A Hybrid Approach in Contemporary Auditing: A Literature Synthesis on the Integration of Risk-Based Audit and Data Analytics

The advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed auditing practice by increasing the volume and complexity of data that auditors must process, necessitating more adaptive and risk-sensitive approaches. Risk-based audit (RBA) and data analytics have emerged as two pivotal responses to this challenge; however, their individual roles and the implications of their integration for audit risk assessment remain insufficiently synthesized in the existing literature. This study aims to analyze the roles of RBA and data analytics, as well as their integration in supporting audit risk assessment. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework was employed, drawing on 30 peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2026, sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that RBA improves audit process quality by enabling systematic risk prioritization and strengthening the audit function as a strategic organizational mechanism, while data analytics extends audit coverage through full population testing, enhances fraud and anomaly detection, and facilitates continuous auditing, despite persistent adoption challenges including regulatory barriers, skills gaps, and cognitive risks. The integration of both approaches optimizes risk assessment through five complementary mechanisms: expanding risk identification, improving misstatement risk assessment accuracy, enabling objective high-risk area determination, enhancing audit judgment quality, and optimizing risk-based resource allocation. These findings underscore that the successful integration of RBA and data analytics depends not solely on technological adoption, but equally on governance maturity, human resource capacity, and the development of adaptive audit standards suited to the demands of the digital era.

Risk-Based Audit, Data Analytics, Risk Assessment, Audit Quality

1. Achmad, T., Huang, C.-Y., Putra, M. A., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2024). Forensic Accounting and Risk Management: Exploring the Impact of Generalized Audit Software and Whistleblowing Systems on Fraud Detection in Indonesia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(12), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almgrashi, A., & Mujalli, A. (2024). The Influence of Sustainable Risk Management on the Implementation of Risk-Based Internal Auditing. Sustainability, 16(19), 8455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Álvarez-Foronda, R., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L. (2023). Implementation model of data analytics as a tool for improving internal audit processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1140972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ardianingsih, A. & Payamta. (2022). Analysis Of the Effectiveness of Risk Based Internal Audit Implementation: A Case Study. Quality - Access to Success, 23(190). https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.190.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Astuti, S., & Riyanti, A. (2025). Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Risk Based Internal Audit Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud. owner, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v9i2.2621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dempsey, K., & Van Dyk, V. (2024). The Role of Data Analytics in Enhancing External Audit Quality. In T. Moloi & B. George (Eds.), Towards Digitally Transforming Accounting and Business Processes (pp. 399–423). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46177-4_22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ditkaew, K., & Suttipun, M. (2023). The impact of audit data analytics on audit quality and audit review continuity in Thailand. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-04-2022-0114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fitria, R. N., Sitorus, L., Arianisari, N., & Saproni. (2025). ENHANCING INTERNAL AUDIT QUALITY THROUGH DATA ANALYTICS AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP. Educoretax, 5(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fitriandini, N., Raguwan, Syifa, A., Alfarizi, M. I., & Mardiana, L. R. (2025). Pengaruh Era Digital Pada Profesi Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 17(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.55049/jeb.v17i1.400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fitriani, Sandy, K. N., Amiruddin, & Syamsuddin. (2025). Governance, Risk, And Compliance: Pilar Utama Untuk Audit Berbasis Nilai Tambah. Jurnal Akuntasi dan Keuangan Kontemporer (JAKK), 7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Föhr, T. L., Schreyer, M., Moffitt, K. C., & Marten, K.-U. (2026). Deep learning meets risk-based auditing: A holistic framework for leveraging foundation and task-specific models in audit procedures. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 57, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hasibuan, Z., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2025). Peran Big Data dan AI (Artificial Intelligence) dalam Mengoptimalkan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara (JINU), 2(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hendra, J., Umida, N., Anggriani, R. A., & Safitri, R. (2025). Penerapan Big Data Analytics Dalam Manajemen Pasar Modal Modern. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hezam, Y. A. A., Anthonysamy, L., & Suppiah, S. D. K. (2023). Big Data Analytics and Auditing: A Review and Synthesis of Literature. Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Huang, F., No, W. G., Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Yan, Z. (2022). Audit data analytics, machine learning, and full population testing. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2022.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khaerunnisa, A., Karfina Ar, L., Amiruddin, A., & Syamsuddin, S. (2025). Integrasi Big Data dalam Penilaian Risiko: Tantangan dan Peluang bagi Akuntan Modern. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 8(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v8i2.1418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Khairunnisa, S., & Wilasittha, A. A. (2025). Penerapan Risk-Based Audit terhadap Siklus Persediaan oleh KAP X. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 5(3), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v5i3.5873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kirpitsas, I., & Pachidis, T. (2026). KIBO, a new hybrid software development method with enhanced information systems auditing capability. Information and Software Technology, 190, 107958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lois, P., Drogalas, G., Nerantzidis, M., Georgiou, I., & Gkampeta, E. (2021). Risk-based internal audit: Factors related to its implementation. Corporate Governance, 21(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ningsih, F. S., Putri, I. R., Nadhifa, I., Ismi, H. S., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2026). Transformasi Audit Manual ke Audit Digital melalui Integrasi Big Data dan Artificial Intelligence. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 9122–9130. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Novita, & Naswandi, A. (2022). APAKAH RISK BASED AUDIT DAPAT MENINGKATKAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN? JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v8i1.4867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nurhaliza, Tjan, J. S., & Bakri, A. A. (2026). Peran Teknologi Informasi dalam Mendukung Penerapan Audit Berbasis Risiko di Pemerintah Kabupaten Barru. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ogeh, F. G. (2026). Peran Data Analytics dalam Audit. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 11(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Prabhugouda, A., & Asra, S. (2024). A Review on Big Data Applications and their Challenges. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 23(06). https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/jikm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Putra, I., Sulistiyo, U., Diah, E., Rahayu, S., & Hidayat, S. (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNAL AUDIT, RISK MANAGEMENT, WHISTLEBLOWING SYSTEM AND BIG DATA ANALYTICS ON THE FINANCIAL CRIME BEHAVIOR PREVENTION. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2148363. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2148363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rahayu, I. Y., & Wilasittha, A. A. (2023). Implementasi ATLAS dalam Prosedur Penilaian Risiko Audit (Studi Kasus pada KAP Luthfi Muhammad & Rekan). Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 9(2), 3445–3451. https://doi.org/10.33197/jabe.vol9.iss2.2023.1136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rakipi, R., De Santis, F., & D’Onza, G. (2021). Correlates of the internal audit function’s use of data analytics in the big data era: Global evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 42, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rozana, A. S. A., Winarningsih, S., & Yadiati, W. (2025). The Impact of Big Data Analytics on Audit Quality in the Digital Era. JASa: Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, 9(2), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa.v9i2.2878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ruhnke, K. (2023). Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 51, 100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sofa, A. R., Marbun, N., Sembiring, D. V. B., Sebayang, V. F., & Nst, D. A. D. (2025). The Role of Internal Audit and Risk-Based Audit in Improving Local Government Financial Accountability. EDUCTUM: Journal Research, 4(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sofyani, H., Rohman, W. M., Oktavia, K. D., & Efsari, A. N. (2025). Big Data Analytics-Based Audit System Quality And Public Sector Audit Performance: Audit Judgment As Mediator. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 15(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i1.36375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Susilawati, I., Yuniarti, R. D., & Widyaningsih, A. (2025). Effect of Evidence Sequencing and Big Data Analytics Knowledge on Risk Assessment Accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 11-23, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v13i1.64294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Thahirah, A. Y., Rahmatillah, A. A., Ombe, I. T., Rifka, N., & Triadi, N. H. (2025). Risk-Based Audit sebagai Pendekatan Strategis dalam Penilaian Risiko Material Misstatement. PERMANA: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 17(2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Torroba, M., Sánchez, J. R., López, L., & Callejón, Á. (2025). Investigating the impacting factors for the audit professionals to adopt data analysis and artificial intelligence: Empirical evidence for Spain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100738 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Verna, E., Genta, G., & Galetto, M. (2026). Risk-based predictive modelling for audit verification: Evidence from EU-funded programmes. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-02725-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wijaya, J. R. T., Prasetyo, I., Rahmatika, D. N., & Indriasih, D. (2025). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND AUDIT QUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL LITERATURE REVIEW FROM SCOPUS DATABASE. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 20(01). http://ejournal.stiepena.ac.id/index.php/fe [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Yufantria, F., & Fadhlihi, A. (2025). Risk-Based Internal Audit in the Digital Era: Trends, Implications, and Challenges. Al Tijarah, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zalaan, S. G., Izadinia, N., & Hamidian, N. (2024). THE EFFECT OF RISK-BASED CONTINUOUS AUDITING ON REDUCING FRAUD IN COMPANIES LISTED ON THE IRAQI STOCK EXCHANGE. INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE STUDIES, 16(01). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria