Enhancing Technology and Livelihood Education Through Cooperative Learning: Insights from Secondary Schools in Tandag City Division
Authors
Secondary School Teacher III, Department of Education, Jacinto P. Elpa National High School (Philippines)
Assistant Professor IV, Commission on Higher Education, North Eastern Mindanao State University-Main Campus (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0377
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 4851-4860
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-20
Accepted: 2026-05-26
Published: 2026-06-23
Abstract
This study investigated the implementation of the cooperative learning approach in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) among Grade 9 students and teachers in the Tandag City Division. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational design, the research analyzed the demographic profiles, the extent of implementation across four domains; Curriculum, Learning Environment, Diversity of Learners, and Social Regard for Learning and the significant relationships between these variables.
Findings revealed a "High Implementation" of cooperative learning, with an overall grand mean of 4.670. While both respondents aligned on most domains, a highly significant difference was found in Social Regard for Learning (t = -5.45, p = 0.000), where teachers perceived their role as social facilitators more positively than students. Correlation analysis for students showed that Sex significantly influenced perceptions of the Curriculum (p=0.044), Diversity (p=0.046), and Social Regard (p=0.036), indicating that female students gen-erally perceived a more effective implementation. For teachers, Educational Attainment was significantly linked to Curriculum delivery (r=0.676, p=0.045), and Age showed a very strong correlation with Social Re-gard (r=0.816, p=0.007).
The study concludes that while the mechanical implementation is consistent, a perception gap exists regarding the social atmosphere of learning. The results emphasize that professional maturity and academic advancement are critical drivers for teachers, while gender-sensitive dynamics play a vital role in student engagement. These findings serve as the empirical basis for a targeted intervention program to enhance pedagogical and technical instruction in the TLE framework.
Keywords
Cooperative Learning, Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). Social Interdependence, Social Regard for Learning, Philippine Secondary Schools, Grade 9 Learners
Downloads
References
1. Armayan, J. (2022). Technical skills performance of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) students in the Tandag City Division [Unpublished research report]. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cole, A., (2020). Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: The effect of free riders on team performance and the relationship between course performance and peer evaluation, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1):45 – 56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Corbin, K. (2018). Learning to teach cooperative learning as inquiry in the rough and table of practice. Journal of Research in Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving communication between researchers and practitioners through a common reform-based model of professional development. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Interaction Book Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Johnson, D., & Johnson, T. (2021). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/625.342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Maligalig, D. S., Albert, J. R. G., & Martinez, A., Jr. (2020). Gender and the labor market in the Philippines. Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/WPS200311-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Meza, B. P. L., Simões, L., Ryan, G., Saunders, M., Turley, K., & Dudovitz, R. N. (2025). Adolescent perspectives on the effect of cooperative classroom learning on social networks and health. PLoS One, 20(7), e0328437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. National Competency Based-Teacher Standard as perceived by the senior high school students of state universities colleges. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 11(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. National Institutes of Health. (2023). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://obssr.od.nih.gov/training/mixed-methods-research-training [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ocampo, A. (2018). Cooperative Learning Approach to Teaching and Learning. National Institute of Education Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pieget, J. and Vygotsky, Lev. (2017).’Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky’s Theories on Cognitive Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/education/jean-piaget-and-levvygotskys-theories-on-cognitiveeducation-essay.php [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rafoth, J. (2018). “An Analysis on the Application of Selected Theories in the Teaching of Grade 9- TLE: An Exploratory Study”, Master’s Thesis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting Early Adolescents' Achievement and Peer Relationships: The Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Sears & Hersh (2020). The effects of cooperative learning on students' achievement and attitude. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 272-- 275. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary and secondary schools. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 881–884). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92013-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Schmoker, A. (2018). Adapting teaching styles to accommodate learning preferences for effective development. Progress in Transplantation, 18(4), 297-300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Slee, R. (2019). Inclusive education: Uniqueness as an opportunity to enhance learning. (Cited in ). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Smith, K. A. (2020). Cooperative learning: Effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. (5th ed.). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Theoretical Perspectives on Cooperative Learning (2018). Examining the curriculum approaches and assessment framework of the Australian Curriculum: Science. Volume 33 Number 1, 2020; Pages 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Tullao, R. (2018). Teachers Perceptions Toward Subject Specialization by Primary School Teachers. University of Visayas [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Verdeflor, V. (2025). Cooperative learning practices in Technology and Livelihood Education among public high school teachers. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Wentzel, K. R. (2017). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic capacity at school. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 420–439). The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study