Evaluating Digital Transformation as Mediator and Organizational Culture as Moderator in UAE Agile Project Management

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has invested heavily in digital construction technologies to improve project efficiency, responsiveness, and sustainability. Digital transformation is increasingly viewed as a key enabler for Agile Project Management (APM) and sustainability-oriented project delivery within the construction sector. Despite this investment, digital transformation adoption among UAE contractors remains inconsistent, which limits the achievement of sustainability and efficiency targets in agile construction projects. This study the evaluating digital transformation as mediator and organizational culture as moderator in UAE agile project management. This study employed a quantitative, hypothesis-driven survey design under a positivist paradigm and deductive approach, guided by the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. The population comprised contractors involved in sustainable construction projects in the UAE, based on licensed and classified construction firms listed by the UAE Ministry of Infrastructure Development. The sample size determination based on a population of 11,676 contractors, the required sample size was 371 respondents. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire survey, distributed electronically to targeted contractor managers, supported by official access to company lists and facilitated through the licensing sector to enhance reach and participation. The study analyzed data using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS, including mediation and moderation testing to assess a moderated mediation model linking TOE determinants to sustainability outcomes through digital transformation. Findings indicate that technological, organizational, and environmental factors significantly influence contractors’ digital transformation adoption. Digital transformation also shows a strong mediating role in improving sustainability outcomes. Moreover, organizational culture significantly moderates the relationships between TOE factors and digital transformation, strengthening the effects of these drivers on adoption. This study contributes by offering an integrated empirical model that positions digital transformation as a mediator and organizational culture as a moderator in explaining sustainability-oriented APM within the UAE construction industry.

Digital Transformation, Online Agile Project Management

1. Abdou, D. S., & Zaazou, Z. (2019). Arab Spring future challenges: Evidence from Egypt. Review of Economics and Political Science, 3(2), 56-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abiodun, T. S., et al. (2023). Driving smartness for organizational performance through Industry 4.0: A systems perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(9), 40-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adebowale, O., & Agumba, J. (2023). Assessing the determinants of digital transformation in construction SMEs: A TOE framework perspective. Journal of Construction Innovation, 23(2), 329–350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adeosun, O. T., Alabi, T., & Nwogu, G. I. (2022). University internship systems and preparation of young people for the world of work in the 4th industrial revolution. Rajagiri Management Journal, 16(2), 164-179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahmad, E. (2024). The convergence of Education 4.0 and Industry 4.0: A Twin Peaks model. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 1(1), 68–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmad, E., & Alammary, A. (2022). Towards unified management of software capstone projects in Saudi universities: A survey-based study. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 40(2), 118-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ajibade, P. (2022). Technology, organization, and environment determinants of digital transformation in project management. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(8), 2114–2133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alami, Y., & El Idrissi, I. (2022). Students' adoption of e-learning: Evidence from a Moroccan business school in the COVID-19 era. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 40(1), 54-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Alassafi, H. T., Alkhowaiter, W. R., & Alzahrani, A. A. (2024). HVAC maintainability risks in healthcare facilities: A design optimization perspective. Facilities, 42(15/16), 30-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ali Mohamad, T., et al. (2023). How artificial intelligence impacts the competitive position of healthcare organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 49-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Alieva, J., & Powell, D. J. (2023). The significance of employee behaviours and soft management practices to avoid digital waste during a digital transformation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(1), 1-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Alizadehsalehi, S., & Yitmen, I. (2023). Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(1), 200-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cosa, M. (2024). Business digital transformation: Strategy adaptation, communication, and future agenda. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 244-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dabash, O. S. (2023). The Implementation of Agile Project Management Using BIM Influences on the Construction Industry in The UAE Sector (Master's thesis, The British University in Dubai). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information seeking behavior and technology adoption, 205(219), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ebekozien, A., Jolaoso, B. A., & Kadiri, D. (2024). Sustainable development goals under threat: The impact of inflation on construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(13), 323-341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ghobakhloo, M., & Ching, N. T. (2019). Adoption of digital technologies in manufacturing SMEs and sustainability outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Holopainen, M., Suominen, A., & Jussila, A. (2024). The effects of digital business strategy on the collaboration performance of companies: The moderating effect of digitally enabled performance measurement. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6(1), 64–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Johnstone, L. (2024). Leveraging digital data to facilitate circular control in the aftermarket: Experiences from an international manufacturing firm. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(4), 987-1014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2019). Accelerating digital innovation through agile methodologies. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Khansaheb, K. S. H. A. (2024, March). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing sustainability: The case of UAE smart cities. In BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2023: Multidisciplinary Studies (pp. 235-242). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Duncan Matthews, R. (2022). A sustainable university: Digital transformation and beyond. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8961-8996.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nguyen, T. H. (2024). Investigating driving factors of digital transformation in the Vietnam shipping companies: Applied for TOE framework. SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241301210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Omol, E. J. (2024). Organizational digital transformation: From evolution to future trends. Digital Transformation and Society, 3(3), 240–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Peter, M. K., et al. (2024). Digital transformation of work: Swiss MSEs working from home behaviour during COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Iqbal, Q. (2024). The nexus of project management approaches in sustainable development: Innovative behaviors as a mechanism in the Polish financial industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(2), 338–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2022). Beyond a tandem analysis of measurement models and structural models in PLS-SEM. Journal of Business Research, 147, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria