The Impact of Assessment for Learning on Student Interest and Participation in Senior High School Mathematics: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Akwamuman Senior High School.

Mathematics education in Ghana frequently faces challenges related to student engagement. This study examined the effect of Assessment for Learning (AfL) strategies on students' interest and participation in mathematics. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 100 Form Two Visual Arts students from a Ghanaian senior high school, assigned to experimental (n=50) and control (n=50) groups. Over an eight-week intervention, the experimental group received instruction integrated with AfL strategies like formative feedback and peer assessment, while the control group received conventional teaching. Data from post-intervention questionnaires revealed that the experimental group reported significantly higher interest (M=3.52 vs. M=2.61, p<.001, d=2.62) and participation (M=3.55 vs. M=2.54, p<.001, d=3.00) than the control group. The exceptionally large effect sizes demonstrate that AfL can profoundly enhance affective engagement, challenging assumptions about its feasibility in resource-constrained contexts. The study provides compelling evidence for integrating AfL into teacher training and mathematics pedagogy in Ghana and similar environments.

Assessment for Learning, Mathematics Education, Student Interest, Student Participation, Quasi-Experimental.

1. Adamu, M. (2020). The challenge of teaching mathematics in Ghana: Linking classroom practices to learners’ experiences. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 45–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrade, H. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4(87), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrade, H., & Beekman, J. (2023). Student perceptions of assessment in learning: A review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2062789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asare, E., & Afriyie, E. (2023). Barriers to basic school teachers’ implementation of formative assessment in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Open Education Studies, 5(1), 20220193. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning – An effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 65–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, G. T. L. (2019). Is assessment for learning really assessment? Frontiers in Education, 4, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive statistics for researchers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Devi, U. (2019). Constructivist teaching in mathematics: An approach to enhance student learning. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(3), 85–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ferguson, R. (2019). Feedback in mathematics classrooms: Strategies to promote engagement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0248-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Finegold, D., & Notabartolo, A. S. (2010). 21st-century competencies and their impact: An interdisciplinary literature review. Research in Higher Education Journal, 1(5), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Frommelt, S., Lazarides, R., & Rubach, C. (2021). Students’ interest in mathematics: Relations to perceived teacher support and motivational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 637737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Grigg, R. (2021). Teaching creative and critical thinking in schools. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., Hart, L., & Goodwin, M. (2020). The role of feedback in mathematics learning. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1728528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: A catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Heritage, M., & Wylie, E. C. (2018). Reaping the benefits of assessment for learning: Achievement, identity, and equity. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 50(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0944-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hermansen, M., Tveit, S., & Berg, A. (2014). Teachers’ use of assessment for learning: Exploring relationships to student motivation and achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.821088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J.-W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. L. (2018). Teacher AfL perceptions and feedback practices in mathematics education among secondary schools in Tanzania. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H., & Dicke, A. L. (2020). Dynamics of classroom motivation: The role of student perceptions and teacher practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ng, C., Leung, F. K. S., & Chan, K. K. (2020). Assessment for learning and student participation: A case study in Hong Kong mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09960-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rahman, M. A., Abdullah, N., & Osman, K. (2021). The role of formative assessment in promoting student learning in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(2), em0629. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Randel, B., Beesley, A. D., Apthorp, H., Clark, T., Wang, X., Cicchinelli, L. F., & Williams, J. M. (2016). Classroom assessment for student learning: The impact on student achievement. REL Technical Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shute, V. J., Rahimi, S., & Lu, X. (2019). The power of feedback in mathematics learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1571630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer assessment effects on the self-assessment process of first-year undergraduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wellberg, R., & Evans, M. (2022). Peer assessment and mathematics participation: A review of classroom practices. Mathematics Education Review, 34(1), 56–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wiliam, D. (2017). Assessment and learning: The balance between assessment of learning and assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1288702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., … Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study