Effectiveness of MyEduSpace: An AI-Driven Integrated Digital Learning Platform for Teaching and Learning in TVET

Lecturers and students today use many separate digital applications for notes, quizzes and group work. Switching between these tools makes a lesson harder to manage and reduces focus. This study evaluates the effectiveness of MyEduSpace, an AI-driven digital learning platform that brings several educational applications, such as ChatGPT, Canva, NotebookLM, Kahoot!, Wordwall and Padlet, together in one online space built on Google Sites. The platform was developed to make learning easier to follow, reduce the use of paper, and support a more learner-centred approach in a Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) setting. A quantitative study combining a survey and a pre-test/post-test was carried out. A five-point Likert questionnaire was answered by 160 respondents: 100 community college students who used the platform in class and 60 community participants who used it in entrepreneurship and skills workshops. Learning outcomes were measured for 12 students. Data were analysed using SPSS, and learner engagement was also observed during the sessions. The results showed a high level of user satisfaction (M = 4.45), with the highest scores for ease of use (M = 4.60) and interactivity (M = 4.55). Student performance improved clearly, with the average score rising from 55.83% before the lessons to 87.50% after, a statistically significant gain (t(11) = 20.45, p < .001) with a large effect size. Observation also showed more active participation and two-way interaction. The study concludes that MyEduSpace improves engagement, understanding and teaching efficiency for both students and community learners, and shows strong potential as a model for digital education that supports Sustainable Development Goal 4 and national TVET digital goals.

Digital Learning Platform, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Gamification, TVET, Academic Achievement.

1. A. N. A. Razak, M. K. Noordin, and M. F. A. Khanan, “Digital learning in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in public university Malaysia,” Journal of Technical Education and Training, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 49–59, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. M. R. M. Jamil, A. T. M. Hasyim, M. S. Othman, A. M. Ahmad, N. R. M. Noh, and M. F. M. Kamal, “Digital pedagogy policy in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Malaysia: Fuzzy Delphi approach,” Journal of Technical Education and Training, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. F. Almasri, “Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research,” Research in Science Education, vol. 54, pp. 977–997, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. D. A. Lupșa-Tătaru, “The role of e-learning platforms in a sustainable higher education: A cross-continental analysis of impact and utility,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 7, art. 3032, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘gamification’,” in Proc. 15th Int. Academic MindTrek Conf., Tampere, Finland, 2011, pp. 9–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. J. Zeng, D. Sun, C.-K. Looi, and A. C. W. Fan, “Exploring the impact of gamification on students’ academic performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of studies from the year 2008 to 2023,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2478–2502, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. M. Li, S. Ma, and Y. Shi, “Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: A meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, art. 1253549, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Strzelecki, “To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 5142–5155, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2–3, pp. 87–105, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. J. L. Pimentel, “A note on the usage of Likert scaling for research data analysis,” USM R&D Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 109–112, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, 2015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study