Balancing the Load: How Workload Management Shapes Employee Performance at Igara Tea Factory — A Mixed-Methods Approach

This study addressed a knowledge gap on how workload management influences employee performance in tea factory settings, where existing literature had largely focused on burnout, occupational stress, or general HRM practices rather than structured workload allocation. The study aimed to examine the effect of workload management on employee performance at Igara Tea Factory. It was anchored on the Job Demands–Resources theory and Goal-Setting theory, which explain how balanced job demands and clear task goals enhance employee outcomes. A descriptive research design supported by a mixed-methods approach was adopted to capture both numerical trends and contextual experiences. The target population comprised 489 employees, including supervisors, clerical staff, casual workers, and support staff. A sample size of 220 respondents was determined using Yamane’s formula, with proportionate stratified random sampling and simple random sampling applied for the quantitative component, while purposive sampling was used to select 19 supervisors for qualitative interviews. Quantitative findings revealed a strong and significant positive relationship between workload management and employee performance (r = 0.688, p < 0.05), while regression analysis confirmed workload management as a significant predictor (B = 0.467, p = 0.000). Qualitative findings further indicated that poor workload distribution reduced efficiency and morale, whereas fair task allocation and clear instructions enhanced performance. The study concluded that effective workload management significantly improves employee performance. It is significant to policy and practice by informing structured workload allocation systems and improved HR planning in tea factories. The study contributes to literature by integrating workload management within performance frameworks in agro-industrial contexts and extending application of JD-R and Goal-Setting theories to workload-performance relationships.

Workload Management, Employee Performance, Igara Tea Factory

1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 1(2014), 389-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human relations, 61(8), 1139-1160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gamage, A., & Wickramaratne, W. P. R. (2021). Quality of life and quality of work life as determinants of employee productivity: Self-reports of tea harvesters in Sri Lanka. EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal, 11(1), 50-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Giotopoulos, K. C., Michalopoulos, D., Vonitsanos, G., Papadopoulos, D., Giannoukou, I., & Sioutas, S. (2024). Dynamic workload management system in the public sector. Information, 15(6), 335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guruge, S. R., & Ban, J. (2021). Analysing the impact of occupational stress on employee performance: A case study on Hayleys Plantations and tea export PLC in Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kazooba, C. (2020). Human resource management practices and employee performance in Kayonza Tea Factory, Uganda. Kampala International University Institutional Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Koech, S. EVALUATING THE CHALLENGES OF STAFF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS DURING COVID-19 PERIOD IN TEA SECTOR IN KENYA'S KERICHO TOWN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290-300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lewandowski, J., & Walaszczyk, A. (2019). Production management and packaging. Food Safety and Industry 4.0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, 57(9), 705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation science, 5(2), 93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mugume, R. (2021). Employee management and organisational performance in Igara Growers Tea Factory Limited. RI Journals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nanayakkara, K. K. H., & Manujaya, W. G. P. (2024, November). Factors Associates with Employee Burnout Among Machine Operators: A Study of Tea Industry, Galle District, Sri Lanka. In 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INNOVATION (p. 220). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ninsiima, D. (2022). Factors affecting employee performance in tea processing firms in Uganda: A case of selected tea factories. Makerere University Institutional Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nuamah, J. K., & Mehta, R. K. (2020). Design for stress, fatigue, and workload management. In Design for health (pp. 201-226). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Omukaga, K. O. (2024). Accounting for labour exploitation in corporations with global supply chains: a case of the Kenyan commercial tea industry (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rambulangi, V., Tampi, J. R., & Tulusan, F. M. (2024). Analysis of employee performance at the Bahu Subdistrict Office: Study on aspects of quality, quantity, timeliness, effectiveness and work independence. Journal La Bisecoman, 5(1), 32-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. REFERENCES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Souisa, N., Macpal, S. J., & Biay, A. (2025). The Influence of Workload and Motivation on Employee Performance through Job Satisfaction. Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 5(1), 23-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wisudawati, N., & Pratama, D. A. (2021). The influence of workload and stress on employee performance in PT X palm oil mill. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 2(6), 2065-2071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]