Evaluating the Impact of K to 3 MATATAG Curriculum Implementation on Early Literacy Development

This study assessed the implementation of the K to 3 MATATAG Curriculum and its perceived impact on early literacy development among learners in selected schools in Cebu City during the School Year 2024–2025. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study involved 30 teacher respondents selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using an adapted survey questionnaire and analyzed using weighted mean and Pearson’s r correlation analysis. Findings revealed that the MATATAG Curriculum was frequently implemented, particularly in terms of aligning literacy competencies with learners’ developmental readiness, appropriateness of instructional materials, and integration of child-centered literacy instruction. The curriculum was likewise perceived to positively influence learners’ oral communication, writing, and reading skills, with stronger outcomes observed in foundational reading competencies. Despite these positive findings, teachers reported moderate challenges related to the adequacy of instructional resources, large class sizes, and addressing diverse learner readiness levels. Correlation analysis further revealed a statistically significant and strong positive relationship between the extent of curriculum implementation and early literacy outcomes, indicating that effective implementation contributes substantially to learners’ literacy development. The findings underscore the importance of sustained instructional support, developmentally appropriate literacy practices, and resource provision in strengthening early literacy instruction under the MATATAG Curriculum.

Early Childhood Education, K to 3 MATATAG Curriculum, Early Literacy Development, Descriptive-Correlational Method

1. Aguanta, E., & Tumibay, J. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions and classroom realities in curriculum implementation. *Philippine Journal of Education, 95*(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, R., & Farouk, H. (2020). Teacher well-being and its impact on instructional quality in early childhood settings. *Journal of Early Education Studies, 18*(2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmed, S., & Nasir, L. (2021). The impact of socio-cultural classroom environments on literacy acquisition in kindergarten. *International Journal of Early Literacy, 12*(4), 134– 148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alvarado, M., & Bautista, C. (2024). Curriculum implementation challenges in multilingual classrooms: A Philippine perspective. *Southeast Asian Review of Education, 10*(1), 41–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chan, L., & Leung, Y. (2023). Curriculum implementation through the ecological systems framework in Hong Kong preschools. *Early Childhood Curriculum Studies, 14*(2), 89–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cruz, D. M. (2020). Adapting literacy instruction to learner readiness in Filipino preschool classrooms. *Philippine Early Learning Journal, 9*(3), 75–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Del Rosario, A. (2020). Teacher talk and emergent literacy skills in Filipino kindergartens. *Journal of Child Language Development, 15*(1), 60–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dela Peña, M. (2022). Community involvement in promoting early literacy: A barangay- based initiative. *Education and Community Journal, 7*(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DepEd Order No. 10, s.2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum.* Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dizon, A., & Almazan, R. (2023). Systemic barriers to literacy instruction in Philippine public schools: Voices of kindergarten teachers. *Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership, 14*(2), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Florian, L. (2021). Inclusive pedagogy: A transformative approach to individual differences but can it help reduce educational inequalities? Scottish Educational Review, 53(1), 5–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garcia, J., & Santos, P. (2021). Cognitive readiness and literacy acquisition in Filipino kindergarten learners. *Philippine Journal of Child Development, 16*(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gonzalez, J., & Ramos, K. (2021). Multilevel influences on early literacy achievement in bilingual classrooms. *Journal of Bilingual Education Research, 19*(3), 104–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. González, M., & Rivera, P. (2021). Community-based literacy projects in Latin America: A sociocultural approach. *International Literacy Review, 17*(1), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Guskey, T. R. (2021). Professional learning and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1933410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Harris, D., & McNally, S. (2023). Understanding the broader contexts of literacy education: A systems theory perspective. *Literacy Education Review, 21*(2), 55–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hernandez, F. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of developmentally appropriate literacymaterials. *Journal of Early Literacy Research, 13*(4), 93–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jaca, C. L., & Lopez-Baroman, L. (2021). Systemic challenges in curriculum reform: Experiences from early literacy classrooms. *Philippine Curriculum Studies Journal, 12*(2), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Johnson, K., & Lee, A. (2023). Collaborative literacy instruction in preschool settings.*Early Childhood Research Forum, 11*(3), 115–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A. R., & Damschroder, L. J. (2020). Play-based literacy instruction: A systematic review of outcomes for early learners. *Reading Research Quarterly, 55*(4), 513–532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lee, J., & Kim, M. (2022). Symbolic play and language acquisition in early childhood education. *Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29*(3), 102–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Li, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Tailoring early reading programs based on cognitive development. *Educational Psychology International, 23*(2), 66–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Teacher-mediated play-based literacy instruction: A comparative study. *Early Learning Review, 20*(1), 90–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Malinao, A., & Miano, K. (2025). Practical barriers to implementing child-centered literacy instruction in the Philippines. *Southeast Asian Literacy Journal, 13*(2), 58–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mendoza, L., & Soriano, A. (2021). Interactive read-alouds as scaffolding tools in early literacy. *Reading Education Quarterly, 34*(3), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mendoza, R., & Cruz, E. (2020). Cognitive development principles in Filipino early literacy instruction. *Journal of Early Education Practice, 8*(1), 42–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Navarro, R. (2021). Challenges in the implementation of the K to 12 curriculum in early childhood education in the Philippines. *Education Reform and Policy Studies, 6*(1), 23–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Neuman, S. B., & Gambrell, L. B. (2021). Best practices in early literacy instruction.*The Reading Teacher, 75*(1), 14–29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nguyen, T. (2023). Symbolic thinking and literacy development in kindergarten classrooms. *Childhood Education International, 17*(1), 39–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Panicker, A., & Nedungottil, P. (2021). Home literacy environments and early reading development among young learners. International Journal of Educational Development, 82, 102374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Patel, R., & Kumar, D. (2020). Addressing early literacy in multilingual contexts: A Piagetian approach. *Language and Learning Journal, 22*(3), 95–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2020). Impact of early literacy development on long-term academic outcomes. *Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51*, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Reyes, J. (2022). Print-rich environments and literacy readiness among Filipino early learners. Philippine Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 5(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rivera, D., & Castillo, L. (2022). Parental involvement and early literacy outcomes in urban and rural schools. *Philippine Journal of Family and Community Education, 10*(2), 66–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Rodriguez, A., Lim, S., & Guevara, J. (2023). Longitudinal analysis of early literacy development and cognitive maturity. *Cognitive Development Studies, 15*(2), 120–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Santos, L., & de la Cruz, M. (2021). Role of school administrators in supporting early childhood teachers: An ecological approach. *Philippine Journal of School Leadership, 9*(2), 72–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Santos, R., & Reyes, T. (2022). Scaffolding strategies in early childhood classrooms in the Philippines. *Journal of Southeast Asian Early Education, 11*(1), 51–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. SEA-PLM. (2019). *Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics: Regional report.* UNICEF & SEAMEO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2023). Developmentally appropriate literacy instruction in preschool: Aligning with Piaget’s stages. *Early Years Research Journal, 10*(3), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Snow, C. (2020). Early literacy development and academic success. *Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40*, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Tan, M., & Villanueva, J. (2023). Group literacy tasks and reading outcomes among Cebu early graders. *Philippine Literacy Research Journal, 14*(1), 30–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Thompson, R., & Rivers, A. (2023). Digital storytelling and peer interaction in early literacy. *Literacy & Technology in Education, 16*(2), 80–97 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2021). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. UNICEF. (2021). Foundational learning and early childhood education: Improving literacy outcomes for children. UNICEF. UNICEF [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Villanueva, J., & Ramos, D. (2020). Chronosystem factors in literacy instruction: COVID-19 and the shift to modular learning in Philippine ECE. *Education in Emergencies Review, 5*(1), 59–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Voogt, J., Pieters, J., & Handelzalts, A. (2020). Teacher beliefs and curriculum implementation: A multi-case study. *Curriculum Journal, 31*(1), 77–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2020). Strategies to promote early literacy development. *Early Education and Development, 31*(7), 1076–1090. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wong, H., & Chan, M. (2021). Curriculum design and cognitive development in early childhood education. *International Journal of Early Years Education, 29*(4), 256–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. World Bank. (2020). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone, everywhere. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study