Transcultural Reception of Dubbed Television Narratives: A Thematic Analysis of How Sinhala-Dubbed Foreign Dramas Mediate Cultural Meaning and Relationship Ideologies in Sri Lanka

Sinhala-dubbed foreign TV dramas remain super popular in Sri Lanka. Since Rupavahini first aired the hit Japanese show Oshin in 1989, such shows kept drawing big crowds. Even reruns drew viewers for decades. They launched a wave of similar content too. For instance, Korean hits like Sujatha Diyani and Boys Over Flowers followed. These shows now define Sri Lankan media culture. So they play a huge role in what folks watch. Despite its widespread viewership, there's a critical lack of empirical research on how Sri Lankan audiences take in, interpret, and behave after watching these programs especially regarding their cultural lifestyles, romantic ideals, and identities. This study steps in to fill that gap. It explores three main questions. The first one is: How do Sinhala-dubbed Korean dramas influence Sri Lankans to adopt certain styles, like haircuts, accessories, clothes, cooking methods, and food likes. Second, do Sinhala-dubbed Korean rom-coms influence what Sri Lankan viewers want in love and art. And third, does watching foreign dramas from Oshin to today's Korean shows help Sri Lankans form and discuss their cultural identity. For this, they used a qualitative research design based on a constructivist view of knowledge. We did small group interviews with 15 people, split into three focus groups. Each had five folks. For analysis, we used Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic method from 2006. This study is guided by two theories: Hall's Encoding/Decoding Theory from 1973 and 1997, and Straubhaar's Cultural Proximity Theory from 2007. This research builds on Hall's encoding/decoding framework and Straubhaar's cultural proximity theory in a South Asian, multilingual, postcolonial setting. It shows that Oshin’s multigenerational impact provides the historical base needed to fully grasp how Korean dramas are now received in Sri Lanka.

Audience reception, cultural lifestyle adoption, Sinhala dubbing, Sri Lanka, television drama

1. Abayasekara, A. (2018). Building a more English-literate Sri Lanka: The need to combat inequities. Talking Economics. https://www.ips.lk/talkingeconomics/2018/04/23/building-a-more-english-literate-sri-lanka-the-need-to-combat-inequities/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akter, S. (2019). Emergence of the Korean Wave and its influence on Bangladesh (Master's thesis). Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cheng, E. S.-K. (2023). Politicized foodscape and cultural sustainability. Food, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2230273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Daily News Sri Lanka. (2017, February 6). Still the "little Oshin". Daily News. https://archives1.dailynews.lk/2017/02/06/features/106729/still-little-oshin [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fernando, A. (2018). Soft power of Korean popular culture in Sri Lanka. International Conference on Social Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fu, G. J., & Wang, H. (2025). Mapping transnational flow of C-dramas through cultural assemblages. Media, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364251349860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 1(3-4), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. University of Birmingham Centre for Cultural Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222-237). Lawrence & Wishart. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. JAMCO [Japan Media Communication Center]. (2016). The current situation of Sri Lanka TV media and the challenges ahead. 24th JAMCO Online International Symposium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2018). Spreadable Media. NYU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jin, D. Y. (2016). New Korean Wave: Transnational cultural power in the age of social media. University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jin, D. Y. (2020). Transnational Korean media and cultural globalization. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jinasena, S. (2014). Korean soap operas and Sri Lankan audiences. Sport and Art, 2(5), 85-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Karunarathna, B. (2015). Translating culture-specific references in dubbing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 19-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kim, Y. (2013). The Korean Wave. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kraidy, M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kraidy, M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lobato, R. (2019). Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution. NYU Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Luyken, G.-M., Herbst, T., Langham-Brown, J., Reid, H., & Spinhof, H. (1991). Overcoming language [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. barriers in television. European Institute for the Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Morley, D. (1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. Comedia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rupavahini Corporation of Sri Lanka. (2023). About us. https://tv.rupavahini.lk/about-us/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ryoo, W. (2009). Globalization and the Korean Wave. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980902826427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schlesinger, P. (2007). Media and modern society. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Straubhaar, J. D. (2007). World television: From global to local. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yecies, B., & Shim, A. (2021). The changing dynamics of Hallyu in the global streaming era. International Journal of Communication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests