The Influence of Port Characteristics on the Operational Performance of Sea Ports in Africa

This study aimed to determine the influence of organizational characteristics on the performance of seaports in Africa. The study replicates previous studies carried out in the European context by Caldeirinha et al. (2011) and Felicio et al. (2013; 2015). This study adopted a positivist research philosophy with a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. Structured questionnaires were used to collect primary data from executives at 54 container-handling seaport terminals in Africa. Of these, only 46 seaport terminals responded, with a response rate of 83.6%. The questionnaires conceptualized six port characteristics: location, size, infrastructure, information and communications technology, hinterland connectivity, and maritime connectivity. Model fitness was confirmed by the use of the Standardized Mean Root Square Residual (SRMR) and Normed Fit Index (NFI). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using Smart PLS 4.1.1 was used for both the measurement model and structural analyses. The findings established a positive and significant influence of port characteristics on the operational performance of seaports in Africa. The study also found that the strongest seaport characteristics for operational performance, in order of importance, are infrastructure, information and communications technology, strategic location, maritime services, hinterland connectivity, and size. The findings imply that for African seaports to improve their operational performance, they need to focus on developing port infrastructure, ICT, and an excellent strategic location.

Partial least squares structural equation modeling, measurement model

1. Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., & Dionísio, A. (2011). Effect of the container terminal characteristics on performance. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17(4), 493–514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Felicio, J. A., Caldeirinha, V. R., & Coelho, J. (2013). The influence of characterizing factors on port performance, measured by operational, financial, and efficiency indicators: Recent Advances in Environment, Energy Systems and Naval Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Felicio, J.A., Caldeirinha, V.R., Dionisio, A. (2015). The effect of port and container terminal characteristics on terminal performance: Maritime Economics & Logistics 17(4):493–514. (2015). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. UNCTAD (2018). World Investment Forum: Investment and New Industrial Policies. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.18.II.D.4 ISBN 978-92-1-112926. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. African CEOs forum (2021). New World Coming: How can Africa and its private sector navigate the change? Digital, 28th to 30th September, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Port Strategy (2021). Insight for Executives: Mercator Media, Dec 1, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Notteboom, T.E., Pallis, A., & Rodrigues, J.P. (2022). Port Economics, Management and Policy; London, Routledge, 690 pages, eBook ISBN 9780429318184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. World Bank (2007). Port Reform Toolkit: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank Group), 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kamara, T.A.R., Turay, A.U., Souldan, S.M., Paul, D.J., Smith, D., Smith, V., & Conteh, A.A. (2025). Impact of Infrastructure Investment on Port Efficiency: A Case Study of Queen Elizabeth II Quay, Sierra Leone. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 15, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2025.152011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Handoyo, S., Erlane, S.M., & Soedarsono, S. (2023). Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 3390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., Rodrigue, J. P. (2026). Port Economics, Management and Policy, 2nd Edition, New York: Routledge, 734 pages / 232 illustrations. ISBN 9781032955339. doi.org/10.4324/9781003585367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McMahon, J. (2012). Performance Management in Human Resource Management: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN. 13: 978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sunitiyoso, Y., Nuraeni, S., Pambudi, N.F., Inayati, I. F., & Tiara, A.R. (2022). Port performance factors and their interactions: A systems thinking approach: The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics,38(2), 107–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNCTAD (2014): World Investment Report: Investment in the SDGs, An Action Plan. United Nations. Sales No. E.14.II.D.1 ISBN 978-92-1-112873-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Notteboom, T., Pallis, A & Rodrigue, J. (2022). Port Economics, Management and Policy, New York: Routledge, 690 pages / 218 illustrations. ISBN 9780367331559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). “The Geography of Maritime Ranges: Interfacing Global Maritime Shipping Networks with Hinterlands”, Geojournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10308-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Adabere, S., Kwateng, K.O., Dzidzah, E., Kamewor, F.T. (2021). Information technologies and seaport operational efficiency. Marine Economics and Management 4 (2): 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAEM-03-2021-0001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cera, E, & Kusaku, A. (2020). Factors influencing organizational performance: work environment, training and development, and organizational culture: European Journal of Economics Business Studies, 6(1),16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Santos, J.B., & Brito, A., (2012). Towards a subjective measurement model for Organizational performance: Handbook of Intelligence: Cambridge University Press, 16–33: New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Richard, P., Devinney, T., Yip, G., Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718–804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lam, J. S. L. & Yap, W. Y. (2019). A Stakeholder Perspective of Port City Sustainable Development: Sustainability, 11 (2), 447-451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kaiser, M. O. (1974). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure for identity correlation matrix: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Bartlett, M.S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 16(B), 296–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hair, J., Sarstedt, C., Hopkin, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2010). PLS-SEM an emerging tool for business research: European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Vinzi, V.E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement: Handbook of Partial Least Squares. DOI: 1.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mou, N., Wang, C., Chen, J. et al. Spatial pattern of location advantages of ports along the Maritime Silk Road. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 149–176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1837-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wong, K.K. (2019). Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS SEM) with Smart PLS in 38 Hours. Universe ISBN: 9781532066498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Notteboom, T. E., & Wang. S. (2015). The role of port authorities in the development of LNG bunkering facilities in North European ports: Journal of Maritime Affairs, 14(1), 61–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Allyn & Bacon, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sohn, J.R., Jung, C.M. (2009). The size effect of a port on the container handling efficiency level and market share in international transshipment flow, pages 118–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tongzon, J. & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization efficiency and performance: Some empirical evidence from Container Terminals: Transportation Research, 39(5), 405–424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pires da Cruz, M. R., Ferreira, J. M., & Azevedo, S. (2013). Key factors of seaport performance from a stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lui, Z. (1995). The comparative performance of public and private Enterprises: The case of British ports. The London School of economics and the university of Bath. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mlambo, C. (2021). The Impact of Port Performance on Trade: The Case of Selected African States: Economies 2021, 9(4), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Elkhouly, H.A. (2026). Tangier Med Port: Leading Africa’s Blue Port Revolution and Maritime Transformation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits