Immersive Learning for Integrity and Anti-Corruption Education in Higher Education: Conceptual Foundations and Best Practices from the UQU10903 Integrity and Anti-Corruption Course in UTHM
Authors
Department of Social Sciences, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Sciences, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600812
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 11646-11659
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
Integrity and anti-corruption education in higher education requires learning designs that move beyond legal literacy and moral instruction towards applied ethical judgment, civic agency and behavioural preparedness. In Malaysia, the National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2024-2028 identifies education as a central strategy and calls for strengthening integrity and anti-corruption courses in higher learning institutions. This article refines a conceptual best-practice manuscript on UQU10903 Integrity and Anti-Corruption at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) by responding to the need for stronger applicability, clearer transferability and a more explicit empirical validation pathway. The objective is to propose a Purposeful Blended-Immersive Integrity Learning (PBIL) model that integrates flipped digital preparation, scenario-based role-play, gamified branching decisions, practitioner engagement, institutional exposure, structured reflection and evidence-informed course improvement. Methodologically, the article adopts a design-informed practice analysis by synthesising recent peer-reviewed literature on immersive, blended, flipped and gamified learning with policy and practice sources from MACC, UNODC, OECD and Malaysian institutional examples. The article identifies a research gap: while integrity education is increasingly institutionalised, limited work explains how immersive and blended strategies can be coherently aligned with anti-corruption learning outcomes and empirically tested in Malaysian higher education. To address this limitation, the revised framework includes a pilot evaluation roadmap using mixed methods, pre-post measures, scenario-based ethical reasoning tasks, reflective journals, focus groups and possible comparison with lecture-based delivery. The article concludes that UQU10903 can serve as a transferable pedagogical model for institutions seeking to strengthen integrity education through low-cost, reflective, evidence-informed and empirically testable immersive learning.
Keywords
Immersive learning, blended learning, integrity education, anti-corruption education, higher education
Downloads
References
1. Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Government of Malaysia. (2019). National Anti-Corruption Plan 2019-2023. Prime Minister's Department. https://www.pmo.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/National-Anti-Corruption-Plan-2019-2023_.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Government of Malaysia. (2024). National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2024-2028. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. https://www.sprm.gov.my/admin/uploads_publication/strategi-pembanterasan-rasuah-nasional-2024-2028--en-08052024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kapur, M., Hattie, J., Grossman, I., & Sinha, T. (2022). Fail, flip, fix, and feed: Rethinking flipped learning: A review of meta-analyses and a subsequent meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, 956416. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.956416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lai, A. (2023, December 9). Integrity and anti-corruption course compulsory for students in higher learning institutions. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/12/09/integrity-and-anti-corruption-course-compulsory-for-students-in-higher-learning-institutions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Makransky, G., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Benefits of taking a virtual field trip in immersive virtual reality: Evidence for the immersion principle in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1771-1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09675-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2023). The Theory of Immersive Collaborative Learning (TICOL). Educational Psychology Review, 35, 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09822-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. (2026a). Angkatan Mahasiswa Anti Rasuah (AMAR). https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php?articleid=693&id=21&page_id=134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. (2026b). Pendidikan Antirasuah. https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php?articleid=692&id=21&page_id=75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mystakidis, S., & Lympouridis, V. (2023). Immersive learning. Encyclopedia, 3(2), 396-405. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3020026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nicaise, G., & Tufft, R. (2023, November 23). Anti-corruption games: Learning how to face corruption challenges. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. https://www.u4.no/blog/anti-corruption-games-learning-how-to-face-corruption-challenges [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. OECD. (2020). OECD public integrity handbook. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Petersen, G. B., Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Raffles University. (2025, March 12). Standing against corruption: Empowering students through integrity education. https://raffles-university.edu.my/anti-corruption-empowering-students-to-stand-for-integrity/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019a). Education for Justice University Module Series: Anti-Corruption Module 1: What is corruption and why should we care? Introduction and learning outcomes. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-1/introduction-learning-outcomes.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019b). Anti-Corruption Module 1: Possible class structure. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-1/class-structure.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019c). Anti-Corruption Module 1: Student assessment. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-1/student-assessment.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah News. (2023, January 20). Reinforcing experience of 18 students in Integrity and Anti-Corruption Course (KIAR) through visit to MACC Pahang. https://news.umpsa.edu.my/student/reinforcing-experience-18-students-integrity-and-anti-corruption-course-kiar-through-visit [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study