Developmental Dyslexia in Children: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Interventions, Parenting Approaches, and Assistive Technologies

Background: Developmental dyslexia is a neurobiological learning disorder that significantly affects reading, spelling, and academic achievement. It is often misunderstood and underdiagnosed, which may result in long-term educational and emotional consequences.
Materials And Methods: This narrative literature review synthesized 19 key references, including peer-reviewed studies and foundational sources relevant to dyslexia. Foundational references published before 2000 were included only to support definitions and theoretical background. Databases searched included PubMed, ProQuest, Academia.edu, and Google Scholar. The review focused on academic interventions, parenting approaches, and assistive technologies for school-aged children with dyslexia.
Results: Phonological awareness training, structured literacy programmes, and multisensory methods were identified as effective academic interventions. Parenting approaches characterized by emotional responsiveness and structured routines were associated with better academic engagement and psychological well-being. Assistive technologies, including text-to-speech and speech-to-text software, were found to improve accessibility, promote independence, and enhance learning participation.
Conclusion: A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach that integrates evidence-based educational strategies, family involvement, and technological support is essential to support children with dyslexia. Further research is needed to refine and contextualize these interventions across diverse educational settings.

Dyslexia; Learning Disorders; Educational Technology; Parent–Child Relations

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Lerner JW. Educational interventions in learning disabilities. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1989; 28:326–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Yang L, Li C, Li X, Zhai M, An Q, Zhang Y, et al. Prevalence of developmental dyslexia in primary school children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hudson RF, High L, Otaiba SA. Dyslexia and the brain: What does current research tell us? Read Teach. 2007;60(6):506–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Macdonald SJ. The prevalence of dyslexia: A new approach to its estimation. J Learn Disabil. 2020. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022219420920377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(11):1301–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eden GF, Zeffiro TA. Neural systems affected in developmental dyslexia revealed by functional neuroimaging. Neuron. 1998;21(2):279–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Stein J. What is developmental dyslexia? Brain Sci. 2018;8(2):26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, Scanlon DM. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45(1):2–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Torgesen JK. The prevention of reading difficulties. J Sch Psychol. 2002;40(1):7–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Elliott JG, Grigorenko EL. The dyslexia debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nicholson T. Orton Gillingham approach – what is it and is it research based. LDA Bull. 2011;43(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343626683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Stevens EA, Austin C, Moore C, Scammacca N, Boucher AN, Vaughn S. Current state of the evidence: Examining the effects of Orton-Gillingham reading interventions for students with or at risk for word-level reading disabilities. Except Child. 2021;87(4):397–417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gersten R, Fuchs LS, Williams JP, Baker S. Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Rev Educ Res. 2001;71(2):279–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Swanson HL, Hoskyn M. Interventions for children with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. J Learn Disabil. 2001;34(1):1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Adebisi RO, Liman NA, Longpoe PK. Using assistive technology in teaching children with learning disabilities in the 21st century. J Educ Pract. 2015;6(24):14–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fuchs D, Fuchs LS. Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Read Res Q. 2006;41(1):93–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Raya AF, Ruiz-Olivares R, Pino J, Herruzo J. Parenting style and parenting practices in disabled children and its relationship with academic competence and behaviour problems. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 89:702–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Snowling MJ. Dyslexia: A practitioner’s handbook. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study