Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve Mental Health Service Delivery: Design and Innovation of the Elevate Minds Network System (EMNS).

Mental health disorders represent a major global public health challenge, affecting approximately one in eight individuals worldwide, equivalent to nearly one billion people, yet access to adequate care remains critically limited due to persistent stigma, financial barriers, geographic inaccessibility, and widespread shortages of trained mental health professionals (World Health Organization [WHO], 2022). The global treatment gap for mental health conditions is estimated at more than 75% in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where psychiatric and psychological resources are severely under-resourced relative to need (Patel et al., 2018). Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), particularly those powered by artificial intelligence (AI), offer scalable, affordable, and accessible solutions to bridge this persistent treatment gap (Torous et al., 2021).
This study presents the design, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of the Elevate Minds Network System (EMNS), a hybrid digital mental health platform that integrates an AI-powered conversational chatbot (Elevana AI) with human counseling, peer support networks, and psychoeducational resources. Developed within the context of Kabarak University and piloted with a broader community of adult digital mental health users, EMNS was designed to address the intersecting barriers of accessibility, stigma, and resource scarcity in mental health service delivery.
A convergent mixed-methods research design was employed, combining a quantitative pre–post observational study with qualitative inquiry conducted over a three-month intervention period. Participants (N = 150) were assessed using internationally validated standardized instruments, including the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), WHO-5 Well-Being Index, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), System Usability Scale (SUS), and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Engagement metrics were analyzed to evaluate system utilization patterns and behavioral indicators of platform adoption.
Statistical analyses included paired-sample t-tests, effect size calculations (Cohen’s d), and regression analysis, while qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were examined using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase thematic analysis framework. Findings revealed statistically significant reductions in depression symptoms (PHQ-9: MΔ = −5.5, p < .001, d = 1.12) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7: MΔ = −5.2, p < .001, d = 1.08), alongside significant improvements in psychological well-being (WHO-5: MΔ = +24.9, p < .001, d = 1.43) and perceived social support (MSPSS: MΔ = +8.3, p < .001, d = 0.92). The platform demonstrated high usability (SUS mean = 79.4) and strong user satisfaction (CSQ-8 mean = 27.1 out of 32). Qualitative themes identified improved accessibility, stigma reduction, enhanced user empowerment, and the complementary value of hybrid AI-human care.
These findings suggest that EMNS constitutes a feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective hybrid model for improving mental health service delivery, particularly in underserved populations. The study contributes foundational evidence to the emerging field of digital psychiatry and AI-augmented mental health care, with significant implications for universities, healthcare systems, governments, and global mental health policy.

Artificial Intelligence, Digital Mental Health, Hybrid Care Model

1. Ae-Ngibise, K., Cooper, S., Adiibokah, E., Akpalu, B., Lund, C., Doku, V., & MHAPP Research Programme Consortium. (2010). ‘Whether you like it or not people with mental problems are going to go to them’: A qualitative exploration into the widespread use of traditional and faith healers in the provision of mental health care in Ghana. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2010.536149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agyapong, V. I. O., Farren, C. K., & McLoughlin, D. M. (2018). Text messaging as an adjunct to CBT in low-income populations in Ghana, West Africa: Randomised controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 48(6), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717002428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anthes, E. (2016). Mental health: There’s an app for that. Nature, 532(7597), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/532020a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baumeister, H., Reichler, L., Munzinger, M., & Lin, J. (2014). The impact of guidance on internet-based mental health interventions: A systematic review. Internet Interventions, 1(4), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2014.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Berry, N., Lobban, F., Emsley, R., & Bucci, S. (2017). Acceptability of a smartphone app (BioBase) to help young people manage psychosis. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 98, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care: Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., Morgan, C., Rüsch, N., Brown, J. S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2015). What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychological Medicine, 45(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Corrigan, P. W. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59(7), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Firth, J., Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Carney, R., Pratap, A., Rosenbaum, S., & Sarris, J. (2017). The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J. (2020). The “online brain”: How the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot). JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018). Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety. JMIR Mental Health, 5(4), e64. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. (2022). Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Graham, S., Depp, C., Lee, E. E., Nebeker, C., Tu, X., Kim, H. C., & Jeste, D. V. (2019). Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: An overview. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(11), 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. GSMA Intelligence. (2023). The mobile economy sub-Saharan Africa 2023. GSM Association. https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/sub-saharan-africa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gureje, O., Oladeji, B. D., Araya, R., Bhui, K. S., Dinolova, R. V., Bhugra, D., & Seedat, S. (2020). Expanding the evidence base for global mental health. BJPsych International, 17(4), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2020.39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Harris, A. D., McGregor, J. C., Perencevich, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Inkster, B., Sarda, S., & Subramanian, V. (2018). An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(11), e12106. https://doi.org/10.2196/12106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kenya Data Protection Act. (2019). Data Protection Act, No. 24 of 2019. National Council for Law Reporting, Kenya. https://www.kenyalaw.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Kenya 2023 population and housing census report. Government of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kessler, R. C., & Ustun, T. B. (Eds.). (2008). The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(11), 858–866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lim, M. H., Gleeson, J. F. M., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., & Penn, D. L. (2022). Loneliness in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1482-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Linardon, J., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Messer, M., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2020). The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 18(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20673 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ministry of Health Kenya. (2021). Kenya national mental health policy 2021–2025. Government of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Miner, A. S., Milstein, A., Schueller, S., Hegde, R., Mangurian, C., & Linos, E. (2016). Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(5), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013). Behavioral intervention technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. General Hospital Psychiatry, 35(4), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mohr, D. C., Cuijpers, P., & Lehman, K. (2011). Supportive accountability: A model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(1), e30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Araya, R., Marsch, L. A., Unützer, J., Patel, V., & Bartels, S. J. (2017). Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(6), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30096-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016). The future of mental health care: Peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ndetei, D. M., Mutiso, V., Musyimi, C., Mokaya, A. G., Anderson, K. K., McKenzie, K., & Musau, A. (2016). The prevalence of mental disorders among primary school children in Kenya. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1068-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., Herrman, H., Herzallah, M. M., Huang, Y., Jordans, M. J. D., Kleinman, A., Medina-Mora, M. E., Morgan, E., Niaz, U., Omigbodun, O., & UnÜtzer, J. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet, 392(10157), 1553–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Perski, O., Blandford, A., West, R., & Michie, S. (2017). Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: A systematic review using cornerstones of engagement with technology. Health Psychology Review, 11(4), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1299580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pfeiffer, P. N., Heisler, M., Piette, J. D., Rogers, M. A. M., & Valenstein, M. (2011). Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: A meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Rickwood, D., Deane, F. P., Wilson, C. J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 4(3), 218–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sankoh, O., Sevalie, S., & Weston, M. (2018). Mental health in Africa. The Lancet Global Health, 6(9), e954–e955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30303-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Shatte, A. B. R., Hutchinson, D. M., & Teague, S. J. (2019). Machine learning in mental health: A systematic scoping review of methods and applications. Psychological Medicine, 49(9), 1426–1448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719000151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Straud, C., Siev, J., Messman-Moore, T., & McNally, R. J. (2019). Examining transdiagnostic mechanisms in PTSD: A meta-analysis of structural equation modeling studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 68, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.11.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Torous, J., Bucci, S., Bell, I. H., Kessing, L. V., Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Whelan, P., Carvalho, A. F., Keshavan, M., Linardon, J., & Firth, J. (2021). The growing field of digital psychiatry: Current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry, 20(3), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Torous, J., & Roberts, L. W. (2017). Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(5), 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2012). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. World Health Organization. (1998). Well-being measures in primary health care: The WHO-5 Well-Being Index. WHO Regional Office for Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. World Health Organization. (2019). WHO guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. World Health Organization Global Health Observatory. (2022). Mental health atlas 2020. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Wozney, L., McGrath, P. J., Turner, K. F., Gehring, N. D., Bennett, K., Huguet, A., & Hartling, L. (2017). eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety and depression in childhood and adolescence: Systematic review of studies reporting implementation outcomes. JMIR Mental Health, 4(1), e5. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.6656 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being