Grandparents As Language Socialisation Agents: Intergenerational Caregiving, Family Language Policy, and Heritage Language Maintenance in Chinese Multilingual Families

Authors

Zhang Ting

Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) (Malaysia)

Md Nasir Bin Masran

Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600316

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 4539-4549

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-21

Accepted: 2026-05-26

Published: 2026-06-23

Abstract

This paper examines how grandparents function as language socialisation agents in Chinese multilingual families, with particular attention to intergenerational caregiving, family language policy, and heritage language maintenance. Recent family language policy research has increasingly questioned parent-centred models of language transmission and has called for more attention to extended kinship, everyday caregiving, emotional relations, and multilingual family ecologies (Bose et al., 2023; Chen & Cao, 2025). Drawing on a systematic-style review of studies published from 2022 onward, this article synthesises recent scholarship on Chinese multilingual families, heritage language maintenance, fangyan transmission, minority language maintenance, and intergenerational family communication. The review suggests that grandparents are not merely passive carriers of ancestral languages; rather, they often become practical language planners through daily routines such as feeding, storytelling, homework supervision, festival practices, and digital communication with children (Fang & Yao, 2025; Gong et al., 2025). The paper proposes a qualitative multiple-case methodology for future empirical research, combining semi-structured interviews, family language diaries, home language mapping, and naturally occurring interactional recordings. It argues that intergenerational caregiving should be conceptualised as an interactional site where family language policy is enacted, negotiated, and emotionally evaluated. The article contributes to family language policy and language socialisation research by reframing grandparents as active agents whose caregiving practices mediate children’s access to Mandarin, fangyan, minority languages, English, and Chinese heritage languages (King, 2023; Tse Crepaldi & Mirvahedi, 2024).

Keywords

Grandparents; language socialisation; family language policy; heritage language maintenance; Chinese multilingual families; intergenerational caregiving

Downloads

References

1. Bose, P., Gao, X., Starfield, S., Sun, S., & Ramdani, J. M. (2023). Conceptualisation of family and language practice in family language policy research on migrants: A systematic review. Language Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-023-09661-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cai, Y., & Fang, F. (2026). “Fangyan is a necessity of my child’s life”: Navigating language ideologies and family language planning in urban Chinese families. Language Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-026-09772-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, M., & Cao, X. (2025). The roles of decision-makers in family language policy process: A systematic review of research since 2013. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fang, F., & Yao, X. (2025). Intergenerational transmission and multilingual dynamics: Exploring language policies in Chaoshan families through a contextual lens. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2024.2410517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fatima, S., & Nadeem, M. U. (2025). Family language policy and heritage language transmission in Pakistan—the intersection of family dynamics, ethnic identity and cultural practices on language maintenance. Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560755/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gong, Z., Pan, L., & Liu, Y. (2025). Negotiating harmony in a bilingual family: A case study of language practice in a Chinese multigenerational household. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2502543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gorter, M., & Berardi-Wiltshire, A. (2026). Heritage language maintenance and family relationship dynamics: A children’s perspective. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241311547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hollebeke, I., Dekeyser, G. N. M., Caira, T., Agirdag, O., & Struys, E. (2023). Cherishing the heritage language: Predictors of parental heritage language maintenance efforts. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221132630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. King, K. A. (2023). Family language policy. In The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003082637-6/family-language-policy-kendall-king [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lam, S. F., Vong, K. I. P., & Wei, B. (2026). The malaise of preserving a minority language in multilingual homes in southwest China: A family language policy perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2451042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lubis, I. S. (2024). Loving your grandparents: Family relationship in shaping language policy. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386248077_Loving_Your_Grandparents_Family_Relationship_in_Shaping_Language_Policy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nie, P., & Wang, S. (2025). Homescape, parental agency and family language policy: How Yi parents utilize semiotic resources to facilitate language maintenance. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2025.2487290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Qin, P., & Zou, Y. (2025). A systematic review of Chinese heritage language learning in Europe: Trends, challenges and potentials. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041251387009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Romanowski, P. (2026). Heritage language revival: Digital media’s role in grandparent-grandchild interactions. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2026.2614753 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tse Crepaldi, Y., & Mirvahedi, S. H. (2024). Language ideologies and practices in flux: The case of an Italian-Chinese transnational family. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2024.2355019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wang, Y. (2023). Speaking Chinese or no breakfast: Emotional challenges and experiences confronting Chinese immigrant families in heritage language maintenance. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221126043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, Z., & Liu, C. (2025). A survey of family language planning in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture in the context of new language education policies. Languages, 10(12), 303. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/12/303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yang, L., & Shang, G. (2026). Plurilingual family language policy of internal immigrant families in Suzhou, China: Capital, identity and agency. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2025.2542481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles