Digital Technologies and Behavioral Dimensions in Financial Research: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Past Decade

Authors

Mahir Aya

LERSEM, National School of Business and Management Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida (Morocco)

Najeh Wassim Abdessalam

LERSEM, National School of Business and Management Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida (Morocco)

Mahir Sarah

National School of Commerce and Management, Hassan I University, Settat (Morocco)

Benarbi Houda

LERSEM, National School of Business and Management Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida (Morocco)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500482

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 7199-7222

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-13

Accepted: 2026-05-18

Published: 2026-06-05

Abstract

The convergence of digital technologies and behavioral research has become a defining feature of contemporary financial innovation, bringing together advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning and blockchain with evolving work on decision-making, risk perception and investor behavior. Yet the literature at this convergence remains fragmented, with few studies offering an integrated view of its intellectual structure. This paper responds to that gap through a bibliometric analysis of 4975 articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection between 2015 and 2024, combining Bibliometrix R and VOSviewer for performance analysis and science mapping. The findings show a marked acceleration of research output following the Covid-19 pandemic, with China, the United States and India emerging as the leading contributors, and with technologically oriented journals such as IEEE Access, Scientific Reports and Sensors serving as the core publication outlets. Keyword co-occurrence yields five coherent thematic clusters that span the technological backbone of digital finance (machine learning, deep learning, blockchain, Internet of Things) and its behavioral dimensions (risk management, uncertainty, investor response to external shocks), with notable hotspots emerging around explainable and trustworthy artificial intelligence. By offering a large-scale mapping of this broader technological and behavioral landscape, the study provides scholars, practitioners and policymakers with a structured overview of how FinTech and behavioral research intersect and where future inquiry may concentrate.

Keywords

Financial technology; investor behavior; decision-making; bibliometric analysis

Downloads

References

1. Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2020). Overconfidence heuristic-driven bias in investment decision-making and performance: Mediating effects of risk perception and moderating effects of financial literacy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 38(1), 60–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-07-2020-0116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akrami, N. E., Hanine, M., Flores, E. S., Aray, D. G., & Ashraf, I. (2023). Unleashing the Potential of Blockchain and Machine Learning: Insights and Emerging Trends From Bibliometric Analysis. IEEE Access, 11, 78879–78903. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3298371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ameknassi, N., Azirar, H., Touate, S., & Loukili, M. (2025). Dual Fintech and Financial inclusion: Bibliometric analysis. Alternatives Managériales et Economiques, 7(3), 702–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ask the algorithm. (2015). The Economist. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2015/05/07/ask-the-algorithm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campos-Teixeira, D., & Tello-Gamarra, J. (2022). Fintechs: A global bibliometric analysis and research trends. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 17(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242022000200071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, X., Li, S., Xu, X., Meng, F., & Cao, W. (2020). A Novel GSCI-Based Ensemble Approach for Credit Scoring. In IEEE ACCESS (Vol. 8, pp. 222449–222465). IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S., & Whelan, B. (2018). Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dai, H.-N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Blockchain for Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 8076–8094. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2920987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ge, Z., Song, Z., Ding, S. X., & Huang, B. (2017). Data Mining and Analytics in the Process Industry: The Role of Machine Learning. IEEE Access, 5, 20590–20616. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a “Right to Explanation.” https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017). Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 73, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49(2), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jafri, J. A., Mohd Amin, S. I., Abdul Rahman, A., & Mohd Nor, S. (2024). A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on Fintech adoption in banking. Heliyon, 10(1), e22980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jiang, C., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Han, Z., Chen, K.-C., & Hanzo, L. (2017). Machine Learning Paradigms for Next-Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 24(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2016.1500356WC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky’, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kou, G., Akdeniz, O. O., Dincer, H., & Yuksel, S. (2021). Fintech investments in European banks: A hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach. In FINANCIAL INNOVATION (Vol. 7, Issue 1). SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00256-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mahmood, F., Arshad, R., Khan, S., Afzal, A., & Bashir, M. (2024). Impact of behavioral biases on investment decisions and the moderation effect of financial literacy; an evidence of Pakistan. Acta Psychologica, 247, 104303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mohammeda, M. G., & Hassan, R. (2024). Factors Influencing FinTech Continuous Use: Systematic Literature Review and Expert Validation. Contemporary Management Research, 20(2), 137–175. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.23599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pandey, D. K. (2025). FinTech literature reviews: A hybrid approach. Finance Research Letters, 79, 107249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rai, J., Yadav, R. K., & Yadav, G. P. (2021). Applying Bibliometric and PRISMA approaches for understanding the advertising effectiveness of social networking sites (SNS). International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective. In IEEE ACCESS (Vol. 8, pp. 21980–22012). IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schueffel, P. (2016). Taming the Beast: A Scientific Definition of Fintech. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352–375. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles