Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Faculty Leadership in Malaysian Higher Education Digital Transformation
Authors
Senior Lecturer cum Programme Leader, Spectrum International University College (Malaysia)
International Provost, Chartered Institute of Digital Economy (Malaysia)
Adjunct Professor, Chartered Institute of Digital Economy (Malaysia)
Research Fellow, Chartered Institute of Digital Economy (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600941
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 13384-13392
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-27
Published: 2026-07-09
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is changing teaching, learning, research, administration, evaluation, and institutional decision-making, making it a defining force in higher education. The national digital transformation strategy in Malaysia, which includes MyDIGITAL, the Malaysia Digital Economy Blueprint, the National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap, the National AI Office, and higher education digitalization plans, is directly associated with the implementation of AI in higher education. However, leadership, faculty preparedness, governance, trust, ethics, and institutional change management are more important for the successful deployment of AI in higher education than technology acquisition alone. As part of a larger digital revolution, this conceptual paper explores how Malaysian university administrators may assist professors in embracing AI. The essay suggests a faculty-centered institutional change management framework based on digital transformation literature, change management theory, responsible AI principles, and Malaysia's national policy background. The leadership vision, faculty capability development, participatory governance, ethical and responsible AI use, curriculum and assessment redesign, and ongoing evaluation are the six strategic components that make up the framework. The paper makes the case that academics shouldn't be viewed as passive AI system users. Rather, they ought to be positioned as academic leaders in AI-enabled education, co-designers, and critical evaluators. By providing institutional leaders looking to execute AI adoption in ways that are inclusive, ethical, pedagogically meaningful, and in line with Malaysia's digital future, the essay adds to the conversation around leadership in higher education.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, Malaysia digital transformation, Higher education leadership, faculty development, institutional change management
Downloads
References
1. Abusabeib, Z. A. (2025). Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Nursing Education in Saudi Arabia: Opportunities, Risks, and Readiness for Assessment Integration. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-7729091/latest [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Innovations in higher education industry–Shaping the future. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 7(4), 283–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Asghar, M. Z., Iqbal, J., Özbilen, F. M., Abedin, J., Järvenoja, H., & Widanapathirana, U. (2025). The nexus of artificial intelligence literacy collaborative knowledge practices and inclusive leadership development among higher education students in Bangladesh China Finland and Turkey. Discover Computing, 28(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09695-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023). Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements. Information and Software Technology, 159, 107197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bick, A., Blandin, A., Deming, D. J., Fuchs-Schündeln, N., & Jessen, J. (2026). Mind the Gap: AI Adoption in Europe and the US. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w34995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Burgan, M. (2006). What ever happened to the faculty?: Drift and decision in higher education. JHU Press. https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bhT2Zox9MM0C&oi= fnd&pg=PR7&dq= Faculty+are+now+at+the+core+of+institutional+change+as+a+result+of+this+transition.+Through+curriculum+design,+classroom+decisions,+assessment+techniques,+research+supervision,+student+mentorship,+and+academic+governance,+faculty+members+put+policy+into+reality.&ots=t8YmPraCli&sig=GZBJFzrq8nSzchOPNnh694L4zpY [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Challoumis, C. (2024). Impact of Technological Change on Production. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://www.academia.edu/download/120669931/ssrn_4912428.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Choiriyah, S., Ramadhan, S., Nugroho, A., & Muharom, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven learning assessment in faculties of education: An exploratory study. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 482–495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cutler, D., Wikler, E., & Basch, P. (2012). Reducing administrative costs and improving the health care system. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/7312037d-c01c-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b/download [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Da Mota, M. (2024). Toward an AI policy framework for research institutions. Artificial Intelligence. https://www.cigionline.org/documents/2520/DPH-paper-daMota.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ejjami, R. (2024). The future of learning: AI-based curriculum development. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Emon, M. M. H., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2026). Safeguarding Student Data: Privacy and Security Challenges in AI-Powered Education Tools. In Enhancing Student Support and Learning Through Conversational AI (pp. 191–228). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/safeguarding-student-data/389139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 62–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gaitantzi, A., & Kazanidis, I. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in computer science education: A systematic review with a focus on database instruction. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3960. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Gbadago, F. Y., Masud, I., Iddris, F., Koomson, S., Poku, P. K., & Zoiku, S. (2025). Ethical dilemmas in teaching and assessment in higher education: A literature synthesis towards an integrative model for policy, practice and academic integrity. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: Regressing or expanding? Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8415–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12174-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Giovanola, B., & Granata, P. (2024). Ethics for human-centered education in the age of AI. In Entrepreneurship and digital humanities (pp. 96–109). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781035331864/book-part-9781035331864-16.xml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Jamaluddin, F., Jamaluddin, A. H., Jamaluddin, F., & Jamaluddin, F. (2025). Malaysia’s AI-Driven Education Landscape: Policies, Applications, and Comparative Insights for a Digital Future (arXiv:2509.21858). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.21858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Jeon, G. (2025). Rethinking Competitiveness in the Age of AI: A Comparative Index‐Based Approach. Journal of International Development, 37(7), 1525–1542. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kassen, M. (2026). From automation to authenticity: Blockchain as a remedy to AI-enhanced social media activism. AI & SOCIETY, 41(5), 5131–5150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02867-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kerrigan, T. (2022). An exploratory study of management perceptions of the role of Kotter’s urgency in creating a future change agenda [PhD Thesis, Dublin, National College of Ireland]. https://norma.ncirl.ie/id/eprint/5368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Krishnan, S. (2025). The Role of Digital Technologies in Accelerating Malaysia’s Economic Agenda. International Journal of Academic Reserach in Economics and Management Sciences, 14(2). https://knowledgewords.com/index.php/ijarems/article/view/1548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Lu, Y. (2024). Impact of digital technologies on organizational change strategies: A review. Research Journal in Business and Economics, 2(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mena-Guacas, A. F., López-Catalán, L., Bernal-Bravo, C., & Ballesteros-Regaña, C. (2025). Educational transformation through emerging technologies: Critical review of scientific impact on learning. Education Sciences, 15(3), 368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Moussa, R. (2024). Predictive Analytics Techniques in Education by Artificial Intelligence Tools for Enhancing Academic Assessment: Systematic Review. المجلة الدولية للتعليم الإلکتروني, 13(2), 91–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Naseer, F., Shahid, S., & Bashir, M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring the Impact of AI-Powered Tools on Teaching Effectiveness, Student Engagement, and Learning Outcomes through a Systematic Qualitative Review. ASSAJ, 5(2), 689–716. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Nguyen, M. (2026). Enhancing employee engagement and knowledge collecting: Impact of anthropomorphic features in company generative AI systems. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 24(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2025.2555856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Onasanya, I. O., & Aramide, K. A. (2025). Ethical Implications of AI in Education: Harmonising Privacy, Equity, and Academic Integrity in the Age of AI. POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA, 48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Overbye-Thompson, H., & Hamilton, K. A. (2025). A diffusion of innovations measurement scale for reinvention, relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability. PLoS One, 20(10), e0334616. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Pasi, B. N., & Dhamak, P. (2026). Transforming higher education for the fourth industrial revolution: A strategic review of digital integration and institutional readiness. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Qin, S. J. (2026). AI for education: The digital transformation of a liberal arts institution–implementation at Lingnan University. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100592. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Ramli, R., Kusmaryani, W., Eppendi, J., Rianto, A., Fitriawati, F., Winarno, W., Rosmayanti, V., Pelu, H., Rosmiati, R., & Sadiq, A. I. (2025). Assessment in ELT: Principles, Practices, and Perspectives. CV Eureka Media Aksara. https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id= 5Ty7EQAAQBAJ&oi =fnd&pg=PR4&dq=Process-based,+authentic,+oral,+reflective,+applied,+and+project-based+ forms + should+be+the+norm+for+assessment.+&ots=C1S3kQ-SLn&sig=uLO3udcBdi UGonRK0yBBH1kQUY [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Romano, L. F., Khumalo, Z. T., & Benitez, S. (2024). FACULTY PERSPECTIVES ON ARTIFICIAL IN℡LIGENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY AT A REGIONAL UNIVERSITY. European Journal of Emerging Social Science and Humanities, 1(01), 66–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Sangwa, S., Mutabazi, P., & Muvunyi, J. B. (2025). AI-Enabled Framework for Program and Course Design in Higher Education. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202512.0682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Shah, P. N. (2026). Faculty Acceptance and Use of Generative AI Tools in Higher Education Teaching [PhD Thesis, University of Cincinnati]. https://search.proquest.com/openview/ 0d9fa6b9d5d1fbb2c914d314570295a9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Shapiro, S. (2025). AI Policies in Higher Education Institutions (HEIS): A Governance Framework for Ethical and Responsible Deployment. In Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Management Education (pp. 89–102). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/ edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003660286-8&type=chapterpdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Somera, F. A. R., & Petrova, K. (2024). A change management view on technology adoption in hotel organizations: A review and a conceptual framework. Businesses, 4(4), 791–811. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Tang, S. S., Beh, W. F., & Cheah, K. S. (2025). The Role of Lecturers’ AI Leadership in Enhancing Postgraduate Student Teachers’ Integration of Mobile AI Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study in Malaysian Education Faculties. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(7). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=18657923&AN=184462179&h=Q7ailUGH6wonDijG2bux8LnN1RX9UbNOV5ldsngIgvh7Ph%2B9BrBsNXTjtfSbPtqRscklHSaiiKJcysAp414Wbw%3D%3D&crl=c [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Ul Haq, F., Asim, M., Suki, N. M., Zakaria, N., & Hussain, S. (2026). AI Adoption and Educational Effectiveness in Emerging Higher Education Institutions: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy and Institutional Support. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 25(03), 2550090. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964922550090X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Ul Hassan, M., Murtaza, A., & Rashid, K. (2025). Redefining Higher Education Institutions ( HEIS ) in the Era of Globalisation and Global Crises: A Proposal for Future Sustainability. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12822. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Wajeed, M. A. (2026). Revolutionizing Higher education with generative AI: Prospects, challenges, and future directions. In Generators, bots, and tutors: Creative approaches to human-AI synergy in classroom instruction (pp. 131–160). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/revolutionizing-higher-education-with-generative-ai/383569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Yuskovych-Zhukovska, V., Poplavska, T., Diachenko, O., Mishenina, T., Topolnyk, Y., & Gurevych, R. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in education. Problems and opportunities for sustainable development. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(1Sup1), 339–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study