Needs Analysis of AI-Assisted Graphic Notation Design in Kindergarten Music Activities: A Preliminary Study from Teachers’ Perspectives

With the rapid development of educational digitalization and generative artificial intelligence technologies, AI-assisted teaching has gradually entered different educational contexts, including early childhood education. In kindergarten music activities, graphic notation, as a visual representation tool of rhythm, melody, and musical structure, has been increasingly valued because it fits the concrete and image-based thinking characteristics of young children. Compared with traditional notation systems, graphic notation can help children understand abstract musical concepts more intuitively, improve participation in music activities, and enhance musical perception and expression. However, in actual teaching practice, many kindergarten teachers still encounter difficulties in designing and applying graphic notation, including insufficient design experience, lack of suitable teaching resources, time-consuming production processes, and limited digital design abilities.
Against this background, this study focuses on kindergarten teachers’ needs for AI-assisted graphic notation design in music activities. As a preliminary investigation conducted during the early stage of a larger doctoral research project on AI-supported graphic notation teaching, the study aims to explore teachers’ current use of graphic notation, their attitudes toward AI-assisted design, and their expectations regarding AI-related functions in kindergarten music education. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 126 kindergarten teachers from eastern and central regions of China, and descriptive statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 26.0.
The findings indicate that kindergarten teachers generally hold positive attitudes toward AI-assisted graphic notation design. Teachers believe that AI technology may help reduce preparation time, lower the difficulty of graphic notation production, and provide richer teaching resources for music activities. The most expected functions include automatic generation of graphic notation based on music input, intelligent matching of child-friendly visual symbols, generation of supporting music activity plans, and one-click production of PPT or courseware materials. At the same time, teachers also expressed concerns regarding the child suitability, educational appropriateness, and editability of AI-generated content.
This study provides preliminary empirical support for the future development of AI-assisted graphic notation teaching models in kindergarten music education. It also enriches research on the integration of artificial intelligence, multimodal teaching, and early childhood music education under the background of educational digital transformation.

artificial intelligence; graphic notation; kindergarten music activities

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bautista, A., & Ho, Y. (2021). Music teaching and learning in early childhood education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bresler, L. (1995). The subservient, co-equal, affective, and social integration styles and their implications for the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(5), 31–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, J. (2020). Research on the application of graphic notation in music teaching for young children (Master’s thesis). Southwest University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hallam, S. (2010). The power of music in education. International Journal of Music Education, 28(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761410370658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, J. (2017). A practical study of graphic notation in primary school music classrooms (Master’s thesis). Jiangsu Normal University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Partti, H., & Westerlund, H. (2013). Envisioning collaborative composing in music education. Music Education Research, 15(2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2012.685463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Savage, J. (2007). Reconstructing music education through ICT. Research in Education, 78(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.78.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wigram, T. (2002). Indications in the assessment of qualitative categories in improvisation. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 11(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098130209478057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wu, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and early childhood education: Opportunities and challenges in digital teaching environments. Journal of Educational Technology Development, 12(4), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, M., & Seah, S. P. (2023). Multimodal representation and graphic notation in children’s music learning. International Journal of Music Education, 41(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). Guide to Learning and Development for Children Aged 3–6. Beijing: Capital Normal University Press.Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Arts Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education (2022 Edition). Beijing: People’s Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study