Self-Regulated Learning-Based Chinese Reading Instruction and Grade 7 Students’ Reading Strategy Use: A Classroom-Based Quasi-Experimental Study
Authors
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0335
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 4294-4308
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-16
Accepted: 2026-05-21
Published: 2026-06-15
Abstract
This classroom-based quasi-experimental study examined whether self-regulated learning (SRL)-based Chinese reading instruction was associated with changes in Grade 7 students’ self-reported reading strategy use. Eighty students from two intact classes in public junior secondary schools in Shanxi Province, China, participated in the study. One class received six weeks of SRL-based Chinese reading instruction organized around planning, monitoring, and reflection, while the other continued with conventional Chinese reading instruction. Students’ strategy use was measured at pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test using an adapted 23-item Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory assessing global, problem-solving, and support strategies. Pre-test MANOVA showed no significant baseline difference between the groups in the overall strategy profile, Pillai’s Trace = .039, F (3, 76) = 1.038, p = .381. At post-test, MANOVA indicated a significant group difference, Wilks’ Λ = .460, F (3, 76) = 29.750, p < .001, partial η² = .540. Baseline-adjusted ANCOVA results showed that the SRL-based instruction group reported significantly higher scores across all three dimensions. Repeated-measures analyses further revealed significant Time × Group interactions across the three strategy dimensions. Bonferroni-adjusted delayed post-test comparisons confirmed that the experimental group maintained significant relative advantages, with the strongest sustained advantage in problem-solving strategies. These findings provide classroom-based quasi-experimental evidence that SRL-based instruction enhances junior secondary students’ perceived strategic reading development by strengthening their awareness of text planning, cognitive monitoring, problem-directed resolution, and post-reading reflection. The results suggest that integrating metacognitive regulation activities into secondary L1 education offers a viable and practical approach to supporting students’ strategic reading development within authentic classroom contexts.
Keywords
Chinese reading instruction; Grade 7 students; reading strategy use; self-regulated learning; quasi-experimental study
Downloads
References
1. Awang, N. A. binti, Wan Zakaria, W. N. F. binti, & Suhaimin, M. F. bin. (2025). Determining the influence of metacognitive strategies on ESL learners’ use of comprehending strategies: A study in a Malaysian public university. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(10), 3698-3705. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chen, J. (2022). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions on L2 learning achievement, strategy employment and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1021101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Dermitzaki, I. (2025). Fostering elementary school students’ self-regulation skills in reading comprehension: Effects on text comprehension, strategy use, and self-efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), Article 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Frey, N., Fisher, D., Barbee, K., & Ortega, S. (2025). A model for adolescent reading instruction. Education Sciences, 15(11), Article 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Kan, T., Noordin, N., & Ismail, L. (2024). Implementation of metacognitive reading strategies to improve English reading ability: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lau, K. L., & Qian, Q. (2025). Enhancing students’ classical Chinese reading through a two-year flipped self-regulated learning intervention program. Reading and Writing, 38, 293-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10516-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Li, H., Wang, C., Gan, Z., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2024). Reading motivation and learning strategies among Chinese EFL learners. Psychology in the Schools, 61(5), 1747-1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Maimaiti, G., & Hew, K. F. (2025). Gamified self-regulated learning improves EFL reading comprehension, motivation, self-regulation skills and process patterns: Quasi-experiment with process mining. The Internet and Higher Education, 67, Article 101042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). 义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版) [Chinese language curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition)]. Beijing Normal University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Olivares, F., Fidalgo, R., & Torrance, M. (2023). Effects of self-regulated strategy instruction on the reading comprehension process and reading self-efficacy in primary students. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 81(285), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.22550/rep81-2-2023-02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pan, M., Lai, C., & Guo, K. (2025). Effects of GenAI-empowered interactive support on university EFL students’ self-regulated strategy use and engagement in reading. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, Article 100991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100991 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Qi, J., Reynolds, B. L., & Bai, X. (2025). Examining the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among primary school students in mainland China: An extension of Tse, Lin, and Ng (2022). Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(1), 1-38.https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 57-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Tse, S. K., Lin, L., & Ng, R. H. W. (2022). Self-regulated learning strategies and reading comprehension among bilingual primary school students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3258-3273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2049686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wang, Y. (2023). Enhancing English reading skills and self-regulated learning through online collaborative flipped classroom: A comparative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1255389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP41022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study