Bridging Transitions: The Interplay of Agency and Structure in the Reintegration of Circular Labor Migrant Returnees (CLMRs)

International labor migration underpins the Philippine economy, yet the reintegration of Circular Labor Migration Returnees (CLMRs) typically leads to a recursive cycle of repeat migration. This study fills a significant research vacuum by going beyond economic remittances to the under-explored social and psychosocial aspects of return and by investigating the interaction between the institutional frameworks and human agency. The study sought to profile CLMRs, assess levels of institutional assistance in three domains (economic, social, and psychosocial), and identify structural hurdles to successful reintegration. The study was based on Rob Stones’ Structuration Theory (SST) and applied the Quadripartite Cycle to chart the relationships between institutional policy (External Structure), migrant knowledge (Internal Structure), strategic navigation (Active Agency), and reintegration outcomes. A concurrent mixed-methods design was used through triangulation of quantitative survey data and qualitative narratives from in-depth interviews and key-informant sessions with OFW returnees and institutional staff. The findings reveal a precipitous reintegration cliff for returnees. The data suggest that after years of intensive work abroad, majority of the households remain caught in low-income bracket, with the respondents describing their present economic situation as “poor.” This lack of economic progress is compounded by a huge institutional deficit, as nearly all returnees in this sample experienced a serious lack of psychosocial support to help them prepare for life back home. In addition, most respondents reported that they had failed in their attempts to obtain economic aid, largely due to the high bureaucratic barriers. The main findings suggest that the current reintegration process is characterized by structural reproduction, which entails that the lack of sustainable safety nets at the local level leads to a re-entry into the global market. The study advances de-bureaucratizing services by creating localized barangay-level centers and reorienting institutions from one-time handouts to long-term, impact-based mentorship and holistic social protection.

Circular Labor Migration; General Santos City, Philippines; Mixed-Method Research; Reintegration; Strong Structuration Theory

1. Asis, M. M. (2017). The Philippines: Beyond labor migration, toward development and (re)integration. Migration Policy Institute. Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agunias, D. R. & Newland, K. (2019). Developing a road map for engaging diasporas in development: A handbook for policymakers and practitioners in home and host countries. International Organization for Migration and Migration Policy Institute. Washington, DC. https://publications.iom.int/books/developing-road-map-engaging-diasporas-development-handbook-policymakers-and-practitioners [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Battistella, G. (2018). Return migration: A conceptual and policy framework. Scalabrini Migration Center. Quezon City, Philippines. https://www.smc.org.ph/index.php/books/return-migration [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253/379. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000138592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cleofas, J. V. (2022). Social protection and Filipino migrant: A review of policies and practices. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 27(1), 88-105. Manila, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131574-20220005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Datu, J. A. D., & Galang, A. J. R. (2021). Psychological capital and work-related outcomes among Filipino workers. Journal of Career Assessment. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. De Haas, H. (2021) A theory of migration: The aspirations-capabilities frameworks. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 1-35. Amsterdam, Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Migrant Workers. (2022). The DMW rules and regulations on the recruitment and deployment of land-based overseas Filipino Workers. Government of the Philippines. Mandaluyong City, Philippines. https://www.dmw.gov.ph/archives/laws-rules [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fowler, F. J. (2020). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Garabiles, M. R., Ofreneo, M. A. P., & Hall, B. J (2022). Towards a model of resilience: The lived experience of returning Filipino migrant workers, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 86, 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/ijintrel.2021.11.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520057289/the-constitution-of-society [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guerin, I., Hillenkamp, I., & Verschuur, C. (2023). Social reproduction, demography and economy. A conceptual framework. Palgrave Macmillan. Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16480-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Huelser, S. & Sanchez, R. (2024). Structural scaffolding and the migration cycle: Addressing skill-wastage in reintegration frameworks. Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://link.springer.com/journal/12134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. International Organization for Migration. (2020). Reintegration handbook: A practical guide to the design, implementation and monitoring of reintegration assistance. IOM Publications. https://publications.iom.int/systems/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Israel, D. C., & Dacuycuy, C. B. (2021). The psychosocial well-being of Filipino migrant workers: A policy review. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Quezon City, Philippines. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps2112.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kuschminder, K. (2017). Reintegration strategies: Conceptualizing how return migrants reintegrate. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58106-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Luthans, F., Yousef-Morgan, C, M., & Avolio, B., J, (2022). Psychological capital and beyond, Oxford University Press. Oxford, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197632406.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Newland, K. (2009). Circular migration and development: Trends, policy routes, and ways forward. Migration Policy Institute. Washinton, DC. https://www.migraitonpolicy.org/research/cicular-migraiton-and-development-trends-policy-routes-and-ways-forward [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. (2010). Republic Act No. 10022: An act amending Republic Act No. 8042, otherwise known as the Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995. Malacañang palace. Manila, Philippines. https://www.officalgazette.gov.ph/2010/03/08/republic-act-no-10022/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Opiniano, J. M. (2021). The pandemic and the return: Assessing the reintegration readiness of Filipino overseas workers. Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University. Quezon City, Philippines. https://www/ateneo.edu/research/ipc/publications/pandemic-and-return [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stones, R. (2005). Structuration theory. Palgrave Macmillan. London, United Kingdom. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780333793770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Stones, R. (2022). Strong structuration theory: Modernity, history, and the social (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-1181-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tullao, T. S. & Rivera, J. P. R. (2022). Economic perspective on the reintegration of returning Filipino migrant worker. De La Salle University Publishing House. Manila, Philippines. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/publishing-house/books/economic-reintegration [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Valencia, M. L. (2021). The recursive trap. Evaluating the sustainability of Philippine reintegration programs. Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University. Quezon City, Philippines. https://ateneo,edu/research/ipc/publications/recursive-trap [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Valenzuela, M.C., & Dizon, R. (2022). The hero’s shadow: Mental health barriers in the reintegration of Filipino labor migrants. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 45-48. Quezon City, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.31755/pip/2022.01.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vertovec, S. (2007). Circular migration: The way forward in global policy? International Migration Institute Working Papers, 4. University of Oxford. Oxford, United Kingdom. https://www.migrationinsitute.org/publications/wp-04-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring Indigenous Female Migrant’s Experiences of Harassments: A Qualitative Study
• Academic Migration, Employability, and Brain Circulation: Professional Integration of Cameroonian Graduates from Zhejiang Normal University in China (2021–2025)