Corporate Governance and Audit Pricing: An Empirical Study of Ghanaian Listed Firms (2015–2024)

Authors

Daniel Quainoo

Directorate of Internal Audit, University of Cape Coast (Ghana)

Jacob Fraikue

Directorate of Internal Audit, University of Cape Coast (Ghana)

Nuhu Alhassan

Directorate of Internal Audit, University of Cape Coast (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500373

Subject Category: Corporate

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 5599-5619

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-11

Accepted: 2026-05-16

Published: 2026-06-02

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of audit fees among firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) over the period 2015–2024, extending earlier research by incorporating a more recent, post-financial-sector-reform era. The study focuses on three broad categories of determinants: client firm characteristics, audit firm attributes, and corporate governance mechanisms. Using a panel data research design with 320 firm-year observations drawn from 32 listed companies and employing Generalised Least Squares (GLS) estimation with fixed effects, the study investigates how variables such as firm size, profitability, complexity, leverage risk, industry classification, audit firm size, audit tenure, board size, board diligence, CEO duality, audit committee independence, and audit committee expertise influence audit fees. Descriptive statistics reveal a mean log audit fee of 5.201 (approximately GHS 159,000), with substantial cross-sectional and temporal variation. The mean log of total assets is 5.610 and mean profitability (ROA) is −0.010, reflecting the mixed financial performance of GSE-listed firms during a decade that encompassed the banking sector clean-up (2017–2019) and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Correlation analysis shows strong positive associations between audit fees and client size (r = 0.7643), profitability (r = 0.6546), complexity (r = 0.3750), and leverage risk (r = 0.3254). VIF tests confirm multicollinearity is within acceptable bounds (Mean VIF = 1.78). The Hausman specification test favours the fixed-effects model. The within-firm R² is 0.8270, indicating that the model explains 82.70 percent of the variation in audit fees after controlling for firm-specific effects. Client size emerges as the dominant driver (β = 0.6665, p < 0.001). Corporate governance mechanisms exhibit significant negative associations with fees, consistent with the substitution hypothesis. These findings carry important implications for regulators, investors, and audit professionals navigating Ghana’s evolving corporate environment.

Keywords

Audit fees; Corporate governance; Ghana Stock Exchange; Panel data; Agency theory; Substitution theory; Board diligence; Audit committee.

Downloads

References

1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afenya, M., Owusu, G., & Antwi, S. (2022). Audit committee characteristics and audit fees in emerging markets: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 601–620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Corporate governance, audit quality and firm performance in emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), 225–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baffour, P. T., Mensah, E., & Adjei, R. (2020). Banking sector reforms and financial stability in Ghana. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(3), 389–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bank of Ghana. (2019). Report on the banking sector cleanup exercise. Accra: Bank of Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bawuah, B. (2024). Corporate governance reforms and financial reporting quality in emerging economies: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Accounting and Finance, 12(1), 44–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2010). Audit partner tenure and audit planning and pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 45–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boo, E., & Sharma, D. (2008). The association between corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence from Australia. Accounting & Finance, 48(3), 433–446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cameran, M., Prencipe, A., & Trombetta, M. (2016). Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 35–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dart, E. (2011). UK investors’ perceptions of audit fees and audit quality. Accounting and Business Research, 41(3), 227–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Francis, J. R., & Simon, D. T. (1987). A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 145–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting and Finance, 46(3), 387–404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2008). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 141–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2020). The Routledge companion to auditing. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Joshi, P. L., Al-Bastaki, H., & Bremser, W. G. (2021). Corporate governance attributes and audit fees: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Journal, 11(2), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kale, E., & Gürel, E. (2024). Determinants of audit fees in emerging economies. International Journal of Corporate and Economic Studies, 6(1), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kim, J., Park, S., & Lee, H. (2024). The impact of board reforms on audit fees: International evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 28(1), 55–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2009). Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 115–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Legenzova, R. (2024). Financial risk, audit quality and audit pricing in emerging economies. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 91(1), 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Millichamp, A. H., & Taylor, J. R. (2008). Auditing (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mohammed, N., & Saeed, A. (2018). Determinants of audit fees in UK alternative investment markets. International Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Musah, A. (2017). Determinants of audit fees in listed firms in Ghana. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(6), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ohidoa, T., & Okun, O. O. (2018). Determinants of audit fees in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Porter, B., Simon, J., & Hatherly, D. (2014). Principles of external auditing (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2023). Annual report on inspections of audit firms. PCAOB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rick, L., et al. (2005). The history of auditing practices. Accounting History Review, 10(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Securities and Exchange Commission Ghana. (2020). Corporate governance directives for public companies. SEC Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Thinggaard, F., & Kiertzner, L. (2008). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from a small capital market. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 141–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tsui, J. S. L., Jaggi, B., & Gul, F. A. (2001). CEO domination, growth opportunities, and their impact on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 16(3), 189–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Widmann, M., Follert, F., & Wolz, M. (2021). What is it going to cost? Audit fee determinants: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 455–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Willmott, H. (1986). Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the accounting profession. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(6), 555–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yamada, T., & Fujita, H. (2022). Corporate governance quality and external audit demand: Evidence from Asian listed firms. Sustainability, 14(9), 5534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2023). Governance reforms, disclosure quality and audit fees: International evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(5), 702–722. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles