Lived Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers in Developing Digital Competence Through an Instructional Training E-Package: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

The growing demand for technology integrated instruction has increased the need for pre-service teachers to develop meaningful digital competence during teacher preparation. This study explored the lived experiences of pre-service teachers in developing digital competence through an instructional training e-package. Specifically, it examined participants’ perceptions of the training experience, their perceived competence development, and the contextual factors that shaped their learning process. The study employed a qualitative exploratory approach informed by phenomenological orientation to understand how participants interpreted and experienced digital learning within teacher education. Six pre-service teachers were purposively selected through maximum variation sampling. Data were gathered through semi structured interviews following the completion of the instructional training e-package. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Findings revealed that participants viewed the training as professionally relevant and meaningful in preparing them for technology integrated teaching. Hands-on learning activities, guided practice, and collaborative engagement contributed to increased confidence and instructional readiness in using digital tools for teaching and learning. Participants also identified contextual challenges, including unstable internet connectivity, limited access to devices, and time-related pressures. The findings provide qualitative insight into how experiential and practice-based digital learning experiences shape pre-service teachers’ perceptions of digital competence development. The study may contribute to the enhancement of technology integrated teacher education initiatives and context responsive digital training programs.

Digital competence; Experiential learning; Instructional technology; Pre-service teachers; Technology integration

1. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Zawacki Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449–2472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model and teachers’ integration of technology. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Computers & Education, 145, 103733. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID 19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study