Cultural Artifacts as a Mediator Between Social Interaction and English Writing Proficiency among Grade 10 Learners
Authors
Graduate School Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600252
Subject Category: English
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 3509-3519
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-26
Accepted: 2026-06-01
Published: 2026-06-22
Abstract
Poor English writing proficiency is a problem in education. A predictive research design was employed, with 380 respondents from a stratified random sample completing a survey and an essay task. The data were analyzed using mediation analysis. Results revealed that cultural artifacts partially but significantly mediate the predictive-criterion correlation, affirming Sociocultural theory. Educators may consider increasing opportunities for learners to use both their home language and English during class discussions, incorporating authentic reading materials and culturally embedded texts into writing tasks, providing targeted teacher training on the integration of cultural artifacts in writing lessons, and encouraging future research on the potential impact of digital media, textbooks, and storytelling traditions as mediating resources. Future research should implement a formal rater calibration phase or utilize a multi-rater system where a subset of essays is cross-examined to compute Cohen's Kappa, Fleiss’ kappa or an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Keywords
Cultural artifacts, mediator, social interaction, English writing proficiency, Grade 10 learners
Downloads
References
1. Angriman, F., Godoy, L. C., & Lawler, P. R. (2023). What is mediation analysis?: Linking exposures and outcomes through intermediary mechanisms. JACC: Advances, 3(1), 100746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bagheri, M., & Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2021). Comparative study of the effect of face-to- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: Speaking skill in focus. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00103-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ballen, C. J., & Salehi, S. (2021). Mediation Analysis in Discipline-Based Education Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Using Structural Equation Modeling: Beyond “What Works” to Understand How It Works, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. and for Whom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.0010821[1](https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.00108-21) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Barro-Punzalan, S. B. (2024). Sociolinguistics, discourse, and literary competences among English language studies students. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1, Part 2), 41–47. Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas. ISSN: 2782-9332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Bascos-Ocampo, R., Guted, M. S., & Wanasen, E. P. (2016). Writing proficiency of Apayao State College first year high school students. International Journal of Social Science an Humanities Research, 4(3), 97–101. Research Publish Journals. http://www.researchpublish.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bayagna, H. K., Cantos, M. A., Tapulgo, J. A., Tomaquin, A., & QuiÒo- Justol, J. (2025). The Influence of Face-to-Face Social Interaction on Grammar Skills among English Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 3(3), 141-164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Belarmino, J. (2023). Writing proficiency as a complex language skill. Journal of Language Education Studies, 15(2), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Cabansag, J. (2013). Written language proficiency of laboratory high school students in a state university in Cagayan Valley Philippines. International Refereed Research Journal, 4(2),87-93. https://www.researchersworld.com/index.php/rworld/article/view/1039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Chi, C. (2024, January 11). Explainer: With students’ poor literacy, are all teachers now‘ reading teachers’? Philippine Star.https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/01/11/2325063/explainer-students poorliteracy-are-all-teachers-now-reading-teachers#:~:text=At%20least%2090%25%20of%20Filipino,2022%20data%20on%20learning%20poverty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Chukwu, M. A. (2025, March). Influence of social interaction on academic performance of secondary school students in Rivers-West Senatorial District of Rivers State, Nigeria [Review of Influence of social interaction on academic performance of secondary school students in Rivers-West Senatorial District of Rivers State, Nigeria]. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 13(1), 264–272. SEAHI Publications. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14895057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. City Government of Davao. (2023). Socio-economic profile. Retrieved from the City Government of Davao Socio-Economic Profile [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Department of Education-Davao City Division. (2022). Division schools profile and statistical data. DepEd Davao City [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ediang, M. K. G., & Celesio, M. C. L. (2025). Exploring writing challenges: A mixed-method analysis of senior high school students’ essay performance. International Journal of Academic Research World, 9(5), 140–156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. He, T. (2022). Research on the mediating effect of IELTS Academic Writing Task 2 among Chinese EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(6), 1039–1056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.126050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Jeong, S., Clyburn, J., Bhatia, N. S., McCourt, J., & Lemons, P. P. (2022). Student thinking in the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. professional development of college biology instructors: An analysis through the lens of sociocultural theory. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar30. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining peer review effects: The role of peer feedback and peer interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 756–775. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762–768. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd57470.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Munder, D. (2024). Writing errors of English as second language (ESL) learners in the 21st Philippine context. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i2.955 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Nature Editorial. (2024, March). My English skills are hurting my chances in academic publishing. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00583-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Patil, D. S. S. (2024). The socio-cultural determinants of English proficiency: A case study of undergraduate students. International Journal of English and World Languages & Literature Paradigm Shift in International Research, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14634114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Pearson, W. S. (2024). Affective, behavioural, and cognitive engagement with written feedback on second language writing: A systematic methodological review. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1285954. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1285954 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Peter, J., & Singaravelu, G. (2024). Problems in writing in English among high school learners. ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Philippine Daily Inquirer. (2023, April 17). Local, international tests show urgent need to improve quality of education. https://opinion.inquirer.net/162422/local-international-tests-show-urgent-need-to-improve-quality-of-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Rahnuma, N. (2025). Contradictions in ESL students’ academic writing trajectories in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Bangladesh. Journal of Language and Education Research, 18(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Rahnuma, N. (2025). Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. education: A cultural historical activity theory perspective. Education Inquiry, 16(3), 303–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2222450 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Roque, J., Sangaban, R., & Zacaria, K. (2025). Culturally responsive elementary English instruction. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(7), 424-435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Saavedra, A. & Barredo, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the poor writing skills in Filipino and English of the Elementary Pupils. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(5), 1090-1106.https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_5/14567_Saavedra_2020_E_R.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Setyaningrum, R. R. (2019). Cultural artifacts in students’ literacy narrative. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v6i1.2353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Silor A., Silor F., & Emfimo M. (2024) Cultural Linguistics: Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Language and Culture in Contemporary Society ISSN: 2758-0970 The Paris Conference on Arts & Humanities 2024 Official Conference Proceedings (pp. 85-92) https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2758-0970.2024.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Turney, S. (2022, May 13). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) | Guide & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/pearson-correlation-coefficient/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds.). Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language (translation newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Wertsch, J. V., Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 363–380). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing English Vocabulary Skills for Grade 9 Students ‘Using Deal or No Deal’ Game
- Enhancing Grade 8 English Engagement: Fill My Bag Strategy
- Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication Competence: An Input to a Communication Skills Development Module
- Lower Secondary School Students' Attitude toward Reading in English
- Learner Autonomy and Attitudes toward Philippine English: Predictors of Grammar Performance among College ESL Students