Progressivism in Context: A Critical Psychological Examination of John Dewey’s Educational Theory in African Schooling Systems with a Case Study of Zimbabwe

Authors

Henry Wasosa

Catholic University of Zimbabwe, Harare (Zimbabwe)

Isaac Mutelo

Catholic University of Zimbabwe, Harare (Zimbabwe)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000076

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 880-890

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-29

Accepted: 2025-10-04

Published: 2025-11-04

Abstract

John Dewey’s progressivist educational philosophy, grounded in inquiry, experiential learning, and democratic classrooms, has informed numerous African curriculum reforms. This paper critically examines the psychological viability of Deweyan progressivism in sub-Saharan African contexts, focusing on Zimbabwe as a case study. Empirical evidence indicates that learner-centred, inquiry-based approaches have the potential to enhance engagement, higher-order thinking, and democratic dispositions. However, gaps in foundational skills (literacy, numeracy), language complexities, teacher capacity, and misaligned assessments frequently hinder the realisation of these ideals. Recommendations include adopting hybrid pedagogical models, sustained teacher professional development, assessment redesign, and sequenced policy implementation.

Keywords

progressivism, Zimbabwe, educational psychology, policy implementation

Downloads

References

1. Ashman, G., & Sweller, J. (2023). What every teacher should know about cognitive load theory and the importance of cognitive load to instruction. CE Overson, C. M. Hakala, LL Kordonowy, & VA Benassi (Eds.), In their own words: What scholars and teachers want you to know about why and how to apply the science of learning in your academic setting, 185-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chimbi, G. T., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Policy failures with learner-centred pedagogy: Case studies from Zimbabwe. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Education Development Trust (EDT). (2023). TEACH Zimbabwe: Teacher effectiveness and equitable access for all children. Retrieved from https://www.edt.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P., Kingsford-Smith, A., & Zhou, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378-392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulation types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviours. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Magudu, S., & Gumbo, M. T. (2022). Teacher education partnerships in Zimbabwe: Challenges and opportunities. South African Journal of Higher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mbonimana, S., & Sikubwabo, C. (2024). Learner-centred pedagogy in Rwanda: Effects on learning outcomes. African Journal of Empirical Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (MoPSE). (2021). Education Sector Strategic Plan (ESSP 2021–2025). Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mtetwa, D. K. J., & Ndemo, Z. (2022). Continuing professional learning for teachers in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Teacher Education and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mwalongo, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about ICT for teaching, professional development, administration and personal use. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 7(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive load theory: Emerging trends and innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4), 458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ryan, R. M. (Ed.). (2023). The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11-12), 813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sikoyo, L. (2010). Contextual challenges of implementing learner-centred pedagogy in Uganda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 247–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 34(1), 171-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sweller, J. (2022). The role of evolutionary psychology in our understanding of human cognition: Consequences for cognitive load theory and instructional procedures. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2229-2241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2021). From theory to practice: the application of cognitive load theory to the practice of medicine. Academic Medicine, 96(1), 24-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles