economies, Bird and Gendron (2007) argue that VAT audits play a crucial role in strengthening fiscal governance by increasing transparency and accountability. Their research indicates that countries with rigorous VAT audit frameworks experience higher revenue mobilization and lower tax gaps. Furthermore, Slemrod (2004) examines the behavioral impact of VAT audits on taxpayer compliance, showing that increased audit probability fosters voluntary tax reporting.

In Oman, VAT audits remain in the developmental phase, with limited automation and a shortage of trained auditors. As per the Oman Ministry of Finance (2023), VAT audits have improved compliance levels but continue to face technological and administrative challenges. By integrating lessons from global best practices, Oman can further enhance its VAT audit framework to optimize compliance and revenue generation. VAT was first introduced in Germany in 1918, but its modern form emerged in France in 1954. The system spread globally due to its efficiency in tax collection and reducing evasion risks. In Oman, VAT was implemented in 2021 as part of economic diversification efforts, following the successful adoption in UAE (2018) and Saudi Arabia (2018).

Theoretical Framework

Classical Theory of Tax Compliance

Allingham and Sandmo (1972) proposed that taxpayers balance the benefits of tax evasion against the risks of detection and penalties. Their model suggests that increasing audit frequency and penalties enhances compliance. Further research by Becker (1968) expands on this theory by suggesting that individuals engage in tax evasion based on a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the potential economic gains against the expected penalties and probability of detection. This concept is reinforced by Kirchler et al. (2008), who introduced the ‘Slippery Slope Framework,’ which argues that trust in tax authorities and perceived fairness play a critical role in compliance decisions. Torgler (2003) contributes to the discussion by emphasizing tax morale, suggesting that social norms, institutional credibility, and individual ethical standards significantly influence tax compliance behavior. Similarly, Feld & Frey (2002) assert that cooperative relationships between tax authorities and taxpayers improve compliance, contrasting with strictly punitive enforcement approaches.

In the context of Oman, these theories highlight the importance of well-structured VAT audits, emphasizing that compliance is driven not only by enforcement but also by trust and transparency in tax administration. Allingham and Sandmo (1972) proposed that taxpayers balance the benefits of tax evasion against the risks of detection and penalties. Their model suggests that increasing audit frequency and penalties enhances compliance.

Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

Ajzen (1991) argues that compliance is influenced by attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. If taxpayers view audits as fair and necessary, voluntary compliance increases. Further research by Bobek and Hatfield (2003) supports this notion, emphasizing that personal beliefs and societal expectations significantly impact tax compliance behavior. They highlight that perceived fairness in tax administration enhances voluntary compliance rates. Lammam et al. (2016) extend TPB by incorporating cognitive and emotional responses, suggesting that individuals who perceive tax authorities as transparent and just are more likely to comply without coercion. This study highlights the necessity of trust-building measures in tax audits.

In the GCC context, studies by Alm and Torgler (2006) indicate that cultural factors play a role in compliance behavior. In Oman, taxpayer attitudes are influenced by perceptions of government spending and the perceived legitimacy of tax enforcement practices. Effective audit transparency and education campaigns can, therefore, improve compliance under the TPB framework. Ajzen (1991) argues that compliance is influenced by attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. If taxpayers view audits as fair and necessary, voluntary compliance increases.

Taxpayer Engagement Model

Mangoting et al. (2019) propose that transparency, trust, and ethics play crucial roles in tax compliance. Oman’s VAT audits can improve compliance by ensuring fairness and transparency in tax administration. A study by Torgler and Murphy (2004) highlights that a collaborative relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities enhances voluntary compliance. They argue that when tax systems are perceived as fair and responsive, taxpayers are more willing to comply. Kirchler et al. (2008) introduce the concept of enforced versus voluntary compliance, suggesting that while enforcement mechanisms are necessary, fostering trust between authorities and taxpayers yields better long-term compliance outcomes. Their findings support the idea that engagement strategies, such as taxpayer education and fair dispute resolution, contribute significantly to compliance rates. Alm and Torgler (2011) further emphasize the role of institutional quality in taxpayer engagement. Their research suggests that countries with efficient tax administration and minimal corruption experience higher levels of compliance. In the case of Oman, strengthening institutional mechanisms and ensuring transparent audit processes can enhance VAT compliance.

Incorporating these findings into Oman’s VAT framework can help bridge the compliance gap, making tax audits more effective and fostering a culture of voluntary adherence to tax laws. Mangoting et al. (2019) propose that transparency, trust, and ethics play crucial roles in tax compliance. Oman’s VAT audits can improve compliance by ensuring fairness and transparency in tax administration.

Empirical Evidence from GCC and Oman

A GCC Secretariat report (2022) highlights that VAT audits significantly improve compliance. In UAE and Saudi Arabia, digital audit systems enhance enforcement, whereas Oman faces challenges due to a shortage of trained auditors and outdated IT infrastructure. According to Oman’s Ministry of Finance, VAT revenue increased by 22.22% between 2022 and 2024, suggesting a positive impact of VAT audits.

A study by Keen and Smith (2007) emphasizes that VAT audits play a critical role in revenue mobilization in emerging economies. Their findings show that efficient VAT administration leads to increased compliance and higher tax revenue collection. Further research by Ebrill et al. (2001) examines global VAT compliance, indicating that nations with stronger enforcement mechanisms and technological integration have higher compliance rates. This is particularly relevant for Oman as it continues to refine its VAT audit procedures. Tanzi and Shome (1992) argue that administrative efficiency in VAT audits is a key determinant of compliance levels. They highlight that well-trained auditors and modern audit technology can reduce evasion and improve voluntary compliance.

Moreover, a comparative study by Alabede et al. (2011) on tax compliance in GCC nations finds that trust in tax authorities significantly influences compliance behavior. Their study suggests that Oman should focus on improving transparency and taxpayer relations to enhance VAT compliance. A GCC Secretariat report (2022) highlights that VAT audits significantly improve compliance. In UAE and Saudi Arabia, digital audit systems enhance enforcement, whereas Oman faces challenges due to a shortage of trained auditors and outdated IT infrastructure. According to Oman’s Ministry of Finance, VAT revenue increased by 22.22% between 2022 and 2024, suggesting a positive impact of VAT audits.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study employs a descriptive and comparative analysis methodology. Data sources include Oman’s General Budget Reports (2022-2024), VAT compliance records, and tax audit reports. Comparative data from UAE and Saudi Arabia provide insights into best practices in VAT audits.

Data Analysis Methods:

The study employs a combination of descriptive, comparative, and analytical methodologies to assess the impact of VAT audits on compliance within the Omani tax system. The descriptive approach evaluates the contribution of VAT to national revenue, examining trends from official financial reports and compliance records. Comparative analysis is conducted by reviewing Oman’s VAT audit performance in relation to other GCC nations, drawing from regional tax administration reports and studies. Additionally, challenge identification focuses on administrative, technological, and taxpayer-related barriers affecting the efficiency of VAT audits. By integrating multiple analytical perspectives, the study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of VAT audits in enhancing tax compliance in Oman.

DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Effectiveness of VAT Audits in Oman

The implementation of VAT audits in Oman has significantly improved tax compliance, as evidenced by revenue growth over recent years. In 2022, VAT revenue was recorded at RO 450 million, rising to RO 500 million in 2023, reflecting an 11.1% increase (Oman Ministry of Finance, 2024; GCC Secretariat, 2022). By 2024, revenue further increased to RO 550 million, representing an additional 10% rise (Keen & Smith, 2007). This trend suggests that VAT audits have played a critical role in enhancing tax compliance and revenue collection.

The effectiveness of VAT audits in Oman aligns with global research on tax enforcement. Studies by Ebrill et al. (2001) highlight that well-structured audit mechanisms contribute to increased voluntary compliance and a reduction in tax evasion. The sustained growth in Oman’s VAT revenue supports these findings, demonstrating that continuous audits and compliance checks have fostered greater fiscal discipline among taxpayers. Despite these positive trends, challenges persist, particularly in digitalization, administrative capacity, and taxpayer awareness. Addressing these issues will be key to further strengthening VAT compliance and optimizing revenue collection in Oman.

These trends indicate increasing audit efficiency and tax compliance.

Challenges in VAT Audits

Administrative Challenges

Oman faces several administrative challenges in conducting VAT audits, which hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of tax compliance efforts. A significant issue is the limited number of trained auditors, resulting in insufficient audit coverage and increased pressure on existing personnel. According to Ebrill et al. (2001), well-trained audit teams are crucial for maintaining compliance, yet Oman struggles with a shortage of experienced tax professionals. Another concern is the inefficiency of manual audit processes, which slow down the verification and enforcement of VAT regulations. Many audits still rely on outdated administrative procedures, making it difficult to track discrepancies effectively. Keen and Smith (2007) highlight that digitalized audit systems significantly improve tax enforcement by reducing human errors and expediting compliance checks. However, Oman has yet to fully integrate such systems, leaving room for inefficiencies and inaccuracies in tax administration.

Additionally, inconsistent enforcement of VAT regulations further complicates compliance. Alm and Torgler (2011) argue that a lack of uniform enforcement leads to taxpayer uncertainty, which, in turn, reduces voluntary compliance rates. In Oman, businesses often encounter inconsistencies in audit procedures, which creates confusion and delays in VAT reporting. Addressing these administrative challenges by investing in audit personnel, streamlining processes, and ensuring consistent enforcement will enhance Oman’s VAT audit framework and improve overall compliance.

Technological Challenges

The implementation of VAT audits in Oman faces significant technological challenges, primarily due to outdated IT systems and integration issues. The country’s tax authority struggles with a lack of automated audit tools, making the audit process inefficient and prone to errors. Ebrill et al. (2001) highlight that modern digital tax infrastructures, such as real-time transaction monitoring and data analytics, improve VAT compliance by reducing manual intervention and enhancing detection capabilities. However, Oman has yet to fully integrate such systems, leading to inefficiencies in tax audits and compliance tracking. Another major concern is the difficulty in synchronizing taxpayer records with audit databases. In many cases, the tax administration’s existing systems are incompatible with those used by businesses, resulting in delays and data discrepancies. Keen and Smith (2007) argue that seamless integration between tax systems and business accounting software significantly reduces errors and enhances enforcement measures. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have successfully implemented digital tax platforms that allow for real-time reporting, setting an example for Oman to follow.

Additionally, limited cybersecurity measures pose a risk to the confidentiality and security of taxpayer data. Kirchler et al. (2008) emphasize that trust in tax authorities is crucial for voluntary compliance, and ensuring robust digital security measures helps maintain taxpayer confidence in the system. Without improved IT security, businesses may be reluctant to fully engage with online tax reporting systems, further complicating audit processes. Addressing these technological deficiencies is essential for Oman to enhance the effectiveness of VAT audits and improve overall tax compliance.

Taxpayer-Related Challenges

A significant challenge in VAT compliance in Oman stems from taxpayer-related issues, including low awareness and intentional evasion. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) lack a thorough understanding of VAT regulations, leading to inadvertent non-compliance. According to Bird and Gendron (2007), in developing economies, a lack of structured taxpayer education significantly contributes to non-compliance. Without adequate knowledge, businesses may fail to file returns correctly or miss deadlines, resulting in penalties and increased administrative burdens. Another pressing issue is the intentional underreporting of VAT by businesses seeking to reduce tax liabilities. Alm and Torgler (2011) argue that the perception of weak enforcement mechanisms emboldens some taxpayers to engage in fraudulent practices. In Oman, the absence of stringent digital monitoring tools makes it easier for businesses to underreport revenue, leading to a significant tax gap. Countries such as the UAE have effectively countered this by implementing robust electronic invoicing and real-time reporting systems, significantly reducing VAT evasion.

Moreover, resistance to compliance due to perceived unfairness in the tax system is another obstacle. Kirchler et al. (2008) highlight that voluntary tax compliance is often influenced by the trust taxpayers have in their government. If businesses believe that VAT revenues are mismanaged or that tax burdens are disproportionately distributed, their willingness to comply decreases. Addressing these concerns requires transparent tax administration, targeted taxpayer education program

Comparative VAT Audit Performance in GCC

A comparison with UAE and Saudi Arabia shows Oman’s progress and gaps:

Findings show that while Oman’s VAT audit effectiveness is improving, it lags behind GCC peers in automation and enforcement.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Expanding the VAT audit workforce is crucial to improving tax compliance in Oman. Recruiting and training additional auditors with expertise in VAT regulations and fraud detection can enhance the efficiency of tax audits. Studies by Alm and Martinez-Vazquez (2003) indicate that countries with well-staffed tax agencies experience higher compliance rates and reduced tax evasion.

Enhancing digital tax audits through AI-driven compliance tracking and real-time data monitoring can significantly improve enforcement. Research by Keen and Smith (2007) demonstrates that nations employing advanced technological solutions in tax auditing achieve better detection of discrepancies and reduce compliance costs. The UAE has successfully integrated digital auditing, leading to a streamlined VAT compliance process. Improving public awareness about VAT compliance is another essential strategy. According to Bird and Gendron (2007), taxpayer education plays a critical role in fostering voluntary compliance. Many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Oman remain unaware of VAT regulations, resulting in unintentional non-compliance. Conducting regular workshops and disseminating educational materials can bridge this gap. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms through stricter penalties for tax evasion is necessary to deter non-compliance. Tanzi and Shome (1992) argue that effective tax enforcement depends on a combination of audits and legal consequences. Saudi Arabia has increased fines and penalties, leading to improved compliance rates.

Oman should also adopt best practices from GCC countries such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Comparative studies by Ebrill et al. (2001) highlight the effectiveness of benchmarking tax administration practices to improve compliance. Implementing automated risk-based assessments, as seen in the UAE, could enhance Oman’s VAT auditing system.

CONCLUSION

VAT audits have significantly contributed to enhancing tax compliance in Oman, demonstrating notable revenue growth between 2022 and 2024. Despite these advancements, administrative inefficiencies, technological limitations, and taxpayer awareness gaps continue to challenge full compliance. The comparative analysis with the UAE and Saudi Arabia underscores the necessity for Oman to adopt best practices such as digital audit systems, risk-based compliance strategies, and enhanced enforcement mechanisms. By strengthening its audit framework through automation, expanding the training of tax auditors, and improving transparency in tax enforcement, Oman can achieve higher compliance rates and sustain long-term fiscal stability. Future research should focus on evaluating the impact of AI-driven VAT audits and examining the role of taxpayer trust in compliance behavior to ensure continued progress in the Omani tax system. have played a crucial role in improving tax compliance in Oman, as demonstrated by revenue growth between 2022 and 2024. However, administrative, and technological challenges hinder full effectiveness. A comparative analysis with UAE and Saudi Arabia highlights areas for improvement. Implementing automation, expanding auditor training, and increasing public awareness will further strengthen Oman’s VAT audit framework, ensuring long-term fiscal sustainability.

REFERENCES

1. Allingham, M.G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
3. Alm, J., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2003). “Institutions, Paradigms, and Tax Evasion in Developing and Transition Countries.” The Economics of Governance.
4. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). “Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology.
5. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). “Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality.” Journal of Business Ethics.
6. Becker, G. S. (1968). “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy.
7. Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P. (2007). “The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries.” Cambridge University Press.
8. Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). “An Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Moral Obligation in Tax Compliance.” Behavioral Research in Accounting.
9. Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J-P., & Summers, V. (2001). “The Modern VAT.” International Monetary Fund.
10. GCC Secretariat (2022). “VAT Implementation in GCC.”
11. Keen, M., & Lockwood, B. (2010). “The Value-Added Tax: Its Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Development Economics.
12. Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2007). “VAT Fraud and Evasion: What Do We Know, and What Can Be Done?” National Tax Journal.
13. Khudir, I.M. and Ali, S., 2019. An Empirical Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Myer Holdings and David Jones. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(1), pp.189-202.
14. Khudir, I.M. and Ali, S., 2019. Elements, Characteristics and Principle for Effectiveness Governance in Public Sector. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(36), pp.1-9.
15. Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). “Enforced Versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The ‘Slippery Slope’ Framework.” Journal of Economic Psychology.
16. Lammam, C., MacIntyre, H., Palacios, M., & Ren, F. (2016). “The Impact of Tax Complexity on Voluntary Compliance.” Fraser Institute.
17. Mangoting, Y., Tangkelobo, H., & Sina, W.L. (2019). “Taxpayer Compliance Model Based on Transparency, Ethics, and Trust.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Oman Ministry of Finance (2024). “General Budget Report.”
18. OECD (2019). “Tax Administration 2019: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies.” Saudi Ministry of Finance (2023). “Fiscal Year Budget Report.” Slemrod, J. (2004). “The Economics of Taxation.” MIT Press.
19. Tanzi, V., & Shome, P. (1992). “The Role of Taxation in the Development of East Asian Economies.” International Monetary Fund.
20. Torgler, B. (2003). “Tax Morale: Theory and Empirical Analysis of Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Surveys.
21. Torgler, B., & Murphy, K. (2004). “Trust in Tax Authorities and the Willingness to Pay Taxes in Australia and Sweden.” Public Choice.
22. UAE Ministry of Finance (2023). “Annual Public Finance Report.”