IJRISS Logo

The Academic Journey of Learners Experiencing Difficulty in General Mathematics: A Narrative Inquiry

Authors

Myra Mae P. Jarabe

North Eastern Mindanao State University (Philippines)

Rolly G. Salvaleon

North Eastern Mindanao State University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601083

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 15370-15396

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-22

Accepted: 2026-06-27

Published: 2026-07-11

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored the academic journey of Senior High School learners experiencing difficulty in General Mathematics. It focused on how instructional practices, classroom conditions, emotional factors, coping strategies, and support systems shaped learners’ engagement, persistence, and changing perceptions of the subject.
Methods: The study employed a qualitative narrative inquiry design. Two Senior High School learners who experienced consistent difficulty in General Mathematics were purposively selected. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, narrative or life-story interviews, and written reflections. The narratives were analyzed using thematic analysis and narrative re-storying.
Results: Findings revealed seven themes: General Mathematics as challenging yet achievable; emotional struggles and mathematics anxiety; complex mathematical concepts as learning barriers; supportive teaching practices; support systems that foster confidence; persistence and self-regulated learning; and changing perceptions from fear to confidence. The learners’ struggles were influenced by abstract concepts, fast-paced instruction, fear of mistakes, language demands, socioeconomic conditions, and cultural beliefs about mathematics.
Discussion: The study shows that difficulty in General Mathematics is not caused by lack of ability alone but by the interaction of cognitive, emotional, instructional, social, linguistic, and cultural factors. Learners developed confidence when supported through scaffolded instruction, teacher feedback, peer collaboration, family encouragement, online resources, and opportunities to connect mathematics with real-life situations.

Keywords

General Mathematics, narrative inquiry, mathematics anxiety, academic resilience

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Arcavi, A. (2022). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 42(1), 24–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Australian Council for Educational Research. (2024). Curiosity and perseverance as factors associated with student performance in PISA-related analysis. ACER/OECD PISA-related reporting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balagtas, M. U. (2021). Alignment of the Philippine mathematics teacher education curriculum with the PISA mathematics literacy framework. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 2(2), 145–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Analyzing students’ difficulties with functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1717651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boaler, J. (2022). Developing mathematical mindsets and conceptual understanding in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(2), 231–248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Catador, J. J. A., & Fernando, H. G. (2024). Assessing the numeracy gaps among junior high school students through Project PEMDAS. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, M. Y. K., Jamaludin, A., & Tan, A. L. (2023). Behavioural predictors of math anxiety. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13639 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. ClassCrafter. (2024). DepEd K–12 curriculum updates: Mathematics competencies and assessment reforms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cuarteros, K. G., & Roble, D. B. (2024). Teacher–student perceptions of senior high school mathematics textbooks: Basis for textbook development framework. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 48–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dalzell, M., & DiNapoli, J. (2021). Assessing cognitive demand in innovative and reform-based mathematics textbooks. EDULEARN21 Proceedings, 9364–9371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (2018). K to 12 Senior High School Core Curriculum – General Mathematics Curriculum Guide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Education. (2023). K to 12 Mathematics Curriculum Framework. Manila, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fiel, Y. R. M. S., Gonzales, A. M. D., Gonzales, C. T., Jeckson, B. M., Llagas, M. L., Limbaga, J. F. A., & Mandriza, A. T. P. (2025). Effect of peer mentoring on the mathematical skills of senior high school students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Flores, L. A., Cunanan, A. F. F., Serminio, R. J. E., Mercurio, S. C., & San Miguel, M. R. (2024). Evaluating Grade 7 students’ performance in integer operations: Basis for strategic intervention material development. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fox, D. S., Robles, B. L., Brovey, E. D., & Schunn, C. D. (2026). Baseline performance of AI tools in classifying cognitive demand of mathematical tasks. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2022). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hadar, L., & Ben-David Kolikant, Y. (2021). Conceptual reasoning and procedural learning in mathematics problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 63, 100870. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Herrera, J., & Dio, R. (2022). Analysis of senior high school students’ competency in General Mathematics. University Journal of Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2021). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(4), 371–398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hiebert, J., et al. (2024). Relationships between conceptual understanding and procedural fluency in mathematics learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 55(1), 5–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Horzum, T., & Duran, A. A. (2024). An examination of the cognitive demand levels posed by problems in middle grades mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 294–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ignacio, A. A., & Bajet, A. P. (2025). Assessing the implementation of senior high school mathematics curriculum: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions in Calbayog City Division, Philippines. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jupri, A., Sispiyati, R., & Chin, K. E. (2021). An investigation of students’ algebraic proficiency from a structure sense perspective. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.13125.147-158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Karjanto, N., & Acelajado, M. J. (2022). Sustainable learning, cognitive gains, and improved attitudes in College Algebra flipped classrooms. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kaur, T., McLoughlin, E., & Grimes, P. (2022). Mathematics and science across the transition from primary to secondary school: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00328-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kim, J.-H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/understanding-narrative-inquiry/book241907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kim, S. H., & Evans, T. (2025). Collaborative preferences for learning mathematics: A scale validation study. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lapinid, M., et al. (2024). Mathematical skills and General Mathematics performance of Grade 11 students in a public national high school in Southern Negros Occidental, Philippines. Philippine Social Science Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Larbi, E. (2025). Junior high school students’ performance and difficulties in simplifying algebraic expressions. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2562343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Malespina, A., Seifollahi, F., & Singh, C. (2025). Bioscience students in physics courses with higher test anxiety have lower grades on high-stakes assessments, and women report more test anxiety than men. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05669 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Namlı, Ş., & Özçakır, B. (2024). Analysing the tasks in middle school mathematics textbooks according to the levels of cognitive demand. TAY Journal, 8(3), 477–502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2022). Students’ misconceptions in functions and their representations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Philippine Star. (2025). DepEd explains the new senior high school curriculum rollout. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Polly, D. (2023). Supporting conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics instruction. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(3), 521–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. (2021). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1203–1234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Robles, R. L., & Chua, E. V. (2024). Geometry competencies of high school students: Basis for an intervention program. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Salazar, C. D. (2025). Mind over math: Teacher’s learning support in alleviating anxiety among Grade 10 students in learning mathematics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2022). The role of self-efficacy in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sharma, S. (2023). Enhancing statistical literacy: Challenges and instructional strategies. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sim, J., Saunders, B., Waterfield, J., & Kingstone, T. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the sample in qualitative research. Scholars’ Journal, 4, 1–13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED618228.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2021). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Toms, K., Williams, M., & Mizuhara, M. S. (2024). Bounded confidence modeling predicts how group work affects student math anxiety. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Villanueva, M. C., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2023). Mathematics anxiety and algebra performance among senior high school students. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Wei, W., Xu, C., Caviola, S., & Mammarella, I. (2024). Affective and cognitive factors associated with children’s arithmetic performance. BMC Psychology, 12, 466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles