The Political Economy of Electric Vehicle Adoption: Policy Stability, Pricing Dynamics, and Infrastructure Variables

Authors

Farizah Mamat @ Mohd Nor

Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan Johor, Jalan Universiti Off KM 12, 85000 Segamat, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Zurina Omar

Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan Johor, Jalan Universiti Off KM 12, 85000 Segamat, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600893

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 12685-12693

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-19

Accepted: 2026-06-24

Published: 2026-07-08

Abstract

This paper examines the interplay between government interventions—primarily fiscal policies such as tax incentives and purchase subsidies—and how the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and strategic pricing policies are utilized to accelerate consumer uptake of electric vehicles (EVs). Adopting a global perspective on the automotive manufacturing industry, this study addresses the primary challenges facing mass-level EV adoption, focusing on the substantial upfront retail pricing premium compared to conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs). By synthesizing international empirical data and TCO frameworks, the paper analyses the structural efficacy of financial interventions in closing this price gap, alongside their direct effects on manufacturer pricing behaviours and consumer purchasing decisions. The literature review confirms that while EVs offer lower lifetime operating and maintenance costs, the high upfront manufacturing cost of batteries remains a primary economic hurdle. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the market efficacy of these fiscal measures is frequently compromised by economic "pass-through" effects, where automotive vendors absorb public subsidies rather than transferring full savings to consumers. The study also demonstrates that long-term policy stability and duration predictability outweigh the absolute monetary volume of short-term incentives, as abrupt policy reversals can severely stall market growth. Additionally, the findings suggest that consumer confidence in EV technology and awareness of long-term cost savings play an important role in shaping purchasing decisions. Crucially, the long-term effectiveness of these pricing architectures relies heavily on critical complementary assets, namely public charging infrastructure availability, and regional energy variables such as domestic fuel subsidies and electricity tariffs.

Keywords

Electric Vehicle (EV) Adoption, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), Fiscal Policy and Subsidies

Downloads

References

1. Abas, N., Kalair, A. R., & Khan, N. (2019). Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies. Futures, 112, 102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel, K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 125, 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2020.106316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: Benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Applied Sciences, 13(10), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2021). Geopolitical risk, oil prices, and clean energy stock returns. Energy Economics, 99, 105341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayodele, B. V., & Mustapa, S. I. (2020). Life cycle cost assessment of electric vehicles: A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(6), 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bernal, D., Raheem, A. A., Inti, S., & Wang, H. (2024). Assessment of economic viability of direct current fast charging infrastructure investments for electric vehicles in the united states. Sustainability, 16(15), 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. BloombergNEF. (2023). Zero-emission vehicles factbook. Bloomberg Professional Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. BloombergNEF. (2026). Electric vehicle outlook 2026: Global EV sales and battery cost trajectories. BNEF Advanced Energy Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Broadbent, G., Metternicht, G., & Drozdzak, L. (2022). Accelerating electric vehicle uptake: Modelling public policy options on prices and infrastructure. Vehicles, 4(3), 694-711. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles4030039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Environmental Science & Technology. (2024). Subsidies, standards, or both? Trade-offs among policies for 100% zero-emissions vehicle sales. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(14), 6112–6122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c11772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2025). Global EV outlook 2025: Transport electrification and the total cost of ownership. IEA Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2026). Global EV outlook 2026: Trends in global electric car affordability and policy rollbacks. IEA Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. J. (2017). Heterogeneous hazard model of PEV users' charging intervals: Analysis of four year charging transactions data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 82, 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.06.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liao, Y. P., Luo, B., & Spiller, E. (2025). A tale of two investments: Charging stations and purchase subsidies for EV adoption. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 187, 104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Luo, Z. (2022). Powering up a slow charging market: How do government subsidies affect charging station supply? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4254128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Levay, P. Z., Drossinos, Y., & Thiel, C. (2017). The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mansor, S. M. F. S., & Anuar, H. S. (2025). Price perception, charging infrastructure and environmental consciousness that influence adoption of electric vehicle (EV): Malaysia perspectives. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, 20(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mustapa, S. I., Ayodele, B. V., Mohamad Ishak, W. W., & Ayodele, F. O. (2020). Evaluation of cost competitiveness of electric vehicles in Malaysia using life cycle cost analysis approach. Sustainability, 12(13), 5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pg Abas, A. E. (2019). Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact of electric vehicles in Brunei Darussalam. IEEE Access, 7, 104200-104212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ramachandaran, R., Jaganathan, M., Mohammad, J., & Sreenivasan, J. (2023). Price, maintenance cost, infrastructure readiness, and attitude: An integrated model of electric vehicle (EV) purchase intention. Sustainability, 15(21), 15421. (Note: This is a highly relevant study tracking consumer barriers in the Malaysian context). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Santos, G., & Davies, H. (2020). Incentives for quick public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Sustainability, 12(7), 2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Van Dijk, J., Delacrétaz, N., & Lanz, B. (2022). Technology adoption and early network infrastructure provision in the market for electric vehicles. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(3), 631–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00703-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Whitehead, J., Jordon, T., & Stockholm, E. (2019). Price premiums and subsidy leakage in low-emission vehicle retail markets. Journal of Environmental Economics, 44(2), 112–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Xing, J., Leard, B., & Li, S. (2021). What does an electric vehicle subsidy do? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Xue, C., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2021). The impact of dynamic fiscal subsidies on the market share of alternative powertrain technologies across 20 global nations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles