Needs Analysis as Basis for the Development of an SSI-Based Module for Teaching Non-Mendelian Inheritance

This study aimed to identify the learning needs of both students and Biology teachers in the lesson on non-Mendelian genetics, as a basis for developing a Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI)-based module. Specifically, it determines students' prior knowledge of the topic, problems encountered, and coping techniques, as well as teachers' difficulties in the teaching-learning process and their familiarity with the SSI-based module as an instructional tool for teaching non-Mendelian inheritance. The study employed a qualitative descriptive research design, using open-ended questions administered to 60 Grade 9 students and 5 Science teachers at the selected secondary school in Iligan City who had already learned about and taught non-Mendelian inheritance, respectively. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and codes. Results show that both students and teachers struggle with the abstract nature of non-Mendelian inheritance. Students have misconceptions, low retention, and rely on self-study despite teachers' effort and use of various strategies such as real-life examples, visual aids, and problem-based learning; thus, these strategies are not always effective. In addition, SSI-based instruction is limited and rarely used because teachers are unfamiliar with it. The findings highlight the need for a structured SSI-based module that uses real-world contexts to improve critical thinking, engagement, and decision-making skills among students. Also, such a module can help teachers teach effectively and assist students in understanding complex non-Mendelian inheritance.

Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI), non-Mendelian Inheritance, Needs Analysis, Science Education, Genetics Learning

1. Adalikwu, S. A., & Iorkpilgh, I. T. (2013). The influence of instructional materials on academic performance of senior secondary school students in chemistry in Cross River State. Global Journal of Educational Research, 12(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v12i1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Eviota, M., & Boyles, L. (2022). Least learned competencies in Grade 9 biology: Basis for development of strategic intervention material (SIM). DOI: 10.55057/ajress.2022.4.1.7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ligado, F. N. G., Guray, N. D., & Bautista, R. G. (2022). Pedagogical beliefs, techniques, and practices towards hands-on science. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(10), 584–591. DOI: 10.12691/education-10-10-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Francisco, L., & Barquilla, M. (2025). Needs assessment-based instructional material on non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance for Grade 9. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(5), 377–390. Retrieved from: https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Galeza, E. T. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of suggested learning activity sheets and problem-based learning in teaching of non-Mendelian law: Enhancing conceptual understanding, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. Pantao (The International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences), 4(3), 3641–3647. DOI: http://doi.org/10.69651/PIJHSS0403334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garg, S. K. (2025). Exploring non-Mendelian inheritance patterns: A comprehensive overview. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.45888 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. https://www.iea.nl/publications/research-publishing-reports/timss-2019-international-results-mathematics-and-science [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Laguindab, D. A. M., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., Madale, V. A., Dinoro, A. P., & Adamat, L. A. (2025). Development of Simredity: An interactive strategic intervention material in teaching non-Mendelian genetics to Grade 9 learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(10), 6267. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91000051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Macalikod, R., & Simpal, E. A. (2025). Development and validation of science instructional materials (SIMs) for the least learned competencies. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education. DOI: 10.35912/jshe.v5i3.2735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Moodelly, S., Reiss, M., & Rumjan, A. (2023). Unpacking procedural and conceptual difficulties of Grade 13 students in solving problems in genetics crosses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mussard, J., & Reiss, M. (2022). Why is genetics so hard to learn? Insights from examiner reports for 16-to 18-year-olds in England. The School Science Review, 103, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ojo, A. T. (2024). Examination of secondary school students’ conceptual understanding, perceptions, and misconceptions about genetics concepts. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0185. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Omictin, R., Salic-Hairulla, M., Adamat, L., Pitporntapin, S., & Malayao, S. Jr. (2024). Development of SSI-based module to aid in teaching genetic engineering and improving the conceptual understanding and decision-making skills of students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Philippines country note. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Purisima, J. K. A., & Celedonio, M. A. (2024). Knowledge and social relevance: Analyzing socio-scientific nature of learning competencies and standards in Grade 8 science. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(10), 3852–3863. DOI: 10.11594/ijmaber.05.10.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rivera, L. (2025). Effectiveness of 5Ps authentic assessment on the normalized gained scores of Grade 9 students in non-Mendelian genetics. International Journal of Research Publications, 175. DOI: 10.47119/IJRP1001751620258155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Santos, J. T. D., Lim, R. R., & Rogayan, D. V. Jr. (2021). Least mastered competencies in biology: Basis for instructional intervention. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 208–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i3.17106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shaw, K. R. M., Van Horne, K., Zhang, H., & Boughman, J. A. (2008). Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics, 178(3), 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1534/GENETICS.107.084194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Saunders, K., & Rennie, L. (2011). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do students retain or lose after instruction? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar55. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech high school students’ misconceptions about basic genetic concepts: Preliminary results. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738–745. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.738 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study