Students’ Responses to TPACK-Based Innovative Teaching Materials for Problem-Solving Learning

Authors

Ahmad Bashri

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Rinie Pratiwi Puspitawati

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Wisanti

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Sifak Indana

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Pramita Yakub

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Rinaldiyanti Rukmana

Department of Science Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, East Java (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500856

Subject Category: Biology

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 12678-12684

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-18

Accepted: 2026-05-24

Published: 2026-06-16

Abstract

Innovative and technologically integrated teaching resources that foster students' active learning and problem-solving abilities are necessary for biology education in the digital age. The purpose of this study was to examine how undergraduate students responded to novel teaching resources that combined problem-solving learning strategies with the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework in biology education. Seventy undergraduate students participated in the study, which used a descriptive quantitative research approach. Students' opinions about problem-solving exercises, technology integration, learning engagement, and content integration were gauged by the questionnaire. Mean scores and response categories were used in a descriptive analysis of the data. The results indicated that students' responses had an average score of 4.31, which was classified as "High." The statement about digital characteristics that facilitate interactive learning had the highest response (M = 4.40), followed by problem-solving exercises that assist students in critically analysing biological challenges (M = 4.37). The findings show that the use of TPACK-based creative teaching resources combined with problem-solving teaching strategies was well received by the students. Higher education biology learning experiences were made more engaging, dynamic, and meaningful by the instructional materials.

Keywords

TPACK, innovative teaching materials, student responses

Downloads

References

1. Abdieva, A. (2023). Methodology of developing students' creative abilities using new technologies in biology classes. Eurasian Science Review An International peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abuan, M. I., Herrera, D. J. L., & Herrera, M. L. (2024). Metacognitive model of the science teachers’ TPACK in Butuan City, Caraga Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 8, 382-403. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803026S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alali, R. (2024). Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated stem education using project-oriented problem-based learning. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Awati, J., Patil, M., Tilve, M., Waghmode, M., & Desai, S. (2024). Enhancing learning in biology for engineers: a problem based case study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v37is2/24038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhoi, C. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of innovative learning approaches in teaching biology to secondary school students: a comparative study of traditional and interactive pedagogical methods. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v2i03.779. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Church, F. (2021). Active learning: basic science workshops, clinical science cases, and medical role-playing in an undergraduate biology course. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., & Hilyana, F. S. (2022). TPACK dalam pembelajaran IPA. Penerbit NEM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jamil, D., Bokhari, T., & Rafiq, M. (2024). Critical thinking skills development for 21st century: an analysis of biology curriculum (2006). Voyage Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.58622/vjes.v4i1.132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Karataş, F., & Ataç, B. A. (2025). When TPACK meets artificial intelligence: Analyzing TPACK and AI-TPACK components through structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 8979-9004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13164-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kasap, M., Acar, B., & Kasap, S. (2024). A qualitative content analysis to investigate 21st century skills in learning outcomes of high school biology course curriculum. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Manaf, C., Desa, S., Saad, M., & Yaakob, M. (2025). TPACK-based teaching approaches in mobile learning for biology education: insights from NGT & ISM approaches. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.906000109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Puspita, L., , A., Jalmo, T., Maulina, D., , K., Luthfi, N., & Rakhmawati, I. (2024). PBL-STEM integrated interactive e-module in improving creative thinking skills and collaboration skills: needs analysis in biology education. E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448204009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rose, A. E., Nency, A., Sudira, E., Haria, Y., & Suryanda, A. (2024). Strategi inovatif pembelajaran eksplorasi strategi inovatif pembelajaran biologi di abad 21: strategi inovatif pembelajaran biologi di abad 21. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.54259/diajar.v3i1.2270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sera, N., Saragih, D., & Pratama, A. (2025). Implementing biology learning with a differentiated approach to support students 21st century skills independent curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sudrajat, A., Susilo, H., & Indriwati, S. (2018). Application of Learning Based on Problem through Lesson Study in Learning Biology in 21st Century Course for Developing Biology Students Critical Thinking Skills and Collaboration Ability. ICLI 2018 . https://doi.org/10.5220/0008409101450152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Suryanda, A. (2024). Eksplorasi strategi inovatif pembelajaran biologi di abad 21. DIAJAR. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 102-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers' TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles