Strengthening Child Protection at the Grassroots: Assessing the Compliance of Barangay Councils for the Protection of Children in Managing Children at Risk

Authors

Damayon, Samuel B.

Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, School of Teacher Education and Humanities, Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines (Philippines)

Manghi, Judy-ann D.

Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, School of Teacher Education and Humanities, Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines (Philippines)

Domingo, Kristine Arwen G.

Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, School of Teacher Education and Humanities, Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines (Philippines)

Jallorina, Glendale P.

Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, School of Teacher Education and Humanities, Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines (Philippines)

Salunat, Moira B

Social Sciences and Philosophy Department, School of Teacher Education and Humanities, Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500611

Subject Category: Child Protection

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 9110-9122

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-13

Accepted: 2026-05-18

Published: 2026-06-09

Abstract

Youth is considered a source of hope and an instrument of change, and it is important to protect the future, starting at the grassroots level. For this reason, this study assessed the compliance of the Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) with the Barangay Protocol in selected barangays of Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, specifically the process of implementing the Barangay Protocol to address cases involving children at risk, and identified the issues and strategies involved in dealing with these cases. To gather more accurate data, triangulation was utilized through surveys, semi-structured interviews, and document review. The study found that perceived compliance with procedures related to children, including custody, intake, and post-intervention follow-up, was high. However, moderate compliance concerning documentation and procedural requirements was observed, including form completion and record submission, revealing implementation gaps. Statistical analysis indicates that compliance with Barangay protocol relies more on practical experience, role responsibilities, and access to training than on formal education and years of service. Major challenges identified from the qualitative insights gathered include insufficient training, limited resources, insufficient parental cooperation, inactive council, and improper case reporting. Thus, the study underscores the need for strengthened institutional support, adequate funding, and continuous capacity-building initiatives to enhance effective protocol implementation. In response to the study's findings, a seminar on strengthening BCPC Capacity in Managing CAR cases is proposed as a research-based intervention to improve the council's competence and confidence in managing CAR cases.

Keywords

Community-based program, Restorative Justice, Protection of Children, Youth Development

Downloads

References

1. Agustin, PJ., Garcia, JY., Matcho, D., Pelayo, M. (2025). The effectiveness of barangay council for the protection of children programs at barangay Bangong Silangan, Quezon City. https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/aasgbcpjmra /article/view/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnika, M., Rifdan, R., Arief, M., Halid, A., Taufik, A., & Hasrini, S. (2024). Collaboration between government agencies: challenges and opportunities in public policy implementation. Jurnal Ilmiah, Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v14i2.67934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bartolome, M. T., Mamat, N., & Masnan, A. H. (2017). Parental involvement in the Philippines: A review of literatures. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 6, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol6.5.2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cuevillas, R. M. (2024). Community council for the protection of children: An assessment. Instabright e-Gazette, 6(1). https://www.instabrightgazette.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dela Cruz, A., Santos, M., & Reyes, L. (2021). Local child protection in the Philippines: A case study of actors, functions and processes. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dela Cruz, M. (2022). Capacity and competence of BCPC in implementing child protection programs: Challenges and recommendations. Community Development Journal, 15(3), 112-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DILG (2021). Memorandum Circular No. 2021-039 entitled “Comprehensive guidelines for the establishment, strengthening, and monitoring of Local Council for the Protection of Children (LCPC) at all levels and for other purposes. “https://dilg.gov.ph/PDF_File/issuances/memo_circulars/dilg-memocircular-202148_6ae247eb95.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellermeijer, R., Robinson, M., Guevara, A., O’Hare, G., Veldhuizen, C., Wessells, M., Reis, R., & Jordans, M. (2023b). A systematic review of the literature on community-level child protection in low- and middle-income countries. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 18(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2023.2230889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Evidor, P. & Villacruz, J. (2025). Child protection policy in school: A case study on implementers. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12050057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Global Initiative on Justice with Children. (2021). Policing of children and young people: A case for “child-friendly police”. https://justicewithchildren.org/sites/default/files/library/attachments/Policing-of-Children-and-Young-People.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gonzales, K., Numbanal, Z., Lim-ang, G., Dulnuan, C. J., Bistol, J., Tagtag, S., Ballitoc, D., & Labasan, G. P. (2025). Barangay councils’ knowledge and capability in handling cases of children in conflict with the law. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(11),32-44. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council. (2014). Revised implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 9344, as amended by Republic Act No. 10630. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council. https://dswd.gov.ph/download/implementing_rules_and_regulations_irrs/Revised-Implementing-Rules-and-Regulations-of-RA-9344-as-amended-by-RA-10630.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Molina-Lingvall, A. (2024). Training needs analysis for local implementers of child protection policies in the Philippines. (Working Paper). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Naynes, L. M. T., Bello, L. Q., & Rey, H. M. T. (2022). The knowledge and competency of barangay council for the protection of children in handling cases of children in conflict with the law. Philippines E-Journals. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=22419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Palafox, Q. A. J., & Mantillas, C. C. (2025). Administration of Children-At-Risk (CAR) in the public secondary schools in Tarlac Province before and during the COVID-19 pandemic vis-à-vis Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act Of 2006: Basis for Policy and Program Enhancement. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Palitayan, B. (2023). Rehabilitation services for children in conflict with the law in Baguio City. International Journal of Advanced Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/17288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. R.A. 9344. (2006). https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2006/ra_9344_2006.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reupert, A., Straussner, S. L., Weimand, B., & Maybery, D. (2022). It takes a village to raise a child: understanding and expanding the concept of the “Village.” Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 756066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.756066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Roche, S., & Flynn, C. (2021). Local child protection in the Philippines: A case study of actors, processes and key risks for children. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 8(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNICEF Philippines. (2015). Study on diversion and alternative measures to detention: Documentation of good practices. https://www.jjwc.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Study-on-Diversion-and-Alternative-Measures-to-Detention-A-Documentation-of-Good-Practices.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wessells, M. G. (2015). Bottom-up approaches to strengthening child protection systems: Placing children, families and communities at the center. Child Abuse & Neglect, 43, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yang, S. (2015). Evaluation of the intervention and rehabilitation program in residential facilities and diversion programs for CICL. Universalia/UNICEF. https://evaluationreports.unicef.org/GetDocument?documentID=7&fileID=28828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zia ud din, M., Yuan Yuan, X., Kan, N., & Han, H. (2023). Correction: Linking local collaborative governance and public service delivery: Mediating role of institutional capacity building. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02505-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles