Digital Technology and Young Children's Well-Being: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Research Trends (2020–2025)

Digital technology is now part of many young children’s everyday lives, bringing both learning opportunities and concerns about developmental well-being. Although research in this area has expanded quickly, it is spread across fields such as developmental psychology, educational technology, and public health, and there is still limited integration of how children’s well-being is represented within this broader literature. To address this gap, this study mapped the structural and thematic development of research on digital technology and young children’s well-being from 2020 to 2025 by analysing 599 peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in Scopus. The analysis was conducted using VOSviewer version 1.6.20 and included annual publication trends, keyword co-occurrence mapping, country co-authorship analysis, and source co-citation analysis. The findings show that annual output increased from 64 publications in 2020 to 158 in 2025, with the most noticeable growth occurring after 2023. Keyword co-occurrence analysis revealed two clearly different strands of research, one focused on risks, especially mental health, social media, and parent-child interaction, and another focused on opportunities, particularly educational technology, game-based learning, and emerging tools such as virtual reality. Country analysis showed strong dominance by Western countries, led by the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, while smaller but visible Asian clusters included Malaysia and Hong Kong. Source co-citation analysis showed that the field draws mainly from developmental psychology, educational technology, and public health journals. Overall, this study offers an updated and integrated picture of the field, highlights conceptual and geographical gaps, and lays the groundwork for a more coherent framework for sustainable digital practices in early childhood education.

Bibliometric analysis, digital technology, early childhood, educational technology, young children's well-being

1. Adeyemi, V. (2025). The impact of digital technology on a child's cognitive and social development: Implications for education. Premier Journal of Psychology, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.70389/PJP.100006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative science studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aliaño-González, M. J., Cantos-Mateos, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. (2022). A bibliometric overview of research on educational technology in early childhood. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12731–12759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11138-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bohnert, M., & Gracia, P. (2021). Emerging digital generations? Impacts of child digital use on mental and socioemotional well-being across two cohorts in Ireland, 2007–2018. Child Indicators Research, 14, 629–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09767-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Borges, D., Pinto, I., Santos, O., Moura, I., Ferreira, I. R., Macedo, A. P., & Taveira, A. (2025). On–off childhood? A rapid review of the impact of technology on children's health. Healthcare, 13(14), 1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., & Gemo, M. (2018). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative study across Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/294383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, S., & Carroll, J. (2024). Contemporary gaps in research on digital divide in education: A literature review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01166-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Coyne, S. M., Rogers, A. A., Zurcher, J. D., Stockdale, L., & Booth, M. (2020). Does time spent using social media impact mental health? An eight-year longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Danell, R. (2025). Global shifts in scientific production: The decline of academic freedom and the impact on international collaboration. European Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798725100185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hutchison, A., Nadolny, L., & Estapa, A. (2016). Using coding apps to support literacy instruction and develop coding literacy. The Reading Teacher, 69(5), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kaye, L. K., Orben, A., Ellis, D. A., Hunter, S. C., & Houghton, S. (2020). The conceptual and methodological mayhem of "screen time". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Magdaleno-Palencia, J. S., Marquez, B. Y., Quezada, Á., & Alanis, A. (2025). Technology in childhood: Mobile application for managing screen time. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(8), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i08.54445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Syukur, M., Setiawan, F., & Putri, C. (2024). Digital parenting and child well-being: A narrative review. E3S Web of Conferences, 568, 04014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456804014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2021). A review of evidence on the role of digital technology in shaping attention and cognitive control in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 611155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study