Digital Commodification of Indigenous Cultural Tourism in Malaysia: Issues, Challenges and Prospects
Authors
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500319
Subject Category: Tourism Planning
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 4691-4700
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-01
Accepted: 2026-05-06
Published: 2026-05-30
Abstract
This review paper examines how Indigenous cultural tourism in Malaysia is shaped by the interconnected dynamics of cultural commodification, authenticity, tourist gaze, and digital transformation, with particular reference to the broader context of Orang Asli tourism. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in tourism studies, Indigenous studies, and cultural representation, the paper argues that commodification in Indigenous tourism should not be viewed solely as an economic process, but as a representational and political process through which cultural meanings are selected, simplified, circulated, and contested. The review shows that tourism may create opportunities for cultural visibility, livelihood diversification, and heritage revitalisation, while simultaneously exposing Indigenous communities to stereotyping, selective authenticity, and unequal control over representation. These tensions are intensified in the digital era, where social media and platform-based tourism systems privilege visual appeal, speed, and shareability, often detaching cultural images from their social and spiritual contexts. The paper proposes a conceptual synthesis in which tourist gaze and digital transformation operate as interrelated representational forces shaping commodification outcomes, while Indigenous agency mediates whether authenticity is preserved, negotiated, transformed, or eroded. It concludes that the key issue is not whether culture enters tourism markets, but whether Indigenous communities retain authority over representation, interpretation, digital circulation, and benefit-sharing. The review contributes a Malaysian perspective to wider debates on Indigenous tourism and identifies directions for more ethical, rights-based, and community-centred tourism governance.
Keywords
Indigenous tourism, cultural commodification, tourist gaze, digital transformation, Mah Meri
Downloads
References
1. Aicken, M., and Ryan, C. (2005) Indigenous tourism: The commodification and management of culture, Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bala, P. & Chang, P. K. (2025). Navigating progress and preservation: village leaders' perspective on tourism and land rights among Temuan, Mah Meri and Semai communities in Selangor. Discover Sustainability, 16, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bianchi, R. (2018) The political economy of tourism development: A critical review, Annals of tourism research, 70, 88-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Belk, R. (2020) Commodification as a Part of Marketization. In Marketization: Theory and evidence from emerging economies (pp. 31-72), Singapore: Springer Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bunten, A. C. (2010) Indigenous tourism: the paradox of gaze and resistance, La ricerca folklorica, 51-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bunten, A. C., and Graburn, N. H. (Eds.). (2018) Indigenous tourism movements, University of Toronto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Carnegie, E., and Mccabe, S. (2008) Re-enactment events and tourism: Meaning, authenticity and identity, Current Issues in Tourism, 11(4), 349-368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Carr, A., Ruhanen, L., and Whitford, M. (2016) Indigenous peoples and tourism: The challenges and opportunities for sustainable tourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(8-9), 1067-1079. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R. & Walker, J. D. (2019). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chowdhury, J. S., Vadevelu, K., Jamir Singh, P. S., Mohd Saad, M. R., and Hatta, Z. A. (2024) The Orang Asli Narratives and Visualizing the Orang Asli-ness Questioned. In The Intersection of Faith, Culture, and Indigenous Community in Malaysia and Bangladesh (pp. 29-50), Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cohen, E. (1988) Authenticity and commoditization in tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Couldry, N. & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data's relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Dwivedi, A. V. (2026). Jarawa as Spectacle 2.0: Tropical Tourism's Algorithmic "Human Safari" in the Andaman Islands. eTropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics, 25(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fan, K. H. F., Chang, T. C. & Ng, S. L. (2020). The Batek's dilemma on indigenous tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 83, 102948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Heikkilä, K., & Williams-Hunt, A. (2024). Forest reserves as frontiers of indigeneity: Semai Orang Asli investments of work, cultural use, and identity in the Bukit Tapah Forest Reserve. Critical Asian Studies, *56*(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2023.2278046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Loh, B. Y. H. & Chin, J. (Eds.). (2023). New Media in the Margins: Lived Realities and Experiences from the Malaysian Peripheries. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. MacCannell, D. (1973) Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings, American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nash, D. (1989) Tourism as a form of imperialism, in V. L. Smith (Ed.), Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (2nd ed.), University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nicholas, C. (2010) The Orang Asli and the contest for resources: Indigenous politics, development and identity in Peninsular Malaysia, IWGIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Oakes, T. (2006) Tourism and cultural representation in Asia, Annals of Tourism Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Richards, G. (2021) Rethinking cultural tourism, Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Rossi, U. & Sporer, E. (2026). Startup Precarity: The Extractivist Economization of Precarious Urban Living in Naples. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Salazar, N. B. (2012) Community-based cultural tourism: Issues, threats and opportunities, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(1), 9–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Scarles, C. (2020) The mediated tourist gaze: Visuality, representation and tourism experience, Annals of Tourism Research, 82, 102932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Scheyvens, R., Carr, A., Movono, A., Hughes, E., Higgins-Desbiolles, F., and Mika, J. P. (2021) Indigenous tourism and the sustainable development goals, Annals of Tourism Research, 90, 103260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Shepherd, R. (2002) Commodification, culture and tourism, Tourist studies, 2(2), 183-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Smith, M. K. (2021), Issues in cultural tourism studies (4th ed.), Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Smith, V. L. (1989) Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism, University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tekobbe, C. (2025). Turtle, Water and Silicon: Storyworking Indigenous Digital Methodologies. Journal of Digital Social Research, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Tucker, H. and Picard, D. (Eds.). (2017), Emotion in motion: Tourism, affect and transformation, Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Urry, J., and Larsen, J. (2011) The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Wang, N. (1999) Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience, Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Van Eyk, T. (2024). Indigenized Leisure and Data Colonialist Systems: Addressing Invisible Presence Through the Visibility of Indigenous Identities Online. Mosaic Journal, 2(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]