The Influence of Social Support in Online Learning Motivation
Authors
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Azyan Zafyrah Binti Mohd Zahid
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Nadia Zalikha Binti Saifullizam
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600930
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 13251-13263
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-18
Accepted: 2026-06-24
Published: 2026-07-09
Abstract
The increasing use of online learning in higher education has highlighted the importance of understanding factors that influence learners’ motivation. This study examines the role of social support in shaping learners’ motivation, with a specific focus on expectancy and value. A quantitative survey was conducted using a structured instrument, involving 119 undergraduate students. Data were analysed using descriptive and correlational techniques. The results show that learners experience strong social support and demonstrate positive levels of expectancy and value, although confidence is slightly lower when dealing with more complex tasks. Significant positive relationships were found between social support and both expectancy and value, indicating that a supportive learning environment enhances learners’ confidence and their perception of learning importance. These findings highlight the importance of integrating social and cognitive factors in designing more engaging online learning environments.
Keywords
online learning, motivation, social support, expectancy, value
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Midgley, C. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2020.101859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2020). Students' motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83, 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fowler,S. (2018) The Motivation to learn Online Questionnaire. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation. Graduate Faculty, The University of Georgia. Retrieved from https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gaspard, H., Wille, E., Wormington, S. V., & Hulleman, C. S. (2025). Reciprocal associations between confidence in getting social support and academic expectancies and subjective task values: Stronger for first-generation and transfer students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12751 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implications. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902857713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3-4), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/PIQ.20001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Huang, S. (2023). Examining the relationship between peer support and foreign language emotions in online learning: The mediating effect of self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1148472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Huang, H.-M., Soman, U., Tangmanee, K., & Wu, I.-L. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3007–3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10386-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jenal, R., Rahmat, N. H., Akhir, N. M., & Hamzah, M. I. (2025). Keeping students motivated in online learning: An exploration of value, expectancy, and social support. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.907000103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2022). Motivation for MOOC learning persistence: An expectancy–value theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 958945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Li, S., Zheng, J., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023). A systematic literature review of social learning theory in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09827-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lin, M.-H. (2021). Exploring the differences in Taiwanese university students' online learning task value, goal orientation, and self-efficacy before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40299-021-00553-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mbati, L. (2013). Online social media applications for constructivism and observational learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V14I5.1579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rahmat,N.H (2025). A Comparison of Online Engagement for Undergraduates. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), IX(VI), 3260-3270. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Restiano, D. M. (2015). A correlation analysis of faculty interaction with undergraduate students in online courses and student course completion rates [Doctoral dissertation]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Sokman, Y., Kilic, E., & Saglam, M. (2022). Exploring online environment: The case for social cognitive theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 12(9), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i9/14761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Solhi, M. (2023). Do L2 teacher support and peer support predict L2 speaking motivation in online classes? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00767-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1205838. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Tahir, M. H. M., Rahmat, N. H., Jenal, R., & Akhir, N. M. (2025). Exploring the relationship between social support and motivational components in online learning: A study of undergraduate polymer chemistry students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.909000124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Vo, M. H., Nguyen, H. K. T., & Nguyen, H. C. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. Australian Educational Researcher, 51(3), 689-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1999.1015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024). The relationship between college students' learning engagement and academic self-efficacy: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Yong, C. L., & Thi, L. S. (2022). Online learning motivation during COVID-19 pandemic. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study