Impact of Resource Scarcity on Creative Potential in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of Digital Media Students

Modern higher education curricula place a strong emphasis on digital innovation and creative risk-taking to prepare students for the demands of the global media industry. However, evaluating student output based solely on intrinsic capability often overlooks the critical variable of institutional infrastructure. The study counters the existing pedagogical deficit model, which often blames the lower fidelity of student media output in developing institutional settings on the absence of intrinsic motivation or underlying competence. This study uses a parallel mixed-methods design, triangulating self-assessment measures of quantitative data with environmental realities of qualitative data on digital media students (N = 31) at Kabarak University, Kenya. Quantitative data indicates the strong background of creative self-efficacy, as 71.0% of students mentioned that they had the necessary skills to develop professional content, and 67.7% of students are engaged in the exploration of new methods of storytelling. Nevertheless, qualitative thematic analysis shows that harsh realities in the environment, namely acute shortages of hardware and network instability (mentioned by 63.6% of participants), systematically undermine these intentions. As a result, this paper presents the notion of theoretical creativity: a phenomenon where students have the cognitive imagination to be creative but do not have the physical affordances to implement, and are forced to routinely demote the complex projects. The findings indicate that navigating this second-level digital divide reduces the educational experience from creative problem-solving to logistical survival. The study concludes that relying on student "forced resilience" is pedagogically unsustainable; institutions must reclassify high-performance digital infrastructure from peripheral administrative overhead to a mandatory core pedagogical requirement.

Resource Scarcity, Theoretical Creativity, Digital Media Education, Creative Self-Efficacy, Digital Divide

1. Almakaty, S. S. (2025). Emerging trends in communication and media education in the digital age: A global analysis and comparative study. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1022.v2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Auerbach, J., Gichanga, M., Jensen, M., Kiden, S., & Orembo, L. (2023). Preparing for the next wave: Facilitating the adoption of technology innovation in digital artistic expression in East Africa. Electric South. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banawa, R. (2025). Mixed-methods research: Combining qualitative and quantitative data. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/mixed-methods-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kabarak University. (2026). Conferences, editorial & publications. https://kabarak.ac.ke/conferences-editorial-publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kiarie, C., & Jones, N. (2024). Towards learning excellence in universities: A critical review of information and communication technology policies in education in Kenya. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 8(1), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v8i1.332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lumivero. (2025). Mixed methods research: Definition, types, benefits, and challenges. Lumivero. https://lumivero.com/resources/mixed-methods-research-definition-types-benefits-and-challenges/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Matjie, M. A., Nethavhani, A. N., & Matlakala, M. M. (2026). AI and the digital divide in education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 8, Article 1759027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2026.1759027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Morrison, K., & See, B. H. (Eds.). (2025). Handbook of mixed methods research in education. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mulwa, P. (2025). Heterogeneity in digital learning resource integration: A multilevel analysis of teacher intern practices in secondary schools across Homa Bay County, Kenya. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 9(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20250901.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ngaine, L. K. (2025). Bridging the digital divide in Kenyan public universities: An appraisal of ICT and artificial intelligence readiness for fostering inclusive pedagogy and sustainable development in education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(11), 8304–8323. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100648 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nkonoki, E. (2026). Inclusive digital learning: Teacher and student perspectives in East African TVET contexts. HAMK Pilkku. https://doi.org/10.63777/5441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Onwuagboke, B. B. C. (2016). Effects of computer self-efficacy on pre-service art teachers’ achievement in graphic design. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24(4), 1315–1333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Owidi, F. O., & Njoroge, R. (2021). Network literacy and utilisation of electronic resources among university students: The case of Kabarak University, Kenya. International Journal of Current Aspects, 5(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v5i2.162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Randle, O., & David, A. (2025). Influence of computer self-efficacy, socio-economic status, and facilitating conditions on the learning abilities of digital arts students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(7), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.7.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rutto, D. K., Bosire, E., & Munge, E. (2025). Impediments of ICT-based library services in supporting university education: The case of selected universities in Kenya. Kabarak Journal of Research & Innovation, 16(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.58216/kjri.v16i1.623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tenya, A. N., Maina, J. C., & Awuor, F. M. (2023). Challenges in accessing and utilising information in digital resource platforms by academic staff in selected public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Current Aspects, 7(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v7i2.335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Thakur, R., Munjal, S., Mishra, A., Gandhi, A., Wani, T. A., & Homavazir, Z. (2025). Exploring GANs in digital media education. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(1s), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1s.2025.66 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]