Students’ Misconceptions and Learning Experiences in Linear Motion: Basis for an Evidence-Based Intervention Framework

This study examined Grade 7 students' conceptual understanding of linear motion and developed an evidence-based intervention framework to address identified learning gaps in physics education. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 110 Grade 7 students using a researcher-developed, validated two-tier concept test, followed by qualitative data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 15 selected students to explore their learning experiences and conceptual difficulties. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that students demonstrated a Fairly Satisfactory level of conceptual understanding, with a mean score of 77.67, indicating moderate mastery of concepts related to displacement, distance, speed, and velocity. However, persistent misconceptions in fundamental motion concepts were identified. Qualitative findings revealed five major themes related to students’ learning experiences: exhibiting conceptual misunderstanding in linear motion, relying on procedural and formula-based problem-solving, expressing uncertainty and low confidence in learning, utilizing everyday experiences to understand motion concepts, and identifying instructional and language-related learning needs. These findings indicate that students' understanding of linear motion is influenced by cognitive, affective, instructional, and contextual factors. Based on the findings, the M.O.T.I.O.N.-S.T.E.P Framework was developed to improve conceptual understanding through diagnostic assessment, conceptual clarification, collaborative learning, contextualized instruction, multilingual support, and continuous assessment. The study concludes that improving students’ conceptual understanding of linear motion requires learner-centered instructional strategies that address misconceptions, strengthen conceptual reasoning, and support students’ confidence and comprehension. The findings provide practical implications for improving instructional practices in physics education.

Conceptual Understanding; Linear Motion

1. Aini, N., & Bunawan, W. (2020). The development of two-tier multiple choice tests to assess student’s conceptual understanding in physics learning assisted by ALGODOO. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI), 8(4), 33–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bolanio, J. C. R., & Mendaño, R. V. Simplified Wave Energy Converter: An Apparatus for Teaching Energy Transformation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boller-Aying, S., & Villegas-Mendano, R. (2024). STUDENTS’PERFORMANCE ON THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COMPONENTS OF PROJECTILE MOTION USING PROJECT-BASED LEARNING. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1689-1704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dalal, R. (2025). Core concepts of mechanics and thermodynamics. Educohack Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eichenlaub, M., & Redish, E. F. (2019). Blending physical knowledge with mathematical form in physics problem solving. In Mathematics in Physics Education (pp. 127-151). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jufriadi, A., & Andinisari, R. (2020). JITT with assessment for learning: Investigation and improvement of students understanding of kinematics concept. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jufriadi, A., Kusairi, S., & Sutopo, S. (2021, April). Exploration of student’s understanding of distance and displacement concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1869, No. 1, p. 012195). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kamcharean, C., & Wattanakasiwich, P. (2014, March 26). A two-tier multiple choice questions to diagnose thermodynamic misconception of Thai and Laos students. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan Conference Proceedings, 1, 017008. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.1.017008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Madca, H., Balinton, C., Agustin, C., & Nabua, E. B. (2025). Learners’ conceptual understanding on force, motion, and energy: Its relationship with motivation. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mazeikiene, N., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2024). AI-enhanced qualitative research: Insights from Adele Clarke's situational analysis of TED Talks. The Qualitative Report, 29(9), 2502–2526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mestre, J., & Docktor, J. (2020). Science Of Learning Physics, The: Cognitive Strategies For Improving Instruction. World Scientific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mitrevski, B. (2019, February). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving in physics. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2075, No. 1, p. 180001). AIP Publishing LLC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Motlhabane, A. (2016). Learner’s alternative and misconceptions in physics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 424–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Renkl, A. (2017). Learning from worked-examples in mathematics: Students relate procedures to principles. Zdm, 49(4), 571-584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rittle‐Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., & Loehr, A. M. (2016). Improving conceptual and procedural knowledge: The impact of instructional content within a mathematics lesson. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 576–591. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rohmantika, N., Kurniawan, E. S., & Sriyono, S. (2022). Effectiveness of two-tier multiple choice diagnostic test for analyzing students' misconceptions in high school physics learning. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 15(2), 79–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shubani, M., & Mavuru, L. (2022). ENGLISH SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS'CHALLENGES IN COMPREHENDING PHYSICAL SCIENCES CONCEPTS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Solikin, Bukit, T. F., Eltera, G. A., Advent, E. B., Pardede, N., Fatimah, F., Hutagalung, R. B. S. D., Munthe, R. T. B., & Cahyani, W. A. (2026). Identifying and analyzing misconception of XI grade students about basic kinematics material by using two-tier test method in SMA Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan. Sultan Adam: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.7.1456/sultan.v4i1.1567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Stefanel, A. (2019). Graph in physics education: From representation to conceptual understanding. In Mathematics in Physics Education (pp. 195–231). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Uçar, F. M., & Sungur, S. (2017). The role of perceived classroom goal structures, self-efficacy, and engagement in student science achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 149-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vosniadou, S. (2019). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vosniadou, S. (2020). Students’ misconceptions and science education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Waldron, K. J., & Schmiedeler, J. (2016). Kinematics. In Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 11–36). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zaid, H. M., & Zainuddin, A. (2017, November). A study on foundation students' misconceptions in projectile motion and free fall. In 2017, the 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF) (pp. 693–696). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Combined and Isolated Effect of SAQ Training and Resistance Training on Agility and Flexibility among Badminton Players
• Importance of Ashtanga Yoga in Physical Education and Mental Health
• Navigating the Path of Exceptional Parenting: An Exploration of Experiences among Parents of Para-Athletes
• Effects of a 12-Week Football Intervention on Mental Health and Psychological Resilience in Secondary School Students
• Academic Achievement, Enthusiasm and Attitude of High School Students Regarding Quizizz as an Educational Gamification Tool for Physics