Low-Carbon Campus: Exploring Universiti Malaysia Sarawak’s Pedestrian Walkways as Tools for Sustainable Mobility

The development of university campuses presents a valuable opportunity to create sustainable and inclusive spaces that support low-carbon initiatives and encourage active mobility. This study focuses on the thoughtful planning and intentional incorporation of pedestrian infrastructure, with UNIMAS West Campus serving as a case study. The research adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey of 107 respondents with site observations at UNIMAS West Campus. It examines students’ perceptions and the current design of pedestrian walkways, aiming to identify improvements for promoting sustainable mobility. Positioned within a horseshoe-shaped elevated area, the campus exemplifies a commitment to blending with the natural landscape while enhancing connectivity and accessibility. Despite the successful establishment of pedestrian walkways, recent studies reveal ongoing challenges, including vehicular emissions and the heavy reliance on motorized transportation by students and staff. The lack of covered walkways and insufficient lighting further diminishes the pedestrian experience, affecting comfort and safety, particularly during adverse weather and nighttime hours. To address these issues, the study proposes key improvements such as the installation of covered walkways, better lighting systems, wider pathways, and regular maintenance of pedestrian routes. Additionally, it emphasizes the need to address diverse user needs, including wheelchair accessibility and tactile guidance, to promote inclusivity. By implementing these recommendations, UNIMAS can foster sustainable mobility and move closer to its goal of becoming a low-carbon campus. This research highlights the need for holistic pedestrian infrastructure and showcases university campuses as models for sustainability and inclusive urban development.

Environmental, Low-Carbon Campus, Pedestrian Design & Planning, Pedestrian Walkway, Students’ Mobility, Sustainable Development

1. Abdullah, W. S., & Al-Qemaqchi, N. T. (2020). Simulation of Pedestrian Behaviour as Design Criteria for University Teaching Buildings. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.26.02.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afsar, B., Yunus, M. Y. M., & Yusof, M. J. M. (2016). Critical analysis of students' perception on pedestrian environment in a Malaysian public university. In Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/70458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amaral, L. P., Martins, N., & Gouveia, J. B. (2015). Quest for a sustainable university: a review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-02-2013-0017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asadi-Shekari Z., Moeinaddini M., Shah M. Z. (2014). A pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting walking facilities on campus streets. Land Use Policy, 38, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and Its Relationships with Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Battista, G.A., Manaugh, K. (2019). Generating walkability from pedestrians’ perspectives using a qualitative GIS method. Travel Behav. Soc. 17, 1–7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barter, P. A. (2004). Transport, urban structure and 'aspiration' in Asian cities: A comparative perspective. Built Environment, 30(1), 24-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Christian, Stephanie; Cochrane Shea, Creelman Michael, d'Apollonia Lesley, Talbot Geoff and Wiggins Marci. (2010). Studley Campus Walkability Assessment EVNS 3502: Final Reports, Dalhousie University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Delmelle, E. C., & Delmelle, E. M. (2012). Exploring spatio-temporal commuting patterns in a university environment. Transport Policy, 21, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. European Commission. (2009). Road transport: Reducing CO2 emissions from vehicles. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/ policies/transport/vehicles/cars_en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighbourhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gomez, N., Cadarso, M., Monsalve, F. (2016). Carbon footprint of a university in a multiregional model: the case of the University of Castilla-La Mancha. J Clean Prod. 2016;138(Part 1):119–130. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016. 06.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Handy, S., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(6), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hooi, K.K., Hassan, F. and Mat, M.C. (2012), “An exploratory study of readiness and development of green university framework in Malaysia”, Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 50, pp. 525-536, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Horacek T. M., White A., Greene G., Reznar M., Quick V., Morrell J., Byrd-Bredbenner C. (2012). Sneakers and spokes: An assessment of the walkability and bikeability of U.S. postsecondary institutions. Journal of Environmental Health, 74(7), 8–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Howell, N. A., Tu, J. V., Moineddin, R., Chen, H., Chu, A., Hystad, P., & Booth, G. L. (2019). Interaction between neighbourhood walkability and traffic-related air pollution on hypertension and diabetes: The CANHEART cohort. Environment International, 132, 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2020), “Nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris agreement: Malaysia”, Retrieved from www.iea.org/policies/11766-nationally-determined-contributionndc-to-the-paris-agreement-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Isa, H.M., Sedhu, D.S., Lop, N.S., Rashid, K., Nor, O.M. and Iffahd, M. (2021), “Strategies, challenges and solutions towards the implementation of green campus in UiTM Perak”, Planning Malaysia, Vol. 19 No. 16, doi: 10.21837/pm.v19i16.952. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kabit, M. R., Ting, J. L. S., & Yassin, A. (2022). Towards Campus Sustainability: Estimating On-Campus Vehicle Co2 Emissions in Unimas. Journal Of Sustainability Science and Management, 17(6), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2022.06.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. King, S., Kaczynski, A T., Wilt, J K., & Stowe, E W. (2020). Walkability 101: A Multi-Method Assessment of the Walkability at a University Campus. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020917954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Leon, I., Oregi, X., & Marieta, C. (2018). Environmental assessment of four Basque University campuses using the NEST tool. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Liu, H., Wang, X., Yang, J., Zhou, X., & Liu, Y. (2017). The ecological footprint evaluation of low carbon campuses based on life cycle assessment: A case study of Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Makki, S., Surat, M., Che-Ani, A-I., Farkisch, H. & Mokhtarian, H.R. (2012). The importance of design characteristics in walking from student’s perspective: a case study in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Building Performance, 3(1), 42-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Malaysian Public Works Department. (1997). Basic Guidelines on Pedestrian Facilities (Volumes 18-97 of Nota teknik (jalan). Jabatan Kerja Raya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Marshall, J. D., Brauer, M., & Frank, L. D. (2009). Healthy Neighborhoods: Walkability and Air Pollution. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(11), 1752–1759. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Marshall, W.E., Garrick, N.W., (2011). Does street network design affect traffic safety? Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mohaiyadin, N.M.H., Mardzuki, K., Liaw, J.O.H., Loong, W.W. and Azan, A. (2018), “Investigating the relationship of sustainability practices dimensions towards green campus initiative in national defence university of Malaysia”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 7, pp. 1526-1531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mustaffa, N., Kudus, S., & Aziz, M. (2022). Key drivers, challenges and strategies towards successful low-carbon campus: the case of UiTM Shah Alam campus. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(4), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-10-2021-0121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nasution, I., Harahap, R.& Ahmad, Z. (2021). User-based Design of Campus Pedestrian: Case Study – Universitas Negeri Medan. 10.4108/eai.31-8-2021.2313762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ramakreshnan, L., Fong, C. S., Rajandra, A., Sulaiman, N. M., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2024). Addressing built environment gaps for the enhancement of campus walkability using community needs assessment approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy, *15*, 101167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., & Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city, Journal of Urban Planning and Development,131(4):246-257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UNIMAS Low-Carbon Roadmap 2030. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.sqrc.unimas.my/images/sdg-directions/ULCCR_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Case Study on the Development and Simulation of a High-Efficiency Flyback Converter for Portable Solar LED Lighting
• Greening the Campus: Stakeholders’ Insights on Sustainability Practices in a Chinese Higher Education Institution
• Malaysia’s Renewable Energy and CO₂ Emissions: ARDL–ECM Evidence with Policy and Managerial Implications
• Waqf within Business Model Framework: A Review and Research Agenda
• Sustainability-Driven Green City Framework and its Impact on Malaysia’s Tourism Industry Development