Adaptive Practices in Sustaining Professional Development in the Digital Era: A Multiple Case Study of Physical Education Teachers in Rural High School

Authors

Karen D. Lampedario

Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City (Philippines)

Emy A. Morbo, PhD

Sultan Kudarat State University, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0358

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 4591-4605

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-29

Accepted: 2026-05-04

Published: 2026-06-19

Abstract

This study investigated how Physical Education teachers sustained professional development and continuous learning in the rapidly evolving digital era. Grounded in Transformative Learning Theory, Communities of Practice, and Lifelong Learning Theory, the research examined how teachers reinterpreted experiences, engaged in collaborative and individual learning processes, and constructed meanings of lifelong learning within their professional careers. The study adopted a qualitative multiple case study design to provide an in-depth understanding of teachers’ lived experiences, adaptive strategies, and contextual realities. The participants consisted of five public secondary school Physical Education teachers from the Municipality of Bagumbayan, Sultan Kudarat, who had actively participated in professional development initiatives. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which allowed participants to articulate their experiences, perspectives, and practices in relation to continuous learning and professional growth. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis guided by Braun and Clarke’s framework, with emphasis on identifying recurring themes and patterns across cases. Specifically, the analysis examined how teachers maintained professional growth, how they perceived lifelong learning as part of their teaching identity, and what contextual factors contributed to similarities and differences in their experiences. Findings revealed that teachers sustained professional development through self-directed digital learning, engagement in professional learning communities, and participation in formal and informal training activities. Institutional factors such as leadership support, access to digital resources, and school culture also influenced their capacity to adapt and grow professionally. The study provided context-specific insights that may inform the development of responsive teacher training programs, strengthen school-based professional learning structures, and guide policy initiatives aimed at enhancing continuous professional development in the digital age.

Keywords

Physical Education Teachers, Professional Development, Continuous Learning, Digital Era, Multiple Case Study

Downloads

References

1. Amemasor, S. K. (2025). The influence of teacher professional development programs on digital instructional integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barroga, I. & Tampus, D. (2023). Pedagogical translanguaging realities in the classroom: Teachers' practices, perceptions, and awareness. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(7), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8211085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Candy, P. C. (2002). Lifelong learning and information literacy. In B. Johnston & S. Webber (Eds.), Aslib proceedings: New information perspectives, 54(4), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530210443369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2021). Best practices in teachers’ professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(6), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721995700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fidalgo, P. (2025). Teacher motivation and professional development engagement. Educational Research Review, 42, 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gu, Y. (2025). Professional development for teachers in the digital age. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Huang, R. (2024). Digital pedagogy for sustainable educational transformation. Frontiers of Education in China, 19(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0031-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nagel, I. (2025). Teachers’ professional digital competence. Education Sciences, 5(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. OECD. (2021). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Richter, D. (2025). Teacher professional development and instructional quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 131, 104198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Stringer, L. R. (2025). Professional learning and teachers’ digital efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00716-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Surikova, S. (2025). Training transfer in teacher professional development. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 16(1), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.1.1721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tagimaucia, J., et al. (2024). Challenges in online physical education teaching. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24(2), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2024.02045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tikly, L. (2004). Education and the new imperialism. Comparative Education, 40(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000231347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tondeur, J., et al. (2021). Preparing teachers for technology integration. Computers & Education, 167, 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhang, L. (2025). Digital competence for sustainable education. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1710983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles