Developing a Speaking Assessment Rubric and Strategies for Enhancing Oral Communication in EFL Classrooms

Background: This study aims to develop pilot a contextually appropriate speaking assessment and to identify effective pedagogical strategies for fostering oral communication skills in EFL classrooms.
Methods: A quantitative pilot study was conducted involving 55 students from three 5th grade classes. Participants completed two comparable speaking assignments. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis were employed to examine score consistency and the reliability of the rubric across tasks.
Results: The results demonstrated that students’ performance across the two tasks was relatively stable, with similar mean scores and moderate variability. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.65) was observed between Task 1 and Task 2, indicating acceptable reliability of the rubric in the pilot phase. However, some individual score fluctuations emphasized potential task-related variability and highlighted the importance of using multiple tasks in speaking assessment.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that integrating assessment with instructional speaking strategies significantly enhances learners’ fluency, confidence, and communicative effectiveness. The study contributes to the field of language assessment by providing a locally developed rubric that integrates psychometric principles with practical classroom application. The proposed rubric and strategies offer valuable implications for teachers aiming to enhance oral communication skills in EFL contexts.

speaking assessment, rubric development, reliability, EFL, Kazakhstan, psychometric evaluation

1. Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of Student Achievement. Allyn & Bacon Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/using-rubrics-to-promote-thinking-and-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrade, H. G. (1999). The effects of instructional rubrics on student learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Tuan, L. T. (2012). Teaching and assessing speaking performance through analytic scoring approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.673-679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Yalçın-Çolakoğlu, Ö., & Selçuk, M. (2019). Assessing individual and group oral exams: Scoring criteria and rater interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Miyazoe, T. (2025). Tracking progress to foster motivation: Implementing a rubric-based P-score model in Japanese university EFL courses. Language Testing in Asia, 15, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00387-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liu, X. J., Wang, J., & Zou, B. (2025). Evaluating an AI speaking assessment tool: Score accuracy, perceived validity, and oral peer feedback as feedback enhancement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 75, 101505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mawalim, C. O., Leong, C. W., Sivan, G., Huang, H.-H., & Okada, S. (2025). Beyond accuracy: Multimodal modeling of structured speaking skill indices in young adolescents. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Andrade, H. L., & Reddy, Y. M. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Serikbayeva, A., Akizhanova, D., Shinetova, L., Altybayeva, S., & Abdrasilov, B. (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Psychometric tools for assessing intercultural communicative competence: A case study for evaluating ICC in Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1727766. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1727766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tleuov, A. (2025). Teaching Speaking in Kazakhstani EFL Classrooms: Negotiating Teacher Beliefs and Assessment Constraints. IAFOR Journal of Education, 13(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Begimbetova G., Kassymova G., Abduldayev Ye. Criteria-based Assessment Model in the Education System of Kazakhstan // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №1 (127). – B. 276–287. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Smakova, K., & Paulsrud, B. (2020). Intercultural communicative competence in English language teaching in Kazakhstan. Issues in Educational Research, 30(2), 691–708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/smakova.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study