The Effectiveness of Essay Navigator in Supporting ESL Students’ Essay Writing Development

This study investigates the effectiveness of EssayNavigator in supporting ESL students’ essay writing development. Academic writing remains a major challenge for many ESL learners, particularly in organizing ideas, developing coherent essay structures, and producing effective introductions, topic sentences, and conclusions. Guided by Cognitive Load Theory, Scaffolding Theory, Dual Coding Theory, Social Constructivism, and Self-Regulation Theory, this study explores how Essay Navigator assists students through step-by-step instruction, colour coding, peer comments, and evaluative review. A quantitative research design was employed, involving 61 respondents who completed a Likert-scale survey on academic writing difficulties, essay structure learning, and peer review activities. The findings revealed that students experienced moderate difficulties in organization and structure, especially in arranging ideas logically and connecting paragraphs smoothly. However, students responded positively to the features integrated in Essay Navigator. Step-by-step instructions were perceived as easy to follow and helpful in understanding the essay writing process, while colour coding improved students’ understanding of essay structure and organization of ideas. In addition, peer comments and evaluative review were found to help students identify weaknesses, understand mistakes, and improve essay quality. The study concludes that Essay Navigator is an effective tool in supporting ESL students’ academic writing development by integrating structured guidance, visual support, collaborative learning, and reflective evaluation. The findings provide useful pedagogical implications for enhancing academic writing instruction in ESL contexts.

Academic Writing, ESL Learners, Essay Structure, Peer Review, Essay Navigator

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114–119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldayel, H. S., Pravitasari, H., & Fadillah, N. (2026). Factors affecting academic writing difficulties among English as a foreign language (EFL) university students. Acta Psychologica, 263, 106250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anyau, E., Habali, A. H. M., Abd Aziz, A. B., Rahmat, N. H., et al. (2024). A study of the use of strategies in ESL academic writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i5/21344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. He, L. (2024). The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Indira, A., Musdalifah, Rosmiana, S., & Asbar. (2025). Writing strategies used by high-achieving students in academic writing. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(2), 1551–1562. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.4435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jimenez, M. M. D., Comison, L. J. M., Dionio, B. B., Clarin, A. S., & Vallejo, J. H. (2024). Challenges encountered by college students in academic writing. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3), 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pratiwi, N. M. S. (2026). The struggle to write: Understanding and overcoming academic writing challenges in higher education. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 3(2), 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/404971453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Subandowo, D., Sárdi, C., & Thresia, F. (2025). An investigation of English academic writing strategies employed by Indonesian graduate students in an English medium instruction (EMI) context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00345-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey, A. E., Jennifer, M. D., Meghan, M. J., Thomas, E. K., & Marna, C. (2021). Impact of demographic survey questions on response rate and measurement: A randomized experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study