Effect of a Comprehensive Learning Environment on Pupils’ Learning Outcomes in Public Primary Schools in Kakamega County, Kenya

Authors

Murunga Caroleen Saya

Masinde Muliro University, Department of Education, P.O. Box P.O Box 190 - 50100, Kakamega (Kenya)

Achoka Judith

Masinde Muliro University, Department of Education, P.O. Box P.O Box 190 - 50100, Kakamega (Kenya)

Nganyi Jason

Masinde Muliro University, Department of Education, P.O. Box P.O Box 190 - 50100, Kakamega (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0603

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 8055-8067

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-16

Accepted: 2025-09-21

Published: 2025-11-06

Abstract

The Teachers Service Commission (TSC) in Kenya launched the Performance Contract (PC) policy to improve teacher performance in the year 2012. The goal of PC was to enhance the quality of education offered to learners through strengthening supervision and continuously monitoring teacher performance at the institutional level. Teacher PC is monitored through regular teacher appraisals of their effectiveness, guided by predetermined PC set targets from the Teacher Professional and Development (TPAD) tool. Despite PC having been in place over last twelve years, its effect on pupil learning outcomes in Kakamega County Public primary schools is still not clear. The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of teacher achievement in the comprehensive learning environment PC target on pupils’ learning outcomes in public primary schools in Kakamega County in Kenya. The three learning outcomes examined were academic achievement, pupil retention and pupil completion rates. The comprehensive learning environment aims to create Child or Learner Friendly Environments. A Correlation research design with a mixed methods approach was used in the study. Eighty-two (82) schools were selected from 13 Sub Counties of Kakamega County using a multistage random sampling. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data on target achievement and learning outcomes from Head teachers and teachers in the selected schools for the period 2018 to 2023. Five Key informants involved in PC appraisals (2 Curriculum Support Officers, 2 Sub County TSC Directors and the County TSC Director) were purposefully selected and interviewed. The quantitative data collected was analyzed using Pearsons’s correlation and Multiple linear regression. The qualitative data was analyzed thematically. The associations between comprehensive learning target achievement and pupil learning outcomes were KCPE performance (r=.0.295; P= 0. 0.540); retention rates (r= 0. 630; p=0.180) and completion rates (r=0.326; p=0. 528). These associations were weak and statistically insignificant across all the learning outcomes examined. The results for the linear regression were also statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The Key informants revealed that the process of PC appraisal was not taken seriously and had been seen as a routine procedure by teachers. The main hurdle in achieving the Comprehensive Learning Environment in schools was limited resources. The study concluded that Teachers’ achievement in the Comprehensive Learning Environment target had no effect on learning outcomes of pupils in public primary schools in Kakamega County. The study recommends that the government should provide adequate resources for effective implementation of the Comprehensive Learning Environment in Public primary schools. There is need for further research to explore the effect of teacher achievement in Comprehensive Learning Environment on other learning outcomes such as communication skills, creativity, problem-solving and critical thinking skills.

Keywords

Target achievement, comprehensive learning Environment, Performance contracts, Learning Outcomes

Downloads

References

1. Amadi, U. V., & Nwogu, U. J. (2023). The impact of funding on educational development in Nigeria. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 31(3), 61-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boruett, H. C., Ronoh, A., Kisirikoi, F., & Dimba, M. (2021). Employees’ Attitude and Implementation of Performance Appraisal System in the Ministry of Education in Nairobi City County, Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education. Management in Education, 35(1), 10-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chirchir, K. M., & Letangule, S. (2021). The Influence of Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development Implementation on the Secondary Students’ Examination Scores in Public Schools in Kenya. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(6), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.6.199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cobanoglu, F., & Sevim, S. (2019). Child-friendly schools: An assessment of kindergartens. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 637-650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L., Wechsler, M. E., Levin, S., & Tozer, S. (2022). Developing Effective Principals: What Kind of Learning Matters?. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Duoblienė, L., Kaire, S., & Vaitekaitis, J. (2023). Education for the future: applying concepts from the new materialist discourse to UNESCO and OECD publications. The Journal of Environmental Education, 54(3), 213-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of Kenya- GOK. (2012). Kenya Education Sector Support Programme (KESSP) Evaluation Report 2005–2010. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Government of Kenya- GOK, (2012). Kenya: Facts and figures 2012. Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hallinger P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hood, C. (2012). Public management by numbers as a performance‐enhancing drug: two Hypotheses. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S85-S92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kagema, J., and Irungu, C. (2018). An analysis of teacher performance appraisals and their influence on teacher performance in secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 93-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kamoet, P. E., and Mbirithi, D.M. (2024). Effect of classroom environment on the academic achievement of secondary school students in Mombasa County, Kenya. International academic journal of social sciences and education, 2(3), 345-363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nthenge, M. (2017). The Basic Education Act of 2013 as a tool for advancing early childhood development and education for children with disabilities in Kenya. African Disability Rts. YB, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nyongesa, W. J., & van der Westhuizen, J. (2023). The effect of performance contracting on public service delivery of employees in Huduma Centres in Western Kenya. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Odhiambo, K. O., Murira, F. N., & Ogeno, J. O. (2023). Effect of Recognition and Appreciation on Primary School Teachers’ Job Performance in Kisumu County, Kenya. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(7), 5-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Okech, T. C. (2017). Impact of performance contracting on efficiency in service delivery in the public sector. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 198-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Qvortrup A. & Lykkegaard E. (2022). Study environment factors associated with retention in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 7:1, 37-64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher burnout: relations between dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. A longitudinal study. Teachers and Teaching, 26(7-8), 602-616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Teachers Service Commission - TSC (2017). A Report on the Implementation of the PC/TPAD, by CSOs & CDs KTIC/TPAD/V.1/6(62) TSC (2017), Strengthening of PC & TPAD at Institutional Level, Circular No.14/ADM/192A/Vol.IX TSC Annual Report (2015-2016) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Teachers Service Commission - TSC (2017). A Report on the Implementation of the PC/TPAD, by CSOs & CDs KTIC/TPAD/V.1/6(62) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Teachers Service Commission - TSC (2017). Strengthening of PC & TPAD at Institutional Level, Circular No.14/ADM/192A/Vol. IX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Teachers Service Commission - TSC Unit, Kakamega county (2019). KCPE performance by Kakamega primary schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Teachers Service Commission - TSC Unit, Kakamega county (2019). The distribution of Schools in Kakamega Sub-Counties. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Teachers Service Commission - TSC. (2017). Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development (TPAD) Manual. Teachers Service Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wanjiku, S. W., Ndichu, F. M., & Andafu, E. M. (2024). A Critique of the Teachers’ Performance Appraisal and Development Tool of Evaluation in Kenya with Reference to the Socratic Pedagogy. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(3), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.3.846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Xiao, E., Sun, M., Lv, K., Zhu, X., & Jia, W. (2023). Development and validation of child-friendly school environment questionnaire from Chinese culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1288085. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles