Relationship of the Perceptions of the Game-Based Learning Tools in Computational Thinking Skills of Grade 7 Learners in Physics

Authors

Guia S. Azur

Tanauan Institute, Incorporated (Philippines)

Hazel Anne Marie M. Maala

Tanauan Institute, Incorporated (Philippines)

Carl Christian P. Tolica

Tanauan Institute, Incorporated (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0305

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3903-3915

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-24

Accepted: 2026-05-29

Published: 2026-06-08

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between game-based learning tools and the computational thinking skills of Grade 7 learners in Physics at Pantay Integrated High School. It focused on the learners’ perceptions of game-based learning tools in terms of engagement, motivation, and positive attitudes, as well as their computational thinking skills in analysis, abstraction, algorithmic thinking, and pattern recognition. The study used a quantitative correlational research design. The sample size of 126 Grade 7 students was determined using the Raosoft Formula, and the respondents were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure proper representation of the different sections. The results showed that game-based learning tools help improve students’ computational thinking skills, especially in problem-solving, logical reasoning, and algorithmic thinking. Based on the findings, the study recommends that Physics teachers may use more game-based learning activities in class and that the school provide enough digital resources and training to support effective teaching strategies in Physics.

Keywords

Game-Based Learning Tools, Engagement, Motivation, Positive Attitudes, Computational Thinking Skills, Analysis, Pattern Recognition, Abstraction, Algorithmic Thinking, Grade 7 Learners, Physics

Downloads

References

1. Agusalim, A., Saleh, R., Riniati, W. O., Yusnan, M., & Farisatma, F. (2025). Implementation of Principal Competence in Educational Resource Management. JURNAL EDUSCIENCE, 12(3), 672–684. https://tinyurl.com/3xzx9y94 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cabrillos, R. D. (2024). Exploring Stakeholders Engagement in School Development: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Insights and Strategies. Southeast Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1). https://tinyurl.com/mtwnub5d [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cherono, I. (2023). Resource Mobilization In The Implementation Of Free Day Secondary School Education in Emgwen Sub-County, Nandi County-Kenya. University of Eldoret. http://erepository.uoeld.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cruzat, M., Cruzat, A. P., & Javillonar, M. G. (2022). The school and its stakeholders: partners in building a strong school community. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 3(4), 314–318. https://tinyurl.com/bdd3tuvw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. Springer. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Domingo, C. M., & Ferolino, C. H. (2023). Instructional supervisory practices of school heads. Philippine EJournals, 15(7). https://tinyurl.com/bdhxkusw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ephrahem, G., & Bhoke-Africanus, A. (2021). Effectiveness of school heads’ financial management skills. International Journal of Education and Research, 9(3), 20–28. https://tinyurl.com/mry9csxj [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Epstein, J. L., Sheldon, S. B., & Hine, M. G. (2025). Theory of overlapping spheres of influence. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/muztc8nf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaspar, M. R., et al. (2022). Transparency and accountability of managing school financial resources. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(2), 102. https://tinyurl.com/544rzzmm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grunwald, G., Kara, A., & Spillan, J. E. (2024). Sustainable innovations through partnerships. Management Decision. https://tinyurl.com/4t4tb96k [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gwaro, P. A., & Ngacha, N. S. (2023). Resource mobilization skills and infrastructure projects. International Academic Journal, 4(2), 363–377. https://tinyurl.com/3yjc9tw2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gumilao, J. (2024). Resource management best practices. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5188961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Knies, E., et al. (2024). Strategic human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(14), 2432–2444. https://tinyurl.com/3rm3hh97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Koko, M. N., & Nkemjika, C. V. (2022). Education laws and resource management. International Journal of Social Science and Management Studies, 1(1), 12–27. https://tinyurl.com/mu2xmmc6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kurniadiningsih, R. S., et al. (2025). Principal leadership and student achievement. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(4), 4096–4114. https://ejournal.papanda.org/index.php/jirpe/article/view/2641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Likoko, S., Barasa, J., & Khaemba, P. (2022). Resource mobilization and academic performance. Resource, 6(5). https://tinyurl.com/4audmhx4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lopez, A. C., & Bauyot, M. M. (2025). Stakeholders’ involvement in school-based programs. https://philarchive.org/rec/LOPSII-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lutempo, M. G. (2022). Financial resource mobilization strategies in schools. University of Zambia. https://tinyurl.com/yxfvfee3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mammadov, M., et al. (2026). Education–technology–economy nexus. Porta Universorum, 2(2), 25–33. https://egarp.lt/index.php/JPURM/article/view/493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mbon, U. F., et al. (2023). Resource supply and inclusive education. https://philpapers.org/rec/MBOEDI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McClure, R. M. (2025). Stakeholder motivation in transformational change. Capella University. https://tinyurl.com/duwr6d87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohamed, Y. A., & Senaji, T. (2025). Resource mobilization and university performance. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 7(27), 80–90. https://ajoeijournal.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/1031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mkhlze, T. R., & Davids, M. N. (2021). Digital resource mobilisation approach. Educational Research for Social Change, 10(2), 18–32. https://tinyurl.com/3x3nt9nd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mujitapha, F., Mahmud, A., & Bakwai, B. K. (2024). Leadership capacity for resource mobilization. https://tinyurl.com/2rbp9wds [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Munywoki, N., Piliyesi, E., & Omundi, E. O. (2025). ICT infrastructure resource mobilization. Journal of Popular Education in Africa, 9(9), 231–244. https://tinyurl.com/34t26fm9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nachinguru, G. A., & Mwila, P. M. (2023). Financial resource management in schools. International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research, 1(1), 1–14. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355425/?v=pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nnam, T. E., Nzokurum, J. C., & Agabi, O. G. (2024). Innovative financial resource mobilization. https://tinyurl.com/42vwpe9t [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Njati, I. (2022). Competency-based curriculum resource mobilization. Afr J Sci Technol Soc Sci, 1(2), 160–168. https://tinyurl.com/yfhn99et [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Njoka, A. W., & Ochieng, P. (2023). Principals’ resource mobilization skills. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 5(13), 39–52. https://ajoeijournal.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Paalisbo, C. J. T., & Escandallo, J. C. Parental support and learning competence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 3(3). https://tinyurl.com/y43s8uf9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Palah, S., Wasliman, I., Sauri, S., & Gaffar, M. A. (2022). Principal strategic management. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(5), 2041–2051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Safrida, S., Tannady, H., Solissa, E. M., Sapulete, H., & Al Haddar, G. (2023). Strategic leadership analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 391–399. https://tinyurl.com/f8b6b67s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sagragao, M. U., Salva, C. R., & Ferenal, E. S. (2025). School leadership and teacher performance. Ignatian International Journal, 3(1), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.17613/vmehe-0x930 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Simwanza, A., & Mabagala, S. (2022). Resource mobilization for sport activities. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/mwfemrcx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Twarary, I., & Thinguri, R. W. (2025). Resource mobilization practices in schools. https://tinyurl.com/367r889r [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Van der Vyver, C. P., & Geduld, B. W. (2022). Self-determination theory in education. South African Journal of Education, 42(1), 1–9. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.15700/saje.v42n1a2049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Webb, A. S., & Welsh, A. J. (2019). Phenomenology in education research. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 7(1), 168–181. https://bit.ly/3FCQmfC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles