An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Governance and Firm Profitability in Nigeria’s Capital Market

Authors

Akinlolu Adekunle Akinwumi

Accounting Department, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500760

Subject Category: Accounting

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 11199-11214

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-23

Accepted: 2026-05-28

Published: 2026-06-12

Abstract

This study investigates the corporate governance mechanisms’ impact on firm profitability in Nigeria’s Capital Market with focus on the most capitalized entities between 2014 and 2023. Profitability was measured by Earnings Per Share (EPS) and board independence, gender diversity, board meeting frequency, institutional investor presence, and committee sizes proxy governance attributes, with Audit quality as a control variable. Using robust pooled regression, results show that board independence, gender diversity, and meeting frequency significantly enhance profitability, highlighting the value of autonomous, inclusive, and active boards. Institutional investor presence, governance nomination and remuneration committee size, and audit quality negatively affect profitability, suggesting short-termism, inefficiencies, or constraints from stringent practices. Statutory audit and risk management committee sizes exert negative but insignificant impacts. With explanatory power of 32.28%, findings emphasize that governance structures strongly influence firm outcomes. The study concludes that effective governance—through improved board composition, optimized committees, and stronger regulatory oversight—remains vital for enhancing profitability and recommends better institutional investor stewardship to strengthen governance quality and financial performance in Nigeria.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Profitability, NGX 30.JEL Classification Codes

Downloads

References

1. Abdelhak, E. E., & Hussainey, K. (2025). The impact of audit quality and corporate governance on financial segment disclosure: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abedin, S. H., Haque, H., Shahjahan, T., & Kabir, M. N. (2022). Institutional ownership and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abdullah, S. N., Chowdhury, K., Khan, M. M., Rahaman, M. A., & Masum, M. H. (2024). Nexus between board characteristics and financial performance: Evidence from developing economy. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(12), 5266. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.5266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abubakar, M., & Bala, H. (2022). Board independence and financial performance of listed firms in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 12(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adewuyi, A. O., & Olowookere, J. K. (2022). Board activity, corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets. African Journal of Management Studies, 8(3), 122–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aidoo, S., Nombare, E., & Boamah, J. Y. (2024). Board Size, Board Independence, Board Expertise and the Financial Performance of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Ghana: Does Board Commitment Play a Role? Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies, 6(2), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2024.6.2.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akinwumi, A. A., Onmonya, L. O., Ugwudioha, O., & Uthman, A. B. (2026). Board Characteristics and Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Nigeria. The Seybold Report, 21(4) (2026), 01-22. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19588251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Akpan, D. C., & Akai, N. D. (2022). Risk management committee attributes and financial performance of selected deposit money banks in Nigeria. Research Journal of Management Practice, 2(11). https://www.ijaar.org/rjmp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 971-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Aldegis, A. M., Ganesan, Y., Alorayni, O. J., & Sadaa, A. M. (2023). Nomination and remuneration committee and firm performance: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(3), 1099–1117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption. Cogent Social Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Audu, I., & Haruna, M. (2023). Audit quality and firm value in the Nigerian capital market. International Journal of Finance and Accounting Research, 5(2), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Azi, S., & Iorpev, L. (2021). Risk management committee effectiveness and firm profitability in Nigerian financial institutions. Nigerian Journal of Management Research, 13(4), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Beyaztaş, B. H. (2020). Robust estimation for linear panel data models. Statistics in Medicine (article). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dao, T. B. (2021). A meta-analysis of corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 9(1), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3979489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dao, T. B., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). A meta-analysis of corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 9(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv9i1art2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Detthamrong, U., Phongphak, S., & Srisang, M. (2017). Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 689-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ebimobowei, A. (2022). Corporate Governance Characteristics and Firm Value of Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. British Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 5(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.52589/BJMMSRBDLYEVJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ehikioya, B. I. (2021). Institutional ownership and firm performance in Nigeria. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(4), 65–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fatma, H. B., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: Evidence from European financial institutions. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00117-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Frank, U. U., & Ukpong, E. G. (2024). Effect of risk management committee attributes on financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 13(1), 53–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kabir, M. (2023). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from developing economies. International Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Karim, M. A., Karim, R., Ali, M. A., Rahman, A. T., & Saeed, A. (2022). Corporate governance practices and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from South Asia. Asian Journal of Management Research, 18(4), 567-590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lin, C., & Hwang, Y. (2022). Audit quality, conservatism and earnings performance: Evidence from emerging markets. International Accounting Review, 23(2), 140–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liu, Y., Wei, J., & Xu, M. (2022). Gender-diverse boards and firm performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Business and Economics, 10(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Madaki, J., Musa, A. Z., Ibrahim, U. S., & Rabiu, Z. I. (2025). Audit committee attributes and financial performance of listed industrial goods companies in Nigeria. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 9(2). STIM Lasharan Jaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Maulina, G. (2023). Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 28(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i5-48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Millo, G. (2017). Robust standard error estimators for panel models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Musah, A., Ayaiga, C., Blay, M. W., & Okyere, D. O. (2025). The influence of audit committee characteristics on firm profitability in Ghana. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.851 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Naz, M. A., Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Corporate governance, working capital management and firm performance: Some new insights from agency theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(5), 1448–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ngowerikumo, R. W., & Nwodimkpa, G. I. (2025). Board attributes and financial performance of listed insurance firms in Nigeria. Advance Journal of Management, Accounting and Finance, 10(9), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17045553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nguyen, N. P. A., & Dao, T. B. (2022). Liquidity, corporate governance and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2137960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nigerian Exchange Group. (n.d.). NGX: Exchange — NGX 30 & listed companies. https://ngxgroup.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nwankwo, O., & Eze, C. (2023). Institutional investor activism and firm performance: Evidence from Nigeria. African Journal of Economics and Financial Research, 11(2), 1–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nwidobie, M. (2021). Corporate governance and performance of listed companies in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Management Review, 9(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ogbechi, C., & Adebayo, A. (2021). Board governance mechanisms and profitability of firms in Nigeria. West African Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Okafor, R., & Olagunju, A. (2022). Audit committee characteristics and financial performance of Nigerian firms. International Journal of Accounting Studies, 7(3), 56–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Oke, O. A., & Dibia, N. (2021). Audit quality and financial reporting outcomes of listed firms in Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Accounting Research, 4(2), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Oladipupo, O. E., & Kelvin, A. O. (2024). Corporate governance and manufacturing firms’ financial performance in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(11), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i11891 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Oluwole, F. O. (2021). The impact of corporate governance on banks’ profitability in Nigeria. ARMG Publishing. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(1).18-28.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Omondi, S., & Ouma, P. (2023). Board diversity and corporate financial performance in African markets. African Journal of Business Sustainability, 6(1), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Owolabi, S., & Ajayi, C. (2022). Corporate ownership structure and firm performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Finance and Banking Studies, 11(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ozturk, O. (2021). Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: an overview. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 525–552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pham, V. L., & Ho, Y.-H. (2024). Independent board members and financial performance: ESG mediation in Taiwan. Sustainability, 16(16), 6836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Sakawa, H., & Watanabe, N. (2020). Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability, 12(3), Article 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Subramaniam, N., Mcmanus, L., & Zhang, J. (2019). Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies. Managerial Audit Journal, 24(4),316-339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Ul Musawir, A. (2024). Revisiting the principal–agent framework in the context of projects: Drawing parallels with corporate governance. Project Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241270572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Yahaya, K., & Yusuf, A. (2023). Committee size, board structure and firm profitability in Nigeria. Journal of Corporate Governance and Policy Review, 3(2), 112–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Younus, F., Hayee, R., & Ahmed, I. (2025). Board Gender Diversity, Board Composition, CEO Duality, Firm Size, and Liquidity: Impact on Financial Performance of Non-financial Listed Firms in Pakistan. Journal of Regional Studies Review (JRSR),4(1), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2025.4a078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zogning, F. (2022). Agency theory: A critical review (working paper / review essay). Available at ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364812853_Agency_theory_A_critical_review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles