Workplace Safety with Personal Protective Equipment Monitoring System using Computer Vision

Authors

Stephanie B. Senomio

Technological University of the Philippines Visayas (Philippines)

Donnie Senomio

Technological University of the Philippines Visayas (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500504

Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 7505-7518

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-12

Accepted: 2026-05-18

Published: 2026-06-05

Abstract

Workplace environments, particularly in manufacturing plants, are highly exposed to occupational hazards, emphasizing the need for effective and reliable safety monitoring systems. Traditional methods of enforcing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) compliance rely heavily on manual supervision, which is often affected by human fatigue, inconsistent judgment, delayed response, and limited monitoring coverage. These limitations reduce the efficiency of workplace safety enforcement and increase the possibility of occupational accidents and injuries. To address these concerns, this study developed a Workplace Safety with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Monitoring System Using Computer Vision designed to provide automated and real-time PPE compliance monitoring in industrial environments. The developed system integrates computer vision and deep learning technologies to perform visual data curation, personnel facial image registration and identity verification, PPE detection, compliance assessment, and real-time reporting. The system utilized cameras, microprocessor, facial recognition, object detection, centralized database storage, and a web-based dashboard for monitoring and analytics. Functionality testing results revealed that the visual data curation module achieved 93.33% accuracy, personnel identity verification achieved 96.67% stability, PPE detection obtained 92.11% precision with a recall score of 0.95 and an F1-score of 0.93, while the compliance assessment module achieved 90.00% effectiveness. Furthermore, the reporting module demonstrated 96.67% reliability in event logging and monitoring operations. The acceptability evaluation using the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) obtained an overall mean rating of 4.68 interpreted as Highly Acceptable. The findings indicate that the developed system has strong potential to improve workplace safety management through automated PPE compliance monitoring, personnel verification, and real-time safety reporting.

Keywords

Computer Vision, PPE Detection, Workplace Safety

Downloads

References

1. Abad, J. R., Santos, M. L., & Rivera, C. P. (2019). Occupational safety practices and PPE compliance among industrial workers in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, 42(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albahri, A. S., Hamid, R. A., Alwan, J. K., Al-Qaysi, Z. T., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., & Jasim, A. N. (2021). Role of monitoring systems in industrial safety and workplace management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 21, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2020). Technology acceptance model in mobile learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, Y., & Li, H. (2021). Intelligent PPE compliance monitoring using facial recognition and computer vision technologies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 114(7–8), 2301–2315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06945-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Deng, J., Guo, J., Ververas, E., Kotsia, I., & Zafeiriou, S. (2022). RetinaFace and InsightFace: Integrated deep learning framework for robust face recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(11), 7840–7854. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fang, Q., Ding, L., Luo, H., & Love, P. E. D. (2018). Real-time helmet detection for construction safety using deep learning. Automation in Construction, 91, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Geller, E. S. (2022). The psychology of safety handbook (3rd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ghasemi, F., Mohammadfam, I., Soltanian, A. R., Mahmoudi, S., & Zarei, E. (2018). Surprising incentive: An instrument for promoting safety performance of construction employees. Safety and Health at Work, 9(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.09.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gonzalez, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (2018). Digital image processing (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guo, J., Deng, J., Lattas, A., & Zafeiriou, S. (2022). InsightFace: 2D and 3D face analysis project. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing Workshops, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Labour Organization. (2019). Safety and health at the heart of the future of work: Building on 100 years of experience. International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jafarililou, H., Rabiei, H., Khankeh, H., & Gholizadeh, M. (2019). Evaluation of personal protective equipment compliance and workplace injuries in industrial sectors. Safety and Health at Work, 10(4), 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.08.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023). Ultralytics YOLO documentation. Ultralytics. https://docs.ultralytics.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khan, M. A., Sharif, M., Akram, T., Kadry, S., & Nam, Y. (2022). Facial recognition under occlusion and varying illumination conditions using deep learning approaches. Applied Sciences, 12(5), 2456. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Li, X., Zhao, Y., & Wang, H. (2020). Deep learning-based real-time PPE detection for industrial safety applications. IEEE Access, 8, 102965–102977. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998855. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Minaee, S., Boykov, Y., Porikli, F., Plaza, A. J., Kehtarnavaz, N., & Terzopoulos, D. (2021). Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(7), 3523–3542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3059968. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2020). Recommended practices for safety and health programs. U.S. Department of Labor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Occupational injuries and illnesses statistics in the Philippines. Philippine Statistics Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Szeliski, R. (2022). Computer vision: Algorithms and applications (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wang, Z., Liu, J., & Chen, X. (2021). Fast personal protective equipment detection for real construction sites using YOLOv5. Automation in Construction, 126, 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103682. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Health Organization, & International Labour Organization. (2021). WHO/ILO joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury, 2000–2016. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Wu, Q. (2021). Deep learning-based intelligent monitoring system for workplace safety compliance. Journal of Safety Research, 78, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.05.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles