Language as Identity and Evidence of Tai: A Case Study of Tai Phake and Tai Lue

Language is a key tool used in the creation, maintenance and expression of ethnic identity. The current paper discusses the role played by the languages of Tai Phake and Tai Lue in providing linguistic evidence of Tai identity and continuity outside the limits of the contemporary nation-state. The analysis utilizes the comparative phonological method from the perspective of ethnographic linguistics based on phonological data obtained in the field and in writing.
It becomes clear that the languages of Tai Phake and Tai Lue possess phonological traits that are characteristic of Southwestern Tai languages such as similar consonantal inventories, syllable structure and tone system. The similarities demonstrate linguistic evidence for the genealogy and history of these languages among others within the Tai community. However, at the same time there are differences in the phonological systems due to the specific nature of their histories in various sociocultural surroundings.
The paper suggests that the importance of phonology exceeds its function in language. Language for speakers of Tai Phake and Tai Lue is not only a means of communicating with each other but is also a way of emphasizing their ethnic origin as well as retaining their connection with common ancestry. It allows not only to communicate through speaking but also to preserve their collective memory through rituals and oral tradition. The results of research allow us to emphasize the significance of language as a tool of communication and culture.
In this way, the examples of Tai Phake and Tai Lue reveal the importance of language not only as a means of historical identity but also as an archive of Tai identity.

Tai languages, Tai Phake, Tai Lue, language and identity

1. Enfield, N. J. (2021). Language histories and classifications. In The languages of mainland Southeast Asia (pp. 38–117). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108605618.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Krainara, A. (2018). Language as identity and evidence of Tai: A case study of Tai Phake and Tai Lue. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 21(2), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-02102007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hassan, D. M. K. ., & Rami, Z. (2024). Exploring Nuances in Second Language Acquisition: An Error Analysis Perspective. Migration Letters, 21(4), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21i4.7319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beqiri, A. (2025). How language contributes to ethnic identity: Insights from a socio-cultural framework. European Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 4(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2025.4.2.146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dockum, R. (2018). Phylogeny in phonology: Tai sound systems encode their evolutionary history. In The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (EvoLang XII). Nicolaus Copernicus University. https://doi.org/10.12775/3991-1.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rami, Z. ., Hassan, D. M. K. ., & Shatnawi, H. (2023). Pedagogy of Communicative and Technical English for Engineering Students at Tertiary Level: A Case Study in Bangladesh. Migration Letters, 20(S8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS8.6429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rami, Z. (2024). An Evaluation of Examination System at Tertiary Level: An Empirical Case Study in Bangladesh. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 31639499. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/3142700346/abstract [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Strecker, D., & Pittayaporn, P. (2018). Tai languages. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The World’s Major Languages (3rd ed., pp. 802–828). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644936-39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, F. K. (1977). A handbook of comparative Tai. University of Hawaii Press. Retrieved from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA06752658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pittayaporn, P. (2025). Lao, Thai, and Their Next of Kin: The Peninsular Branch of Southwestern Tai. The Journal of the Siam Society, 113(1), 7–34. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/284576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pittayaporn, P. (2009). The phonology of Proto-Tai [Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University]. Cornell University Graduate School. Retrieved from https://ecommons.cornell.edu/entities/publication/99c98876-889e-4e62-b4e8-8e5bfe40d2e9/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In F. Barth (Ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference (pp. 9–38). Little, Brown and Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/588416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Enfield, N. J. (2005). Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Onlao, S., & Hongsuwan, P. (2024). The relationship between language and the creation of ethnic identities of Tai Loei in the northeastern of Thailand. International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 3578–3586. https://doi.org/10.61707/60tksx47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Greenhill SJ, Hua X, Welsh CF, Schneemann H and Bromham L (2018) Population Size and the Rate of Language Evolution: A Test Across Indo-European, Austronesian, and Bantu Languages. Front. Psychol. 9:576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chambers, J. K. (2009). Sociolinguistic Theory: linguistic variation and its social significance (Rev. ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/7822898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8501341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/shop/general-introductory-linguistics/principles-of-linguistic-change-volume-2-social-factors-p-9780631179153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests